Brian T. DeVree
University of Michigan
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Brian T. DeVree.
Nature | 2011
Søren Rasmussen; Brian T. DeVree; Yaozhong Zou; Andrew C. Kruse; Ka Young Chung; Tong Sun Kobilka; Foon Sun Thian; Pil Seok Chae; Els Pardon; Diane Calinski; Jesper Mosolff Mathiesen; Syed T. A. Shah; Joseph A. Lyons; Martin Caffrey; Samuel H. Gellman; Jan Steyaert; Georgios Skiniotis; William I. Weis; Roger K. Sunahara; Brian K. Kobilka
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are responsible for the majority of cellular responses to hormones and neurotransmitters as well as the senses of sight, olfaction and taste. The paradigm of GPCR signalling is the activation of a heterotrimeric GTP binding protein (G protein) by an agonist-occupied receptor. The β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) activation of Gs, the stimulatory G protein for adenylyl cyclase, has long been a model system for GPCR signalling. Here we present the crystal structure of the active state ternary complex composed of agonist-occupied monomeric β2AR and nucleotide-free Gs heterotrimer. The principal interactions between the β2AR and Gs involve the amino- and carboxy-terminal α-helices of Gs, with conformational changes propagating to the nucleotide-binding pocket. The largest conformational changes in the β2AR include a 14 Å outward movement at the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane segment 6 (TM6) and an α-helical extension of the cytoplasmic end of TM5. The most surprising observation is a major displacement of the α-helical domain of Gαs relative to the Ras-like GTPase domain. This crystal structure represents the first high-resolution view of transmembrane signalling by a GPCR.
Nature | 2011
Søren Rasmussen; Hee Jung Choi; Juan José Fung; Els Pardon; Paola Casarosa; Pil Seok Chae; Brian T. DeVree; Daniel M. Rosenbaum; Foon Sun Thian; Tong Sun Kobilka; Andreas Schnapp; Ingo Konetzki; Roger K. Sunahara; Samuel H. Gellman; Alexander Pautsch; Jan Steyaert; William I. Weis; Brian K. Kobilka
G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) exhibit a spectrum of functional behaviours in response to natural and synthetic ligands. Recent crystal structures provide insights into inactive states of several GPCRs. Efforts to obtain an agonist-bound active-state GPCR structure have proven difficult due to the inherent instability of this state in the absence of a G protein. We generated a camelid antibody fragment (nanobody) to the human β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) that exhibits G protein-like behaviour, and obtained an agonist-bound, active-state crystal structure of the receptor-nanobody complex. Comparison with the inactive β2AR structure reveals subtle changes in the binding pocket; however, these small changes are associated with an 11 Å outward movement of the cytoplasmic end of transmembrane segment 6, and rearrangements of transmembrane segments 5 and 7 that are remarkably similar to those observed in opsin, an active form of rhodopsin. This structure provides insights into the process of agonist binding and activation.
Nature | 2011
Daniel M. Rosenbaum; Cheng Zhang; Joseph A. Lyons; Ralph Holl; David Aragão; Daniel H. Arlow; Sã̧ren G F Rasmussen; Hee Jung Choi; Brian T. DeVree; Roger K. Sunahara; Pil Seok Chae; Samuel H. Gellman; Ron O. Dror; David E. Shaw; William I. Weis; Martin Caffrey; Peter Gmeiner; Brian K. Kobilka
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are eukaryotic integral membrane proteins that modulate biological function by initiating cellular signalling in response to chemically diverse agonists. Despite recent progress in the structural biology of GPCRs, the molecular basis for agonist binding and allosteric modulation of these proteins is poorly understood. Structural knowledge of agonist-bound states is essential for deciphering the mechanism of receptor activation, and for structure-guided design and optimization of ligands. However, the crystallization of agonist-bound GPCRs has been hampered by modest affinities and rapid off-rates of available agonists. Using the inactive structure of the human β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) as a guide, we designed a β2AR agonist that can be covalently tethered to a specific site on the receptor through a disulphide bond. The covalent β2AR-agonist complex forms efficiently, and is capable of activating a heterotrimeric G protein. We crystallized a covalent agonist-bound β2AR–T4L fusion protein in lipid bilayers through the use of the lipidic mesophase method, and determined its structure at 3.5 Å resolution. A comparison to the inactive structure and an antibody-stabilized active structure (companion paper) shows how binding events at both the extracellular and intracellular surfaces are required to stabilize an active conformation of the receptor. The structures are in agreement with long-timescale (up to 30 μs) molecular dynamics simulations showing that an agonist-bound active conformation spontaneously relaxes to an inactive-like conformation in the absence of a G protein or stabilizing antibody.
Nature | 2011
Ka Young Chung; Søren Rasmussen; Tong Liu; Sheng Li; Brian T. DeVree; Pil Seok Chae; Diane Calinski; Brian K. Kobilka; Virgil L. Woods; Roger K. Sunahara
G protein-coupled receptors represent the largest family of membrane receptors that instigate signalling through nucleotide exchange on heterotrimeric G proteins. Nucleotide exchange, or more precisely, GDP dissociation from the G protein α-subunit, is the key step towards G protein activation and initiation of downstream signalling cascades. Despite a wealth of biochemical and biophysical studies on inactive and active conformations of several heterotrimeric G proteins, the molecular underpinnings of G protein activation remain elusive. To characterize this mechanism, we applied peptide amide hydrogen–deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to probe changes in the structure of the heterotrimeric bovine G protein, Gs (the stimulatory G protein for adenylyl cyclase) on formation of a complex with agonist-bound human β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR). Here we report structural links between the receptor-binding surface and the nucleotide-binding pocket of Gs that undergo higher levels of hydrogen–deuterium exchange than would be predicted from the crystal structure of the β2AR–Gs complex. Together with X-ray crystallographic and electron microscopic data of the β2AR–Gs complex (from refs 2, 3), we provide a rationale for a mechanism of nucleotide exchange, whereby the receptor perturbs the structure of the amino-terminal region of the α-subunit of Gs and consequently alters the ‘P-loop’ that binds the β-phosphate in GDP. As with the Ras family of small-molecular-weight G proteins, P-loop stabilization and β-phosphate coordination are key determinants of GDP (and GTP) binding affinity.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2009
Xiao Jie Yao; Gisselle Vélez Ruiz; Matthew R. Whorton; Søren Rasmussen; Brian T. DeVree; Xavier Deupi; Roger K. Sunahara; Brian K. Kobilka
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate the majority of physiologic responses to hormones and neurotransmitters. However, many GPCRs exhibit varying degrees of agonist-independent G protein activation. This phenomenon is referred to as basal or constitutive activity. For many of these GPCRs, drugs classified as inverse agonists can suppress basal activity. There is a growing body of evidence that basal activity is physiologically relevant, and the ability of a drug to inhibit basal activity may influence its therapeutic properties. However, the molecular mechanism for basal activation and inhibition of basal activity by inverse agonists is poorly understood and difficult to study, because the basally active state is short-lived and represents a minor fraction of receptor conformations. Here, we investigate basal activation of the G protein Gs by the β2 adrenergic receptor (β2AR) by using purified receptor reconstituted into recombinant HDL particles with a stoichiometric excess of Gs. The β2AR is site-specifically labeled with a small, environmentally sensitive fluorophore enabling direct monitoring of agonist- and Gs-induced conformational changes. In the absence of an agonist, the β2AR and Gs can be trapped in a complex by enzymatic depletion of guanine nucleotides. Formation of the complex is enhanced by the agonist isoproterenol, and it rapidly dissociates on exposure to concentrations of GTP and GDP found in the cytoplasm. The inverse agonist ICI prevents formation of the β2AR-Gs complex, but has little effect on preformed complexes. These results provide insights into G protein-induced conformational changes in the β2AR and the structural basis for ligand efficacy.
The EMBO Journal | 2009
Juan José Fung; Xavier Deupi; Leonardo Pardo; Xiao Jie Yao; Gisselle Velez-Ruiz; Brian T. DeVree; Roger K. Sunahara; Brian K. Kobilka
The β2‐adrenoceptor (β2AR) was one of the first Family A G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) shown to form oligomers in cellular membranes, yet we still know little about the number and arrangement of protomers in oligomers, the influence of ligands on the organization or stability of oligomers, or the requirement for other proteins to promote oligomerization. We used fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to characterize the oligomerization of purified β2AR site‐specifically labelled at three different positions with fluorophores and reconstituted into a model lipid bilayer. Our results suggest that the β2AR is predominantly tetrameric following reconstitution into phospholipid vesicles. Agonists and antagonists have little effect on the relative orientation of protomers in oligomeric complexes. In contrast, binding of inverse agonists leads to significant increases in FRET efficiencies for most labelling pairs, suggesting that this class of ligand promotes tighter packing of protomers and/or the formation of more complex oligomers by reducing conformational fluctuations in individual protomers. The results provide new structural insights into β2AR oligomerization and suggest a possible mechanism for the functional effects of inverse agonists.
Science | 2015
Leah N. Makley; Kathryn A. McMenimen; Brian T. DeVree; Joshua W. Goldman; Brittney McGlasson; Ponni Rajagopal; Bryan M. Dunyak; Thomas J. McQuade; Andrea D. Thompson; Roger K. Sunahara; Rachel E. Klevit; Usha P. Andley; Jason E. Gestwicki
A visionary approach to transparency Cataracts are the most common cause of vision loss, especially in our ever-increasing elderly population. Cataracts arise when crystallin, a major protein component of the eye lens, begins to aggregate, which causes the lens to become cloudy. Makley et al. explored whether small molecules that reverse this aggregation might have therapeutic potential for treating cataracts, which normally require surgery (see the Perspective by Quinlan). They used a screening method that monitors the effect of ligands on temperature-dependent protein unfolding and identified several compounds that bind and stabilize the soluble form of crystallin. In proof-of-concept studies, one of these compounds improved lens transparency in mice. Science, this issue p. 674; see also p. 636 A compound that reverses the molecular cause of cataract formation improves eye lens transparency in mice. [Also see Perspective by Quinlan] Cataracts reduce vision in 50% of individuals over 70 years of age and are a common form of blindness worldwide. Cataracts are caused when damage to the major lens crystallin proteins causes their misfolding and aggregation into insoluble amyloids. Using a thermal stability assay, we identified a class of molecules that bind α-crystallins (cryAA and cryAB) and reversed their aggregation in vitro. The most promising compound improved lens transparency in the R49C cryAA and R120G cryAB mouse models of hereditary cataract. It also partially restored protein solubility in the lenses of aged mice in vivo and in human lenses ex vivo. These findings suggest an approach to treating cataracts by stabilizing α-crystallins.
Nature | 2016
Brian T. DeVree; Jacob P. Mahoney; Gisselle Velez-Ruiz; Søren Rasmussen; Adam Kuszak; Elin Edwald; Juan-Jose Fung; Aashish Manglik; Matthieu Masureel; Yang Du; Rachel Matt; Els Pardon; Jan Steyaert; Brian K. Kobilka; Roger K. Sunahara
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain the primary conduit by which cells detect environmental stimuli and communicate with each other. Upon activation by extracellular agonists, these seven-transmembrane-domain-containing receptors interact with heterotrimeric G proteins to regulate downstream second messenger and/or protein kinase cascades. Crystallographic evidence from a prototypic GPCR, the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), in complex with its cognate G protein, Gs, has provided a model for how agonist binding promotes conformational changes that propagate through the GPCR and into the nucleotide-binding pocket of the G protein α-subunit to catalyse GDP release, the key step required for GTP binding and activation of G proteins. The structure also offers hints about how G-protein binding may, in turn, allosterically influence ligand binding. Here we provide functional evidence that G-protein coupling to the β2AR stabilizes a ‘closed’ receptor conformation characterized by restricted access to and egress from the hormone-binding site. Surprisingly, the effects of G protein on the hormone-binding site can be observed in the absence of a bound agonist, where G-protein coupling driven by basal receptor activity impedes the association of agonists, partial agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists. The ability of bound ligands to dissociate from the receptor is also hindered, providing a structural explanation for the G-protein-mediated enhancement of agonist affinity, which has been observed for many GPCR–G-protein pairs. Our data also indicate that, in contrast to agonist binding alone, coupling of a G protein in the absence of an agonist stabilizes large structural changes in a GPCR. The effects of nucleotide-free G protein on ligand-binding kinetics are shared by other members of the superfamily of GPCRs, suggesting that a common mechanism may underlie G-protein-mediated enhancement of agonist affinity.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2011
Gerwin Westfield; Søren Rasmussen; Min Su; Somnath Dutta; Brian T. DeVree; Ka Young Chung; D. Calinski; Gisselle Velez-Ruiz; Austin N. Oleskie; Els Pardon; Pil Seok Chae; Tong Liu; Sheng Li; Virgil L. Woods; Jan Steyaert; Brian K. Kobilka; Roger K. Sunahara; Georgios Skiniotis
The active-state complex between an agonist-bound receptor and a guanine nucleotide-free G protein represents the fundamental signaling assembly for the majority of hormone and neurotransmitter signaling. We applied single-particle electron microscopy (EM) analysis to examine the architecture of agonist-occupied β2-adrenoceptor (β2AR) in complex with the heterotrimeric G protein Gs (Gαsβγ). EM 2D averages and 3D reconstructions of the detergent-solubilized complex reveal an overall architecture that is in very good agreement with the crystal structure of the active-state ternary complex. Strikingly however, the α-helical domain of Gαs appears highly flexible in the absence of nucleotide. In contrast, the presence of the pyrophosphate mimic foscarnet (phosphonoformate), and also the presence of GDP, favor the stabilization of the α-helical domain on the Ras-like domain of Gαs. Molecular modeling of the α-helical domain in the 3D EM maps suggests that in its stabilized form it assumes a conformation reminiscent to the one observed in the crystal structure of Gαs-GTPγS. These data argue that the α-helical domain undergoes a nucleotide-dependent transition from a flexible to a conformationally stabilized state.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2011
Gerwin Westfield; Søren Rasmussen; Min Su; Somnath Dutta; Brian T. DeVree; Ka Young Chung; Diane Calinski; Gisselle Velez-Ruiz; Austin N. Oleskie; Els Pardon; Pil Seok Chae; Tong Liu; Sheng Li; Virgil L. Woods; Jan Steyaert; Brian K. Kobilka; Roger K. Sunahara; Georgios Skiniotis
The active-state complex between an agonist-bound receptor and a guanine nucleotide-free G protein represents the fundamental signaling assembly for the majority of hormone and neurotransmitter signaling. We applied single-particle electron microscopy (EM) analysis to examine the architecture of agonist-occupied β2-adrenoceptor (β2AR) in complex with the heterotrimeric G protein Gs (Gαsβγ). EM 2D averages and 3D reconstructions of the detergent-solubilized complex reveal an overall architecture that is in very good agreement with the crystal structure of the active-state ternary complex. Strikingly however, the α-helical domain of Gαs appears highly flexible in the absence of nucleotide. In contrast, the presence of the pyrophosphate mimic foscarnet (phosphonoformate), and also the presence of GDP, favor the stabilization of the α-helical domain on the Ras-like domain of Gαs. Molecular modeling of the α-helical domain in the 3D EM maps suggests that in its stabilized form it assumes a conformation reminiscent to the one observed in the crystal structure of Gαs-GTPγS. These data argue that the α-helical domain undergoes a nucleotide-dependent transition from a flexible to a conformationally stabilized state.