Bijoy K. Mohanty

The Sm-like protein Hfq regulates polyadenylation dependent mRNA decay in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, the post‐transcriptional addition of poly(A) tails by poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I, pcnB) plays a significant role in cellular RNA metabolism. However, many important features of this system, including its regulation and the selection of polyadenylation sites, are still poorly understood. Here we show that the inactivation of Hfq (hfq), an abundant RNA‐binding protein, leads to the reduction in the ability of PAP I to add poly(A) tails at the 3′ termini of mRNAs containing Rho‐independent transcription terminators even though PAP I protein levels remain unchanged. Those poly(A) tails that are synthesized in the absence of Hfq are shorter in length, even in the absence of polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), RNase II and RNase E. In fact, the biosynthetic activity of PNPase in the hfq single mutant is enhanced and it becomes the primary polynucleotide polymerase, adding heteropolymeric tails almost exclusively to 3′ truncated mRNAs. Surprisingly, both PNPase and Hfq co‐purified with His‐tagged PAP I under native conditions indicating a potential complex among these proteins. Immunoprecipitation experiments using PNPase‐ and Hfq‐specific antibodies confirmed the protein–protein interactions among PAP I, PNPase and Hfq. Analysis of mRNA half‐lives in hfq, ΔpcnB and hfq ΔpcnB mutants suggests that Hfq and PAP I function in the same mRNA decay pathway.

Analysis of the function of Escherichia coli poly(A) polymerase I in RNA metabolism

To help understand the role of polyadenylation in Escherichia coli RNA metabolism, we constructed an IPTG‐inducible pcnB [poly(A) polymerase I, PAP I] containing plasmid that permitted us to vary poly(A) levels without affecting cell growth or viability. Increased polyadenylation led to a decrease in the half‐life of total pulse‐labelled RNA along with decreased half‐lives of the rpsO, trxA, lpp and ompA transcripts. In contrast, the transcripts for rne (RNase E) and pnp (polynucleotide phosphorylase, PNPase), enzymes involved in mRNA decay, were stabilized. rnb (RNase II) and rnc (RNase III) transcript levels were unaffected in the presence of increased polyadenylation. Long‐term overproduction of PAP I led to slower growth and irreversible cell death. Differential display analysis showed that new RNA species were being polyadenylated after PAP I induction, including the mature 3′‐terminus of 23S rRNA, a site that was not tailed in wild‐type cells. Quantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) demonstrated an almost 20‐fold variation in the level of polyadenylation among three different transcripts and that PAP I accounted for between 94% and 98.6% of their poly(A) tails. Cloning and sequencing of cDNAs derived from lpp, 23S and 16S rRNA revealed that, during exponential growth, C and U residues were polymerized into poly(A) tails in a transcript‐dependent manner.

Genomic analysis in Escherichia coli demonstrates differential roles for polynucleotide phosphorylase and RNase II in mRNA abundance and decay

Previous work has shown that simultaneous inactivation of polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) and RNase II (both 3′→ 5′ exonucleases) in Escherichia coli leads to the loss of cell viability and the accumulation of partially degraded mRNA species. In order to help to distinguish how these two enzymes globally affect the abundance and decay of mRNAs, we have carried out a genome‐wide analysis of the steady‐state levels of E. coli transcripts using deletion mutations in either rnb or pnp. The data show that, in exponentially growing cells, inactivation of PNPase leads to an increase in the steady‐state level of more expressed mRNAs (17.3%) than inactivation of RNase II (7.3%). In contrast, the steady‐state levels of a large number of E. coli mRNAs (31%) are decreased in the absence of RNase II, including almost all the ribosomal protein genes, suggesting that a major function of this enzyme is to protect specific mRNAs from the activity of other ribonucleases. Array data were confirmed by Northern analysis of 12 individual mRNAs. A comparison between the steady‐state levels and the half‐lives of individual mRNAs indicates that there may be a direct interaction between transcription and mRNA decay for some of the transcripts. In addition, results are presented to show significant phenotypic differences between the pnp‐7 point mutant and the pnpΔ683 deletion allele.

The majority of Escherichia coli mRNAs undergo post-transcriptional modification in exponentially growing cells.

