Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Benjamin Kirtman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Benjamin Kirtman.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2015

Understanding ENSO Diversity

Andrew T. Wittenberg; Matthew Newman; Emanuele Di Lorenzo; Jin-Yi Yu; Pascale Braconnot; Julia Cole; Boris Dewitte; Benjamin S. Giese; Eric Guilyardi; Fei-Fei Jin; Kristopher B. Karnauskas; Benjamin Kirtman; Tong Lee; Niklas Schneider; Yan Xue; Sang Wook Yeh

El Nino–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a naturally occurring mode of tropical Pacific variability, with global impacts on society and natural ecosystems. While it has long been known that El Nino events display a diverse range of amplitudes, triggers, spatial patterns, and life cycles, the realization that ENSO’s impacts can be highly sensitive to this event-to-event diversity is driving a renewed interest in the subject. This paper surveys our current state of knowledge of ENSO diversity, identifies key gaps in understanding, and outlines some promising future research directions.


Journal of Climate | 2014

North American Climate in CMIP5 Experiments: Part III: Assessment of Twenty-First-Century Projections*

Eric D. Maloney; Suzana J. Camargo; Edmund K. M. Chang; Brian A. Colle; Rong Fu; Kerrie L. Geil; Qi Hu; Xianan Jiang; Nathaniel C. Johnson; Kristopher B. Karnauskas; James L. Kinter; Benjamin Kirtman; Sanjiv Kumar; Baird Langenbrunner; Kelly Lombardo; Lindsey N. Long; Annarita Mariotti; Joyce E. Meyerson; Kingtse C. Mo; J. David Neelin; Zaitao Pan; Richard Seager; Yolande L. Serra; Anji Seth; Justin Sheffield; Julienne Stroeve; Jeanne M. Thibeault; Shang-Ping Xie; Chunzai Wang; Bruce Wyman

AbstractIn part III of a three-part study on North American climate in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) models, the authors examine projections of twenty-first-century climate in the representative concentration pathway 8.5 (RCP8.5) emission experiments. This paper summarizes and synthesizes results from several coordinated studies by the authors. Aspects of North American climate change that are examined include changes in continental-scale temperature and the hydrologic cycle, extremes events, and storm tracks, as well as regional manifestations of these climate variables. The authors also examine changes in the eastern North Pacific and North Atlantic tropical cyclone activity and North American intraseasonal to decadal variability, including changes in teleconnections to other regions of the globe. Projected changes are generally consistent with those previously published for CMIP3, although CMIP5 model projections differ importantly from those of CMIP3 in some aspects, inc...


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2016

Challenges and Prospects for Reducing Coupled Climate Model SST Biases in the Eastern Tropical Atlantic and Pacific Oceans: The U.S. CLIVAR Eastern Tropical Oceans Synthesis Working Group

Paquita Zuidema; Ping Chang; Brian Medeiros; Benjamin Kirtman; Roberto Mechoso; Edwin K. Schneider; Thomas Toniazzo; Ingo Richter; R. Justin Small; Katinka Bellomo; Peter Brandt; Simon P. de Szoeke; J. Thomas Farrar; Eunsil Jung; Seiji Kato; Mingkui Li; Christina M. Patricola; Zaiyu Wang; Robert Wood; Zhao Xu

Well-known problems trouble coupled general circulation models of the eastern Atlantic and Pacific Ocean basins. Model climates are significantly more symmetric about the equator than is observed. Model sea surface temperatures are biased warm south and southeast of the equator, and the atmosphere is too rainy within a band south of the equator. Near-coastal eastern equatorial SSTs are too warm, producing a zonal SST gradient in the Atlantic opposite in sign to that observed. The U.S. Climate Variability and Predictability Program (CLIVAR) Eastern Tropical Ocean Synthesis Working Group (WG) has pursued an updated assessment of coupled model SST biases, focusing on the surface energy balance components, on regional error sources from clouds, deep convection, winds, and ocean eddies; on the sensitivity to model resolution; and on remote impacts. Motivated by the assessment, the WG makes the following recommendations: 1) encourage identification of the specific parameterizations contributing to the biases in individual models, as these can be model dependent; 2) restrict multimodel intercomparisons to specific processes; 3) encourage development of high-resolution coupled models with a concurrent emphasis on parameterization development of finer-scale ocean and atmosphere features, including low clouds; 4) encourage further availability of all surface flux components from buoys, for longer continuous time periods, in persistently cloudy regions; and 5) focus on the eastern basin coastal oceanic upwelling regions, where further opportunities for observational–modeling synergism exist.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2016

The Earth System Prediction Suite: Toward a Coordinated U.S. Modeling Capability

Gerhard Theurich; Cecelia DeLuca; Timothy Campbell; Fushan Liu; K. Saint; Mariana Vertenstein; Junye Chen; R. Oehmke; James D. Doyle; Timothy R Whitcomb; Alan J. Wallcraft; Mark Iredell; Thomas L. Black; A. da Silva; T. Clune; Robert D. Ferraro; P. Li; M. Kelley; I. Aleinov; V. Balaji; N. Zadeh; Robert L. Jacob; Benjamin Kirtman; Francis X. Giraldo; D. McCarren; Scott Sandgathe; Steven E. Peckham; R. Dunlap

