Björn Kull

Structure and function of adenosine receptors and their genes

Four adenosine receptors have been cloned from many mammalian and some non-mammalian species. In each case the translated part of the receptor is encoded by two separate exons. Two separate promoters regulate the A1 receptor expression, and a similar situation may pertain also for the other receptors. The receptors are expressed in a cell and tissue specific manner, even though A1 and A2B receptors are found in many different cell types. Emerging data indicate that the receptor protein is targeted to specific parts of the cell. A1 and A3 receptors activate the Gi family of G proteins, whereas A2A and A2B receptors activate the Gs family. However, other G proteins can also be activated even though the physiological significance of this is unknown. Following the activation of G proteins several cellular effector pathways can be affected. Signaling via adenosine receptors is also known to interact in functionally important ways with signaling initiated via other receptors.

Comparison of the potency of adenosine as an agonist at human adenosine receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

The potency of adenosine and inosine as agonists at human adenosine receptors was examined in a functional assay using changes in cyclic AMP (cAMP) formation in intact Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with the human A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 receptors. Adenosine increased cAMP formation in cells expressing the A2A (EC(50): 0.7 microM) and A2B (EC(50): 24 microM) receptors and inhibited forskolin (0.3-3 microM)-stimulated cAMP formation in cells expressing the A1 (EC(50): 0.31 microM) and A3 receptors (EC(50): 0.29 microM). The potency of adenosine at the A2A and A2B receptors was not altered by the presence of the uptake inhibitor nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR), whereas it was increased about 6-fold by NBMPR at the A1 and A3 receptors. In the presence of NBMPR, inosine was a potent agonist (EC(50): 7 and 0.08 microM at the A1 and A3 receptors, respectively), but with low efficacy especially at the A3 receptors. No effect of inosine was seen at the A(2) receptors. Caffeine, theophylline, and paraxanthine shifted the dose-response curve for adenosine at the A1, A2A, and A2B receptors. These results indicate that adenosine is the endogenous agonist at all human adenosine receptors and that physiological levels of this nucleoside can activate A1, A2A, and A3 receptors on cells where they are abundantly expressed, whereas pathophysiological conditions are required to stimulate A2B receptors to produce cyclic AMP.

Cellular expression of adenosine A2A receptor messenger RNA in the rat central nervous system with special reference to dopamine innervated areas

The cellular distribution of adenosine A2A receptor messenger RNA in the central nervous system was investigated using in situ hybridization with ribonucleotide probes. A specific expression was found in the dorsal (i.e. caudate putamen) and ventral (i.e. nucleus accumbens and olfactory tubercle) striatum, the lateral septum and in some cerebellar Purkinje cells. Simultaneous detection of radioactive and non-radioactive probes showed that the majority of adenosine A2A receptor messenger RNA-containing neurons in the dorsal and ventral striatum co-expressed dopamine D2 receptor messenger RNA and preproenkephalin A messenger RNA. However, a minor sub-population of neurons expressing adenosine A2A receptor messenger RNA, but not preproenkephalin A messenger RNA, was found in clusters along the ventral border of the nucleus accumbens. Only a small number of striatal neurons expressing dopamine D1 receptor or substance P messenger RNAs also expressed adenosine A2A receptor messenger RNA. Finally, in the ventral part of nucleus accumbens and in the olfactory tubercle a major sub-population of neurons expressed preproenkephalin A messenger RNA, but not adenosine A2A receptor messenger RNA. Cholinergic interneurons did not express adenosine A2A receptor messenger RNA. Thus, the extensive co-localization of adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors previously described in the dorsal striatum extends into its ventral part. There is also a high degree of co-expression of adenosine A2A receptor messenger RNA and preproenkephalin A messenger RNA in the ventral striatum, but within this region several topologically defined sub-populations of neurons express only one of these transcripts. A majority of the adenosine A2A receptor messenger RNA-containing neurons in the lateral septum did contain preproenkephalin A messenger RNA, whereas only a few co-expressed dopamine D2 receptor messenger RNA. This detailed investigation demonstrates that most of the subcortical areas innervated by dopamine have an abundant, although restricted expression of the adenosine A2A receptor gene and that this receptor is expressed in very few cells outside these areas. These results predict that adenosine A2A receptors are involved not only in motor behaviour, but also in goal-oriented behaviours.