Polyadenylation of RNAs by poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I) in Escherichia coli plays a significant role in mRNA decay and general RNA quality control. However, many important features of this system, including the prevalence of polyadenylated mRNAs in the bacterium, are still poorly understood. By comparing the transcriptomes of wild-type and pcnB deletion strains using macroarray analysis, we demonstrate that >90% of E.coli open reading frames (ORFs) transcribed during exponential growth undergo some degree of polyadenylation by PAP I, either as full-length transcripts or decay intermediates. Detailed analysis of over 240 transcripts suggests that Rho-independent transcription terminators serve as polyadenylation signals. Conversely, mRNAs terminated in a Rho-dependent fashion are probably not substrates for PAP I, but can be modified by the addition of long polynucleotide tails through the biosynthetic activity of polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). Furthermore, real-time PCR analysis indicates that the extent of polyadenylation of individual full-length transcripts such as lpp and ompA varies significantly in wild-type cells. The data presented here demonstrates that polyadenylation in E.coli occurs much more frequently than previously envisioned.

Polynucleotide phosphorylase, RNase II and RNase E play different roles in the in vivo modulation of polyadenylation in Escherichia coli

Poly(A) tails in Escherichia coli are hypothesized to provide unstructured single‐stranded substrates that facilitate the degradation of mRNAs by ribonucleases. Here, we have investigated the role that such nucleases play in modulating polyadenylation in vivo by measuring total poly(A) levels, polyadenylation of specific transcripts, growth rates and cell viabilities in strains containing various amounts of poly(A) polymerase I (PAP I), polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), RNase II and RNase E. The results demonstrate that both PNPase and RNase II are directly involved in regulating total in vivo poly(A) levels. RNase II is primarily responsible for degrading poly(A) tails associated with 23S rRNA, whereas PNPase is more effective in modulating the polyadenylation of the lpp and 16S rRNA transcripts. In contrast, RNase E appears to affect poly(A) levels indirectly through the generation of new 3′ termini that serve as substrates for PAP I. In addition, whereas excess PNPase suppresses polyadenylation by more than 70%, the toxicity associated with increased poly(A) levels is not reduced. Conversely, toxicity is significantly reduced in the presence of excess RNase II. Overproduction of RNase E leads to increased polyadenylation and no reduction in toxicity.

Bacterial/archaeal/organellar polyadenylation

Although the first poly(A) polymerase (PAP) was discovered in Escherichia coli in 1962, the study of polyadenylation in bacteria was largely ignored for the next 30 years. However, with the identification of the structural gene for E. coli PAP I in 1992, it became possible to analyze polyadenylation using both biochemical and genetic approaches. Subsequently, it has been shown that polyadenylation plays a multifunctional role in prokaryotic RNA metabolism. Although the bulk of our current understanding of prokaryotic polyadenylation comes from studies on E. coli, recent limited experiments with Cyanobacteria, organelles, and Archaea have widened our view on the diversity, complexity, and universality of the polyadenylation process. For example, the identification of polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase), a reversible phosphorolytic enzyme that is highly conserved in bacteria, as an additional PAP in E. coli caught everyone by surprise. In fact, PNPase has now been shown to be the source of post‐transcriptional RNA modifications in a wide range of cells of prokaryotic origin including those that lack a eubacterial PAP homolog. Accordingly, the past few years have witnessed increased interest in the mechanism and role of post‐transcriptional modifications in all species of prokaryotic origin. However, the fact that many of the poly(A) tails are very short and unstable as well as the presence of polynucleotide tails has posed significant technical challenges to the scientific community trying to unravel the mystery of polyadenylation in prokaryotes. This review discusses the current state of knowledge regarding polyadenylation and its functions in bacteria, organelles, and Archaea. WIREs RNA 2011 2 256–276 DOI: 10.1002/wrna.51

RNAsnap™: a rapid, quantitative and inexpensive, method for isolating total RNA from bacteria

RNAsnap™ is a simple and novel method that recovers all intracellular RNA quantitatively (>99%), faster (<15 min) and less expensively (∼3 cents/sample) than any of the currently available RNA isolation methods. In fact, none of the bacterial RNA isolation methods, including the commercial kits, are effective in recovering all species of intracellular RNAs (76–5700 nt) with equal efficiency, which can lead to biased results in genome-wide studies involving microarray or RNAseq analysis. The RNAsnap™ procedure yields ∼60 µg of RNA from 108 Escherichia coli cells that can be used directly for northern analysis without any further purification. Based on a comparative analysis of specific transcripts ranging in size from 76 to 5700 nt, the RNAsnap™ method provided the most accurate measure of the relative amounts of the various intracellular RNAs. Furthermore, the RNAsnap™ RNA was successfully used in enzymatic reactions such as RNA ligation, reverse transcription, primer extension and reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction, following sodium acetate/ethanol precipitation. The RNAsnap™ method can be used to isolate RNA from a wide range of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria as well as yeast.

Rho-independent transcription terminators inhibit RNase P processing of the secG leuU and metT tRNA polycistronic transcripts in Escherichia coli

The widely accepted model for the processing of tRNAs in Escherichia coli involves essential initial cleavages by RNase E within polycistronic transcripts to generate pre-tRNAs that subsequently become substrates for RNase P. However, recently we identified two polycistronic tRNA transcripts whose endonucleolytic processing was solely dependent on RNase P. Here we show that the processing of the secG leuU and metT leuW glnU glnW metU glnV glnX polycistronic transcripts takes place through a different type of maturation pathway. Specifically, RNase P separates the tRNA units within each operon following the endonucleolytic removal of the distal Rho-independent transcription terminator, primarily by RNase E. Failure to remove the Rho-independent transcription terminator inhibits RNase P processing of both transcripts leading to a decrease in mature tRNA levels and dramatically increased levels of full-length transcripts in an RNase E deletion strain. Furthermore, we show for the first time that RNase G also removes the Rho-independent transcription terminator associated with the secG leuU operon. Our data also demonstrate that the Rne-1 protein retains significant activity on tRNA substrates at the non-permissive temperature. Taken together it is clear that there are multiple pathways involved in the maturation of tRNAs in E. coli.

RNase E levels in Escherichia coli are controlled by a complex regulatory system that involves transcription of the rne gene from three promoters

The rne gene of Escherichia coli encodes RNase E, an essential endoribonuclease that is involved in both mRNA decay and rRNA processing. Here we present evidence that the gene is transcribed from three promoters: p1, p2 and p3. The p2 and p3 promoters map 34 and 145 nt upstream from the previously characterized rne promoter, p1, generating unusually long 5′ UTRs of 395 and 506 nt respectively. Based on promoter–lacZ transcriptional fusions, p1 is a more efficient promoter than either p2 or p3. Low copy number or single copy number vectors carrying rne transcribed from either p1, p2 or p3 alone complement the rneΔ1018::bla deletion mutation at 30°C, 37°C and 44°C. However, normal autoregulation requires the presence of all three promoters. A comparison among intracellular levels of RNase E, the half‐lives of the rpsO, rpsT and rne mRNAs, and growth rates, indicates that the cell contains a considerable excess of RNase E protein. In addition, when the rne transcript is stabilized at low RNase E levels, it is not efficiently translated.

Ribonuclease P processes polycistronic tRNA transcripts in Escherichia coli independent of ribonuclease E

The first step in the current model for the processing and maturation of mono- and polycistronic tRNA precursors in Escherichia coli involves initial cleavages by RNase E 1–3 nt downstream of each chromosomally encoded CCA determinant. Subsequently, each mature 5′ terminus is generated by single RNase P cleavage, while the 3′ terminus undergoes exonucleolytic processing by a combination of 3′ → 5′ exonucleases. Here we describe for the first time a previously unidentified pathway for the maturation of tRNAs in polycistronic operons (valV valW and leuQ leuP leuV) where the processing of the primary transcripts is independent of RNase E. Rather, RNase P cleavages separate the individual tRNA precursors with the concomitant formation of their mature 5′ termini. Furthermore, both polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) and RNase II are required for the removal of the 3′ Rho-dependent terminator sequences. Our data indicate that RNase P substrate recognition is more complex than previously envisioned.