Bernadett Kiss
International Institute of Minnesota
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bernadett Kiss.
Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future; pp 1665-1744 (2012) | 2012
A. Grubler; Francisco Aguayo; Kelly Sims Gallagher; Marko P. Hekkert; Kejun Jiang; Lynn K. Mytelka; Lena Neij; Gregory F. Nemet; Charlie Wilson; Per Dannemand Andersen; Leon Clarke; Laura Diaz Anadon; Sabine Fuss; Jakob Martin; Daniel M. Kammen; Ruud Kempener; Osamu Kimura; Bernadett Kiss; Anastasia O'Rourke; Robert N. Shock; Paulo Teixeirade Sousa
The development and introduction of heat pumps provides an interesting illustration of policy influence and effectiveness in relation to energy technology innovation. Heat pumps have been supported by several countries since the 1970s as a strategy to improve energy efficiency, support energy security, reduce environmental degradation, and combat climate change. Sweden and Switzerland have been essential to the development and commercialization of heat pumps in Europe. In both countries, numerous policy incentives have lined the path of technology and market development. Early policy initiatives were poorly coordinated but supported technology development, entrepreneurial experimentation, knowledge development, and the involvement of important actors in networks and organisations. The market collapse in the mid 1980s could have resulted in a total failure ‐ but did not. The research programmes continued in the 1980s, and a new set of stakeholders formed ‐ both publicly and privately funded researchers, authorities, and institutions ‐ and provided an important platform for further development. In the 1990s and 2000s, Sweden and Switzerland introduced more coordinated and strategic policy incentives for the development of heat pumps. The approaches were flexible and adjusted over time. The policy interventions in both countries supported learning, successful development and diffusion processes, and cost reductions. This assessment of innovation and diffusion policies for heat pump systems can be used to generalise some insights for energy technology innovation policy.
Journal of Cleaner Production | 2016
Bernadett Kiss
In order to tap the energy saving and climate mitigation potential of the building sector, transaction costs of implementing energy efficient technologies need to be better understood and ultimately reduced. The objective of this paper is to identify and analyze the nature and scale of transaction costs resulting from the application of the passive house concept in energy efficient renovations. Related conceptual choices are also discussed. Our study explores measures to promote learning and knowledge development as potential strategies to reduce transaction costs. It focuses on transaction costs borne by building owners and building developers in the planning and implementation phases of a passive house-oriented renovation in Sweden. Results reveal three main sources of transaction costs: due diligence, negotiations and monitoring. The analysis shows that transaction costs are non-negligible, and for individual cost sources the scale can be 200% higher than for conventional renovations. To reduce transaction costs, various strategies such as study visits, demonstration projects, new forms of meetings and new channels of (written) information were found. (Less)
Energy Technology Innovation - Learning from Historical Successes and Failures; pp 118-132 (2014) | 2014
Bernadett Kiss; Lena Neij; Martin Jakob
The development and introduction of heat pumps provides an interesting illustration of policy influence and effectiveness in relation to energy technology innovation. Heat pumps have been supported by several countries since the 1970s as a strategy to improve energy efficiency, support energy security, reduce environmental degradation, and combat climate change. Sweden and Switzerland have been essential to the development and commercialization of heat pumps in Europe. In both countries, numerous policy incentives have lined the path of technology and market development. Early policy initiatives were poorly coordinated but supported technology development, entrepreneurial experimentation, knowledge development, and the involvement of important actors in networks and organisations. The market collapse in the mid 1980s could have resulted in a total failure ‐ but did not. The research programmes continued in the 1980s, and a new set of stakeholders formed ‐ both publicly and privately funded researchers, authorities, and institutions ‐ and provided an important platform for further development. In the 1990s and 2000s, Sweden and Switzerland introduced more coordinated and strategic policy incentives for the development of heat pumps. The approaches were flexible and adjusted over time. The policy interventions in both countries supported learning, successful development and diffusion processes, and cost reductions. This assessment of innovation and diffusion policies for heat pump systems can be used to generalise some insights for energy technology innovation policy. (Less)
In: Leal Filho, W and Brandli, L, (eds.) Engaging Stakeholders in Education for Sustainable Development at University Level. (pp. 191-215). Springer: Berlin. (2016) | 2016
Gregory Trencher; Daniel Rosenberg Daneri; Kes McCormick; Toru Terada; John E. Petersen; Masaru Yarime; Bernadett Kiss
Accompanying realisations that engagement of multiple societal sectors (academia, industry, government, citizenry) and disciplines is required for formulating effective responses to complex sustainability challenges, calls for new forms of knowledge production are increasing in magnitude, both inside and outside the university. In parallel, experiences from the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development have highlighted that collaborations with societal stakeholders and experiential approaches are desirable for effective sustainability education. This article examines activities at three institutions—Lund University, Oberlin College and the University of Tokyo—to identify potential models for integrating students into the co-creation of transformational knowledge and sustainability experiments with faculty and multiple stakeholders. We examine the types of outputs that can ensue differing participation models, whilst also considering their impact on university and stakeholder efforts to advance societal sustainability. We argue that transformational sustainability partnerships integrating students can foster the alignment of the three university missions of education, research and community engagement with place-specific needs and sustainability challenges. Accordingly, efforts to promote experiential forms of sustainability education with societal stakeholders should refrain from focusing uniquely on education and encourage synergistic linking of all university missions. (Less)
Journal of Cleaner Production | 2013
Bernadett Kiss; Clara González Manchón; Lena Neij
Energy Policy | 2011
Bernadett Kiss; Lena Neij
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability | 2015
Kes McCormick; Bernadett Kiss
EconStor Research Reports | 2011
Aleksandra Novikova; Hermann Amecke; Karsten Neuhoff; Kateryna Stelmakh; Bernadett Kiss; Clemens Rohde; Elisa Dunkelberg; Julia Weiß; Kaisa Matschoss; Sarah Darby
Counting on Energy Programs: It's Why Evaluation Matters | 2010
Bernadett Kiss; Kes McCormick; Lena Neij; Luis Mundaca
DIME International Conference “Innovation, sustainability and policy” | 2008
Lena Neij; Bernadett Kiss; Martin Jakob