Bruce Braithwaite

Laser and Radiofrequency Ablation Study (LARA study): A Randomised Study Comparing Radiofrequency Ablation and Endovenous Laser Ablation (810 nm)

OBJECTIVES There have been few randomised studies comparing Radiofrequency Ablation(RFA) with other endovenous techniques. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether RFA of the great saphenous vein (GSV) was associated with less pain and bruising than endovenous laser ablation (EVLA). MATERIALS AND METHODS This trial had two cohorts--patients with bilateral GSV incompetence causing varicose veins (VV) and those with unilateral GSV VVs. In total 87 legs were treated in this study. Limbs in the bilateral group were treated with RFA in one leg and EVLA in the other. In the unilateral group limbs were randomised to RFA or EVLA. RFA was performed using the Celon RFiTT system (Teltow, Germany). EVLA was performed using an 810nm Laser (Biolitec AG, Germany). Phlebectomies were performed as required. Primary endpoints were patient assessed pain and bruising measured by visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints were patency assessed by duplex ultrasound at 6 weeks and 6 months. RESULTS In the bilateral group, RFA resulted in significantly less pain than EVLA on days 2-11 postoperatively. RFA also resulted in significantly less bruising than EVLA on days 3-9. There were no significant differences in mean post operative pain, bruising and activity scores in the unilateral group. Both RFA and EVLA resulted in occlusion rates of 95% at 10 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS RFA was less painful for patients than EVLA and produced less bruising in the postoperative period with comparable success rates but there was no difference in the unilateral group.

Long-Term Renal Function following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with Infrarenal and Suprarenal Aortic Stent-Grafts

Purpose: To determine in a retrospective analysis the incidence of renal impairment (RI) following endovascular repair (EVR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), to assess the morbidity and mortality in endograft patients with preoperative RI, and to examine the impact of suprarenal stent-grafts on renal function. Methods: From March 1994 to October 2001, 315 AAA patients (289 men; mean age 72.4±7.0 years) undergoing EVR were entered prospectively into a vascular registry. The patients received either an in-house custom-made stent-graft or one of several commercially made devices implanted with infrarenal or suprarenal fixation. Renal function was monitored by serum creatinine measurements prior to discharge and at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Preoperative RI was defined as a serum creatinine > 130 μmol/L and/or long-term dialysis. Postoperative RI referred to a >20% increase in the serum creatinine over baseline. Additional deterioration of renal function in patients with preoperative RI was referred to as postoperatively worsened RI. Results: Of the 315 patients treated, 220 (69.8%) were considered high risk (ruptured AAA or ASA grade III or IV). Sixty-nine (21.9%) patients had preoperative RI (6 [1.9%] on preoperative dialysis). A suprarenal stent-graft was used in 169 (53.7%) patients and infrarenal stent-graft in the remaining 146 (46.3%). The mean follow-up was 30.1 ±22.7 months. Postoperative RI occurred in 53 (16.8%) patients (24 [7.6%] transient, 29 [9.2%] persistent). Patients with preoperative RI had a significantly higher incidence of postoperatively worsened RI (37.7% versus 11.0%, p<0.0001) and a higher mortality related to RI (7.2% versus 1.6%, p=0.02). Suprarenal fixation had no influence on the incidence of RI, on perioperative mortality, or on mortality related to RI. The only significant predictive factor of postoperative RI was preoperative RI (risk ratio 5.09, 95% CI 2.38 to 10.87, p=0.0001). Conclusions: Endovascular AAA repair may lead to persistent postoperative RI in nearly 10% of cases, especially in patients with preoperative RI. Suprarenal stent-graft fixation does not seem to have any deleterious effect on renal function. Further long-term studies are required to confirm the innocuous nature of transrenal stent placement.

Early complications of femorofemoral crossover bypass grafts after aorta uni-iliac endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE The following procedures are the 3 main methods of endovascular repair (EVR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA): aorto-aortic bypass grafting, bifurcated bypass grafting, and aorta uni-iliac grafts. The latter method has the potential disadvantage of requiring an extra anatomic graft (ie, a femorofemoral crossover bypass graft) to maintain contralateral pelvic and limb perfusion. The aim of this study was to assess the complications associated with the femorofemoral crossover bypass graft after aorta uni-iliac EVR of AAA. METHOD A prospective review was conducted of the complications attributable to the femorofemoral crossover bypass graft in 136 patients who underwent EVR of AAA with an aorta uni-iliac device. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 7 months (range, 0 to 36 months), 4 patients had superficial wound infections that required antibiotic treatment and 2 patients had bypass graft infections. Nine hematomas developed: 7 (5%) groin hematomas (6 in patients with Dacron bypass grafts), 1 scrotal hematoma, and 1 perigraft hematoma. One bypass graft thrombus developed. CONCLUSION The femorofemoral crossover bypass graft is a safe and a durable component of EVR of AAA with an aorta uni-iliac device. The results are similar to those with bifurcated devices.

Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Endovascular Repair Does Not Confer Any Long-term Survival Advantage Over Open Repair

Recent studies have suggested that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) may reduce the perioperative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Whether EVAR confers any long-term survival advantage over published results for open repair of ruptured AAA has not been established. We conducted a single-center retrospective study over a 10-year period (1994–2004) examining the long-term outcome of patients who have undergone endovascular repair of ruptured AAA. Fifty-four patients underwent endovascular repair of a ruptured AAA. The median age was 75 years (interquartile range 69.5–79.5 years); 42 (78%) patients were male. The perioperative mortality rate was 37%. During a median follow-up of 32 months (range 14–48 months), there were 5 aneurysm-related and 13 non-aneurysm-related deaths. Overall, the 3- and 5-year survival rates were 36% and 26%, respectively. EVAR does not appear to confer any overall survival advantage in the mid- to long term compared with the published results for open repair. The reasons for this remain unclear. Further, larger studies are required to confirm these results.

Emergency Endovascular Repair of Aortocaval Fistula-A Single Center Experience

Purpose: To review the outcomes of patients undergoing emergency endovascular repair of aortocaval fistula (ACF) secondary to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Case Report: Four consecutive patients who underwent emergency endovascular repair of ACF associated with AAA in a tertiary institution between 2002 and 2009. Of the 4 patients, 3 had initially been misdiagnosed and managed for several days by other specialists for their symptoms prior to diagnosis of their ACF. Three patients died in the early postoperative period. The fourth patient made a satisfactory postoperative recovery but subsequently required further endovascular surgery to treat a persistent type 1 endoleak. Conclusions: Our experience illustrates the importance of early diagnosis and management of ACF. Even in experienced hands, the management of spontaneous ACF associated with AAA is challenging. Endovascular surgery may still have a role in improving outcomes in these patients.

The Importance of Anatomical Suitability and Fitness for the Outcome of Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

INTRODUCTION Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm (EVAR) has a lower mortality than open repair. The aim of this study was to assess mortality from EVAR for emergency AAA repair and the impact of fitness for operation and adverse anatomy. METHODS One-hundred and forty two patients who had EVAR for a ruptured AAA (80, REVAR) or a symptomatic AAA (62, SEVAR) between 1994 and 2007 in a single specialist endovascular centre were reviewed. Fitness for surgery was assessed by Hardmans index (age>76, loss of consciousness, Hb<9.0, Cr>190, ischaemic ECG). CT scans were reviewed, compared with operative images and operation notes for adverse anatomy. Details of perioperative complications, and outcome were recorded. RESULTS Overall mortality at 24-h, 30-days and one year were, respectively: 17%, 36%, 50% for REVAR and 5%, 8%, 23% for SEVAR. Overall adverse anatomy increased 30-day mortality. Hardmans index of three or more increased mortality HR=2.59 (1.24-5.41), p=0.01. On Cox regression Univariate analysis increasing Hardmans index score and adverse anatomy increased the overall mortality over time. In multivariate Cox regression analysis (controlled for the Hardmans index) adverse anatomy was associated with significant increase in graft related mortality. CONCLUSION The use of EVAR is feasible in patients who present with a ruptured or acutely symptomatic AAA. Care must be taken not to extend anatomical or clinical guidelines.

Transperitoneal laparoscopic left gonadal vein ligation can be the right treatment option for pelvic congestion symptoms secondary to nutcracker syndrome.

The nutcracker phenomenon refers to compression of the left renal vein at the origin of the superior mesenteric artery and is often underdiagnosed. This can cause symptoms of pelvic venous congestion with retrograde venous flow and a dilated gonadal vein. Here we describe a case in a 39-year-old female, who following imaging investigations to confirm the diagnosis, underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic ligation of the left gonadal vein. Laparoscopic sterilization was also performed with the aid of the gynecologists. Multiparous women, who are more likely to develop pelvic congestion symptoms, more commonly request sterilization and thus we propose that a dual laparoscopic procedure in these cases could be the treatment of choice.

Use of the Hardman Index in Predicting Mortality in Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

PURPOSE The Hardman index is a predictor of 30-day mortality after open ruptured abdominal aneurysm repair through the use of preoperative patient factors. The aim of this study was to assess the Hardman index in patients undergoing endovascular repair of ruptured aortic aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of 95 patients undergoing emergency endovascular repairs of computed tomography-confirmed ruptured aneurysms from 1994 to 2008 in a university hospital was performed. All relevant patient variables, calculations of the Hardman index, and the incidence of 30-day mortality were collected in these patients. Correlation of the relationship between each variable and the overall score with the incidence of 30-day mortality was undertaken. RESULTS The 24-hour mortality was 16% and 30-day mortality 36%. Increasing scores on the Hardman index showed an increasing mortality rate. Thirty-day mortality in patients with a score of 0 to 2 was 30.5%, and in those with a score of ≥3 was 69.2% (P = .01, risk ratio = 2.26, 95% confidence interval = 0.98 to 5.17). This is lower than predicted in both patient groups based on Hardman index score. Loss of consciousness was the only statistically significant independent predictor of 30-day mortality with a risk ratio of 3.16 (95% confidence interval = 2.00-4.97, P < .001). CONCLUSION These data suggest that the Hardman index can predict an increased risk of 30-day mortality from endovascular repairs of ruptured aortic aneurysms. However, mortality from endovascular repair is much lower than would be predicted in open repair and it therefore cannot be used clinically as a tool for exclusion from intervention.

The Feasibility of Reentry Device in Recanalization of TASC C and D Iliac Occlusions

Aim: To determine the feasibility of subintimal angioplasty (SIA), aided by reentry device in iliac artery occlusions. Methods: Forty-eight patients with severe claudication (Fontaine-III, n = 24) or critical limb ischaemia (Fontaine-IV, n = 24) had SIA, aided with a reentry device, for chronic iliac occlusions TASC C (n =28) and D (n = 20). The primary outcome was arterial patency at duplex follow-up. Secondary outcomes were primary failure, postprocedural complications, stent use, late occlusions, and length of hospital stay. Results: The patency rate was 89% at a mean follow-up of 13 (±11) months. There were 2 primary failures, no postprocedural complications, and 5 late occlusions. Almost 80% of patients were ready for discharge within 24 hours. Conclusions: Subintimal angioplasty with a reentry device for long iliac occlusions provides a feasible option with excellent results and short hospital stay. A randomized trial of SIA of iliac occlusion versus open reconstruction is now required.

Technique for Retrieval of a Knotted and Entrapped Guide Wire After Central Venous Catheterization

Central venous catheterization is a common procedure performed in the critically ill patient. The complication associated with this invasive procedure is well established. However, complication related to the guide wire is rare. We present a case of knotted and entrapped guide wire following central venous catheterization using the Seldinger method and technique to retrieve it nonoperatively.