Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Bruce H. Dean is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Bruce H. Dean.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2006

Phase Retrieval Algorithm for JWST Flight and Testbed Telescope

Bruce H. Dean; David L. Aronstein; J. Scott Smith; Ron Shiri; D. Scott Acton

An image-based wavefront sensing and control algorithm for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is presented. The algorithm heritage is discussed in addition to implications for algorithm performance dictated by NASAs Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 6. The algorithm uses feedback through an adaptive diversity function to avoid the need for phase-unwrapping post-processing steps. Algorithm results are demonstrated using JWST Testbed Telescope (TBT) commissioning data and the accuracy is assessed by comparison with interferometer results on a multi-wave phase aberration. Strategies for minimizing aliasing artifacts in the recovered phase are presented and orthogonal basis functions are implemented for representing wavefronts in irregular hexagonal apertures. Algorithm implementation on a parallel cluster of high-speed digital signal processors (DSPs) is also discussed.


Journal of The Optical Society of America A-optics Image Science and Vision | 2003

Diversity selection for phase-diverse phase retrieval.

Bruce H. Dean; Charles W. Bowers

Wavefront-sensing performance is assessed for focus-diverse phase retrieval as the aberration spatial frequency and the diversity defocus are varied. The analysis includes analytical predictions for optimal diversity values corresponding to the recovery of a dominant spatial-frequency component in the pupil. The calculation is shown to be consistent with the Cramér-Rao lower bound by considering a sensitivity analysis of the point-spread function to the spatial frequency being estimated. A maximum value of diversity defocus is also calculated, beyond which wavefront-sensing performance decreases as diversity defocus is increased. The results are shown to be consistent with the Talbot imaging phenomena, explaining multiple periodic regions of maximum and minimum contrast as a function of aberration spatial frequency and defocus. Wavefront-sensing performance for an iterative-transform phase-retrieval algorithm is also considered as diversity defocus and aberration spatial frequency are varied.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2007

TRL-6 for JWST wavefront sensing and control

Lee D. Feinberg; Bruce H. Dean; David L. Aronstein; Charles W. Bowers; William L. Hayden; Richard G. Lyon; Ron Shiri; J. Scott Smith; D. Scott Acton; Larkin Carey; Adam R. Contos; Erin Sabatke; John P. Schwenker; Duncan Shields; Tim Towell; Fang Shi; Luis Meza

NASAs Technology Readiness Level (TRL)-6 is documented for the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Wavefront Sensing and Control (WFSC) subsystem. The WFSC subsystem is needed to align the Optical Telescope Element (OTE) after all deployments have occurred, and achieves that requirement through a robust commissioning sequence consisting of unique commissioning algorithms, all of which are part of the WFSC algorithm suite. This paper identifies the technology need, algorithm heritage, describes the finished TRL-6 design platform, and summarizes the TRL-6 test results and compliance. Additionally, the performance requirements needed to satisfy JWST science goals as well as the criterion that relate to the TRL-6 Testbed Telescope (TBT) performance requirements are discussed.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2012

Wavefront Sensing and Controls for the James Webb Space Telescope

D. Scott Acton; J. Scott Knight; Adam R. Contos; Stefano Grimaldi; James P. Terry; Paul A. Lightsey; Allison Barto; B. League; Bruce H. Dean; J. Scott Smith; Charles W. Bowers; David L. Aronstein; Lee D. Feinberg; William L. Hayden; Thomas Comeau; Rémi Soummer; Erin Elliott; Marshall D. Perrin; Carl W. Starr

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is a segmented deployable telescope, utilizing 6 degrees of freedom for adjustment of the Secondary Mirror (SM) and 7 degrees of freedom for adjustment of each of its 18 segments in the Primary Mirror (PM). When deployed, the PM segments and the SM will be placed in their correct optical positions to within a few mm, with accordingly large wavefront errors. The challenge, therefore, is to position each of these optical elements in order to correct the deployment errors and produce a diffraction-limited telescope, at λ=2μm, across the entire science field. This paper describes a suite of processes, algorithms, and software that has been developed to achieve this precise alignment, using images taken from JWST’s science instruments during commissioning. The results of flight-like end-to-end simulations showing the commissioning process are also presented.


Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation | 2000

Wavefront Control for a Segmented Deployable Space Telescope

David C. Redding; Scott A. Basinger; David Cohen; Andrew E. Lowman; Fang Shi; Pierre Y. Bely; Charles W. Bowers; Richard Burg; Laura A. Burns; Pamela S. Davila; Bruce H. Dean; Gary E. Mosier; Todd A. Norton; Peter Petrone; Brendon D. Perkins; Mark E. Wilson

By segmenting and folding the primary mirror, quite large telescopes can be packed into the nose cone of a rocket. Deployed after launch, initial optical performance can be quite poor, due to deployment errors, thermal deformation, fabrication errors and other causes. We describe an automatic control system for capturing, aligning, phasing, and deforming the optics of such a telescope, going from initial cm-level wavefront errors to diffraction-limited observatory operations. This system was developed for the Next Generation Space Telescope and is being tested on the NGST Wavefront Control Testbed.