Adenosine A2A receptor facilitation of hippocampal synaptic transmission is dependent on tonic A1 receptor inhibition

Abstract Adenosine tonically inhibits synaptic transmission through actions at A 1 receptors. It also facilitates synaptic transmission, but it is unclear if this facilitation results from pre- and/or postsynaptic A 2A receptor activation or from indirect control of inhibitory GABAergic transmission. The A 2A receptor agonist, CGS 21680 (10 nM), facilitated synaptic transmission in the CA1 area of rat hippocampal slices (by 14%), independent of whether or not GABAergic transmission was blocked by the GABA A and GABA B receptor antagonists, picrotoxin (50 μM) and CGP 55845 (1 μM), respectively. CGS 21680 (10 nM) also inhibited paired-pulse facilitation by 12%, an effect prevented by the A 2A receptor antagonist, ZM 241385 (20 nM). These effects of CGS 21680 (10 nM) were occluded by adenosine deaminase (2 U/ml) and were made to reappear upon direct activation of A 1 receptors with N 6 -cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, 6 nM). CGS 21680 (10 nM) only facilitated (by 17%) the K + -evoked release of glutamate from superfused hippocampal synaptosomes in the presence of 100 nM CPA. This effect of CGS 21680 (10 nM), in contrast to the isoproterenol (30 μM) facilitation of glutamate release, was prevented by the protein kinase C inhibitors, chelerythrine (6 μM) and bisindolylmaleimide (1 μM), but not by the protein kinase A inhibitor, H-89 (1 μM). Isoproterenol (30 μM), but not CGS 21680 (10–300 nM), enhanced synaptosomal cAMP levels, indicating that the CGS 21680-induced facilitation of glutamate release involves a cAMP-independent protein kinase C activation. To discard any direct effect of CGS 21680 on adenosine A 1 receptor, we also show that in autoradiography experiments CGS 21680 only displaced the adenosine A 1 receptor antagonist, 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentyladenosine ([ 3 H]DPCPX, 0.5 nM) with an EC 50 of 1 μM in all brain areas studied and CGS 21680 (30 nM) failed to change the ability of CPA to displace DPCPX (1 nM) binding to CHO cells stably transfected with A 1 receptors. Our results suggest that A 2A receptor agonists facilitate hippocampal synaptic transmission by attenuating the tonic effect of inhibitory presynaptic A 1 receptors located in glutamatergic nerve terminals. This might be a fine-tuning role for adenosine A 2A receptors to allow frequency-dependent plasticity phenomena without compromising the A 1 receptor-mediated neuroprotective role of adenosine.

Human neuropeptide Y signal peptide gain-of-function polymorphism is associated with increased body mass index: Possible mode of function

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) has been implicated in the control of food intake and energy balance based on many observations in animals. We have studied single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the regulatory and coding sequences of the human NPY gene. One variant (1128 T>C), which causes an amino acid change from leucine to proline at codon 7 in the signal peptide of NPY, was associated with increased body mass index (BMI) in two separate Swedish populations of normal and overweight individuals. In vitro transcription and translation studies indicated the unlikelihood that this signal peptide variation affects the site of cleavage and targeting or uptake of NPY into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). However, the mutant, and to a lesser extent the wild-type, signal peptide by themselves markedly potentiated NPY-induced food intake, as well as hypothalamic NPY receptor signaling. Our findings in humans strongly indicate that the NPY signaling system is implicated in body weight regulation and suggest a new and unexpected functional role of a signal peptide.

