Bjørnar Lund

Full Scale Flow Loop Experiments of Hole Cleaning Performances of Drilling Fluids

One important requirement for a drilling fluid is the ability to transport the cuttings out of the borehole. Improved hole cleaning is a key to solve several challenges in the drilling industry and will allow both longer wells and improved quality of well construction. It has been observed, however, that drilling fluids with similar properties according to the API standard can have significantly different behavior with respect to hole cleaning performance. The reasons for this are not fully understood.This paper presents results from flow loop laboratory tests without and with injected cuttings size particles using a base oil and a commercial oil based drilling fluid. The results demonstrate the importance of the rheological properties of the fluids for the hole cleaning performance. A thorough investigation of the viscoelastic properties of the fluids was performed with a Fann viscometer and a Paar-Physica rheometer, and was used to interpret the results from the flow loop experiments.Improved understanding of the fluid properties relevant to hole cleaning performance will help develop better models of wellbore hydraulics used in planning of well operations. Eventually this may lead to higher ROP with water based drilling fluids as obtained with oil based drilling fluids. This may ease cuttings handling in many operations and thereby significantly reduce the drilling cost using (normally) more environmentally friendly fluids.The experiments have been conducted as part of an industry-sponsored research project where understanding the hole cleaning performance of various oil and water based drilling fluids is the aim. The experiments have been performed under realistic conditions. The flow loop includes a 10 meter long test section with 2″ OD freely rotating drillstring inside a 4″ ID wellbore made of concrete. Sand particles were injected while circulating the drilling fluid through the test section in horizontal position.Copyright

Development of a Steady-State Point Model for Prediction of Gas/Oil and Water/Oil Pipe Flow

We report the development and testing of steady-state point models for two-phase gas–liquid and oil–water flow in pipes. A new point model for gas–viscous oil compared well with flow loop data using dense gas (SF6) and viscous oil. However, the flow regime prediction and the modeling of the transition from laminar to turbulent flow regime were found to be in need of further improvement. Data from stratified viscous oil–water experiments were analyzed using the point model for liquid–liquid flow. Traversing gamma densitometry was used to characterize the oil-in-water emulsion layer. Analysis of the measurements confirms the assumption of a flat interface between oil-continuous and water-continuous layers. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Rheological Properties of Oil Based Drilling Fluids and Base Oils

Drilling fluids for oil wells must meet a number of requirements, including maintaining formation integrity, lubricating the drill string, and transporting cuttings to the surface. In order to satisfy these needs, drilling fluids have become increasingly complex and expensive. To ensure safe and efficient drilling, it is vital for the drilling operator to be able to make a qualified choice of fluid appropriate for each individual well.API/ISO standards specify a set of tests for characterization of drilling fluids. However, fluids that are tested to have equal properties according to these standards are still observed to perform significantly different when used in the field. The aim of the full project is to provide a thorough comparison of drilling fluids in particular with respect to hole cleaning performance, in light of the issues presented above. As part of this investigation we here present results for two oil based drilling fluids, as well as for the corresponding base oil. The drilling fluids differ in composition by varying fraction of base oil, and thus density and water content.The fluids have been tested according to the API standard, and further, viscoelastic properties have been examined using an Anton Paar rheometer. The rheological test campaign includes determination of the linear viscoelastic range (LVER), viscosity and yield point, thixotropic time test, and temperature dependence of rheological parameters.Further, it is demonstrated how the rheological data may be used to interpret data from ongoing full scale flow loop experiments with the same fluids. In a more general context, the rheological test campaign of the drilling fluids is expected to make a crucial contribution for the petroleum industry in explaining observed differences in hole cleaning properties beyond what todays API/ISO industry standard provides.Copyright

Experimental Study of Cuttings Transport Efficiency of Water Based Drilling Fluids

One important requirement for a drilling fluid is the ability to transport the cuttings out of the borehole. Improved hole cleaning is a key to solve several challenges in the drilling industry and will allow both longer wells and improved quality of well construction. It has been observed, however, that drilling fluids with similar properties according to the API standard can have significantly different behavior with respect to hole cleaning performance. The reasons for this are not fully understood.This paper presents results from laboratory tests where water based drilling fluids with similar rheological properties according to API measurements have been tested for their hole cleaning capabilities in a full scale flow loop. Thorough investigation of the viscoelastic properties of the fluids were performed with, among other instruments, a Paar-Physica rheometer.Improved understanding of the fluid properties relevant to hole cleaning performance will help develop better models of wellbore hydraulics used in planning of well operations. Eventually this may lead to higher ROP with water based drilling fluids as obtained with oil based drilling fluids. This may ease cuttings handling in many operations and thereby significantly reduce the drilling cost using (normally) more environmentally friendly fluids.The experiments have been conducted as part of an industry-sponsored research project where understanding the hole cleaning performance of various oil and water based drilling fluids is the aim. The experiments have been performed under realistic conditions. The flow loop includes a 12 meter long test section with 2″ OD freely rotating drillstring inside a 4″ ID wellbore made of concrete. Sand particles were injected while circulating the drilling fluid through the test section in horizontal position.Copyright

Experimental Study of Hydraulics and Cuttings Transport in Circular and Non-Circular Wellbores

Cuttings transport is one of the most important aspects to control during drilling operations, but the effect of wellbore geometry on hole cleaning is not fully understood. This paper presents results from experimental laboratory tests where hydraulics and hole cleaning have been investigated for two different wellbore geometries; circular and a non-circular, where spiral grooves have been deliberately added to the wellbore wall in order to improve cuttings transport. Improving hole cleaning will improve drilling efficiency in general, and will in particular enable longer reach for ERD wells.The experiments have been conducted as part of a research project where friction and hydraulics in non-circular wellbores for more efficient drilling and well construction is the aim. The experiments have been performed under realistic conditions. The flow loop includes a 12 meter long test section with 2″ diameter freely rotating drillstring inside a 4″ diameter wellbore made of concrete. Sand particles were injected while circulating the drilling fluid through the test section in horizontal and 30° inclined positions. The test results show that borehole hydraulics and cuttings transport can be significantly improved in a non-circular wellbore relative to a circular wellbore.Investigating the cutting transport in non-circular wellbores with available models is even more complex than for circular wellbores. Most drilling models assume circular wellbores, but in reality the situation is often different. Also, it may be possible to create non-circular wellbores on purpose, as in the present study. Such a comparative, experimental study of hole cleaning in different wellbore geometries has to our knowledge previously never been performed, and the results were obtained in a custom-made and unique experimental flow loop. The results and the experimental approach could therefore be of value for any one working with drilling.Copyright

Friction and wear characteristics of steel on rock under water and oil based lubricated sliding conditions

Abstract In recent years, drilling extended reach wells have become more and more common in the petroleum industry to optimise the oil and gas production. Extended reach wells are defined as wells that have two times more horizontal step out than true vertical depth. High friction (frictional torque) and drag are two of the mechanical limiting factors while drilling longer horizontal wellbores. There are numerous methods and tools developed to lower the drillstring friction. Drilling non-circular wellbores is a new concept with potential to minimise the mechanical friction by reducing drillstring and sidewalls contact area. However, this will cause an increase of contact pressure owing to the reduced contact area between drillstring and the formation. This article presents results obtained from an experimental study pertaining to the friction behaviour using a pin on disc set-up with steel pin and granite disc in the presence of water and oil based lubricants. These tests have been designed to represent frictional contact conditions between a rotating steel drillstring and the wellbore wall at different contact pressures. Test results show that the friction coefficient decreases with an increase of contact pressure in wet condition for both water and oil based lubricants. It is also observed that the friction factor increased by adding sand and phyllite particles to the water based lubricant. Considering the wear scars, the friction coefficient shows reduction with increased contact pressure in all tests with and without particles for both water and oil based lubricants.

The Effect of Different Drilling Fluids on Borehole Mechanical Friction

Mechanical friction is one of the most important aspects in highly inclined wellbores such as extended reach drilling (ERD) and through tubing extended reach drilling (TTERD). Friction caused by the contact between the drill string and the well casing or borehole is dependent to the drilling weight and fluid properties. Drilling fluids play an important role on mechanical friction and using oil based drilling fluids with higher lubricity can reduce torque and drag and minimize stick and slip concerns. Reducing mechanical friction will improve drilling efficiency in general, and will in particular enable longer reach for ERD wells.This paper presents results from experimental laboratory tests where mechanical friction has been investigated in non-circular wellbore geometry. The experiments have been conducted as part of a research project in the tribology lab in Technical University of Lulea. The project was sponsored by the Research Council of Norway and four oil companies.Friction behavior has been investigated for two different drilling fluids; water based and oil based drilling fluids both with and without solid particles. A pin on disc setup was used for these experiments where a spherical steel pin was sliding on a rotational disc made of granite. Friction force has been measured in constant sliding speed and in presence of particles in wet condition. The test results show that mechanical friction is smaller with oil based than water based drilling fluids in the presence of solid particles. In addition, the friction coefficient depends to the particle types and is higher when solid particles were added to the lubricants.Such experiments in a tribology laboratory are important to identify the effect of drilling fluid on mechanical friction from a basic point of view isolated from the other wellbore parameters. Test results and the experimental approach could therefore be of value for any one working with drilling and well construction.Copyright