Daan Touw

Inhaled medication and inhalation devices for lung disease in patients with cystic fibrosis: A European consensus ☆

In cystic fibrosis inhalation of drugs for the treatment of CF related lung disease has been proven to be highly effective. Consequently, an increasing number of drugs and devices have been developed for CF lung disease or are currently under development. In this European consensus document we review the current status of inhaled medication in CF, including the mechanisms of action of the various drugs, their modes of administration and indications, their effects on lung function, exacerbation rates, survival and quality of life, as well as side effects. Specifically we address antibiotics, mucolytics/mucous mobilizers, anti-inflammatory drugs, bronchodilators and combinations of solutions. Additionally, we review the current knowledge on devices for inhalation therapy with regard to optimal particle sizes and characteristics of wet nebulisers, dry powder and metered dose inhalers. Finally, we address the subject of testing new devices before market introduction.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of the Carbapenems Clinical Implications

During the last few decades, several carbapenems have been developed. The major characteristic of the newer drugs, such as MK-826, is a prolonged half-life. Alternatively, some carbapenems have been developed that can be given orally, such as CS-834 and L-084. Although imipenem and panipenem have to be administered with a co-drug to prevent degradation by the enzyme dehydropeptidase-1 and reduce nephrotoxicity, the newer drugs such as meropenem, biapenem and lenapenem are relatively stable towards that enzyme. Structural modifications have, besides changes in pharmacology, also led to varying antimicrobial properties. For instance, meropenem is relatively more active against Gram-negative organisms than most other carbapenems, but is slightly less active against Gram-positive organisms.Except for half-life and bioavailability, the pharmacokinetic properties of the carbapenems are relatively similar. Distribution is mainly in extracellular body-water, as observed both from the volumes of distribution and from blister studies. Some carbapenems have a better penetration in cerebrospinal fluid than others. In patients with renal dysfunction, doses have to be adjusted, and special care must be taken with imipenem/cilastatin and panipenem/betamipron to prevent accumulation of the co-drugs, as the pharmacokinetic properties of the co-drugs differ from those of the drugs themselves. However, toxicity of the co-drugs has not been shown. The carbapenems differ in proconvulsive activity. Imipenem shows relatively the highest proconvulsive activity, especially at higher concentrations.Pharmacodynamic studies have shown that the major surrogate parameter for antimicrobial efficacy is the percentage of time of the dosage interval above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). The minimum percentage percentage of time above the MIC (TaM) needed for optimal effect is known in animals (30 to 50%), but not in humans. It is probably less than 100%, but may be higher than 50%. Dosage regimens currently in use result in a TaM of about 50% at 4 mg/L, which is the current ‘susceptible’ breakpoint determined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) for most micro-organisms. Dosage regimens in patients with reduced renal clearance should be based on the TaM. The increased half-life of the newer carbapenems will probably lead to less frequent administration, although continuous infusion may still be the optimal mode of administration for these drugs. The availability of oral carbapenems will have a profound effect on the use of carbapenems in the community.

Cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring: a systematic review

There are a number of effective but highly toxic drugs that exhibit a narrow therapeutic index and marked interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Individualized therapy with such drugs requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to obtain the desired clinical effects safely. Cost-effectiveness analysis in health care is still at an early stage of development, especially for TDM. A systematic review was carried out to document studies that have addressed the cost-effectiveness of TDM. The Cochrane database and Medline were searched. References identified by this approach were then searched manually for relevant articles. Very few studies have been performed that document the cost-effectiveness of TDM, and TDM has been demonstrated to be cost-effective only for aminoglycosides. For the other classes of drugs that are monitored, the rationale for TDM has been supported, but appropriate cost-effectiveness analyses have not been performed. Because the use of many of these drugs without TDM would increase the risk of under- or overdosing, emphasis should not be placed solely on cost-effectiveness but rather on how such interventions can be applied in the most cost-effective and clinically useful manner.

Dry powder inhalation of antibiotics in cystic fibrosis therapy: Part 2. Inhalation of a novel colistin dry powder formulation: A feasibility study in healthy volunteers and patients

The aim of the present study was to perform a proof of principle study with a new colistin dry powder inhalation system in six healthy volunteers and five patients with cystic fibrosis. All subjects were asked to inhale 25 mg colistin sulfate dry powder. The patients were also asked to nebulize 160 mg colistin sulfomethate as a solution. Colistin serum concentrations were determined as an indirect parameter to compare both forms of administration. Pulmonary function tests were performed. Peak serum colistin concentrations ranged from 14 to 59 microg/l in volunteers after inhalation of 25 mg as dry powder. In patients, peak concentrations ranged from 18 to 64 microg/l after nebulization of 160 mg colistin sulfomethate solution and from 77 to 159 microg/l after inhalation of 25 mg colistin sulfate dry powder. Pulmonary function tests were not significantly different after inhalation of the dry powder by the volunteers nor after nebulization of the solution by the patients. In some patients a decrease in pulmonary function and moderate to severe cough was observed after inhalation of the dry powder. The new colistin inhaler provides an attractive alternative for nebulized colistin and was highly appreciated by the patients. The decrease in pulmonary function and cough in patients is a drawback, which may be overcome by dose reduction and a further improvement of the new dosage form.

