Brian J. Holleran

Biological properties and functional determinants of the urotensin II receptor

The urotensin II receptor (UT) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and binds the cyclic undecapeptide urotensin II (U-II) as well as the octapeptide urotensin II-related peptide (URP). The active UT mediates pleiotropic effects through various signal transduction pathways, including coupling to G proteins and activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Several highly conserved residues and motifs of class A GPCRs that are important for activity are found in UT. This review highlights some of the putative roles of these motifs in the binding, activation and desensitization of UT.

Activation of the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Leads to Movement of the Sixth Transmembrane Domain: Analysis by the Substituted Cysteine Accessibility Method

The role of transmembrane domain six (TMD6) of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, which is predicted to undergo conformational changes after agonist binding, was investigated using the substituted-cysteine accessibility method. Each residue in the Lys240-Leu265 fragment was mutated, one at a time, to a cysteine. The resulting mutants were expressed in COS-7 cells, which were subsequently treated with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA). This treatment led to a significant reduction in binding of 125I-[Sar1,Ile8]AngII to the F249C, H256C, T260C, and V264C mutant receptors, suggesting that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. It is noteworthy that this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD6 cysteines engineered in a constitutively active AT1 receptor. Indeed, mutant F249C was insensitive to MTSEA treatment, whereas the sensitivity of mutant V264C decreased. Under these conditions, one other mutant, F261C, was found to be sensitive to MTSEA treatment. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of the AT1 receptor causes TMD6 to pivot. This movement moves the top (extracellular side) of TMD6 toward the binding pocket and simultaneously distances the bottom (intracellular side) away from the binding pocket. Using this approach, we identified key elements within TMD6 that contribute to the activation of class A GPCRs through structural rearrangements.

Mutational Analysis of the Conserved Asp2.50 and ERY Motif Reveals Signaling Bias of the Urotensin II Receptor

Class A (rhodopsin-like) G protein-coupled receptors possess conserved residues and motifs that are important for their specific activity. In the present study, we examined the role of residue Asp972.50 as well as residues Glu1473.49, Arg1483.50, and Tyr1493.51 of the ERY motif on the functionality of the urotensin II receptor (UT). Mutations D972.50A, R1483.50A, and R1483.50H abolished the ability of UT to activate phospholipase C, whereas mutations E1473.49A and Y1493.51A reduced the ability to activate PLC by 50%. None of the mutants exhibited constitutive activity. However, R1483.50A and R1483.50H promoted ERK1/2 activation, which was abolished by 4-(3-chloroanilino)-6,7-dimethoxyquinazoline (AG1478), an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase activity. Both these mutants were capable of directly activating EGFR, which confirmed that they activated the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway by a Gαq/11-independent transactivation of EGFR. The D972.50A, R1483.50A, and R1483.50H mutants did not readily internalize and did not promote translocation or colocalize with β-arrestin2-GFP. Finally, the agonist-induced internalization of the E1473.49A mutant receptor was significantly increased compared with wild-type receptor. This study highlights the major contribution of the conserved Asp2.50 residue to the functionality of the UT receptor. The Arg residue in the ERY motif of UT is an important structural element in signaling crossroads that determine whether Gαq/11-dependent and -independent events can occur.

The Fifth Transmembrane Domain of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Participates in the Formation of the Ligand-binding Pocket and Undergoes a Counterclockwise Rotation upon Receptor Activation

The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II exerts a wide variety of cardiovascular effects through the activation of the angiotensin II Type 1 (AT1) receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Like other G protein- coupled receptors, the AT1 receptor possesses seven transmembrane domains that provide structural support for the formation of the ligand-binding pocket. The role of the fifth transmembrane domain (TMD5) was investigated using the substituted cysteine accessibility method. All of the residues within Thr-190 to Leu-217 region were mutated one at a time to cysteine, and after expression in COS-7 cells, the mutant receptors were treated with the sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA). MTSEA reacts selectively with water-accessible, free sulfhydryl groups of endogenous or introduced point mutation cysteines. If a cysteine is found in the binding pocket, the covalent modification will affect the binding kinetics of the ligand. MTSEA substantially decreased the binding affinity of L197C-AT1, N200C-AT1, I201C-AT1, G203C-AT1, and F204C-AT1 mutant receptors, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD5 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active N111G-AT1 receptor background. Indeed, mutant I201C-N111G-AT1 became more sensitive to MTSEA, whereas mutant G203C-N111G-AT1 lost some sensitivity. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of AT1 receptor causes an apparent counterclockwise rotation of TMD5 as viewed from the extracellular side.

The Second Transmembrane Domain of the Human Type 1 Angiotensin II Receptor Participates in the Formation of the Ligand Binding Pocket and Undergoes Integral Pivoting Movement during the Process of Receptor Activation

The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII) exerts a wide variety of cardiovascular effects through the activation of the angiotensin II type-1 (AT1) receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Like other G protein-coupled receptors, the AT1 receptor possesses seven transmembrane domains that provide structural support for the formation of the ligand-binding pocket. In order to identify those residues in the second transmembrane domain (TMD2) that contribute to the formation of the binding pocket of the AT1 receptor, we used the substituted cysteine accessibility method. All of the residues within the Leu-70 to Trp-94 region were mutated one at a time to a cysteine, and, after expression in COS-7 cells, the mutant receptors were treated with the sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA). MTSEA reacts selectively with water-accessible, free sulfhydryl groups of endogenous or introduced point mutation cysteines. If a cysteine is found in the binding pocket, the covalent modification will affect the binding kinetics of the ligand. MTSEA substantially decreased the binding affinity of D74C-AT1, L81C-AT1, A85C-AT1, T88C-AT1, and A89C-AT1 mutant receptors, which suggests that these residues orient themselves within the water-accessible binding pocket of the AT1 receptor. Interestingly, this pattern of acquired MTSEA sensitivity was altered for TMD2 reporter cysteines engineered in a constitutively active N111G-AT1 receptor background. Indeed, mutant D74C-N111G-AT1 became insensitive to MTSEA, whereas mutant L81C-N111G-AT1 lost some sensitivity and mutant V86C-N111G-AT1 became sensitive to MTSEA. Our results suggest that constitutive activation of the AT1 receptor causes TMD2 to pivot, bringing the top of TMD2 closer to the binding pocket and pushing the bottom of TMD2 away from the binding pocket.

Photolabelling the urotensin II receptor reveals distinct agonist- and partial-agonist-binding sites.

The mechanism by which GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) undergo activation is believed to involve conformational changes following agonist binding. We have used photoaffinity labelling to identify domains within GPCRs that make contact with various photoreactive ligands in order to better understand the activation mechanism. Here, a series of four agonist {[Bpa1]U-II (Bpa is p-benzoyl-L-phenylalanine), [Bpa2]U-II, [Bpa3]U-II and [Bpa4]U-II} and three partial agonist {[Bpa1Pen5D-Trp7Orn8]U-II (Pen is penicillamine), [Bpa2Pen5D-Trp7Orn8]U-II and [Pen5Bpa6D-Trp7Orn8]U-II} photoreactive urotensin II (U-II) analogues were used to identify ligand-binding sites on the UT receptor (U-II receptor). All peptides bound the UT receptor expressed in COS-7 cells with high affinity (Kd of 0.3-17.7 nM). Proteolytic mapping and mutational analysis led to the identification of Met288 of the third extracellular loop of the UT receptor as a binding site for all four agonist peptides. Both partial agonists containing the photoreactive group in positions 1 and 2 also cross-linked to Met288. We found that photolabelling with the partial agonist containing the photoreactive group in position 6 led to the detection of transmembrane domain 5 as a binding site for that ligand. Interestingly, this differs from Met184/Met185 of the fourth transmembrane domain that had been identified previously as a contact site for the full agonist [Bpa6]U-II. These results enable us to better map the binding pocket of the UT receptor. Moreover, the data also suggest that, although structurally related agonists or partial agonists may dock in the same general binding pocket, conformational changes induced by various states of activation may result in slight differences in spatial proximity within the cyclic portion of U-II analogues.

