Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Brian J. Levine is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Brian J. Levine.


Chest | 2015

Mechanical Ventilation and ARDS in the ED: A Multicenter, Observational, Prospective, Cross-sectional Study

Brian M. Fuller; Nicholas M. Mohr; Christopher N. Miller; Andrew R. Deitchman; Brian J. Levine; Nicole Castagno; Elizabeth Hassebroek; Adam Dhedhi; Nicholas Scott-Wittenborn; Edward Grace; Courtney Lehew; Marin H. Kollef

BACKGROUND There are few data regarding mechanical ventilation and ARDS in the ED. This could be a vital arena for prevention and treatment. METHODS This study was a multicenter, observational, prospective, cohort study aimed at analyzing ventilation practices in the ED. The primary outcome was the incidence of ARDS after admission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the predictors of ARDS. RESULTS We analyzed 219 patients receiving mechanical ventilation to assess ED ventilation practices. Median tidal volume was 7.6 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) (interquartile range, 6.9-8.9), with a range of 4.3 to 12.2 mL/kg PBW. Lung-protective ventilation was used in 122 patients (55.7%). The incidence of ARDS after admission from the ED was 14.7%, with a mean onset of 2.3 days. Progression to ARDS was associated with higher illness severity and intubation in the prehospital environment or transferring facility. Of the 15 patients with ARDS in the ED (6.8%), lung-protective ventilation was used in seven (46.7%). Patients who progressed to ARDS experienced greater duration in organ failure and ICU length of stay and higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS Lung-protective ventilation is infrequent in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the ED, regardless of ARDS status. Progression to ARDS is common after admission, occurs early, and worsens outcome. Patient- and treatment-related factors present in the ED are associated with ARDS. Given the limited treatment options for ARDS, and the early onset after admission from the ED, measures to prevent onset and to mitigate severity should be instituted in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01628523; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.


Annals of Pharmacotherapy | 2015

A Randomized Trial of Loading Vancomycin in the Emergency Department

Jamie M. Rosini; Julie Laughner; Brian J. Levine; Mia A. Papas; John F. Reinhardt; Neil Jasani

Background: Optimizing vancomycin dosing may help eradicate bacteria while avoiding resistance. The guidelines recommend loading doses; however, there are no data to demonstrate that this may result in a more rapid achievement of therapeutic troughs. Objective: To evaluate the percentage of troughs reaching therapeutic levels at 12, 24, and 36 hours following an initial vancomycin dose of 30 mg/kg compared with 15 mg/kg. Methods: This prospective, randomized study was performed in a community academic medical center. Patients who were to receive vancomycin in the emergency department were randomized to an initial traditional dose of 15 mg/kg or a 30-mg/kg loading dose followed by 15 mg/kg every 12 hours for 3 doses. Patients weighing >120 kg or with creatinine clearances <50 mL/min were excluded. Results: In total, 99 patients were enrolled; 12 hours after the initial dose of vancomycin, there was a significantly greater proportion of patients reaching target trough levels of 15 mg/L among the patients who received a loading dose as compared with a traditional dose (34% vs 3%, P < 0.01). This trend continued at 24 hours but was not statistically significant. At 36 hours, there was no difference in the percentage of patients reaching target levels between the 2 groups. No statistically significant difference in nephrotoxicity or adverse events among the 2 groups was demonstrated. Conclusion: A loading dose of 30 mg/kg of vancomycin achieved a higher percentage of therapeutic levels at 12 hours when compared with the traditional dose of 15 mg/kg, without increased nephrotoxicity or adverse events.


Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2014

Ultrasound-Guidance Can Reduce Adverse Events During Femoral Central Venous Cannulation

John T. Powell; Jennifer T. Mink; Jason T. Nomura; Brian J. Levine; Neil Jasani; W. Nichols; J.F. Reed; Paul Sierzenski

BACKGROUND Ultrasound-guidance for internal jugular central venous cannulation (CVC) has become the recommended best practice and has been shown to improve placement success and reduce complications. There is a dearth of studies that evaluate emergency point-of-care ultrasound guidance of femoral CVC. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to determine if point-of-care ultrasound guidance for femoral CVC decreases adverse events and increases the likelihood of successful placement when compared with the landmark technique. METHODS We conducted an Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective, observational study of consecutive patients who required CVC. Physicians who performed CVC completed a standardized, web-based data sheet for a national CVC registry. We evaluated single-institution data regarding CVC site, ultrasound usage, CVC indication, and mechanical complications (e.g., pneumothorax, arterial puncture, failed access, catheter misdirection, and hematoma). The study period was between January 2006 and June 2010. Analysis using Pearsons χ(2) and Agresti-Coull binomial confidence intervals was performed; significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS We evaluated data for 143 patients who had femoral CVC in our institution. Sixty CVCs (42%) were performed under ultrasound guidance, 83 (58%) via landmark technique (p = 0.0159); 3.3% of femoral central venous lines placed by ultrasound guidance had recorded adverse events compared with 9.6% for the landmark technique (p = 0.145). There was no statistically significant difference in complications between ultrasound-guidance and landmark techniques. Our data showed a trend toward decreased rates of arterial puncture and reduced cannulation attempts resulting in improved placement success. CONCLUSIONS Our experience shows that ultrasound guidance for femoral CVC might decrease complications and improve placement success, although we cannot recommend this approach without additional data. We recommend a larger study to further evaluate this technique.


Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2013

Prescribing Habits of Vancomycin in the Emergency Department: Are We Dosing Appropriately?

Jamie M. Rosini; Michael R. Grovola; Brian J. Levine; Neil Jasani

BACKGROUND To prevent the development of bacterial resistance, current guidelines recommend vancomycin dosages of 15-20 mg/kg based on actual body weight. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to determine if two community teaching Emergency Departments followed the new recommendations for a weight-based dosing regimen for vancomycin. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted on the prescribing habits of vancomycin in the Emergency Department. During a 6-month time period, 1,734 doses of vancomycin were dispensed and a subsequent random sample of 240 doses was reviewed. Data collection included age, gender, weight, creatinine clearance, vancomycin dose, and indication for vancomycin therapy. Mean values, standard deviations, and ranges were computed to illustrate current prescribing practices. RESULTS The mean vancomycin dose was 1,117 ± 325 mg. Based on actual body weight, the calculated mean dose was 14.6 ± 5.7 mg/kg. Only 19.6% (47 of 240) of all patients received an appropriate dose based on the recommended 15-20 mg/kg vancomycin dose. CONCLUSIONS Our Emergency Department is inappropriately dosing vancomycin in the majority of patients. Educating clinicians regarding appropriate vancomycin dosing is recommended to achieve compliance with the latest consensus guidelines.


Academic Emergency Medicine | 2016

High Single-dose Vancomycin Loading Is Not Associated With Increased Nephrotoxicity in Emergency Department Sepsis Patients.

Jamie M. Rosini; Joshua J. Davis; Jeffrey Muenzer; Brian J. Levine; Mia A. Papas; Dominique Comer; Ryan Arnold

OBJECTIVE Vancomycin loading doses are recommended; however, the risk of nephrotoxicity with these doses is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to compare nephrotoxicity in emergency department (ED) sepsis patients who received vancomycin at high doses (>20 mg/kg) versus lower doses (≤20 mg/kg). METHODS A retrospective cohort study was performed in three academic EDs. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, intravenous vancomycin order, and hospital admission. Exclusion criteria were no documented weight, hemodialysis-dependent, and inadequate serum creatinine (SCr) values for the measured outcome. Analyses compared the incidence of nephrotoxicity for patients who received vancomycin at high dose (>20 mg/kg) versus low dose (≤20 mg/kg). RESULTS A total of 2,131 consecutive patients prescribed vancomycin over 6 months were identified. Of these, 1,330 patients had three SCr values assessed for the primary outcome. High-dose initial vancomycin was associated with a significantly lower rate of nephrotoxicity (5.8% vs. 11.1%). After age, sex, and initial SCr were adjusted for, the risk of high-dose vancomycin compared to low-dose was decreased for the development of nephrotoxicity (relative risk = 0.60; 95% confidence interval = 0.44 to 0.82). CONCLUSION Initial dosing of vancomycin > 20 mg/kg was not associated with an increased rate of nephrotoxicity compared with lower doses. Findings from this study support compliance with initial weight-based vancomycin loading doses.


Journal of Emergency Medicine | 1997

Another false alarm? Apnea monitor activation in a Neonatal Intensive care unit graduate☆

Robert Rosenbaum; Brian J. Levine; Thomas A. Sweeney

Neonatal emergencies have become more common as increasingly sophisticated Neonatal Intensive Care Units graduate lower birth-weight babies born at younger gestational ages. These patients present a number of challenges to emergency physicians. They are often discharged with apnea monitors, which generate a high number of false alarms. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit graduates, however, are predisposed to a number of conditions that can result in true episodes of apnea. We present such a case and will discuss the unusual underlying cause of apnea, the utility of apnea monitors, and the need for emergency physicians to be prepared to evaluate and treat these potentially complicated patients.


Academic Emergency Medicine | 2001

Emergency Department Evaluation of Chest Pain Using Exercise Stress Echocardiography

Michael S. Buchsbaum; Erik S. Marshall; Brian J. Levine; Martin A. Bennett; Angela DiSabatino; Robert E. O'Connor; Neil Jasani


Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2015

Predictors of a Top Performer During Emergency Medicine Residency

Rahul Bhat; Katrin Takenaka; Brian J. Levine; Nikhil Goyal; Manish Garg; Annette Visconti; Leslie C. Oyama; Edward M. Castillo; Joshua Broder; Rodney Omron; Stephen R. Hayden


American Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2013

Computerized provider order entry improves compliance of vancomycin dosing guidelines in the emergency department

Kathryn Calmus Frankel; Jamie M. Rosini; Brian J. Levine; Mia A. Papas; Neil Jasani


American Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2009

CLEAR: Central Line Emergency Access Registry. The CLEAR project protocol methods paper.

Adam Balls; Frank LoVecchio; Stephan Stapczynski; Mary Mulrow; Brian J. Levine; Ross Berkely; Ed Panacek; Andrew Miller; Craig Norquist; Ralph Riviello; Roy Ary; Elliot Rodriguez; Janet Young; Eric A. Gross; Lisa Mills; Wes Zeger

Collaboration


Dive into the Brian J. Levine's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil Jasani

Christiana Care Health System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jamie M. Rosini

Christiana Care Health System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mia A. Papas

Christiana Care Health System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J.F. Reed

Christiana Care Health System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles L. Reese

Christiana Care Health System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H. Farley

Christiana Care Health System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Mink

Christiana Care Health System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

N. Jasani

Christiana Care Health System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T. Sweeney

Christiana Care Health System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Erik S. Marshall

Christiana Care Health System

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge