Bert Hansky

Pathways for training and accreditation for transvenous lead extraction: a European Heart Rhythm Association position paper.

### Introduction The European Heart Rhythm Association charged the present writing committee with the task of producing a consensus document on training and accreditation for transvenous extraction of chronically implanted pacing and defibrillator leads.1,2 The core curriculum for the European Heart Rhythm Specialist includes implantation of heart rhythm devices but does not specifically mandate learning and accreditation for extraction techniques.3 The lack of such recommendations is related to the limited number of extractions available for training purposes and attaining competency. The present document focuses on the rising burden and the increasing complexity of techniques of lead extraction with an emphasis on the critical issues of training, accreditation, and documentation of results. There is also an educational component felt necessary to include by the Task Force in view of the specialized and emerging nature of this field. Where appropriate, a European perspective is presented and paediatric aspects are treated separately. The aim is to complement two recently published documents, one from the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)4 on facilities, training, indications, and management of transvenous lead extraction and the other from the American Heart Association on device-related infections.5 The indications for lead extraction have not changed since these publications and are therefore not covered in this present document. ### Need for lead extraction/removal—a European perspective Due to improving recognition of clinical need and wider indications, the implant rate of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED) continues to rise in most countries.6,7 The number of leads per patient is increasing with cardiac resynchronisation therapy–pacemaker/defibrillator, upgrades and a higher proportion of dual vs. single-chamber devices. As life expectancy has risen, so have the number of generator and lead changes despite advances in technology. Product advisories are inevitable despite overall improvements in reliability and have led to surges in extraction.8–10 Currently, infection accounts …

Left heart pacing--experience with several types of coronary vein leads.

Our experience with 121 coronary vein (CV) leads in 116 patients shows that CV leads are the leads of choice for pacing the left ventricle (LV). The information gained from pre-operative venous angiography permits individual selection of the most appropriate lead model for each case. The use of steerable electrophysiology catheters facilitates guide catheter cannulation of the coronary sinus (CS) when the anatomy is difficult and reduces the risk of complications. By selecting the CV lead model most suitable for each individual patient, we achieved successful implantation in 99.1% of patients. In this day and age, epicardial electrodes should be restricted to cases with CS anomalies which make CS cannulation impossible, and to LV lead implantation during heart surgery.

Electrocardiographic remodeling in patients paced for heart failure

Congestive heart failure due to advanced coronary artery disease or dilated cardiomyopathy is often associated with intraventricular conduction delays. Electrical resynchronization is an evolving method to improve clinical and functional status. To evaluate whether pacing-induced changes in the electrocardiogram are related to hemodynamic changes, we analyzed electrocardiograms of patients enrolled in the Pacing Therapies in Congestive Heart Failure trial. The study population consisted of 42 patients, New York Heart Association functional class III-IV with a baseline QRS complex of 175 +/- 32 msec and a PR interval of 196 +/- 33 msec. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.23. Using high-resolution computer scans, we measured QRS duration of intrinsic and paced electrocardiographs at different times during the study. Results of the electrocardiographic measurements were correlated with functional results. During the crossover period, 34 episodes of biventricular pacing, 27 episodes of left ventricular pacing, and 5 episodes of right ventricular pacing occurred, each at an individual optimized atrioventricular (AV) delay. The only significant difference was that right ventricular pacing increased the QRS width by 40 msec as compared with baseline or biventricular pacing. Functional benefit, as indicated by relative increase of peak oxygen uptake (VO2) compared with baseline, was significantly correlated with shortening of paced QRS width (correlation coefficient, r = 0.55; p <0.05). After 12-month follow-up of 28 patients, we saw a slight, nonsignificant decrease of intrinsic QRS width. With regard to the underlying disease, intrinsic QRS width at baseline and at 12 months was also not significantly different between patients with coronary artery disease and dilated cardiomyopathy. This study found that right ventricular pacing causes an increase in QRS duration in patients with left bundle-branch block, whereas in left ventricular and biventricular pacing, QRS width remains unchanged. Shortening of QRS width is correlated with a pronounced relative increase of peak VO2, and thus may become a noninvasive marker of clinical efficacy. There is no evidence of remodeling of the intrinsic electrocardiogram after 12 months of pacing.

Coronary vein balloon angioplasty forleft ventricular pacemaker lead implantation

OBJECTIVES Retrospective analysis of five cases of coronary vein balloon angioplasty performed to allow insertion of left ventricular pacing leads. BACKGROUND Coronary vein stenoses or an insufficient vessel caliber can preclude transvenous placement of coronary vein leads. METHODS We compared our total patient population (n = 218), in whom we implanted coronary vein leads, to those five patients who required coronary vein angioplasty to allow lead placement. Standard over-the-wire coronary artery balloon angioplasty catheters were used to dilate the vessel to 2.5 mm (n = 3) or 3.5 mm (n = 2). RESULTS Transvenous lead placement succeeds in >99% of patients. Four cases of target vein stenoses and one case of a vein of insufficient caliber were successfully treated by balloon angioplasty. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS Coronary vein angioplasty is an effective and safe technique to permit transvenous left ventricular pacing lead insertion in cases of target vein stenoses or insufficient target vein caliber.

Endocardial pacing after Fontan-type procedures.

Background: Sinus node dysfunction is a frequent complication of Fontan‐type procedure. Epicardial pacing is considered as the standard treatment for these patients.

Implantation of Active Fixation Leads in Coronary Veins for Left Ventricular Stimulation: Report of Five Cases

Background: Securing transvenous left ventricular (LV) pacing leads without an active fixation mechanism in proximal coronary vein (CV) segments is usually challenging and frequently impossible. We investigated how active fixation leads can be safely implanted in this location, how to avoid perforating the free wall of the CV, and how to recognize and respond to perforations.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Long-Term Alternative to Cardiac Transplantation?

BACKGROUND Cardiac transplantation remains the gold standard for treating end-stage heart failure. However, because of donor shortage and posttransplant complications alternative options are needed. METHODS We investigated the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on clinical outcome in 545 patients with left bundle-branch block and interventricular asynchrony, who fulfilled the cardiac criteria for cardiac transplantation listing. Primary end point was heart failure death. Secondary end points were New York Heart Association class, functional (cardiopulmonary exercise tolerance, 6-minute hall walk distance), and morphologic (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter) factors. RESULTS The average follow-up period was 39.6 months (standard deviation, 26.1 months). In total, 1,784 years of observation were accrued. The percentage of nonresponders (no functional and morphologic improvement during follow-up) was 21.2%. One-year and 3-year freedom from heart failure death was 92.3% and 77.3%, respectively. Functional variables improved, but the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter decreased during the first 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy only in patients who survived during follow-up. Under cardiac resynchronization therapy, 42.5% (n = 34) of the cardiac transplantation candidates with atrial fibrillation at baseline returned to sinus rhythm. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that cardiac resynchronization therapy is a reliable long-term therapeutic option for the treatment of end-stage heart failure and intraventricular asynchrony.

Successful heart-lung transplantation in a patient with kyphoscoliosis.

The association is well established between congenital heart disease and spinal deformities such as scoliosis or kyphosis, but data are not available for risks and the outcome of heart surgery in patients with spinal deformities. We report a case of successful orthotopic heart lung transplantation in a patient with complex congenital heart disease and severe chest deformity who had undergone previous spinal fusion surgery for progressive right convex thoracic kyphoscoliosis.

Left ventricular pacing and CRT. What CV lead fits into which vein

SummaryThe experience of 579 patients with left ventricular pacing specific characteristics of various leads and lead types for left ventricular stimulation are reported. After describing the advantages of coronary vein (CV) leads versus epicardial lead usage for left ventricular stimulation, commercially available CV leads are introduced and discussed. Since there is no universally applicable CV lead, the individual optimal lead choice and the sequelae of erroneous lead choice are described in typical clinical examples.ZusammenfassungBasierend auf der Erfahrung von 579 Patienten mit linksventrikulärer Stimulation werden die unterschiedlichen Elektrodentypen zur Stimulation des linken Ventrikels und ihre spezifischen Charakteristika vorgestellt. Neben der Beschreibung der Vorteile von Koronarvenen(CV)-Elektroden gegenüber epikardialen Elektroden bei der Stimulation des linken Ventrikels erfolgt die Vorstellung der verwendeten CV-Elektroden. Da bislang keine universell implantierbare CV-Elektrode verfügbar ist, wird anhand typischer klinischer Beispiele die optimale individuelle Elektrodenauswahl und die Folgen einer falschen Elektrodenwahl beschrieben.

Linksventrikuläre Stimulation und CRT

SummaryThe experience of 579 patients with left ventricular pacing specific characteristics of various leads and lead types for left ventricular stimulation are reported. After describing the advantages of coronary vein (CV) leads versus epicardial lead usage for left ventricular stimulation, commercially available CV leads are introduced and discussed. Since there is no universally applicable CV lead, the individual optimal lead choice and the sequelae of erroneous lead choice are described in typical clinical examples.ZusammenfassungBasierend auf der Erfahrung von 579 Patienten mit linksventrikulärer Stimulation werden die unterschiedlichen Elektrodentypen zur Stimulation des linken Ventrikels und ihre spezifischen Charakteristika vorgestellt. Neben der Beschreibung der Vorteile von Koronarvenen(CV)-Elektroden gegenüber epikardialen Elektroden bei der Stimulation des linken Ventrikels erfolgt die Vorstellung der verwendeten CV-Elektroden. Da bislang keine universell implantierbare CV-Elektrode verfügbar ist, wird anhand typischer klinischer Beispiele die optimale individuelle Elektrodenauswahl und die Folgen einer falschen Elektrodenwahl beschrieben.