Bradley Christoffersen
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bradley Christoffersen.
New Phytologist | 2013
Thomas L. Powell; David Galbraith; Bradley Christoffersen; Anna B. Harper; Hewlley Maria Acioli Imbuzeiro; Lucy Rowland; Samuel Almeida; Paulo M. Brando; Antonio Carlos Lola da Costa; Marcos Heil Costa; Naomi M. Levine; Yadvinder Malhi; Scott R. Saleska; Eleneide Doff Sotta; Mathew Williams; Patrick Meir; Paul R. Moorcroft
Considerable uncertainty surrounds the fate of Amazon rainforests in response to climate change. Here, carbon (C) flux predictions of five terrestrial biosphere models (Community Land Model version 3.5 (CLM3.5), Ecosystem Demography model version 2.1 (ED2), Integrated BIosphere Simulator version 2.6.4 (IBIS), Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 2.1 (JULES) and Simple Biosphere model version 3 (SiB3)) and a hydrodynamic terrestrial ecosystem model (the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere (SPA) model) were evaluated against measurements from two large-scale Amazon drought experiments. Model predictions agreed with the observed C fluxes in the control plots of both experiments, but poorly replicated the responses to the drought treatments. Most notably, with the exception of ED2, the models predicted negligible reductions in aboveground biomass in response to the drought treatments, which was in contrast to an observed c. 20% reduction at both sites. For ED2, the timing of the decline in aboveground biomass was accurate, but the magnitude was too high for one site and too low for the other. Three key findings indicate critical areas for future research and model development. First, the models predicted declines in autotrophic respiration under prolonged drought in contrast to measured increases at one of the sites. Secondly, models lacking a phenological response to drought introduced bias in the sensitivity of canopy productivity and respiration to drought. Thirdly, the phenomenological water-stress functions used by the terrestrial biosphere models to represent the effects of soil moisture on stomatal conductance yielded unrealistic diurnal and seasonal responses to drought.
Science | 2016
Jin Wu; Loren P. Albert; Aline P. Lopes; Natalia Restrepo-Coupe; Matthew Hayek; Kenia T. Wiedemann; Kaiyu Guan; Scott C. Stark; Bradley Christoffersen; Neill Prohaska; Julia V. Tavares; Suelen Marostica; Hideki Kobayashi; Mauricio Lima Ferreira; Kleber Silva Campos; Rodrigo Dda Silva; Paulo M. Brando; Dennis G. Dye; Travis E. Huxman; Alfredo R. Huete; Bruce Walker Nelson; Scott R. Saleska
Leaf seasonality in Amazon forests Models assume that lower precipitation in tropical forests means less plant-available water and less photosynthesis. Direct measurements in the Amazon, however, show that production remains constant or increases in the dry season. To investigate this mismatch, Wu et al. use tower-based cameras to detect the phenology (i.e., the seasonal patterns) of leaf dynamics in tropical tree crowns in Amazonia, Brazil, and relate this to patterns of CO2 flux. Accounting for age-dependent variation among individual leaves and crowns is necessary for understanding the seasonal dynamics of photosynthesis in the entire ecosystem. Leaf phenology regulates seasonality of the carbon flux in tropical forests across a gradient of climate zones. Science, this issue p. 972 Camera recordings of the age distribution of leaves coupled with carbon dioxide flux data show the phenological basis of photosynthesis. In evergreen tropical forests, the extent, magnitude, and controls on photosynthetic seasonality are poorly resolved and inadequately represented in Earth system models. Combining camera observations with ecosystem carbon dioxide fluxes at forests across rainfall gradients in Amazônia, we show that aggregate canopy phenology, not seasonality of climate drivers, is the primary cause of photosynthetic seasonality in these forests. Specifically, synchronization of new leaf growth with dry season litterfall shifts canopy composition toward younger, more light-use efficient leaves, explaining large seasonal increases (~27%) in ecosystem photosynthesis. Coordinated leaf development and demography thus reconcile seemingly disparate observations at different scales and indicate that accounting for leaf-level phenology is critical for accurately simulating ecosystem-scale responses to climate change.
Global Change Biology | 2016
Michelle O. Johnson; David Galbraith; Manuel Gloor; Hannes De Deurwaerder; Matthieu Guimberteau; Anja Rammig; Kirsten Thonicke; Hans Verbeeck; Celso von Randow; Abel Monteagudo; Oliver L. Phillips; Roel J. W. Brienen; Ted R. Feldpausch; Gabriela Lopez Gonzalez; Sophie Fauset; Carlos A. Quesada; Bradley Christoffersen; Philippe Ciais; Gilvan Sampaio; Bart Kruijt; Patrick Meir; Paul R. Moorcroft; Ke Zhang; Esteban Álvarez-Dávila; Atila Alves de Oliveira; Iêda Leão do Amaral; Ana Andrade; Luiz E. O. C. Aragão; Alejandro Araujo-Murakami; E.J.M.M. Arets
Abstract Understanding the processes that determine above‐ground biomass (AGB) in Amazonian forests is important for predicting the sensitivity of these ecosystems to environmental change and for designing and evaluating dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs). AGB is determined by inputs from woody productivity [woody net primary productivity (NPP)] and the rate at which carbon is lost through tree mortality. Here, we test whether two direct metrics of tree mortality (the absolute rate of woody biomass loss and the rate of stem mortality) and/or woody NPP, control variation in AGB among 167 plots in intact forest across Amazonia. We then compare these relationships and the observed variation in AGB and woody NPP with the predictions of four DGVMs. The observations show that stem mortality rates, rather than absolute rates of woody biomass loss, are the most important predictor of AGB, which is consistent with the importance of stand size structure for determining spatial variation in AGB. The relationship between stem mortality rates and AGB varies among different regions of Amazonia, indicating that variation in wood density and height/diameter relationships also influences AGB. In contrast to previous findings, we find that woody NPP is not correlated with stem mortality rates and is weakly positively correlated with AGB. Across the four models, basin‐wide average AGB is similar to the mean of the observations. However, the models consistently overestimate woody NPP and poorly represent the spatial patterns of both AGB and woody NPP estimated using plot data. In marked contrast to the observations, DGVMs typically show strong positive relationships between woody NPP and AGB. Resolving these differences will require incorporating forest size structure, mechanistic models of stem mortality and variation in functional composition in DGVMs.
Global Change Biology | 2018
Rosie A. Fisher; Charles D. Koven; William R. L. Anderegg; Bradley Christoffersen; Michael C. Dietze; Caroline E. Farrior; Jennifer Holm; George C. Hurtt; Ryan G. Knox; Peter J. Lawrence; Jeremy W. Lichstein; Marcos Longo; Ashley M. Matheny; David Medvigy; Helene C. Muller-Landau; Thomas L. Powell; Shawn P. Serbin; Hisashi Sato; Jacquelyn K. Shuman; Benjamin Smith; Anna T. Trugman; Toni Viskari; Hans Verbeeck; Ensheng Weng; Chonggang Xu; Xiangtao Xu; Tao Zhang; Paul R. Moorcroft
Numerous current efforts seek to improve the representation of ecosystem ecology and vegetation demographic processes within Earth System Models (ESMs). These developments are widely viewed as an important step in developing greater realism in predictions of future ecosystem states and fluxes. Increased realism, however, leads to increased model complexity, with new features raising a suite of ecological questions that require empirical constraints. Here, we review the developments that permit the representation of plant demographics in ESMs, and identify issues raised by these developments that highlight important gaps in ecological understanding. These issues inevitably translate into uncertainty in model projections but also allow models to be applied to new processes and questions concerning the dynamics of real-world ecosystems. We argue that stronger and more innovative connections to data, across the range of scales considered, are required to address these gaps in understanding. The development of first-generation land surface models as a unifying framework for ecophysiological understanding stimulated much research into plant physiological traits and gas exchange. Constraining predictions at ecologically relevant spatial and temporal scales will require a similar investment of effort and intensified inter-disciplinary communication.
Global Change Biology | 2015
Lucy Rowland; Raquel Lobo-do-Vale; Bradley Christoffersen; Eliane A. Melém; Bart Kruijt; Steel Silva Vasconcelos; Tomas F. Domingues; Oliver J. Binks; Alex A. R. Oliveira; Daniel B. Metcalfe; Antonio Carlos Lola da Costa; Maurizio Mencuccini; Patrick Meir
Abstract Determining climate change feedbacks from tropical rainforests requires an understanding of how carbon gain through photosynthesis and loss through respiration will be altered. One of the key changes that tropical rainforests may experience under future climate change scenarios is reduced soil moisture availability. In this study we examine if and how both leaf photosynthesis and leaf dark respiration acclimate following more than 12 years of experimental soil moisture deficit, via a through‐fall exclusion experiment (TFE) in an eastern Amazonian rainforest. We find that experimentally drought‐stressed trees and taxa maintain the same maximum leaf photosynthetic capacity as trees in corresponding control forest, independent of their susceptibility to drought‐induced mortality. We hypothesize that photosynthetic capacity is maintained across all treatments and taxa to take advantage of short‐lived periods of high moisture availability, when stomatal conductance (g s) and photosynthesis can increase rapidly, potentially compensating for reduced assimilate supply at other times. Average leaf dark respiration (R d) was elevated in the TFE‐treated forest trees relative to the control by 28.2 ± 2.8% (mean ± one standard error). This mean R d value was dominated by a 48.5 ± 3.6% increase in the R d of drought‐sensitive taxa, and likely reflects the need for additional metabolic support required for stress‐related repair, and hydraulic or osmotic maintenance processes. Following soil moisture deficit that is maintained for several years, our data suggest that changes in respiration drive greater shifts in the canopy carbon balance, than changes in photosynthetic capacity.
New Phytologist | 2016
Oliver J. Binks; Patrick Meir; Lucy Rowland; Antonio Carlos Lola da Costa; Steel Silva Vasconcelos; Alex A. R. Oliveira; Leandro V. Ferreira; Bradley Christoffersen; Andrea Nardini; Maurizio Mencuccini
Summary The tropics are predicted to become warmer and drier, and understanding the sensitivity of tree species to drought is important for characterizing the risk to forests of climate change. This study makes use of a long‐term drought experiment in the Amazon rainforest to evaluate the role of leaf‐level water relations, leaf anatomy and their plasticity in response to drought in six tree genera. The variables (osmotic potential at full turgor, turgor loss point, capacitance, elastic modulus, relative water content and saturated water content) were compared between seasons and between plots (control and through‐fall exclusion) enabling a comparison between short‐ and long‐term plasticity in traits. Leaf anatomical traits were correlated with water relation parameters to determine whether water relations differed among tissues. The key findings were: osmotic adjustment occurred in response to the long‐term drought treatment; species resistant to drought stress showed less osmotic adjustment than drought‐sensitive species; and water relation traits were correlated with tissue properties, especially the thickness of the abaxial epidermis and the spongy mesophyll. These findings demonstrate that cell‐level water relation traits can acclimate to long‐term water stress, and highlight the limitations of extrapolating the results of short‐term studies to temporal scales associated with climate change.
Ecological Informatics | 2017
Danielle Christianson; Charuleka Varadharajan; Bradley Christoffersen; Matteo Detto; Boris Faybishenko; Bruno O. Gimenez; Val Hendrix; K. Jardine; Robinson I. Negrón-Juárez; Gilberto Pastorello; Thomas L. Powell; Megha Sandesh; Jeffrey M. Warren; Brett T. Wolfe; Jeffrey Q. Chambers; Lara M. Kueppers; Nate G. McDowell; Deborah A. Agarwal
Abstract Metadata describe the ancillary information needed for data preservation and independent interpretation, comparison across heterogeneous datasets, and quality assessment and quality control (QA/QC). Environmental observations are vastly diverse in type and structure, can be taken across a wide range of spatiotemporal scales in a variety of measurement settings and approaches, and saved in multiple formats. Thus, well-organized, consistent metadata are required to produce usable data products from diverse environmental observations collected across field sites. However, existing metadata reporting protocols do not support the complex data synthesis and model-data integration needs of interdisciplinary earth system research. We developed a metadata reporting framework (FRAMES) to enable management and synthesis of observational data that are essential in advancing a predictive understanding of earth systems. FRAMES utilizes best practices for data and metadata organization enabling consistent data reporting and compatibility with a variety of standardized data protocols. We used an iterative scientist-centered design process to develop FRAMES, resulting in a data reporting format that incorporates existing field practices to maximize data-entry efficiency. Thus, FRAMES has a modular organization that streamlines metadata reporting and can be expanded to incorporate additional data types. With FRAMESs multi-scale measurement position hierarchy, data can be reported at observed spatial resolutions and then easily aggregated and linked across measurement types to support model-data integration. FRAMES is in early use by both data originators (persons generating data) and consumers (persons using data and metadata). In this paper, we describe FRAMES, identify lessons learned, and discuss areas of future development.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | 2013
Natalia Restrepo-Coupe; Humberto R. da Rocha; Lucy R. Hutyra; Alessandro C. da Araujo; Laura S. Borma; Bradley Christoffersen; Osvaldo Cabral; Plínio Barbosa de Camargo; Fernando L. Cardoso; Antonio Carlos Lola da Costa; David R. Fitzjarrald; Michael L. Goulden; Bart Kruijt; Jair Max Furtunato Maia; Yadvinder Malhi; Antonio O. Manzi; Scott D. Miller; Antonio Donato Nobre; Celso von Randow; Leonardo D. A. Sá; Ricardo K. Sakai; Julio Tóta; Steven C. Wofsy; Fabrício Berton Zanchi; Scott R. Saleska
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | 2013
Luis Gustavo Gonçalves de Gonçalves; Jordan Borak; Marcos Heil Costa; Scott R. Saleska; Ian T. Baker; Natalia Restrepo-Coupe; Michel Nobre Muza; Benjamin Poulter; Hans Verbeeck; Joshua B. Fisher; M. Altaf Arain; Phillip A. Arkin; Bruno Paraluppi Cestaro; Bradley Christoffersen; David Galbraith; Xiaodan Guan; Bart van den Hurk; Kazuhito Ichii; Hewlley Maria Acioli Imbuzeiro; Atul K. Jain; Naomi M. Levine; Chaoqun Lu; Gonzalo Miguez-Macho; Débora Regina Roberti; A. K. Sahoo; Koichi Sakaguchi; Kevin Schaefer; Mingjie Shi; W. James Shuttleworth; Hanqin Tian
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | 2014
Bradley Christoffersen; Natalia Restrepo-Coupe; M. Altaf Arain; Ian T. Baker; Bruno Paraluppi Cestaro; P. Ciais; Joshua B. Fisher; David Galbraith; Xiaodan Guan; Lindsey E. Gulden; Bart van den Hurk; Kazuhito Ichii; Hewlley Maria Acioli Imbuzeiro; Atul K. Jain; Naomi M. Levine; Gonzalo Miguez-Macho; Ben Poulter; Débora Regina Roberti; Koichi Sakaguchi; A. K. Sahoo; Kevin Schaefer; Mingjie Shi; Hans Verbeeck; Zong-Liang Yang; Alessandro C. Araújo; Bart Kruijt; Antonio O. Manzi; Humberto R. da Rocha; Celso von Randow; Michel Nobre Muza