Bradley A. Schiff

Validation of the histologic risk model in a new cohort of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundHalf of the patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) can be expected to fail therapy, indicating that more aggressive treatment is warranted for this group. We have developed a novel risk model that can become a basis for developing new treatment paradigms. Here we report on the performance of our model in a new multicenter cohort. DesignEligible patients from 3 institutions (Montefiore Medical Center, University of Manitoba, and New York University Medical Center) were identified and pathology slides from their resection specimens were reviewed by Margaret Brandwein-Gensler; risk category was assigned as previously published. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for disease progression and survival. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed, adjusted for potential confounders. A teaching module was also developed; attending pathologists were asked to score coded slides after a lecture and multiheaded microscope teaching session. Agreement was assessed by calculating Cohen unweighted κ coefficients. ResultThe validation cohort consisted of 305 patients, from the above institutions, with 311 primary HNSCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx. The median follow-up period for all patients was 27 months. Risk category predicts time to disease progression (P=0.0005), locoregional recurrence (P=0.013), and overall survival (P=0.0000) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. High-risk status is significantly associated with decreased time to disease progression, adjusted for clinical confounders (P=0.015, hazard ratio 2.32, 95% confidence interval 1.18-4.58) compared with collapsed intermediate and low-risk groups. We also demonstrate substantial interrater agreement (κ=0.64), and very good rater agreement when compared with the standard (κ=0.87). ConclusionsWe demonstrate significant predictive performance of the risk model in a new cohort of patients with primary HNSCC, adjusted for confounders. Our training experience also supports the feasibility of adapting the risk model in clinical practice.

Combined P16 and human papillomavirus testing predicts head and neck cancer survival.

While its prognostic significance remains unclear, p16INK4a protein expression is increasingly being used as a surrogate marker for oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). To evaluate the prognostic utility of p16 expression in HNSCC, we prospectively collected 163 primary tumor specimens from histologically confirmed HNSCC patients who were followed for up to 9.4 years. Formalin fixed tumor specimens were tested for p16 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). HPV type‐16 DNA and RNA was detected by MY09/11‐PCR and E6/E7 RT‐PCR on matched frozen tissue, respectively. P16 protein expression was detected more often in oropharyngeal tumors (53%) as compared with laryngeal (24%), hypopharyngeal (8%) or oral cavity tumors (4%; p < 0.0001). With respect to prognosis, p16‐positive oropharyngeal tumors exhibited significantly better overall survival than p16‐negative tumors (log‐rank test p = 0.04), whereas no survival benefit was observed for nonoropharyngeal tumors. However, when both p16 and HPV DNA test results were considered, concordantly positive nonoropharyngeal tumors had significantly better disease‐specific survival than concordantly negative nonoropharyngeal tumors after controlling for sex, nodal stage, tumor size, tumor subsite, primary tumor site number, smoking and drinking [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.04, 0.01–0.54]. Compared with concordantly negative nonoropharyngeal HNSCC, p16(+)/HPV16(−) nonoropharyngeal HNSCC (n = 13, 7%) demonstrated no significant improvement in disease‐specific survival when HPV16 was detected by RNA (adjusted HR = 0.83, 0.22–3.17). Our findings show that p16 IHC alone has potential as a prognostic test for oropharyngeal cancer survival, but combined p16/HPV testing is necessary to identify HPV‐associated nonoropharyngeal HNSCC with better prognosis.

Importance of computer-aided design and manufacturing technology in the multidisciplinary approach to head and neck reconstruction.

Head and neck reconstruction is a multidisciplinary field, requiring communication among various surgical and dental specialists. The free fibular flap is the standard method for reconstructing large mandibular defects after benign or malignant tumor ablation. The graft has to be precisely contoured to fit the three-dimensional defect to meet the functional and aesthetic goals.Virtual surgical planning using computed tomographic imaging and computer-aided design and manufacturing technology allows the surgeons to perform virtual surgery and generates templates and cutting guides that allow for the precise and expedient recreation of the plan in the operating room. The authors describe 2 cases where virtual planning was used for the extirpative and reconstruction phases to achieve precise reconstruction and decreased time under anesthesia.

Transoral robotic total laryngectomy

Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard of care in many organ systems. Head and neck surgery has incorporated transoral surgery, either laser microsurgery or robotic resection, in the management of pharyngeal and laryngeal cancers. To date, the laryngeal procedures have taken the form of partial laryngectomy, as transoral approaches have not allowed reconstruction following total laryngectomy. We present the first series of transoral total laryngectomies.

Mentoring in otolaryngology training programs

Objective: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Educations focus on outcome-based training has made the mentoring process critical for resident education. It is unknown how otolaryngology training programs mentor residents. Our objective was to determine the current state of mentoring in otolaryngology training programs and describe resident perceptions of mentoring. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Accredited U.S. otolaryngology training programs. Subjects and Methods: All U.S. otolaryngology residents and program directors were contacted via e-mail with a link to an online survey. Results: Of the 1411 residents contacted, 27.7 percent responded, representing 71 of the 103 accredited otolaryngology programs. Of the 103 program directors contacted, 37.9 percent responded. Of these programs, 26 had formal mentoring programs, 45 did not have formal mentoring programs, and 12 programs were listed in both categories. Fifty-one percent of male residents and 49 percent of female residents had mentors. The most important mentor characteristics were personality match, good clinical role model, and similar subspecialty interests. Least important characteristics were race, gender, and age. Twenty-six percent of residents felt that mentoring was critical to their training, while 63 percent of residents listed mentoring as important but not critical. Programs with fewer faculty and residents were less likely to offer formal mentoring (P = 0.007 and 0.054, respectively). Of residents who did not have mentors, 80 percent lacked a mentor because their residency had no formal mentoring program. Conclusion: Residents perceive mentoring as important, and formal mentoring programs should be incorporated into otolaryngology training programs.

The impact of transoral robotic surgery on the overall treatment of oropharyngeal cancer patients

To assess adjuvant therapy in patients undergoing surgical management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCCA) with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and neck dissection.

Occult nodal disease in patients with failed laryngeal preservation undergoing surgical salvage

The primary objective was to determine the incidence of pathologically positive lymph nodes in clinically N0 larynx cancer patients undergoing salvage surgery following nonsurgical primary therapy. Secondary aims included assessment of the impact of laryngeal subsite and neck dissection on disease status and survival.

Otolaryngology Resident Selection Do Rank Lists Matter

Objectives. To examine the relationship between National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) rank list position and future otolaryngology residency performance. Study Design. Cohort study. Methods. Eight consecutive residency classes (starting 2001-2008; 4 residents/y) were reviewed. Three hundred and thirty-three applicants (40.6 applicants/y) were interviewed, and 316 (94.9%) were ranked. Residents matching with our program were divided 3 different ways: into quarters, thirds, and halves, based on their rank order. Correlation coefficients were obtained to compare resident rank number and rank group (quarter, third, half) to faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, and in-service score. Chi-square tests were conducted comparing rank group to chief resident selection and annual teaching award. Results. Resident NRMP rank number was not significantly correlated with faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, or in-service exam score (−0.21 < r < 0.05; P > .28). There was also no significant correlation between resident quarter, third, or half rank group and faculty evaluation; coresident evaluation; or in-service exam score (−0.29 < r < 0.10; P > .13). Chi-square analysis found no relationship between resident rank group and chief resident (P > .35) or teaching award (P > .13) selection. Conclusions. Applicant rank number and rank group did not correlate with performance of this otolaryngology residency cohort as assessed by faculty evaluation, coresident evaluation, in-service exam score, or selection for chief resident or the annual teaching award. Resident selection committees should consider reallocating manpower hours from creating rank order to recruiting applicants and selecting interview candidates.

Refining the utility and role of Frozen section in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resection.

Previous studies report high‐accuracy rates for intraoperative frozen sections, but reliability of frozen sections in predicting the ultimate final margin status is unknown. We compared frozen and permanent reads to identify risk factors for overall discrepancies between intraoperative and final margin status.

Risk Factors for Perioperative Airway Difficulty and Evaluation of Intubation Approaches Among Patients With Benign Goiter

Objective: The objective was to determine patient and gland characteristics associated with difficult intubation in patients undergoing thyroidectomy for goiter and to assess different methods of intubation in these patients. Methods: This study was an IRB-approved, retrospective chart review of 112 consecutive patients undergoing hemithyroidectomy or total thyroidectomy for thyroid goiter from 2009-2012 at an academic tertiary care facility in Bronx, New York. Patient demographics, thyroid gland characteristics (gland weight and nodule size), presence of preoperative symptoms (dyspnea, dysphagia, and hoarseness), and radiographical findings (tracheal compression, tracheal deviation, and substernal extension of the thyroid gland) were recorded. Anesthesia records were reviewed for method of intubation, as well as success or failure of intubation attempts. Results: Nineteen patients (17.0%) were men and 93 (83.0%) were women. The age of the patients included in the study ranged from 14 to 86 years with a mean ± SD age of 53.5 ± 14.7 years. Difficult intubation was noted with 13 (11.6%) patients. Only patient age was significantly associated with difficult intubation. The mean age of patients with airway difficulty was 60.7 ± 3.7 years compared to 52.1 ± 1.5 years in those who did not experience airway difficulty (P = .04). No other reviewed risk factors were found to be significantly associated with difficult intubation. Fiberoptic intubation (FOI) was used in 38 patients and difficult intubation occurred in 18.4% (7/38). Direct laryngoscopy with transoral intubation (LTOI) was used in 58 patients, in whom 3.4% (2/58) experienced a difficult intubation. FOI was aborted 6 times and LTOI was subsequently successful in each of these cases. Conclusions: Our results suggest that benign nodular goiter disease does not pose significant challenges to intubation in our patient cohort. The technique of intubation deviated from the initial plan several times in the FOI group, whereas LTOI was ultimately successful in every case. Our data suggest that the role of fiberoptic intubation for patients with large goiters should be further refined.