Bobby C. Jacob

Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Males With Erectile Dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as the inability to achieve or maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance. Endogenous testosterone is critical for normal libido; however, studies have also demonstrated a potentially important role with respect to the erectile process. The prevalence of testosterone deficiency ranges from 1.7% to 35% in patients with ED, and age is a common factor linking ED and testosterone deficiency. By 2025, global estimates are that there will be 356 million men >65 years. Age-associated testosterone deficiency is characterized by symptoms such as ED, and low serum testosterone. Randomized, placebo controlled studies have established the utility of testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) for the restoration of serum testosterone levels to the normal range in hypogonadal males; however, well designed studies are limited with respect to specific evaluation of the role of TRT as monotherapy in improving erectile function. In addition, recent literature suggests a possible role for TRT in combination with phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors for men with ED. The following review describes the potential roles of testosterone in erectile physiology, examines the relationship between testosterone deficiency and ED, and reviews published literature evaluating the use of TRT in hypogonadal males with a diagnosis of ED.

Postoperative Pain Management With Liposomal Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Knee and Hip Arthroplasty at a Community Hospital

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the association between liposomal bupivacaine use in patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty and concurrent pain control, length of hospitalization, and physical therapy milestones. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review. Patients receiving liposomal bupivacaine during a 1-year period (study group) were compared with patients seen by the same surgeon in the previous year who did not receive liposomal bupivacaine (control group). Clinical outcomes included concurrent opioid use, average pain scores, length of stay, ambulation, and range of motion. Results: A total of 357 patients were included in the study. Knee study group patients received lower amounts of opioid (209 vs 248 mg; P = .02) and had a delayed time to first rescue medication (6.3 ± 4.7 vs 5.0 ± 4.4 hours; P = .02). Hip study group patients had a delay in time to first rescue medication (7.1 ± 6.3 vs 4.9 ± 4.0 hours; P = .046). Both knee and hip study group patients had higher average pain score during the 72-hour postoperative period (6.38 vs 6.06; P = .01, and 6.32 vs 5.80; P = .02, respectively) but decreased median length of stay (2.0 vs 3.0 days; P < .0001, and 2.0 vs 3.0 days; P = .04, respectively). Conclusions: Use of liposomal bupivacaine produced a modest decrease in opioid use among knee patients and a decreased length of stay in both knee and hip patients; however, this was accompanied by a non-clinically significant increase in pain scores for knee and hip patients suggesting limited utility for orthopedic procedures.

Hypoglycemia Associated With Insulin Use During Treatment of Hyperkalemia Among Emergency Department Patients

Purpose: Hypoglycemia is a common adverse event associated with insulin during treatment of hyperkalemia in hospitalized patients; however, limited data exist regarding hypoglycemia incidence and appropriate dosing strategies for treatment of patients in the emergency department. The study objective was to determine the incidence of hypoglycemia associated with insulin use during treatment of hyperkalemia among patients seen in the emergency department. Methods: This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB)–approved retrospective, chart-review study. All adult patients who received intravenous regular insulin as a result of an order from the emergency department hyperkalemia order set were eligible for inclusion. The main clinical outcomes were incidence of hypoglycemia (blood glucose <70 mg/dL) and severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose <40 mg/dL). Blood glucose was checked within 24 hours of insulin administration. Results: A total of 172 patients were included. The incidence of hypoglycemia was 19.8% (n = 34) and the incidence of severe hypoglycemia was 5.2% (n = 9). Hypoglycemic patients had a significantly lower median blood glucose at baseline compared to those who did not develop hypoglycemia (83.5 [72.0-112.0] mg/dL vs 123.0 [96.0-167.0] mg/dL, P < .0001); however, no difference was noted between groups in the average insulin dose administered (0.11 ± 0.04 units/kg vs 0.12 ± 0.05 units/kg, P = .6175). Conclusion: There is a concerning risk of hypoglycemia associated with insulin use during treatment of hyperkalemia in the emergency department. Standard insulin doses may not be appropriate in some cases like patients with lower baseline blood glucose. Further research is warranted to develop safer hyperkalemia treatment protocols that mitigate this high risk of hypoglycemia associated with insulin use.

Time–Motion Analysis of Nurses Utilizing Insulin Pen Devices Compared to Vial and Syringe in an Inpatient Setting:

Objective: To compare the time taken and steps completed by nurses in the process of insulin preparation and administration using the pen device compared to the vial and syringe method. Methods: Observational and exploratory study utilizing a time–motion analysis of nurses’ administration of insulin using the pen versus vial and syringe delivery methods. Nurses were observed, video-recorded, and timed during insulin preparation and administration using each delivery method. The steps performed by nurses were observed against recommended processes for preparing and administering insulin, and the percentage of nurses completing each step was noted. Results: A total of 137 (94%) nurses participated. Nurses took less time preparing and administering insulin with the pen device compared with the vial and syringe method (79 ± 18 seconds vs 88 ± 20 seconds, respectively, P < .001). The overall average completion rate of steps with the pen device was 90% ± 7% compared to 88% ± 7% with the vial and syringe method. Conclusion: The time taken by nurses to prepare and administer insulin was lower with the pen device compared with vial and syringe. Furthermore, areas were identified for potential nursing education to enhance safe and appropriate use of insulin with both delivery methods.