Brett J. Butler
National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Brett J. Butler.
Icarus | 2003
Imke de Pater; Brett J. Butler; D. A. Green; R.G. Strom; Robyn Margaret Millan; Michael J. Klein; M. K. Bird; O. Funke; J. Neidhöfer; Ronald J. Maddalena; Robert J. Sault; M. J. Kesteven; D.P. Smits; Richard W. Hunstead
Abstract We carried out a brief campaign in September 1998 to determine Jupiter’s radio spectrum at frequencies spanning a range from 74 MHz up to 8 GHz. Eleven different telescopes were used in this effort, each uniquely suited to observe at a particular frequency. We find that Jupiter’s spectrum is basically flat shortwards of 1–2 GHz, and drops off steeply at frequencies greater than 2 GHz. We compared the 1998 spectrum with a spectrum (330 MHz–8 GHz) obtained in June 1994, and report a large difference in spectral shape, being most pronounced at the lowest frequencies. The difference seems to be linear with log(ν), with the largest deviations at the lowest frequencies (ν). We have compared our spectra with calculations of Jupiter’s synchrotron radiation using several published models. The spectral shape is determined by the energy-dependent spatial distribution of the electrons in Jupiter’s magnetic field, which in turn is determined by the detailed diffusion process across L -shells and in pitch angle, as well as energy-dependent particle losses. The spectral shape observed in September 1998 can be matched well if the electron energy spectrum at L = 6 is modeled by a double power law E − a (1+( E / E 0 )) − b , with a = 0.4, b = 3, E 0 = 100 MeV, and a lifetime against local losses τ 0 = 6 × 10 7 s. In June 1994 the observations can be matched equally well with two different sets of parameters: (1) a = 0.6, b = 3, E 0 = 100 MeV, τ 0 = 6 × 10 7 s, or (2) a = 0.4, b = 3, E 0 = 100 MeV, τ 0 = 8.6 × 10 6 s. We attribute the large variation in spectral shape between 1994 and 1998 to pitch angle scattering, coulomb scattering and/or energy degradation by dust in Jupiter’s inner radiation belts.
New Astronomy Reviews | 2004
Brett J. Butler; D. B. Campbell; I. de Pater; Dale E. Gary
Abstract Radio wavelength observations of solar system bodies reveal unique information about them, as they probe to regions inaccessible by nearly all other remote sensing techniques and wavelengths. As such, the SKA will be an important telescope for planetary science studies. With its sensitivity, spatial resolution, and spectral flexibility and resolution, it will be used extensively in planetary studies. It will make significant advances possible in studies of the deep atmospheres, magnetospheres and rings of the giant planets, atmospheres, surfaces, and subsurfaces of the terrestrial planets, and properties of small bodies, including comets, asteroids, and KBOs. Further, it will allow unique studies of the Sun. Finally, it will allow for both indirect and direct observations of extrasolar giant planets.
Earth Moon and Planets | 1997
J. E. Wink; W. J. Altenhoff; John H. Bieging; Brett J. Butler; Harold M. Butner; C. G. T. Haslam; E. Kreysa; R. N. Martin; R. Mauersberger; J. P. McMullin; D. Muders; William L. Peters; J. Schmidt; J. B. Schraml; A. Sievers; P. Stumpff; A. Von Kapp-Herr; C. Thum; R. Zylka
The concept of simultaneous multifrequency continuum observations, successfully tested on Comet Hyakutake, was applied to Comet Hale-Bopp, using the Heinrich Hertz Submillimeter Telescope (HHT) with the four color bolometer between 250 and 870 GHz, the IRAM 30m telescope at 240 Ghz, the MPIfR 100-m telescope at 32 GHz, and the IRAM interferometer near 90 and 240 GHz. Near-simultaneous measurements were done between February 15 and April 26, 1997, mainly concentrated in mid March shortly before perigee of the comet.The measurements gave the following preliminary results:Interferometer detection of the nuclear thermal emission. If the signal at the longest interferometer spacing of 170 mis due to thermal emission from the nucleus only, its equivalent diameter is ∼49 km. If, however, this signal contains a contribution from a strongly centrally peaked halo distribution(e.g., r−2 density variation) the diameter may be as low as 35 km. The emission found interferometrically was always 5″ north and 0.1 sec east from the position predicted by Yeomans solution 55.The comparison of the interferometric continuum emission with the simultanously obtained molecular line observations (reported on this conference) shows the origin of the strongest line emission concentrated on the nucleus. The 30-m observations show a radio halo with a gaussian FWHP of ∼11, corresponding to a diameter of 11000 km at geocentric distance of 1.2 a.u.A spectral index of ∼3.0 for the total signal, which may indicate a smaller mean particle size than for Hyakutake. Assuming an average cometary density of 0.5 gcm−3, the mass contained in the nucleus is ∼1
Symposium - International Astronomical Union | 2004
Brett J. Butler; Alwyn Wootten; Robert L. Brown
#x2013;3 1019 g and 1012 g in the particle halo.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2010
Paul D. Spudis; D. B. J. Bussey; S. M. Baloga; Brett J. Butler; D. Carl; L. M. Carter; M. Chakraborty; Richard C. Elphic; Jeffrey J. Gillis-Davis; Jitendra Nath Goswami; Essam Heggy; M. Hillyard; R. Jensen; R. L. Kirk; David LaVallee; P. McKerracher; Catherine Dorothy Neish; Stewart D. Nozette; S. Nylund; M. Palsetia; W. Patterson; Mark S. Robinson; Russell Keith Raney; R. C. Schulze; H. Sequeira; Joseph P. Skura; T. W. Thompson; B. J. Thomson; E. A. Ustinov; Helene L. Winters
We address in this white paper the ability of ALMA to observe extrasolar planetary systems (in various stages of formation). The observation of extrasolar planetary systems is thought to be one of the most important science drivers for ALMA. As such, we should have some idea of what the capabilities might be in this regard.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 1999
W. J. Altenhoff; John H. Bieging; Brett J. Butler; Harold M. Butner; R. Chini; C. G. T. Haslam; E. Kreysa; R. N. Martin; R. Mauersberger; J. P. McMullin; D. Muders; William L. Peters; J. Schmidt; J. B. Schraml; A. Sievers; P. Stumpff; C. Thum; A. von Kap-Herr; H. Wiesemeyer; J. E. Wink; R. Zylka
Archive | 1996
Patrick Palmer; Alwyn Wootten; Brett J. Butler; Dominique Bockelee-Morvan; Jacques Crovisier; Didier Despois; D. K. Yeomans
Archive | 1992
Duane O. Muhleman; Aaron W. Grossman; Martin A. Slade; Brett J. Butler
Archive | 2010
P. L. McKerracher; John B. Jensen; H. B. Sequeira; Russell Keith Raney; Ron Schulze; D. B. J. Bussey; Brett J. Butler; Catherine Dorothy Neish; Marzban Palsetia; G. W. Patterson; Paul D. Spudis; B. J. Thomson; F. Scott Turner
Archive | 2006
Mark David Hofstadter; Brett J. Butler; M. A. Gurwell