Analysis of transmembrane domains 1 and 4 of the human angiotensin II AT1 receptor by cysteine-scanning mutagenesis.

The octapeptide hormone angiotensin II (AngII) exerts a wide variety of cardiovascular effects through the activation of the AT1 receptor, which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Like other G protein-coupled receptors, the AT1 receptor possesses seven transmembrane domains that provide structural support for the formation of the ligand-binding pocket. Here, we investigated the role of the first and fourth transmembrane domains (TMDs) in the formation of the binding pocket of the human AT1 receptor using the substituted-cysteine accessibility method. Each residue within the Phe-28(1.32)–Ile-53(1.57) fragment of TMD1 and Leu-143(4.40)–Phe-170(4.67) fragment of TMD4 was mutated, one at a time, to a cysteine. The resulting mutant receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells, which were subsequently treated with the charged sulfhydryl-specific alkylating agent methanethiosulfonate ethylammonium (MTSEA). This treatment led to a significant reduction in the binding affinity of TMD1 mutants M30C(1.34)-AT1 and T33C(1.37)-AT1 and TMD4 mutant V169C(4.66)-AT1. Although this reduction in binding of the TMD1 mutants was maintained when examined in a constitutively active receptor (N111G-AT1) background, we found that V169C(4.66)-AT1 remained unaffected when treated with MTSEA compared with untreated in this context. Moreover, the complete loss of binding observed for R167C(4.64)-AT1 was restored upon treatment with MTSEA. Our results suggest that the extracellular portion of TMD1, particularly residues Met-30(1.34) and Thr-33(1.37), as well as residues Arg-167(4.64) and Val-169(4.66) at the junction of TMD4 and the second extracellular loop, are important binding determinants within the AT1 receptor binding pocket but that these TMDs undergo very little movement, if at all, during the activation process.

Identification of Distinct Conformations of the Angiotensin-II Type 1 Receptor Associated with the Gq/11 Protein Pathway and the β-Arrestin Pathway Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Background: The N111G and D74N mutations bias the AT1 receptor for the Gq/11 and β-arrestin pathways, respectively. Results: Structural rearrangements of theAT1 receptor are induced by the N111G mutation and AngII. Conclusion: Activation of the Gq/11 and β-arrestin pathways is associated with a decreased and increased stability, respectively, of the ground state of the receptor. Significance: Distinct conformations of AT1 receptor are associated with distinct pathways. Biased signaling represents the ability of G protein-coupled receptors to engage distinct pathways with various efficacies depending on the ligand used or on mutations in the receptor. The angiotensin-II type 1 (AT1) receptor, a prototypical class A G protein-coupled receptor, can activate various effectors upon stimulation with the endogenous ligand angiotensin-II (AngII), including the Gq/11 protein and β-arrestins. It is believed that the activation of those two pathways can be associated with distinct conformations of the AT1 receptor. To verify this hypothesis, microseconds of molecular dynamics simulations were computed to explore the conformational landscape sampled by the WT-AT1 receptor, the N111G-AT1 receptor (constitutively active and biased for the Gq/11 pathway), and the D74N-AT1 receptor (biased for the β-arrestin1 and -2 pathways) in their apo-forms and in complex with AngII. The molecular dynamics simulations of the AngII-WT-AT1, N111G-AT1, and AngII-N111G-AT1 receptors revealed specific structural rearrangements compared with the initial and ground state of the receptor. Simulations of the D74N-AT1 receptor revealed that the mutation stabilizes the receptor in the initial ground state. The presence of AngII further stabilized the ground state of the D74N-AT1 receptor. The biased agonist [Sar1,Ile8]AngII also showed a preference for the ground state of the WT-AT1 receptor compared with AngII. These results suggest that activation of the Gq/11 pathway is associated with a specific conformational transition stabilized by the agonist, whereas the activation of the β-arrestin pathway is linked to the stabilization of the ground state of the receptor.

Critical Hydrogen Bond Formation for Activation of the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor

Background: The N111G and N111W mutations make the AT1 receptor constitutively active and inactivable, respectively. Results: The orientation and interactions of D742.50 are influenced by the residue at position 1113.35. Conclusion: H-bond formation between D742.50 and N461.50 is critical for AT1 receptor activation. Significance: This novel molecular switch could be involved in the GPCR activation mechanism as it involves highly conserved residues D2.50 and N1.50. G protein-coupled receptors contain selectively important residues that play central roles in the conformational changes that occur during receptor activation. Asparagine 111 (N1113.35) is such a residue within the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor. Substitution of N1113.35 for glycine leads to a constitutively active receptor, whereas substitution for tryptophan leads to an inactivable receptor. Here, we analyzed the AT1 receptor and two mutants (N111G and N111W) by molecular dynamics simulations, which revealed a novel molecular switch involving the strictly conserved residue D742.50. Indeed, D742.50 forms a stable hydrogen bond (H-bond) with the residue in position 1113.35 in the wild-type and the inactivable receptor. However, in the constitutively active mutant N111G-AT1 receptor, residue D74 is reoriented to form a new H-bond with another strictly conserved residue, N461.50. When expressed in HEK293 cells, the mutant N46G-AT1 receptor was poorly activable, although it retained a high binding affinity. Interestingly, the mutant N46G/N111G-AT1 receptor was also inactivable. Molecular dynamics simulations also revealed the presence of a cluster of hydrophobic residues from transmembrane domains 2, 3, and 7 that appears to stabilize the inactive form of the receptor. Whereas this hydrophobic cluster and the H-bond between D742.50 and W1113.35 are more stable in the inactivable N111W-AT1 receptor, the mutant N111W/F77A-AT1 receptor, designed to weaken the hydrophobic core, showed significant agonist-induced signaling. These results support the potential for the formation of an H-bond between residues D742.50 and N461.50 in the activation of the AT1 receptor.

Characterization of Angiotensin II Molecular Determinants Involved in AT1 Receptor Functional Selectivity

The octapeptide angiotensin II (AngII) exerts a variety of cardiovascular effects through the activation of the AngII type 1 receptor (AT1), a G protein–coupled receptor. The AT1 receptor engages and activates several signaling pathways, including heterotrimeric G proteins Gq and G12, as well as the extracellular signal–regulated kinases (ERK) 1/2 pathway. Additionally, following stimulation, βarrestin is recruited to the AT1 receptor, leading to receptor desensitization. It is increasingly recognized that specific ligands selectively bind and favor the activation of some signaling pathways over others, a concept termed ligand bias or functional selectivity. A better understanding of the molecular basis of functional selectivity may lead to the development of better therapeutics with fewer adverse effects. In the present study, we developed assays allowing the measurement of six different signaling modalities of the AT1 receptor. Using a series of AngII peptide analogs that were modified in positions 1, 4, and 8, we sought to better characterize the molecular determinants of AngII that underlie functional selectivity of the AT1 receptor in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. The results reveal that position 1 of AngII does not confer functional selectivity, whereas position 4 confers a bias toward ERK signaling over Gq signaling, and position 8 confers a bias toward βarrestin recruitment over ERK activation and Gq signaling. Interestingly, the analogs modified in position 8 were also partial agonists of the protein kinase C (PKC)–dependent ERK pathway via atypical PKC isoforms PKCζ and PKCι.