Signaling via A2A adenosine receptor in four PC12 cell clones

PC12 cells are genetically labile and so-called wild-type cells comprise multiple subclones. We have examined the A2A adenosine receptor signal transduction pathways in four such clones (denoted clones 1, 19, 21 and 27) of PC12 cells. Adenosine A2A, A2B and A1 receptor mRNAs were detected in all four clones by RT-PCR, whereas no A3 receptor mRNA was found. A2A receptors were quantitated by radioligand binding using the antagonist radioligand [3H]SCH 58261 ([3H]-5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4 triazolo [1,5-c] pyrimidine). The Bmax was highest in clone 1 followed by clones 21, 19 and 27. Whereas the amount of Gi protein appeared similar in all four clones, the amount of Gs protein was higher in clones 21 and 27 than in the other two clones. Maximal responses to the non-selective adenosine analogue NECA (5’-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine) were similar to those observed with the selective adenosine A2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 (2-[p-(2-carbonylethyl) phenylethylamino]-5’-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine), and were approximately equal in clones 1 and 21, but lower in clone 19 and very low in clone 27. For both compounds EC50 was significantly higher in clone 27 than in clone 1. In both clones the response to NECA could be competitively antagonized by a selective adenosine A2A antagonist, SCH 58261. The present results show that different clones of PC12 cells differ widely in the cAMP increase induced by adenosine analogues and that this is due to differences in the amount of adenosine A2A receptor, G protein and effector. A large difference in receptor number resulted in differences in potency of an agonist.

Characterization of human A2A adenosine receptors with the antagonist radioligand [3H]-SCH 58261

We have characterized the binding of the new potent and selective antagonist radioligand [3H]‐5‐amino‐7‐(2‐phenylethyl)‐2‐(2‐furyl)‐pyrazolo[4,3‐e]‐1,2,4‐triazolo[1,5‐c]pyrimidine, [3H]‐SCH 58261, to human cloned A2A adenosine receptors. In Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with the human cloned A2A receptor, [3H]‐SCH 58261 specific binding (about 70%) was rapid, saturable, reversible and proportional to protein concentration. The kinetic KD value was 0.75 nM. Saturation experiments showed that [3H]‐SCH 58261 labelled a single class of recognition sites with high affinity (KD=2.3 nM) and limited capacity (apparent Bmax=526 fmol mg−1 protein). Competition experiments revealed that binding of 0.5 nM [3H]‐SCH 58261 was displaced by adenosine receptor agonists with the following order of potency: 2‐hexynyl‐5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamido‐adenosine (2HE‐NECA)>5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA)=2‐phenylaminoadenosine (CV 1808)>2‐[4‐(2‐carboxyethyl)‐phenethylamino]‐5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680)>R‐N6‐phenylisopropyladenosine (R‐PIA)N6‐cyclohexyladenosine (CHA)>S‐N6‐phenylisopropyladenosine (S‐PIA). Adenosine receptor antagonists inhibited [3H]‐SCH 58261 binding with the following order: 5‐amino‐9‐chloro‐2‐(2‐furyl)‐[1,2,4]‐triazolo[1,5‐c] quinazoline (CGS 15943)>SCH 58261>xanthine amine congener (XAC)>(E,18%‐Z,82%)7‐methyl‐8‐(3,4‐dimethoxystyryl)‐1,3‐dipropylxanthine (KF 17837S)> 8‐cyclopentyl‐1,3‐dipropylxanthine (DPCPX)>theophylline. Affinity values and rank order of potency of both receptor agonists and antagonists were similar to those previously obtained in human platelet and rat striatal membranes, except for CV 1808 which was more potent than CGS 21680. SCH 58261 was a competitive antagonist at inhibiting NECA‐induced adenosine 3′ : 5′‐cyclic monophosphate (cyclic AMP) accumulation in CHO cells transfected with human A2A receptors. Good agreement was found between binding and functional data. Thus, the new antagonist radioligand is preferable to the receptor agonist radioligand [3H]‐CGS 21680 hitherto used to examine the pharmacology of human cloned A2A adenosine receptors.

Differences in the order of potency for agonists but not antagonists at human and rat adenosine A2A receptors

To examine possible species differences in pharmacology, rat adenosine A2A receptors were studied in PC12 (pheochromocytoma) cells, and human receptors in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with the cloned human A2A receptor cDNA. Using [3H]-5-amino-7(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo [1,5-c]pyrimidine ([3H]-SCH 58261) as radioligand, the estimated Bmax (maximal binding) was 538 and 2085 fmol/mg in CHO and PC12 cells, respectively. The Kd (dissociation constant) values for [3H]-SCH 58261 were 1.05 and 5.6 nM in the two cell types, respectively. The order of potency of antagonists and most agonists was the same in both cell types, but 2-phenylaminoadenosine and 2-chloroadenosine were relatively less potent in PC12 cells than in CHO cells. In the functional assay, using cyclic AMP accumulation, all agonists tested were more potent in CHO than in PC12 cells, but this could not be readily explained by differences in adenylyl cyclase or in the expression of G proteins. As in the case of binding, the relative agonist potencies were similar for most compounds, but 2-phenylaminoadenosine and 2-chloroadenosine were more potent at human A2A receptors in CHO cells than predicted from the data obtained on rat A2A receptors in PC12 cells. Antagonists were approximately equipotent in the two cells. These results show that, despite only small differences in amino acid sequences and no difference in antagonist pharmacology, the relative order of potency of receptor agonists can differ between species homologues of the adenosine A2A receptor.

A 68930 and dihydrexidine inhibit locomotor activity and d-amphetamine-induced hyperactivity in rats: a role of inhibitory dopamine d1/5 receptors in the prefrontal cortex?

The behavioral and biochemical effects of the full dopamine D(1/5) receptor agonists, dihydrexidine and (1R,3S)-1-aminomethyl-5,6-dihydroxy-3-phenylisochroman HCl (A 68930), were examined in rats. Both A 68930 (0-4.6 mg kg(-1), s.c.) and dihydrexidine (0-8.0 mg kg(-1), s.c.) caused a dose-dependent suppression of locomotor activity, as assessed in an open-field. This locomotor suppression was dose-dependently antagonized by the selective dopamine D(1/5) receptor antagonist R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine HCl (SCH 23390; 0-5.0 microg kg(-1), s.c.), but not by the selective dopamine D(2/3) receptor antagonist raclopride (0-25.0 microg kg(-1), s.c.). Furthermore, A 68930 and dihydrexidine did not cause any locomotor activity in habituated rats that displayed a very low base-line activity. Neither did A 68930 nor dihydrexidine produce any excessive stereotypies that could possibly interfere with and mask ambulatory activity. In fact, both A 68930 and dihydrexidine potently blocked hyperactivity produced by d-amphetamine (0-4.0 mg kg(-1), s.c.). Such findings traditionally would be interpreted as a sign of potential antipsychotic properties of A 68930 and dihydrexidine. Examination of neuronal activation, as indexed by the immediate early gene c-fos, showed that A 68930 and dihydrexidine caused a highly significant expression of c-fos in the medial prefrontal cortex. This c-fos expression was sensitive to treatment with SCH 23390, but not with raclopride. The effects of A 68930 and dihydrexidine on c-fos expression in caudate putamen or nucleus accumbens were less marked, or undetectable. The results indicate that stimulation of dopamine D(1/5) receptors, possibly in the medial prefrontal cortex, is associated with inhibitory actions on locomotor activity and d-amphetamine-induced hyperactivity. Assuming an important role of prefrontal dopamine D(1/5) receptors in schizophrenia, such inhibitory actions of dopamine D(1/5) receptor stimulation on psychomotor activation may have interesting clinical implications in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Adenosine (P1) receptor signalling

The coupling of the four defined types of adenosine receptors to G proteins and the consequent activation of effector pathways is briefly summarized. It is pointed out that the G proteins are able to influence many types of cellular effector systems, and, in particular, that the α and the β,γ‐subunits may activate different signalling pathways that may either act synergistically or antagonistically in the cell. Because adenosine physiologically plays the role of a modulator, particular emphasis is placed on the interactions with parallel signalling pathways. Drug Dev. Res. 39:262–268, 1996.