Bernd Kühn

Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging of the Liver: Effect of Triggering Methods on Regional Variability and Measurement Repeatability of Quantitative Parameters

PURPOSE To compare the influence of triggering methods for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters in the liver, as well as regional variability and measurement repeatability. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, 12 healthy volunteers (six women, six men; mean age, 30 years) underwent 1.5-T DWI of the liver by using nine b values twice with free breathing (FB) without triggering (mean acquisition time ± standard deviation, 3.7 minutes ± 0), respiratory triggering (RT) (mean acquisition time, 6.8 minutes ± 1.4), and echocardiography triggering (ET) (mean acquisition time, 8.3 minutes ± 2.0) after providing written informed consent. ADC and IVIM parameters, including pure diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion fraction (f), and perfusion-related diffusion coefficient (D*), were measured by using 15 regions of interest (ROIs). Regional variability of ADC and IVIM parameters and measurement repeatability were evaluated by using the coefficient of variation (CV) across ROIs and within-subject CV, respectively. RESULTS ET DWI (range of CV across ROIs, 6.69%-20.0%) resulted in significantly decreased regional variability of ADC, D, and f, compared with FB DWI (13.86%-35.8%) and RT DWI (15.15%-35.91%, P ≤. 049). ET DWI showed better repeatability of ADC measurement (within-subject CV range, 3.17%-4.12% for ET DWI; 4.15%-4.74% for FB DWI; and 2.33%-6.96% for RT DWI), D (4.05%-5.34% for ET DWI, 4.11%-12.51% for FB DWI, and 3.19%-16.17% for RT DWI), and f (7.6%-9.86% for ET DWI, 13.83%-16.81% for FB DWI, and 10.05%-12.10% for RT DWI), compared with FB DWI and RT DWI, with significant differences in within-subject CV for D in the left hepatic lobe compared with RT DWI (P = .023) and for f compared with FB DWI (P ≤ .032). For all three imaging techniques, D* showed the worst repeatability (within-subject CV, 57.05%-156.61%) among ADC and IVIM parameters. CONCLUSION ET DWI is more effective for decreasing regional variability of ADC and IVIM parameters than FB DWI or RT DWI; it may improve measurement repeatability by reducing cardiac motion-induced measurement error.

Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for liver fibrosis assessment: a pilot study.

Background There has been a growing need for an imaging method for the accurate diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis as a non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of intra-voxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging for classifying the severity of liver fibrosis. Material and Methods Fifty-seven patients who underwent navigator-triggered, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the liver on a 1.5-T system using nine b-values and had a reliable reference standard for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis (histopathologic findings [n = 27] or clinical findings for normal [n = 18] or cirrhotic liver [n = 12]), were included in our study. Liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion (Dslow), perfusion fraction (f), and perfusion-related diffusion (Dfast), and the product f · Dfast were compared with the liver fibrosis stages (F). The accuracies of these parameters in diagnosing severe liver fibrosis (F ≥3) were evaluated using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The liver fibrosis stages had the strongest negative correlation with f · Dfast (ρ = –0.52). All of the parameters, except for Dslow, were significantly lower in patients with F ≥3 than in those with F ≤2 (P ≤ 0.001). The area under the ROC curve for diagnosing severe fibrosis was the largest for f · Dfast (0.844) with an overall accuracy of 79.0% (45/57) at the optimal cutoff value and followed by f (0.834), Dfast (0.773), ADC (0.762), and Dslow (0.656). Conclusion IVIM imaging is a promising method for classifying the severity of liver fibrosis, with the product f · Dfast being the most accurate parameter.

Motion-corrected multiparametric renal arterial spin labelling at 3 T: reproducibility and effect of vasodilator challenge

ObjectivesWe investigated the feasibility and reproducibility of free-breathing motion-corrected multiple inversion time (multi-TI) pulsed renal arterial spin labelling (PASL), with general kinetic model parametric mapping, to simultaneously quantify renal perfusion (RBF), bolus arrival time (BAT) and tissue T1.MethodsIn a study approved by the Health Research Authority, 12 healthy volunteers (mean age, 27.6 ± 18.5 years; 5 male) gave informed consent for renal imaging at 3 T using multi-TI ASL and conventional single-TI ASL. Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) was used as a vasodilator challenge in six subjects. Flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) preparation was used with background suppression and 3D-GRASE (gradient and spin echo) read-out, and images were motion-corrected. Parametric maps of RBF, BAT and T1 were derived for both kidneys. Agreement was assessed using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots.ResultsInter-study correlation of whole-kidney RBF was good for both single-TI (r2 = 0.90), and multi-TI ASL (r2 = 0.92). Single-TI ASL gave a higher estimate of whole-kidney RBF compared to multi-TI ASL (mean bias, 29.3 ml/min/100 g; p <0.001). Using multi-TI ASL, the median T1 of renal cortex was shorter than that of medulla (799.6 ms vs 807.1 ms, p = 0.01), and mean whole-kidney BAT was 269.7 ± 56.5 ms. GTN had an effect on systolic blood pressure (p < 0.05) but the change in RBF was not significant.ConclusionsFree-breathing multi-TI renal ASL is feasible and reproducible at 3 T, providing simultaneous measurement of renal perfusion, haemodynamic parameters and tissue characteristics at baseline and during pharmacological challenge.Key points• Multiple inversion time arterial spin labelling (ASL) of the kidneys is feasible and reproducible at 3 T.• This approach allows simultaneous mapping of renal perfusion, bolus arrival time and tissue T1during free breathing.• This technique enables repeated measures of renal haemodynamic characteristics during pharmacological challenge.