Effect of CYP2C19*2 and *17 mutations on pharmacodynamics and kinetics of proton pump inhibitors in Caucasians

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT The influence of CYP2C19 on the kinetics and dynamics of omeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole has been studied in Japanese subjects. * It has been suggested that subjects with *1/*1 genotype might need stronger acid suppression than *1/*2 and *2/*2 subjects. This suggestion comes from data in Japanese subjects and has not been confirmed in Caucasians. * Furthermore, a novel CYP2C19 mutation, *17, which mainly occurs in Caucasians has been discovered. This mutation has been associated with clinical failure, but its relevance for therapy with PPIs has not been studied yet. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS In this study, the influence of CYP2C19 on both the pharmacokinetics and dynamics in Caucasian subjects after single and repeated dosing has been investigated. * This is the first study showing that Caucasian subjects with *1/*1 and *1/*17 mutations need stronger acid-inhibition. In this study three proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole, in different doses) were studied of which pantoprazole had not been studied before in this setting, not even in Japanese. AIMS To investigate the impact of CYP2C19 mutations *2-*6 and *17 on acid-inhibition and pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole (L15), omeprazole (O10, O20) and pantoprazole (P40) in Caucasians. METHODS CYP2C19 genotyping for *2-*6 and *17 mutations was assessed in subjects who were H. pylori negative in two randomized crossover trials. The influence of CYP2C19 mutations on single and repeated administration of L15 and O10 (study A) and O20 and P40 (study B) was investigated. Pharmacokinetics and the cumulative percentage of time with intragastric pH above 4 (% > pH 4) were assessed on day 1 and 6. RESULTS For study A CYP2C19 genotyping found five *1/*1, four *1/*2, one *1/*17 and one *2/*17. For study B the results were six *1/*1, two *1/*2, six *1/*17, one *2/*2 and one *2/*17. For all PPIs AUC was highest in *2/*2 and lowest in *1/*17. On day 1, all PPIs significantly increased percentage >pH 4 compared with baseline. *1/*1 genotype showed no significant acid-inhibition after L15, O10 and O20. *1/*17 genotype showed no significant acid-inhibition after O20 and P40. *1/*2 genotype showed significant acid-inhibition after L15 and O10. On day 6, all four PPIs showed significantly increased acid-inhibition. *1/*1 and *1/*17 showed a significantly increased percentage > pH 4 after treatment with O20 and P40. However, in *1/*1 subjects percentage > pH 4 was not significantly increased after L15 and O10. *1/*2 genotype showed a significant acid-inhibitory effect after repeated dosing with L15 and O10. CONCLUSIONS Caucasian subjects with *1/*1 and *1/*17 genotype need stronger acid-suppression therapy, especially during the first days of treatment or with on-demand therapy.

Clinical toxicology of citalopram after acute intoxication with the sole drug or in combination with other drugs: overview of 26 cases

There is discussion concerning the cardiac safety of citalopram in an overdose. The aim of this study was to investigate the toxic effects and toxicokinetic parameters of citalopram in an overdose as a single drug and in combination with other drugs. Cases observed between 1997 and 2006 were evaluated. Patient demographics, ingested doses, serum concentrations of citalopram, coingested drugs, and clinical parameters were acquired. Outcomes were observed symptoms of the gastrointestinal tract, respiratory tract, central nervous system, and cardiovascular system. Poisoning Severity Score was used to evaluate severity of every intoxicated patient. Individual toxicokinetic parameter values were calculated. Twenty-nine cases of citalopram overdose were observed; three cases had incomplete data so that 26 cases were evaluable. The ingested amount ranged from 200 to 4960 mg. Blood concentrations ranged from 0.21 to 7.5 mg/L with 20 minutes to 8 hours between suggested time of ingestion and blood sampling. Most frequently reported symptoms were drowsiness (seven cases), tachycardia (15 cases), QTc prolongation (eight cases), decrease of consciousness (eight cases), and seizures (four cases). Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1-8 days). Of the 26 evaluated cases, two fatalities occurred, one because of a cardiac arrest and one as a result of a respiratory arrest. According to Poisoning Severity Score, severity of intoxication was minor in three patients (11%), moderate in nine patients (35%), and severe in 14 patients (54%). Severity was mainly caused by neurologic and respiratory effects. Elimination half-life was prolonged but did not correlate with the amount of ingestion. Citalopram intoxications seem to proceed more severely than is known for other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor intoxications, causing drowsiness, coma, and seizures in overdose. Cardiac toxicity is generally mild. Therefore, we recommend seizure precautions and intensive care unit admission with cardiac monitoring for citalopram-intoxicated patients. Because elimination half-life is prolonged, normal pharmacokinetics do not apply.

A comparison of the acid-inhibitory effects of esomeprazole and rabeprazole in relation to pharmacokinetics and CYP2C19 polymorphism

Esomeprazole and rabeprazole are metabolised in the liver by means of the CYP2C19 enzyme, which has several functional genetic polymorphisms. Among Caucasians, 70% of the population has a fast metaboliser phenotype, 25–30% an intermediate and 2–5% a slow metaboliser phenotype. It is unknown whether different PPIs are affected to the same extent by these phenotypic differences.

International interlaboratory proficiency testing program for measurement of azole antifungal plasma concentrations.

ABSTRACT An international interlaboratory proficiency testing program for the measurement of antifungal drugs was initiated in 2007. This first round was limited to azole antifungals: fluconazole, itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. The results demonstrate the need for and utility of an ongoing proficiency testing program to further improve the analytical methods for routine patient management and clinical research.

The International Interlaboratory Quality Control Program for Measurement of Antiretroviral Drugs in Plasma: a global proficiency testing program.

The International Interlaboratory Quality Control Program for Measurement of Antiretroviral Drugs in Plasma was initiated in 1999 by Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, The Netherlands, and continued later on in collaboration with the Dutch Association for Quality Assessment in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (www.kkgt.nl). The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the first 10 years of the Program and to determine variables associated with reporting of less accurate results. Two rounds are organized annually in which blind samples are shipped to participants containing a low, medium, or high concentration of each antiretroviral drug. Any reported result that deviates more than 20% from the spiked concentration is defined as inaccurate. By the end of 2009, the number of laboratories participating in the Program had increased to 56; 44 (79%) are located in Europe. A total of 12,798 test results was available for analysis, of which 2104 (16.4%) were reported as inaccurate. Performance was best for samples containing nevirapine (mean of inadequate scores per round: 11.1%) and lopinavir (11.9%) and worst for indinavir (18.7%), atazanavir (18.9%), saquinavir (19.6%), and nelfinavir (21.3%). High and medium concentrations were less frequently reported as inaccurate than low concentrations: 13.5%, 13.0%, and 22.4%, respectively. Although the overall performance of the laboratories varied per year, a trend was visible for improvement over time with 19.9% of the results being inaccurate in 2002 (n = 20 laboratories) to 15.7% in 2009 (n = 56 laboratories). The Program provides a proficiency testing program in which laboratories are alerted to potential analytical errors while performing therapeutic drug monitoring in HIV-infected patients. Laboratories should put more effort in adequately analyzing concentrations of antiretroviral drugs with low minimum effective concentrations.

Dry powder inhalation of colistin sulphomethate in healthy volunteers: A pilot study

BACKGROUND Pulmonary administration of the antimicrobial drugs colistin sulphomethate and tobramycin has been shown to be effective in slowing down pulmonary deterioration in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Both drugs are administered by liquid nebulisation, a technique known to have disadvantages. Dry powder inhalation may be an attractive alternative. We investigated inhalation of colistin sulphomethate dry powder using a newly developed Twincer device in healthy volunteers. METHODS Eight healthy volunteers inhaled a single dose of 25mg colistin sulphomethate dry powder each, using the Twincer inhaler. The median diameter (X(50)) of the dry powder was 1.6 microm (X(10)=0.7 microm, X(90)=3.1 microm), measured by laser diffraction technique. Pulmonary function tests were performed before, 5 and 30 min after inhalation. Serum samples were drawn at t=15 min, 45 min, 1.5h, 2.5h, 3.5h, 5.5h, 7.5h and 24h after inhalation. RESULTS The colistin sulphomethate dry powder inhaler was well tolerated: no clinically relevant effect on FEV(1) was observed nor did the volunteers experience adverse effects. CONCLUSION Dry powder inhalation of colistin sulphomethate using the Twincer inhaler is well tolerated by healthy volunteers. A pilot study in cystic fibrosis patients is therefore considered safe in developing a dry powder inhalation of colistin for everyday CF treatment.