Optical Engineering | 2012

Space telescope design considerations

Lee D. Feinberg; Lester M. Cohen; Bruce H. Dean; William L. Hayden; Joseph M. Howard; Ritva A. M. Keski-Kuha

The design considerations for astronomical space telescopes cover many disciplines but can be simplified into two overarching constraints: the desire to maximize science while adhering to budgetary constraints. More than ever, understanding the cost implications up front will be critical to success. Science performance can be translated into a set of simple performance metrics that set the requirements for design options. Cost is typically estimated by considering mass, complexity, technology maturity, and heritage. With this in mind, we survey the many diverse design considerations for a space telescope and, where appropriate, relate them to these basic performance metrics. In so doing, we hope to provide a roadmap for future space telescope designers on how best to optimize the design to maximize science and minimize total cost.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2006

Demonstration of the James Webb Space Telescope commissioning on the JWST testbed telescope

D. Scott Acton; Timothy W. Towell; John P. Schwenker; John P. Swensen; Duncan Shields; Erin Sabatke; Lana Klingemann; Adam R. Contos; Brian Bauer; Karl Hansen; Paul D. Atcheson; David C. Redding; Fang Shi; Scott A. Basinger; Bruce H. Dean; Laura A. Burns

The one-meter Testbed Telescope (TBT) has been developed at Ball Aerospace to facilitate the design and implementation of the wavefront sensing and control (WFS&C) capabilities of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). The TBT is used to develop and verify the WFS&C algorithms, check the communication interfaces, validate the WFS&C optical components and actuators, and provide risk reduction opportunities for test approaches for later full-scale cryogenic vacuum testing of the observatory. In addition, the TBT provides a vital opportunity to demonstrate the entire WFS&C commissioning process. This paper describes recent WFS&C commissioning experiments that have been performed on the TBT.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2010

ATLAST-9.2m: a large-aperture deployable space telescope

William R. Oegerle; Lee D. Feinberg; Lloyd Purves; Tupper Hyde; Harley Thronson; Jacqueline A. Townsend; Marc Postman; Matthew R. Bolcar; Jason Budinoff; Bruce H. Dean; Mark Clampin; Dennis C. Ebbets; Qian Gong; Theodore R. Gull; Joseph M. Howard; Andrew L. Jones; Richard G. Lyon; Bert A. Pasquale; Charles Perrygo; Jeffrey S. Smith; Patrick L. Thompson; Bruce E. Woodgate

We present results of a study of a deployable version of the Advanced Technology Large-Aperture Space Telescope (ATLAST), designed to operate in a Sun-Earth L2 orbit. The primary mirror of the segmented 9.2-meter aperture has 36 hexagonal 1.315 m (flat-to-flat) glass mirrors. The architecture and folding of the telescope is similar to JWST, allowing it to fit into the 6.5 m fairing of a modest upgrade to the Delta-IV Heavy version of the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV). We discuss the overall observatory design, optical design, instruments, stray light, wavefront sensing and control, pointing and thermal control, and in-space servicing options.


Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation | 2003

Optical design and performance of the NGST wavefront control testbed

Peter Petrone; Scott A. Basinger; Laura A. Burns; Charles W. Bowers; Andrew Chu; David Cohen; Pamela S. Davila; Bruce H. Dean; Peter Dogota; Michael W. Fitzmaurice; Joseph J. Green; Kong Ha; William L. Hayden; Don J. Lindler; Andrew E. Lowman; Catherine M. Ohara; Mark E. Wilson; David C. Redding; Fang Shi; Barbara Zukowski

The NGST Wavefront Control Testbed (WCT) is a joint technology program managed by the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) for the purpose of developing technologies relevant to the NGST optical system. The WCT provides a flexible testing environment that supports the development of wavefront sensing and control algorithms that may be used to align and control a segmented optical system. WCT is a modular system consisting of a Source Module (SM), Telescope Simulator Module (TSM) and an Aft-Optics (AO) bench. The SM incorporates multiple sources, neutral density filters and bandpass filters to provide a customized point source for the TSM. The telescope simulator module contains a flip-in mirror that selects between a small deformable mirror and three actively controlled spherical mirror segments. The TSM is capable of delivering a wide range of aberrated, unaberrated, continuous and segmented wavefronts to the AO optical bench for analysis. The AO bench consists of a series of reflective and transmissive optics that images the exit pupil of the TSM onto a 349 actuator deformable mirror that is used for wavefront correction. A Fast Steering Mirror (FSM) may be inserted into the system (AO bench) to investigate image stability and to compensate for systematic jitter when operated in a closed loop mode. We will describe the optical design and performance of the WCT hardware and discuss the impact of environmental factors on system performance.


Frontiers in Optics | 2010

Determination of the Sampling Factor in a Phase-Diverse Phase Retrieval Algorithm

Thomas P. Zielinski; Bruce H. Dean; Jeffrey S. Smith; David L. Aronstein; James R. Fienup

The sampling factor (Q) determines the scale relationship between the pupil and image plane. Knowledge of this quantity is essential for obtaining accurate retrieval results. We present a method for determining Q from image data.

Collaboration


Dive into the Bruce H. Dean's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David L. Aronstein

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeffrey S. Smith

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lee D. Feinberg

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Scott Smith

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Charles W. Bowers

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fang Shi

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jason Budinoff

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge