Brad Boyle
University of Arizona
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Brad Boyle.
Science | 2011
Nathan J. B. Kraft; Liza S. Comita; Jonathan M. Chase; Nathan J. Sanders; Nathan G. Swenson; Thomas O. Crist; James C. Stegen; Mark Vellend; Brad Boyle; Marti J. Anderson; Howard V. Cornell; Kendi F. Davies; Amy L. Freestone; Brian D. Inouye; Susan Harrison; Jonathan Myers
Increases in species turnover of woody plants at low latitudes and elevations are explained by the size of species pools alone. Understanding spatial variation in biodiversity along environmental gradients is a central theme in ecology. Differences in species compositional turnover among sites (β diversity) occurring along gradients are often used to infer variation in the processes structuring communities. Here, we show that sampling alone predicts changes in β diversity caused simply by changes in the sizes of species pools. For example, forest inventories sampled along latitudinal and elevational gradients show the well-documented pattern that β diversity is higher in the tropics and at low elevations. However, after correcting for variation in pooled species richness (γ diversity), these differences in β diversity disappear. Therefore, there is no need to invoke differences in the mechanisms of community assembly in temperate versus tropical systems to explain these global-scale patterns of β diversity.
Frontiers in Plant Science | 2011
Stephen A. Goff; Matthew W. Vaughn; Sheldon J. McKay; Eric Lyons; Ann E. Stapleton; Damian Gessler; Naim Matasci; Liya Wang; Matthew R. Hanlon; Andrew Lenards; Andy Muir; Nirav Merchant; Sonya Lowry; Stephen A. Mock; Matthew Helmke; Adam Kubach; Martha L. Narro; Nicole Hopkins; David Micklos; Uwe Hilgert; Michael Gonzales; Chris Jordan; Edwin Skidmore; Rion Dooley; John Cazes; Robert T. McLay; Zhenyuan Lu; Shiran Pasternak; Lars Koesterke; William H. Piel
The iPlant Collaborative (iPlant) is a United States National Science Foundation (NSF) funded project that aims to create an innovative, comprehensive, and foundational cyberinfrastructure in support of plant biology research (PSCIC, 2006). iPlant is developing cyberinfrastructure that uniquely enables scientists throughout the diverse fields that comprise plant biology to address Grand Challenges in new ways, to stimulate and facilitate cross-disciplinary research, to promote biology and computer science research interactions, and to train the next generation of scientists on the use of cyberinfrastructure in research and education. Meeting humanitys projected demands for agricultural and forest products and the expectation that natural ecosystems be managed sustainably will require synergies from the application of information technologies. The iPlant cyberinfrastructure design is based on an unprecedented period of research community input, and leverages developments in high-performance computing, data storage, and cyberinfrastructure for the physical sciences. iPlant is an open-source project with application programming interfaces that allow the community to extend the infrastructure to meet its needs. iPlant is sponsoring community-driven workshops addressing specific scientific questions via analysis tool integration and hypothesis testing. These workshops teach researchers how to add bioinformatics tools and/or datasets into the iPlant cyberinfrastructure enabling plant scientists to perform complex analyses on large datasets without the need to master the command-line or high-performance computational services.
BMC Bioinformatics | 2013
Brad Boyle; Nicole Hopkins; Zhenyuan Lu; Juan Antonio Raygoza Garay; Dmitry Mozzherin; Tony Rees; Naim Matasci; Martha L. Narro; William H. Piel; Sheldon J. McKay; Sonya Lowry; Chris Freeland; Robert K. Peet; Brian J. Enquist
BackgroundThe digitization of biodiversity data is leading to the widespread application of taxon names that are superfluous, ambiguous or incorrect, resulting in mismatched records and inflated species numbers. The ultimate consequences of misspelled names and bad taxonomy are erroneous scientific conclusions and faulty policy decisions. The lack of tools for correcting this ‘names problem’ has become a fundamental obstacle to integrating disparate data sources and advancing the progress of biodiversity science.ResultsThe TNRS, or Taxonomic Name Resolution Service, is an online application for automated and user-supervised standardization of plant scientific names. The TNRS builds upon and extends existing open-source applications for name parsing and fuzzy matching. Names are standardized against multiple reference taxonomies, including the Missouri Botanical Gardens Tropicos database. Capable of processing thousands of names in a single operation, the TNRS parses and corrects misspelled names and authorities, standardizes variant spellings, and converts nomenclatural synonyms to accepted names. Family names can be included to increase match accuracy and resolve many types of homonyms. Partial matching of higher taxa combined with extraction of annotations, accession numbers and morphospecies allows the TNRS to standardize taxonomy across a broad range of active and legacy datasets.ConclusionsWe show how the TNRS can resolve many forms of taxonomic semantic heterogeneity, correct spelling errors and eliminate spurious names. As a result, the TNRS can aid the integration of disparate biological datasets. Although the TNRS was developed to aid in standardizing plant names, its underlying algorithms and design can be extended to all organisms and nomenclatural codes. The TNRS is accessible via a web interface at http://tnrs.iplantcollaborative.org/ and as a RESTful web service and application programming interface. Source code is available at https://github.com/iPlantCollaborativeOpenSource/TNRS/.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014
Christine Lamanna; Benjamin Blonder; Cyrille Violle; Nathan J. B. Kraft; Brody Sandel; Irena Šímová; John C. Donoghue; Jens-Christian Svenning; Brian J. McGill; Brad Boyle; Vanessa Buzzard; Steven Dolins; Peter M. Jørgensen; Aaron Marcuse-Kubitza; Naia Morueta-Holme; Robert K. Peet; William H. Piel; James Regetz; Mark Schildhauer; Nick Spencer; Barbara M. Thiers; Susan K. Wiser; Brian J. Enquist
Significance We present a conceptual framework for testing theories for the latitudinal gradient of species richness in terms of variation in functional diversity at the alpha, beta, and gamma scales. We compared ecological community theory with large-scale observational data of tree species richness and functional diversity. We found that the patterns of functional trait diversity are not consistent with any one theory of species diversity. These conflicting results indicate that none of the broad classes of biodiversity theory considered here is alone able to explain the latitudinal gradient of species diversity in terms of functional trait space. The processes causing the latitudinal gradient in species richness remain elusive. Ecological theories for the origin of biodiversity gradients, such as competitive exclusion, neutral dynamics, and environmental filtering, make predictions for how functional diversity should vary at the alpha (within local assemblages), beta (among assemblages), and gamma (regional pool) scales. We test these predictions by quantifying hypervolumes constructed from functional traits representing major axes of plant strategy variation (specific leaf area, plant height, and seed mass) in tree assemblages spanning the temperate and tropical New World. Alpha-scale trait volume decreases with absolute latitude and is often lower than sampling expectation, consistent with environmental filtering theory. Beta-scale overlap decays with geographic distance fastest in the temperate zone, again consistent with environmental filtering theory. In contrast, gamma-scale trait space shows a hump-shaped relationship with absolute latitude, consistent with no theory. Furthermore, the overall temperate trait hypervolume was larger than the overall tropical hypervolume, indicating that the temperate zone permits a wider range of trait combinations or that niche packing is stronger in the tropical zone. Although there are limitations in the data, our analyses suggest that multiple processes have shaped trait diversity in trees, reflecting no consistent support for any one theory.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2015
J. W. Ferry Slik; Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez; Shin-ichiro Aiba; Patricia Alvarez-Loayza; Luciana F. Alves; Peter S. Ashton; Patricia Balvanera; Meredith L. Bastian; Peter J. Bellingham; Eduardo van den Berg; Luís Carlos Bernacci; Polyanna da Conceição Bispo; Lilian Blanc; Katrin Böhning-Gaese; Pascal Boeckx; Frans Bongers; Brad Boyle; M. Bradford; Francis Q. Brearley; Mireille Breuer-Ndoundou; Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin; Darley Calderado; Leal Matos; Miguel Castillo-Santiago; Eduardo Luís Martins Catharino; Shauna-Lee Chai; Yukai Chen; Eizi Suzuki; Natália Targhetta; Duncan W. Thomas
Significance People are fascinated by the amazing diversity of tropical forests and will be surprised to learn that robust estimates of the number of tropical tree species are lacking. We show that there are at least 40,000, but possibly more than 53,000, tree species in the tropics, in contrast to only 124 across temperate Europe. Almost all tropical tree species are restricted to their respective continents, and the Indo-Pacific region appears to be as species-rich as tropical America, with each of these two regions being almost five times as rich in tree species as African tropical forests. Our study shows that most tree species are extremely rare, meaning that they may be under serious risk of extinction at current deforestation rates. The high species richness of tropical forests has long been recognized, yet there remains substantial uncertainty regarding the actual number of tropical tree species. Using a pantropical tree inventory database from closed canopy forests, consisting of 657,630 trees belonging to 11,371 species, we use a fitted value of Fisher’s alpha and an approximate pantropical stem total to estimate the minimum number of tropical forest tree species to fall between ∼40,000 and ∼53,000, i.e., at the high end of previous estimates. Contrary to common assumption, the Indo-Pacific region was found to be as species-rich as the Neotropics, with both regions having a minimum of ∼19,000–25,000 tree species. Continental Africa is relatively depauperate with a minimum of ∼4,500–6,000 tree species. Very few species are shared among the African, American, and the Indo-Pacific regions. We provide a methodological framework for estimating species richness in trees that may help refine species richness estimates of tree-dependent taxa.
