Benoît Schilter

Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: A practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing

The de minimis concept acknowledges a human exposure threshold value for chemicals below which there is no significant risk to human health. It is the underlying principle for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation on substances used in food-contact articles. Further to this, the principle of Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) has been developed and is now used by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) in their evaluations. Establishing an accepted TTC would benefit consumers, industry and regulators, since it would preclude extensive toxicity evaluations when human intakes are below such threshold, and direct considerable time and cost resources towards testing substances with the highest potential risk to human health. It was questioned, however, whether specific endpoints that may potentially give rise to low-dose effects would be covered by such threshold. In this review, the possibility of defining a TTC for chemical substances present in the diet was examined for general toxicity endpoints (including carcinogenicity), as well as for specific endpoints, namely neurotoxicity and developmental neurotoxicity, immunotoxicity and developmental toxicity. For each of these endpoints, a database of specific no-observed-effect levels (NOELs) was compiled by screening oral toxicity studies. The substances recorded in each specific database were selected on the basis of their demonstrated adverse effects. For the neurotoxicity and developmental neurotoxicity databases, it was intended to cover all classes of compounds reported to have either a demonstrated neurotoxic or developmentally neurotoxic effect, or at least, on a biochemical or pharmacological basis were considered to have a potential for displaying such effects. For the immunotoxicity endpoint, it was ensured that only immunotoxicants were included in the database by selecting most of the substances from the Luster et al. database, provided that they satisfied the criteria for immunotoxicity defined by Luster. For the developmental toxicity database, substances were selected from the Munro et al. database that contained the lowest NOELs retrieved from the literature for more than 600 compounds. After screening these, substances showing any effect which could point to developmental toxicity as broadly defined by the US were recorded in the database. Additionally, endocrine toxicity and allergenicity were addressed as two separate cases, using different approaches and methodology. The distributions of NOELs for the neurotoxicity, developmental neurotoxicity and developmental toxicity endpoints were compared with the distribution of NOELs for non-specific carcinogenic endpoints. As the immunotoxicity database was too limited to draw such a distribution of immune NOELs, the immunotoxicity endpoint was evaluated by comparing immune NOELs (or LOELs-lowest-observed-effect levels-when NOELs were not available) with non-immune NOELs (or LOELs), in order to compare the sensitivity of this endpoint with non-specific endpoints. A different methodology was adopted for the evaluation of the endocrine toxicity endpoint since data currently available do not permit the establishment of a clear causal link between endocrine active chemicals and adverse effects in humans. Therefore, this endpoint was analysed by estimating the human exposure to oestrogenic environmental chemicals and evaluating their potential impact on human health, based on their contribution to the overall exposure, and their estrogenic potency relative to endogenous hormones. The allergenicity endpoint was not analysed as such. It was addressed in a separate section because this issue is not relevant to the overall population but rather to subsets of susceptible individuals, and allergic risks are usually controlled by other means (i.e. labelling) than the Threshold of Toxicological Concern approach. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Protective effects of coffee diterpenes against aflatoxin B1-induced genotoxicity: mechanisms in rat and human cells

The coffee-specific diterpenes cafestol and kahweol (C + K) have been reported to be anticarcinogenic in several animal models. Proposed mechanisms involve a co-ordinated modulation of several enzymes responsible for carcinogen detoxification, thus preventing reactive agents interacting with critical target sites. To address the human relevance of the chemoprotective effects of C + K against aflatoxin B(1) (AFB1) genotoxicity observed in rat liver, and to compare the mechanisms of protection involved in both species, animal and human hepatic in vitro test systems were applied. In rat primary hepatocytes, C + K reduced the expression of cytochrome P450 CYP 2C11 and CYP 3A2, the key enzymes responsible for AFB1 activation to the genotoxic metabolite aflatoxin B1-8,9 epoxide (AFBO). In addition, these diterpenes induced significantly GST Yc2, the most efficient rat GST subunit involved in AFBO detoxification. These effects of C + K resulted in a marked dose-dependent inhibition of AFB1-DNA binding in this rat in vitro culture system. Their relevance in humans was addressed using liver epithelial cell lines (THLE) stably transfected to express AFB1 metabolising cytochrome P450s. In these cells, C + K also produced a significant inhibition of AFB1-DNA adducts formation linked with an induction of the human glutathione S-transferase GST-mu. Altogether, these results suggest that C + K may have chemoprotective activity against AFB1 genotoxicity in both rats and humans.

Ochratoxin A carcinogenicity involves a complex network of epigenetic mechanisms

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a mycotoxin occurring in a wide range of food products. Because of the limitation of human epidemiological data, the safety significance of OTA in food has to rely on animal data, with renal toxicity and carcinogenicity being considered the pivotal effects. The elucidation of the mechanism of action would improve the use of experimental animal data for risk assessment. Direct genotoxicity versus epigenetic mechanisms appears to be a key question. In the present review, the increasingly documented epigenetic cellular effects of OTA and their potential toxicological relevance are discussed. The information available suggests that OTA is unlikely to act through a single, well-defined mechanism of action. Instead, it is proposed that a network of interacting epigenetic mechanisms, including protein synthesis inhibition, oxidative stress and the activation of specific cell signalling pathways, is responsible for OTA carcinogenicity. From a risk assessment perspective, it has to be noted that the mechanisms proposed above depend mainly upon gene expression and enzyme activation, and are, therefore, likely to be thresholded.

Increased vulnerability of neurones and glial cells to low concentrations of methylmercury in a prooxidant situation.

Abstract Using reaggregating rat brain cell cultures at two different stages of differentiation, we examined the biochemical effects of a 10-day treatment with nanomolar concentrations of methylmercuric chloride (monomethylmercury), in the presence or absence of promoters of hydroxyl radical formation (10 μM copper sulphate plus 100 μM ascorbate). A decrease in total protein content accounted for the general cytotoxicity of these compounds, whereas selective effects were assessed by determining the activities of cell type-specific enzymes. Methylmercury, up to 100 nM, as well as the copper ascorbate mixture, when applied separately, induced no general cytotoxicity, and only slight effects on neuronal parameters. However, when applying 100 nM methylmercury and the copper-ascorbate mixture together, a drastic decrease in neuronal and glial parameters was found. Under these conditions, the content of reactive oxygen species, assessed by 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin oxidation, increased greatly, while the activities of antioxidant enzymes decreased. In the presence of copper and ascorbate, differentiated cultures appeared more resistant than immature ones to low methylmercury concentrations (1–10 mM), but did undergo similar changes in both cell type-specific and antioxidant enzyme activities at 100 nM methylmercury. These results suggest that in prooxidant conditions low doses of mercury can become much more deleterious for the central nervous system.

International STakeholder NETwork (ISTNET): creating a developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing road map for regulatory purposes

Abstract A major problem in developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) risk assessment is the lack of toxicological hazard information for most compounds. Therefore, new approaches are being considered to provide adequate experimental data that allow regulatory decisions. This process requires a matching of regulatory needs on the one hand and the opportunities provided by new test systems and methods on the other hand. Alignment of academically and industrially driven assay development with regulatory needs in the field of DNT is a core mission of the International STakeholder NETwork (ISTNET) in DNT testing. The first meeting of ISTNET was held in Zurich on 23–24 January 2014 in order to explore the concept of adverse outcome pathway (AOP) to practical DNT testing. AOPs were considered promising tools to promote test systems development according to regulatory needs. Moreover, the AOP concept was identified as an important guiding principle to assemble predictive integrated testing strategies (ITSs) for DNT. The recommendations on a road map towards AOP-based DNT testing is considered a stepwise approach, operating initially with incomplete AOPs for compound grouping, and focussing on key events of neurodevelopment. Next steps to be considered in follow-up activities are the use of case studies to further apply the AOP concept in regulatory DNT testing, making use of AOP intersections (common key events) for economic development of screening assays, and addressing the transition from qualitative descriptions to quantitative network modelling.

Ochratoxin A-mediated DNA and protein damage: roles of nitrosative and oxidative stresses.

Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a mycotoxin occurring in a variety of foods. OTA is nephrotoxic and nephrocarcinogenic in rodents. An OTA-mediated increase of the inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression was observed in normal rat kidney renal cell line and in rat hepatocyte cultures, suggesting the induction of nitrosative stress. This was associated with an increased nuclear factor kappa-light chain enhancer of activated B cells activity. The potential consequences of iNOS induction were further investigated. A significant increase in the levels of protein nitrotyrosine residues was observed with OTA. In addition, OTA was found to increase the level of DNA abasic sites in both cell cultures system. This end point was used as an indirect measure of 8-nitroguanine formation. Treatment of the cells with L-N(6)-(1-iminoethyl) lysine, a specific inhibitor of iNOS activity, inhibited the OTA-mediated overnitration of proteins but did not reduce the level of DNA abasic sites. It was found previously that nuclear factor-erythroid 2 p45-related factor 2 (Nrf2) activators were able to restore the cellular defense against oxidative stress and could prevent DNA abasic sites in cell cultures. In the present study, pretreatment of the cells with activators of Nrf2 prevented OTA-mediated increase in lipid peroxidation, confirming the potential of Nrf2 activators to confer protection against OTA-mediated oxidative stress. In addition, it was found that Nrf2 activators could also prevent OTA-induced protein nitration and cytotoxicity. In conclusion, the present data further confirm oxidative stress as a key source of OTA-induced DNA damage and provide additional evidence for a role of this mechanism in OTA carcinogenicity. The exact role of nitrosative stress still remains to be established.

Ochratoxin A: Potential epigenetic mechanisms of toxicity and carcinogenicity

Assessment of the significance to human health of ochratoxin A (OTA) in food is limited by a lack of human toxicity data. Therefore, OTA risk evaluation relies mainly on the use of animal data, with renal carcinogenicity in rat being considered as the pivotal effect. The elucidation of the mechanism of action would improve the use of the carcinogenicity data for risk assessment. Direct genotoxicity versus epigenetic mechanisms appears to be a key question. In this presentation, new biochemical and toxicogenomic results obtained in a recent European project (EU-Grant # QLK1-CT-2001-011614) will be summarized in the context of previously reported mechanisms of action including inhibition of protein synthesis, production of oxidative stress and alteration of cell signalling. Amongst others, the new data indicate that chronic administration of a carcinogenic dose of OTA affected cell-signalling pathways resulting in a significantly reduced renal antioxidant defence and increased oxidative DNA damage. These data confirm previous hypotheses involving oxidative stress as a possible key epigenetic mechanism of OTA toxicity and carcinogenicity.

Impact of paper filtered coffee on oxidative DNA-damage: results of a clinical trial.

Coffee is among the most frequently consumed beverages worldwide and epidemiological studies indicate that its consumption is inversely related to the incidence of diseases in which reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved (liver cirrhosis, certain forms of cancer and neurodegenerative disorders). It has been postulated that antioxidant properties of coffee may account for this phenomenon. To find out if consumption of paper filtered coffee which is the most widely consumed form in Central Europe and the US protects humans against oxidative DNA-damage, a controlled intervention trial with a cross-over design was conducted in which the participants (n=38) consumed 800ml coffee or water daily over 5 days. DNA-damage was measured in peripheral lymphocytes in single cell gel electrophoresis assays. The extent of DNA-migration attributable to formation of oxidised purines (formamidopyrimidine glycosylase sensitive sites) was decreased after coffee intake by 12.3% (p=0.006). Biochemical parameters of the redox status (malondialdehyde, 3-nitrotyrosine and the total antioxidant levels in plasma, glutathione concentrations in blood, intracellular ROS levels and the activities of superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase in lymphocytes) were not markedly altered at the end of the trial, also the urinary 8-isoprostaglandine F2α concentrations were not affected. Overall, the results indicate that coffee consumption prevents endogenous formation of oxidative DNA-damage in human, this observation may be causally related to beneficial health effects of coffee seen in earlier studies.

Coffee diterpenes prevent benzo[a]pyrene genotoxicity in rat and human culture systems.

The coffee-specific diterpenes cafestol and kahweol (C+K) have been identified as two important chemoprotective agents in coffee. In the present study, the potential preventive effects of C+K against the genotoxicity of B[a]P were investigated in rat primary hepatocytes and in human bronchial Beas-2B cells. Several independent mechanisms were identified and their respective contribution to the overall protective effects was determined. A marked dose-dependent inhibition by C+K of B[a]P DNA-binding was found in cells of both origins. However, data showed that the significant induction by C+K of the detoxifying enzyme GST-Yp subunit is the key mechanism of protection against B[a]P DNA-binding in rat liver. In contrast, the phase I-mediated mechanism where C+K produce an inhibition of CYP 1A1 induction by B[a]P is of key significance for the C+K protection in human Beas-2B cells. Moreover, this effect suggests a novel mechanism of chemoprotection by the coffee diterpenes cafestol and kahweol.

Establishing the level of safety concern for chemicals in food without the need for toxicity testing.

There is demand for methodologies to establish levels of safety concern associated with dietary exposures to chemicals for which no toxicological data are available. In such situations, the application of in silico methods appears promising. To make safety statement requires quantitative predictions of toxicological reference points such as no observed adverse effect level and carcinogenic potency for DNA-reacting chemicals. A decision tree (DT) has been developed to aid integrating exposure information and predicted toxicological reference points obtained with quantitative structure activity relationship ((Q)SAR) software and read across techniques. The predicted toxicological values are compared with exposure to obtain margins of exposure (MoE). The size of the MoE defines the level of safety concern and should account for a number of uncertainties such as the classical interspecies and inter-individual variability as well as others determined on a case by case basis. An analysis of the uncertainties of in silico approaches together with results from case studies suggest that establishing safety concern based on application of the DT is unlikely to be significantly more uncertain than based on experimental data. The DT makes a full use of all data available, ensuring an adequate degree of conservatism. It can be used when fast decision making is required.