Benjamin Bockmann

Deltoid-split or deltopectoral approaches for the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures?

BackgroundProximal humeral fractures are mainly associated with osteoporosis and are becoming more common with the aging of our society. The best surgical approach for internal fixation of displaced proximal humeral fractures is still being debated.Questions/purposesIn this prospective randomized study, we aimed to investigate whether the deltoid-split approach is superior to the deltopectoral approach with regard to (1) complication rate; (2) shoulder function (Constant score); and (3) pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) for internal fixation of displaced humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate.MethodsWe randomized 120 patients with proximal humeral fractures to receive one of these two approaches (60 patients for each approach). We prospectively documented demographic and perioperative data (sex, age, fracture type, hospital stay, operation time, and fluoroscopy time) as well as complications. Followup examinations were conducted at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, including radiological and clinical evaluations (Constant score, activities of daily living, and pain [VAS]). Baseline and perioperative data were comparable for both approaches. The sample size was chosen to provide 80% power, but it reached only 68% as a result of the loss of followups to detect a 10-point difference on the Constant score, which we considered the minimum clinically important difference.ResultsComplications or reoperations between the approaches were not different. Eight patients in the deltoid-split group (14%) needed surgical revisions compared with seven patients in the deltopectoral group (13%; p = 1.00). Deltoid-split and deltopectoral approaches showed similar Constant scores 12 months postoperatively (Deltoid-split 81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 74–87 versus deltopectoral 73; 95% CI, 64–81; p = 0.13), and there were no differences between the groups in terms of pain at 1 year (deltoid-split 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2–1.4 versus deltopectoral 2.5; 95% CI, 1.7–3.2; p = 0.14). No learning-curve effects were noted; fluoroscopy use during surgery and function and pain scores during followups were similar among the first 30 patients and the next 30 patients treated in each group.ConclusionsThe treatment of proximal humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate is reliable using both approaches. For a definitive recommendation for one of these approaches, further studies with appropriate sample size are necessary.Level of EvidenceLevel II, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The osseous morphology of nondegenerated shoulders shows no side-related differences in elderly patients: an analysis of 102 computed tomography scans.

BACKGROUND A precise understanding of glenohumeral anatomy is required to optimize preoperative planning in shoulder joint arthroplasty, which is difficult in the presence of degenerative disease. In unilateral disease, the contralateral shoulder can be used as a representation of normal anatomy; however, intrasubject differences in shoulder morphology have not been investigated. METHODS A retrospective study of all patients aged >65 years who received whole body computed tomography at our trauma center from 2010 through 2014 was conducted. Right and left shoulder computed tomography scans were examined, and the following anatomic parameters were measured: humeral head diameter in anteroposterior and axial views, glenoid diameter in anteroposterior and axial views, glenoid surface, scapula neck depth, neck-shaft angle, glenoid inclination, glenoid/head ratio, and glenoid version. Patients with inadequate scan quality, osseous lesions, pre-existing anatomic abnormality, or metallic implant at the shoulder region and significant osteoarthritis were excluded. RESULTS The study analyzed 102 shoulders of 51 patients. Mean age was 71.4 ± 8.2 years. Humeral head and glenoid diameters, scapula neck depth (right, 36 ± 8 mm; left, 36 ± 7 mm; P = .684), glenoid/head ratio (right, 0.6 ± 0.1; left, 0.6 ± 0.0; P = .961), and glenoid surface (right, 790 ± 152 mm(2); left, 754 ± 134 mm(2); P = .215) showed no significant side-related differences. In addition, no significant difference was found regarding the neck-shaft angle (P = .211) and glenoid anteversion or retroversion (right, 65% [n = 33] anteversion and 35% [n = 18] retroversion; left, 69% [n = 35] anteversion and 31% [n = 16] retroversion; P = .417). CONCLUSION There are no significant side-dependent differences in the osseous anatomy of the glenohumeral joint. In patients with unilateral shoulder degeneration, the contralateral shoulder can provide reference values during the planning of shoulder replacement surgery.

One-Year Outcome of Geriatric Hip-Fracture Patients following Prolonged ICU Treatment

Purpose. Incidence of geriatric fractures is increasing. Knowledge of outcome data for hip-fracture patients undergoing intensive-care unit (ICU) treatment, including invasive ventilatory management (IVM) and hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), is sparse. Methods. Single-center prospective observational study including 402 geriatric hip-fracture patients. Age, gender, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and the Barthel index (BI) were documented. Underlying reasons for prolonged ICU stay were registered, as well as assessed procedures like IVM and CVVHDF. Outcome parameters were in-hospital, 6-month, and 1-year mortality and need for nursing care. Results. 15% were treated > 3 days and 68% < 3 days in ICU. Both cohorts had similar ASA, BI, and age. In-hospital, 6-month, and 12-month mortality of ICU > 3d cohort were significantly increased (p = 0.001). Most frequent indications were cardiocirculatory pathology followed by respiratory failure, renal impairment, and infection. 18% of patients needed CVVHDF and 41% IVM. In these cohorts, 6-month mortality ranged > 80% and 12-month mortality > 90%. 100% needed nursing care after 6 and 12 months. Conclusions. ICU treatment > 3 days showed considerable difference in mortality and nursing care needed after 6 and 12 months. Particularly, patients requiring CVVHDF or IVM had disastrous long-term results. Our study may add one further element in complex decision making serving this vulnerable patient cohort.

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The benefit of arthroscopically assisted therapy for concomitant glenohumeral injuries in patients with unstable lateral clavicle fractures

This article has been retracted at the request of the authors. The reason is that the authors have stated that the number of patients at time points investigated as well as data regarding pain levels and functional outcome are incorrect. They would like to express their regrets to the Editor-inChief and the whole Editorial Board. The online version of this article contains the full text of the retracted article as electronic supplementary material.

Is there a benefit of proximal locking screws in osteoporotic distal radius fractures? – A biomechanical study

INTRODUCTION The distal radial fracture is a common fracture and frequently seen in geriatric patients. During the last years, volar plating has become a popular treatment option. While the application of locking screws at the distal fragment is widely accepted, there is no evidence for their use at the radial shaft. MATERIALS AND METHODS In six osteoporotic pairs of matched human cadaver radii an extra-articular model creating an AO 23-A2.1 fracture was employed. Osteosynthesis were performed using the APTUS 2.5 Adaptive TriLock Distal Radius System (Medartis AG) with locking (LS) or non-locking screws (NLS) for proximal fixation. Biomechanical testing was performed in a staircase fashion: starting with 50 cycles at 200N, the load was continuously increased by 50N every 80 cycles up to a maximum force of 400N. Finally, load to failure was analyzed with failure defined as sudden loss of force measured (20%) or major deformation of the radii (10mm). RESULTS At 200N, 250N, 300N, 400N and load to failure, the NLS group showed a higher degree of elastic modulus. In contrast, the LS group showed higher elastic modulus at 350N. Maximum force was higher in the LS group without reaching statistical significance. Reasons for loss of fixation were longitudinal shaft fractures, horizontal peri-implant fractures and distal cutting out. No difference was seen between the two groups concerning the development of the above mentioned complications. CONCLUSION Our study did not show biomechanical superiority for distal radius fracture fixation by using locking screws in the proximal holes in an osteoporotic cadaver study. At load to failure, longitudinal shaft fractures and peri-implant fractures seemed to be a more relevant problem rather than failure of the proximal fixation.

Surgical complications following ESIN for clavicular mid-shaft fractures do not limit functional or patient-perceived outcome

Elastic intramedullary nailing (ESIN) has been proposed as an alternative minimal-invasive method for the operative management of mid-shaft fractures of the clavicle. However, a relevant complication rate has been reported in previous cohorts. The present retrospective single-centre study aimed to analyse the complications following ESIN in adult patients with clavicular mid-shaft fractures (Allman type I) and their impact on functional and patient-perceived outcome measures. Results were compared to a control group receiving locking plate osteosynthesis. The clinical course and outcome of operatively managed patients with clavicular mid-shaft fractures were retrospectively analysed. Patients were assigned to group A (ESIN) and group B (plate fixation). Radiological, functional (Constant Murley Shoulder Outcome Score (CS), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score, the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)), and patient perceived aesthetic and clinical outcome were measured. A total of 47 (33 male, 14 female) operatively managed patients with a mean age of 26.7 ± 14.9 years and a follow up time of 38.1 ± 19.4 months were analysed. 36 patients were treated by ESIN (Group A), whereas 11 patients received open reduction and internal plate fixation (Group B). Patients were operatively treated with a mean delay of 7.4 ± 9.3 days (group A: 6.6 ± 8.7 days, group B: 10.2 ± 11.1 days, p=0.326) between trauma and the surgical index procedure. There were no significant differences in the functional (CS: p=0.338, DASH: p=0.247, OSS: p=0.434) and patient-perceived (p=0.346) outcome measures between both groups. Surgical complications were noted in 14 patients (group A: 12, group B: 2) and non-union in 4 patients (group A: 3, group B: 1). There was no correlation between the recorded complications as assessed by the Clavien and Dindo classification and the functional as well as the patient-perceived outcome measures. Despite a relevant incidence rate of surgical complications, ESIN provides good to excellent functional and patient-perceived results in the treatment of clavicular mid-shaft fractures.

Anatomic considerations for arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction using iliac crest grafts: a radiologic study

BACKGROUND Arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction using autografts is an advanced procedure that requires experience and preparation. Knowledge about anatomic pitfalls is therefore important to establish well-positioned portals and prevent neurovascular damage. METHODS We included 43 computed tomography scans from 43 patients. The distance between the tip of the coracoid process and a perpendicular line representing the anteroinferior glenoid was measured. From these results an anteroinferior working portal was designed, and the angulation needed for screw insertion to fixate a hypothetical graft was measured. In a second step, 9 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging scans 34 ± 10 months after glenoid reconstruction, and the distance between the screw approach path and the neurovascular bundle was measured. RESULTS In the analyzed scans, average defect size was 23%, and the coracoid process to the anteroinferior glenoid distance was 32 ± 7 mm. We thus hypothesized that a corridor 20 to 30 mm inferior to the coracoid process would be the ideal position for a working portal. Through this portal, 85% of screws could be applied with 0° to 30° angulation. When the postoperative scans were analyzed, the distance from the neurovascular bundle showed an average of 26 ± 6 mm for the superior screw and 21 ± 5 mm for the inferior screw. CONCLUSIONS The ideal distance between the coracoid process and an anteroinferior working portal is 32 mm. Having established the portal, instruments should not be inserted pointing in a medial direction of the coracoid process due to the proximity of the neurovascular bundle.

Mapping of glenoid bone loss in recurrent anterior shoulder instability: is there a particular deficit pattern?

BACKGROUND Glenoid bone loss in recurrent anterior shoulder instability is a challenging problem for shoulder surgeons, and knowledge about the anatomy of glenoid deficits is scarce. In this study, we tried to evaluate the pattern of this pathology. METHODS Our analysis included 44 shoulders from 44 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability accompanied by a clinically relevant glenoid bone loss. The defect size, the localization of the inferior defect edge, and the defect angle were measured, and osseous landmarks were identified. An en face view on 2-dimensional computed tomography scans of each patient was fitted onto a template to create a deficit map for small (<23%) and large (>23%) defects. RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 9 women and 35 men with a mean age of 33 ± 11 years at the date of the scan. The defect size and localization of the inferior defect edge showed significant differences between both groups, indicating a more posterior position of larger defects. The defect angle, however, showed no significant difference between small and large defects. Both groups showed a vertical defect pattern. CONCLUSION The osseous glenoid deficit in recurrent anterior shoulder instability shows a vertical pattern with no remarkable differences between small and large defects. This finding can influence biomechanical models as well as surgical reconstruction.

Association of an In-House Blood Bank with Therapy and Outcome in Severely Injured Patients: An Analysis of 18,573 Patients from the TraumaRegister DGU®.

Introduction Hemorrhagic shock remains one of the most common causes of death in severely injured patients. It is unknown to what extent the presence of a blood bank in a trauma center influences therapy and outcome in such patients. Material and Methods We retrospectively analyzed prospectively recorded data from the TraumaRegister DGU® and the TraumaNetzwerk DGU®. Inclusion criteria were Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16, primarily treated patients, and hospital admission 2 years before or after the audit process. Results Complete data sets of 18,573 patients were analyzed. Of 457 hospitals included, 33.3% had an in-house blood bank. In trauma centers with a blood bank (HospBB), packed red blood cells (PRBCs) (21.0% vs. 17.4%, p < 0.001) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) (13.9% vs. 10.2%, p <0.001) were transfused significantly more often than in hospitals without a blood bank (Hosp0). However, no significant difference was found for in-hospital mortality (standard mortality ratio [SMR, 0.907 vs. 0.945; p = 0.25). In patients with clinically apparent shock on admission, no difference of performed transfusions were present between HospBB and Hosp0 (PRBCs, 51.4% vs. 50.4%, p = 0.67; FFP, 32.7% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.99), and no difference in in-hospital mortality was observed (SMR, 0.907 vs. 1.004; p = 0.21). Discussion In HospBB transfusions were performed more frequently in severely injured patients without positively affecting the 24h mortality or in-house mortality. Easy access may explain a more liberal transfusion concept.

Impact of cement-augmented condylar screws in locking plate osteosynthesis for distal femoral fractures — A biomechanical analysis

INTRODUCTION Compromised bone quality and the need for early mobilization continue to lead to implant failure in elderly patients with distal femoral fractures. The cement augmentation of screws might facilitate improving implant anchorage. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of cement augmentation of the condylar screws on implant fixation in a human cadaveric bone model. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten pairs of osteoporotic femora (mean age: 90 years, range: 84-99 years) were used. A 2-cm gap osteotomy was created in the metaphyseal region to simulate an unstable AO/OTA 33-A3 fracture. All specimens were treated with a polyaxial locking plate. Specimens randomly assigned to the augmented group received an additional cement augmentation of the condylar screws using bone cement. A servohydraulic testing machine was used to perform incremental cyclic axial loading using a load-to-failure mode. RESULTS All specimens survived at least 800N of axial compressive force. The mean compressive forces leading to failure were 1620N (95% CI: 1382-1858N) in the non-augmented group and 2420N (95% CI: 2054-2786N) in the group with cement-augmented condylar screws (p=0.005). Deformation with cutting out of the condylar screws and condylar fracture were the most common reasons for failure in both groups. Whereas axial stiffness was comparable between both osteosyntheses (p=0.508), significant differences were observed for the plastic deformation of the constructs (p=0.014). CONCLUSION The results of the present study showed that the cement augmentation of the condylar screws might be a promising technique for the fixation of distal femoral fractures in elderly patients with osteoporotic bones.