Ecology Letters | 2013
Naia Morueta-Holme; Brian J. Enquist; Brian J. McGill; Brad Boyle; Peter M. Jørgensen; Jeffrey E. Ott; Robert K. Peet; Irena Šímová; Lindsey L. Sloat; Barbara M. Thiers; Cyrille Violle; Susan K. Wiser; Steven Dolins; John C. Donoghue; Nathan J. B. Kraft; Jim Regetz; Mark Schildhauer; Nick Spencer; Jens-Christian Svenning
Despite being a fundamental aspect of biodiversity, little is known about what controls species range sizes. This is especially the case for hyperdiverse organisms such as plants. We use the largest botanical data set assembled to date to quantify geographical variation in range size for ∼ 85 000 plant species across the New World. We assess prominent hypothesised range-size controls, finding that plant range sizes are codetermined by habitat area and long- and short-term climate stability. Strong short- and long-term climate instability in large parts of North America, including past glaciations, are associated with broad-ranged species. In contrast, small habitat areas and a stable climate characterise areas with high concentrations of small-ranged species in the Andes, Central America and the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest region. The joint roles of area and climate stability strengthen concerns over the potential effects of future climate change and habitat loss on biodiversity.
Ecography | 2015
Irena Šímová; Cyrille Violle; Nathan J. B. Kraft; David Storch; Jens-Christian Svenning; Brad Boyle; John C. Donoghue; Peter M. Jørgensen; Brian J. McGill; Naia Morueta-Holme; William H. Piel; Robert K. Peet; Jim Regetz; Mark Schildhauer; Nick Spencer; Barbara M. Thiers; Susan K. Wiser; Brian J. Enquist
One of the key hypothesized drivers of gradients in species richness is environmental filtering, where environmental stress limits which species from a larger species pool gain membership in a local community owing to their traits. Whereas most studies focus on small-scale variation in functional traits along environmental gradient, the effect of large-scale environmental filtering is less well understood. Furthermore, it has been rarely tested whether the factors that constrain the niche space limit the total number of coexisting species. We assessed the role of environmental filtering in shaping tree assemblages across North America north of Mexico by testing the hypothesis that colder, drier, or seasonal environments (stressful conditions for most plants) constrain tree trait diversity and thereby limit species richness. We assessed geographic patterns in trait filtering and their relationships to species richness pattern using a comprehensive set of tree range maps. We focused on four key plant functional traits reflecting major life history axes (maximum height, specific leaf area, seed mass, and wood density) and four climatic variables (annual mean and seasonality of temperature and precipitation). We tested for significant spatial shifts in trait means and variances using a null model approach. While we found significant shifts in mean species’ trait values at most grid cells, trait variances at most grid cells did not deviate from the null expectation. Measures of environmental harshness (cold, dry, seasonal climates) and lower species richness were weakly associated with a reduction in variance of seed mass and specific leaf area. The pattern in variance of height and wood density was, however, opposite. These findings do not support the hypothesis that more stressful conditions universally limit species and trait diversity in North America. Environmental filtering does, however, structure assemblage composition, by selecting for certain optimum trait values under a given set of conditions.
Ecology and Evolution | 2015
Kristine Engemann; Brian J. Enquist; Brody Sandel; Brad Boyle; Peter M. Jørgensen; Naia Morueta-Holme; Robert K. Peet; Cyrille Violle; Jens-Christian Svenning
Macro-scale species richness studies often use museum specimens as their main source of information. However, such datasets are often strongly biased due to variation in sampling effort in space and time. These biases may strongly affect diversity estimates and may, thereby, obstruct solid inference on the underlying diversity drivers, as well as mislead conservation prioritization. In recent years, this has resulted in an increased focus on developing methods to correct for sampling bias. In this study, we use sample-size-correcting methods to examine patterns of tropical plant diversity in Ecuador, one of the most species-rich and climatically heterogeneous biodiversity hotspots. Species richness estimates were calculated based on 205,735 georeferenced specimens of 15,788 species using the Margalef diversity index, the Chao estimator, the second-order Jackknife and Bootstrapping resampling methods, and Hill numbers and rarefaction. Species richness was heavily correlated with sampling effort, and only rarefaction was able to remove this effect, and we recommend this method for estimation of species richness with “big data” collections.
American Journal of Botany | 2012
Benjamin Blonder; Vanessa Buzzard; Irena Šímová; Lindsey L. Sloat; Brad Boyle; Rebecca Lipson; Brianna Aguilar-Beaucage; Angelina Andrade; Benjamin Barber; Chris Barnes; Dharma Bushey; Paulina Cartagena; Max Chaney; Karina Contreras; Mandarava Cox; Maya Cueto; Cannon Curtis; Mariah Fisher; Lindsey Furst; Jessica Gallegos; Ruby Hall; Amelia Hauschild; Alex Jerez; Nadja Jones; Aaron Klucas; Anita Kono; Mary Lamb; Jacob David Ruiz Matthai; Colten McIntyre; Joshua McKenna
PREMISE OF THE STUDY Leaf area is a key trait that links plant form, function, and environment. Measures of leaf area can be biased because leaf area is often estimated from dried or fossilized specimens that have shrunk by an unknown amount. We tested the common assumption that this shrinkage is negligible. METHODS We measured shrinkage by comparing dry and fresh leaf area in 3401 leaves of 380 temperate and tropical species and used phylogenetic and trait-based approaches to determine predictors of this shrinkage. We also tested the effects of rehydration and simulated fossilization on shrinkage in four species. KEY RESULTS We found that dried leaves shrink in area by an average of 22% and a maximum of 82%. Shrinkage in dried leaves can be predicted by multiple morphological traits with a standard deviation of 7.8%. We also found that mud burial, a proxy for compression fossilization, caused negligible shrinkage, and that rehydration, a potential treatment of dried herbarium specimens, eliminated shrinkage. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that the amount of shrinkage is driven by variation in leaf area, leaf thickness, evergreenness, and woodiness and can be reversed by rehydration. The amount of shrinkage may also be a useful trait related to ecologically and physiological differences in drought tolerance and plant life history.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution | 2017
Brian S. Maitner; Brad Boyle; Nathan Casler; Rick Condit; John C. Donoghue; Sandra M. Durán; Daniel Guaderrama; Cody E. Hinchliff; Peter M. Jørgensen; Nathan J. B. Kraft; Brian J. McGill; Cory Merow; Naia Morueta-Holme; Robert K. Peet; Brody Sandel; Mark Schildhauer; Stephen A. Smith; Jens-Christian Svenning; Barbara M. Thiers; Cyrille Violle; Susan K. Wiser; Brian J. Enquist
There is an urgent need for large-scale botanical data to improve our understanding of community assembly, coexistence, biogeography, evolution, and many other fundamental biological processes. Understanding these processes is critical for predicting and handling human-biodiversity interactions and global change dynamics such as food and energy security, ecosystem services, climate change, and species invasions. The Botanical Information and Ecology Network (BIEN) database comprises an unprecedented wealth of cleaned and standardised botanical data, containing roughly 81 million occurrence records from c. 375,000 species, c. 915,000 trait observations across 28 traits from c. 93,000 species, and co-occurrence records from 110,000 ecological plots globally, as well as 100,000 range maps and 100 replicated phylogenies (each containing 81,274 species) for New World species. Here, we describe an r package that provides easy access to these data. The bien r package allows users to access the multiple types of data in the BIEN database. Functions in this package query the BIEN database by turning user inputs into optimised PostgreSQL functions. Function names follow a convention designed to make it easy to understand what each function does. We have also developed a protocol for providing customised citations and herbarium acknowledgements for data downloaded through the bien r package. The development of the BIEN database represents a significant achievement in biological data integration, cleaning and standardization. Likewise, the bien r package represents an important tool for open science that makes the BIEN database freely and easily accessible to everyone.