The Earth System Prediction Suite (ESPS) is a collection of flagship U.S. weather and climate models and model components that are being instrumented to conform to interoperability conventions, documented to follow metadata standards, and made available either under open source terms or to credentialed users. The ESPS represents a culmination of efforts to create a common Earth system model architecture, and the advent of increasingly coordinated model development activities in the U.S. ESPS component interfaces are based on the Earth System Modeling Framework (ESMF), community-developed software for building and coupling models, and the National Unified Operational Prediction Capability (NUOPC) Layer, a set of ESMF-based component templates and interoperability conventions. This shared infrastructure simplifies the process of model coupling by guaranteeing that components conform to a set of technical and semantic behaviors. The ESPS encourages distributed, multi-agency development of coupled modeling systems, controlled experimentation and testing, and exploration of novel model configurations, such as those motivated by research involving managed and interactive ensembles. ESPS codes include the Navy Global Environmental Model (NavGEM), HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM), and Coupled Ocean Atmosphere Mesoscale Prediction System (COAMPS®); the NOAA Environmental Modeling System (NEMS) and the Modular Ocean Model (MOM); the Community Earth System Model (CESM); and the NASA ModelE climate model and GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model.


Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience | 2017

On the complexities of utilizing large-scale lightpath-connected distributed cyberinfrastructure

Jason Maassen; Ben van Werkhoven; Maarten van Meersbergen; Henri E. Bal; Michael Kliphuis; S.-E. Brunnabend; Henk A. Dijkstra; Gerben van Malenstein; Migiel de Vos; Sylvia Kuijpers; Sander Boele; Jules Wolfrat; Nick Hill; David Wallom; Christian Grimm; Dieter Kranzlmüller; Dinesh Ganpathi; Shantenu Jha; Yaakoub El Khamra; Frank O. Bryan; Benjamin Kirtman; Frank J. Seinstra

In Autumn 2013, we—an international team of climate scientists, computer scientists, eScience researchers, and e‐Infrastructure specialists—participated in the enlighten your research global competition, organized to showcase advanced lightpath technologies in support of state‐of‐the‐art research questions. As one of the winning entries, our enlighten your research global team embarked on a very ambitious project to run an extremely high resolution climate model on a collection of supercomputers distributed over two continents and connected using an advanced 10 G lightpath networking infrastructure. Although good progress was made, we were not able to perform all desired experiments due to a varying combination of technical problems, configuration issues, policy limitations and lack of (budget for) human resources to solve these issues. In this paper, we describe our goals, the technical and non‐technical barriers, we encountered and provide recommendations on how these barriers can be removed so future project of this kind may succeed. Copyright


Proceedings of SPIE | 2016

Operational planning using Climatological Observations for Maritime Prediction and Analysis Support Service (COMPASS)

Alison O'Connor; Benjamin Kirtman; Scott Harrison; Joe Gorman

The US Navy faces several limitations when planning operations in regard to forecasting environmental conditions. Currently, mission analysis and planning tools rely heavily on short-term (less than a week) forecasts or long-term statistical climate products. However, newly available data in the form of weather forecast ensembles provides dynamical and statistical extended-range predictions that can produce more accurate predictions if ensemble members can be combined correctly. Charles River Analytics is designing the Climatological Observations for Maritime Prediction and Analysis Support Service (COMPASS), which performs data fusion over extended-range multi-model ensembles, such as the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME), to produce a unified forecast for several weeks to several seasons in the future. We evaluated thirty years of forecasts using machine learning to select predictions for an all-encompassing and superior forecast that can be used to inform the Navy’s decision planning process.


Archive | 2007

Climate models and their evaluation

David A. Randall; Richard A. Wood; Sandrine Bony; R. A. Colman; Thierry Fichefet; John C. Fyfe; Vladimir M. Kattsov; A. J. Pitman; J. Shukla; J. Srinivasan; Ronald J. Stouffer; Akimasa Sumi; Karl E. Taylor; contributors; Krishna AchutaRao; Richard P. Allan; André Berger; H. Blatter; C. Bonfi ls; Aaron Boone; Christopher S. Bretherton; Anthony J. Broccoli; Victor Brovkin; W. Cai; Martin Claussen; Paul A. Dirmeyer; C. Doutriaux; H. Drange; Jean-Louis Dufresne; Seita Emori


Climate Dynamics | 2008

Current status of ENSO prediction skill in coupled ocean–atmosphere models

Emilia K. Jin; James L. Kinter; Bin Wang; C.-K. Park; In-Sik Kang; Benjamin Kirtman; Jong-Seong Kug; Arun Kumar; Jing-Jia Luo; Jae-Kyung E. Schemm; J. Shukla; Toshio Yamagata


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2014

Issues and Challenges with Using Ensemble-Based Prediction to Probe the Weather–Climate Interface

Bruce D. Cornuelle; James A. Hansen; Benjamin Kirtman; Scott Sandgathe; Steve Warren


PAGES News | 2013

Challenges in understanding and modeling ENSO

Antonietta Capotondi; Eric Guilyardi; Benjamin Kirtman

Collaboration


Dive into the Benjamin Kirtman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew T. Wittenberg

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Shukla

George Mason University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew Newman

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Niklas Schneider

University of Hawaii at Manoa

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tong Lee

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge