Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Brenda Andrews is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Brenda Andrews.


Science | 2010

The Genetic Landscape of a Cell

Michael Costanzo; Anastasia Baryshnikova; Jeremy Bellay; Yungil Kim; Eric D. Spear; Carolyn S. Sevier; Huiming Ding; Judice L. Y. Koh; Kiana Toufighi; Jeany Prinz; Robert P. St.Onge; Benjamin VanderSluis; Taras Makhnevych; Franco J. Vizeacoumar; Solmaz Alizadeh; Sondra Bahr; Renee L. Brost; Yiqun Chen; Murat Cokol; Raamesh Deshpande; Zhijian Li; Zhen Yuan Lin; Wendy Liang; Michaela Marback; Jadine Paw; Bryan Joseph San Luis; Ermira Shuteriqi; Amy Hin Yan Tong; Nydia Van Dyk; Iain M. Wallace

Making Connections Genetic interaction profiles highlight cross-connections between bioprocesses, providing a global view of cellular pleiotropy, and enable the prediction of genetic network hubs. Costanzo et al. (p. 425) performed a pairwise fitness screen covering approximately one-third of all potential genetic interactions in yeast, examining 5.4 million gene-gene pairs and generating quantitative profiles for ∼75% of the genome. Of the pairwise interactions tested, about 3% of the genes investigated interact under the conditions tested. On the basis of these data, a reference map for the yeast genetic network was created. A genome-wide interaction map of yeast identifies genetic interactions, networks, and function. A genome-scale genetic interaction map was constructed by examining 5.4 million gene-gene pairs for synthetic genetic interactions, generating quantitative genetic interaction profiles for ~75% of all genes in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A network based on genetic interaction profiles reveals a functional map of the cell in which genes of similar biological processes cluster together in coherent subsets, and highly correlated profiles delineate specific pathways to define gene function. The global network identifies functional cross-connections between all bioprocesses, mapping a cellular wiring diagram of pleiotropy. Genetic interaction degree correlated with a number of different gene attributes, which may be informative about genetic network hubs in other organisms. We also demonstrate that extensive and unbiased mapping of the genetic landscape provides a key for interpretation of chemical-genetic interactions and drug target identification.


Nature | 2005

Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast

Jason Ptacek; Geeta Devgan; Gregory A. Michaud; Heng Zhu; Xiaowei Zhu; Joseph Fasolo; Hong Guo; Ghil Jona; Ashton Breitkreutz; Richelle Sopko; Rhonda R. McCartney; Martin C. Schmidt; Najma Rachidi; Soo Jung Lee; Angie S. Mah; Lihao Meng; Michael J. R. Stark; David F. Stern; Claudio De Virgilio; Mike Tyers; Brenda Andrews; Mark Gerstein; Barry Schweitzer; Paul F. Predki; Michael Snyder

Protein phosphorylation is estimated to affect 30% of the proteome and is a major regulatory mechanism that controls many basic cellular processes. Until recently, our biochemical understanding of protein phosphorylation on a global scale has been extremely limited; only one half of the yeast kinases have known in vivo substrates and the phosphorylating kinase is known for less than 160 phosphoproteins. Here we describe, with the use of proteome chip technology, the in vitro substrates recognized by most yeast protein kinases: we identified over 4,000 phosphorylation events involving 1,325 different proteins. These substrates represent a broad spectrum of different biochemical functions and cellular roles. Distinct sets of substrates were recognized by each protein kinase, including closely related kinases of the protein kinase A family and four cyclin-dependent kinases that vary only in their cyclin subunits. Although many substrates reside in the same cellular compartment or belong to the same functional category as their phosphorylating kinase, many others do not, indicating possible new roles for several kinases. Furthermore, integration of the phosphorylation results with protein–protein interaction and transcription factor binding data revealed novel regulatory modules. Our phosphorylation results have been assembled into a first-generation phosphorylation map for yeast. Because many yeast proteins and pathways are conserved, these results will provide insights into the mechanisms and roles of protein phosphorylation in many eukaryotes.


Nature | 2007

Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map

Sean R. Collins; Kyle M. Miller; Nancy L. Maas; Assen Roguev; Jeffrey Fillingham; Clement S. Chu; Maya Schuldiner; Marinella Gebbia; Judith Recht; Michael Shales; Huiming Ding; Hong Xu; Junhong Han; Kristin Ingvarsdottir; Benjamin Cheng; Brenda Andrews; Charles Boone; Shelley L. Berger; Phil Hieter; Zhiguo Zhang; Grant W. Brown; C. James Ingles; Andrew Emili; C. David Allis; David P. Toczyski; Jonathan S. Weissman; Jack Greenblatt; Nevan J. Krogan

Defining the functional relationships between proteins is critical for understanding virtually all aspects of cell biology. Large-scale identification of protein complexes has provided one important step towards this goal; however, even knowledge of the stoichiometry, affinity and lifetime of every protein–protein interaction would not reveal the functional relationships between and within such complexes. Genetic interactions can provide functional information that is largely invisible to protein–protein interaction data sets. Here we present an epistatic miniarray profile (E-MAP) consisting of quantitative pairwise measurements of the genetic interactions between 743 Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes involved in various aspects of chromosome biology (including DNA replication/repair, chromatid segregation and transcriptional regulation). This E-MAP reveals that physical interactions fall into two well-represented classes distinguished by whether or not the individual proteins act coherently to carry out a common function. Thus, genetic interaction data make it possible to dissect functionally multi-protein complexes, including Mediator, and to organize distinct protein complexes into pathways. In one pathway defined here, we show that Rtt109 is the founding member of a novel class of histone acetyltransferases responsible for Asf1-dependent acetylation of histone H3 on lysine 56. This modification, in turn, enables a ubiquitin ligase complex containing the cullin Rtt101 to ensure genomic integrity during DNA replication.


Cell | 2005

Exploration of the Function and Organization of the Yeast Early Secretory Pathway through an Epistatic Miniarray Profile

Maya Schuldiner; Sean R. Collins; Natalie J. Thompson; Vladimir Denic; Arunashree Bhamidipati; Thanuja Punna; Jan Ihmels; Brenda Andrews; Charles Boone; Jack Greenblatt; Jonathan S. Weissman; Nevan J. Krogan

We present a strategy for generating and analyzing comprehensive genetic-interaction maps, termed E-MAPs (epistatic miniarray profiles), comprising quantitative measures of aggravating or alleviating interactions between gene pairs. Crucial to the interpretation of E-MAPs is their high-density nature made possible by focusing on logically connected gene subsets and including essential genes. Described here is the analysis of an E-MAP of genes acting in the yeast early secretory pathway. Hierarchical clustering, together with novel analytical strategies and experimental verification, revealed or clarified the role of many proteins involved in extensively studied processes such as sphingolipid metabolism and retention of HDEL proteins. At a broader level, analysis of the E-MAP delineated pathway organization and components of physical complexes and illustrated the interconnection between the various secretory processes. Extension of this strategy to other logically connected gene subsets in yeast and higher eukaryotes should provide critical insights into the functional/organizational principles of biological systems.


Cell | 2004

Exploration of Essential Gene Functions via Titratable Promoter Alleles

Sanie Mnaimneh; Armaity P. Davierwala; Jennifer Haynes; Jason Moffat; Wen-Tao Peng; Wen Zhang; Xueqi Yang; Jeff Pootoolal; Gordon Chua; Andres Lopez; Miles Trochesset; Darcy Morse; Nevan J. Krogan; Shawna L. Hiley; Zhijian Li; Quaid Morris; Jörg Grigull; Nicholas Mitsakakis; Christopher J. Roberts; Jack Greenblatt; Charles Boone; Chris A. Kaiser; Brenda Andrews; Timothy R. Hughes

Nearly 20% of yeast genes are required for viability, hindering genetic analysis with knockouts. We created promoter-shutoff strains for over two-thirds of all essential yeast genes and subjected them to morphological analysis, size profiling, drug sensitivity screening, and microarray expression profiling. We then used this compendium of data to ask which phenotypic features characterized different functional classes and used these to infer potential functions for uncharacterized genes. We identified genes involved in ribosome biogenesis (HAS1, URB1, and URB2), protein secretion (SEC39), mitochondrial import (MIM1), and tRNA charging (GSN1). In addition, apparent negative feedback transcriptional regulation of both ribosome biogenesis and the proteasome was observed. We furthermore show that these strains are compatible with automated genetic analysis. This study underscores the importance of analyzing mutant phenotypes and provides a resource to complement the yeast knockout collection.


Nature Reviews Genetics | 2007

Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast

Charles Boone; Howard Bussey; Brenda Andrews

The development and application of genetic tools and resources has enabled a partial genetic-interaction network for the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to be compiled. Analysis of the network, which is ongoing, has already provided a clear picture of the nature and scale of the genetic interactions that robustly sustain biological systems, and how cellular buffering is achieved at the molecular level. Recent studies in yeast have begun to define general principles of genetic networks, and also pave the way for similar studies in metazoan model systems. A comparative understanding of genetic-interaction networks promises insights into some long-standing genetic problems, such as the nature of quantitative traits and the basis of complex inherited disease.


The EMBO Journal | 1996

The Clk/Sty protein kinase phosphorylates SR splicing factors and regulates their intranuclear distribution.

Karen Colwill; Tony Pawson; Brenda Andrews; Jayendra Prasad; James L. Manley; John C. Bell; Peter I. Duncan

Mammalian Clk/Sty is the prototype for a family of dual specificity kinases (termed LAMMER kinases) that have been conserved in evolution, but whose physiological substrates are unknown. In a yeast two‐hybrid screen, the Clk/Sty kinase specifically interacted with RNA binding proteins, particularly members of the serine/arginine‐rich (SR) family of splicing factors. Clk/Sty itself has an serine/arginine‐rich non‐catalytic N‐terminal region which is important for its association with SR splicing factors. In vitro, Clk/Sty efficiently phosphorylated the SR family member ASF/SF2 on serine residues located within its serine/arginine‐rich region (the RS domain). Tryptic phosphopeptide mapping demonstrated that the sites on ASF/SF2 phosphorylated in vitro overlap with those phosphorylated in vivo. Immunofluorescence studies showed that a catalytically inactive form of Clk/Sty co‐localized with SR proteins in nuclear speckles. Overexpression of the active Clk/Sty kinase caused a redistribution of SR proteins within the nucleus. These results suggest that Clk/Sty kinase directly regulates the activity and compartmentalization of SR splicing factors.


Cell | 2004

CDK Activity Antagonizes Whi5, an Inhibitor of G1/S Transcription in Yeast

Michael Costanzo; Joy L. Nishikawa; Xiaojing Tang; Jonathan S Millman; Oliver Schub; Kevin E. Breitkreuz; Danielle Dewar; Ivan Rupeš; Brenda Andrews; Mike Tyers

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity initiates the eukaryotic cell division cycle by turning on a suite of gene expression in late G1 phase. In metazoans, CDK-dependent phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (Rb) alleviates repression of E2F and thereby activates G1/S transcription. However, in yeast, an analogous G1 phase target of CDK activity has remained elusive. Here we show that the cell size regulator Whi5 inhibits G1/S transcription and that this inhibition is relieved by CDK-mediated phosphorylation. Deletion of WHI5 bypasses the requirement for upstream activators of the G1/S transcription factors SBF/MBF and thereby accelerates the G1/S transition. Whi5 is recruited to G1/S promoter elements via its interaction with SBF/MBF in vivo and in vitro. In late G1 phase, CDK-dependent phosphorylation dissociates Whi5 from SBF and drives Whi5 out of the nucleus. Elimination of CDK activity at the end of mitosis allows Whi5 to reenter the nucleus to again repress G1/S transcription. These findings harmonize G1/S control in eukaryotes.


Cell | 1991

Transcriptional activation of CLN1, CLN2, and a putative new G1 cyclin (HCS26) by SWI4, a positive regulator of G1-specific transcription

Joseph Ogas; Brenda Andrews; Ira Herskowitz

SWI4 of budding yeast codes for a component of a transcription factor (cell cycle box factor, or CCBF) necessary for G1-specific expression of HO. We show that SWI4 is essential for haploid cell viability at high temperature and in a/alpha cells at all temperatures: SWI4-deficient cells arrest as large unbudded cells. Eight high copy number plasmids were identified that allow swi4- strains to grow under nonpermissive conditions. Two carry G1 cyclin genes, CLN1 and CLN2; another carries HCS26, coding for a putative cyclin, a/alpha swi4- mutants exhibit 3- to 20-fold reductions in the levels of CLN1, CLN2, and HCS26 transcripts. The requirement of SWI4 for transcription appears to be direct: each gene contains sites similar to the CCBF-binding site; CCBF binds to the upstream region of HCS26. We propose that SWI4 participates in a positive feedback loop by which CLN1, CLN2, and possibly HCS26 promote their own transcription in G1.


Science Signaling | 2010

Deciphering Protein Kinase Specificity Through Large-Scale Analysis of Yeast Phosphorylation Site Motifs

Janine Mok; Philip M. Kim; Hugo Y. K. Lam; Stacy Piccirillo; Xiuqiong Zhou; Grace R. Jeschke; Douglas L. Sheridan; Sirlester A. Parker; Ved Desai; Miri Jwa; Elisabetta Cameroni; Hengyao Niu; Matthew C. Good; Attila Reményi; Jia Lin Nianhan Ma; Yi Jun Sheu; Holly E. Sassi; Richelle Sopko; Clarence S.M. Chan; Claudio De Virgilio; Nancy M. Hollingsworth; Wendell A. Lim; David F. Stern; Bruce Stillman; Brenda Andrews; Mark Gerstein; Michael Snyder; Benjamin E. Turk

A high-throughput peptide array approach reveals insight into kinase substrates and specificity. Exploring Kinase Selectivity Kinases are master regulators of cellular behavior. Because of the large number of kinases and the even larger number of substrates, approaches that permit global analysis are valuable tools for investigating kinase biology. Mok et al. identified the phosphorylation site selectivity for 61 of the 122 kinases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by screening a miniaturized peptide library. By integrating these data with other data sets and structural information, they revealed information about the relationship between kinase catalytic residues and substrate selectivity. They also identified and experimentally verified substrates for kinases, including one for which limited functional information was previously available, showing the potential for this type of analysis as a launching point for the exploration of the biological functions of kinases. Phosphorylation is a universal mechanism for regulating cell behavior in eukaryotes. Although protein kinases target short linear sequence motifs on their substrates, the rules for kinase substrate recognition are not completely understood. We used a rapid peptide screening approach to determine consensus phosphorylation site motifs targeted by 61 of the 122 kinases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. By correlating these motifs with kinase primary sequence, we uncovered previously unappreciated rules for determining specificity within the kinase family, including a residue determining P−3 arginine specificity among members of the CMGC [CDK (cyclin-dependent kinase), MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase), GSK (glycogen synthase kinase), and CDK-like] group of kinases. Furthermore, computational scanning of the yeast proteome enabled the prediction of thousands of new kinase-substrate relationships. We experimentally verified several candidate substrates of the Prk1 family of kinases in vitro and in vivo and identified a protein substrate of the kinase Vhs1. Together, these results elucidate how kinase catalytic domains recognize their phosphorylation targets and suggest general avenues for the identification of previously unknown kinase substrates across eukaryotes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Brenda Andrews's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Corey Nislow

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge