Bruce J. Gerbi

Stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent malignant gliomas.

PURPOSE To evaluate the role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of recurrent malignant gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS We treated 35 patients with large (median treatment volume, 28 cm3) recurrent tumors that had failed to respond to conventional treatment. Twenty-six patients (74%) had glioblastomas multiforme (GBM) and nine (26%) had anaplastic astrocytomas (AA). RESULTS The mean time from diagnosis to radiosurgery was 10 months (range, 1 to 36), from radiosurgery to death, 8.0 months (range, 1 to 23). Twenty-one GBM (81%) and six AA (67%) patients have died. The actuarial survival time for all patients was 21 months from diagnosis and 8 months from radiosurgery. Twenty-two of 26 patients (85%) died of local or marginal failure, three (12%) of noncontiguous failure, and one (4%) of CSF dissemination. Age (P = .0405) was associated with improved survival on multivariate analysis, and age (P = .0110) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (P = .0285) on univariate analysis. Histology, treatment volume, and treatment dose were not significant variables by univariate analysis. Seven patients required surgical resection for increasing mass effect a mean of 4.0 months after radiosurgery, for an actuarial reoperation rate of 31%. Surgery did not significantly influence survival. At surgery, four patients had recurrent tumor, two had radiation necrosis, and one had both tumor and necrosis. The actuarial necrosis rate was 14% and the pathologic findings could have been predicted by the integrated logistic formula for developing symptomatic brain injury. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiosurgery appears to prolong survival for recurrent malignant gliomas and has a lower reoperative rate for symptomatic necrosis than does brachytherapy. Patterns of failure are similar for both of these techniques.

Single dose versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas by comparing two different treatment regimens, single dose or fractionated radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between April 1991 and January 1998, 71 patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas were treated with SRT. Forty-six patients (65%) were treated with single dose radiosurgery (SRS) and 25 patients (35 %) with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). For the SRS group, the median radiosurgical dose of 17 Gy was delivered to the median of 50% isodose surface (IDS) encompassing the target. For the FSRT group, the median dose of 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions was delivered to the median of 85% IDS. RESULTS Actuarial median survival time was 11 months for the SRS group and 12 months for the FSRT group (p = 0.3, log-rank test). Variables predicting longer survival were younger age (p = 0.006), lower grade (p = 0.0006), higher Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) (p = 0.0005), and smaller tumor volume (p = 0.02). Patients in the SRS group had more favorable prognostic factors, with median age of 48 years, KPS of 70, and tumor volume of 10 ml versus median age of 53 years, KPS of 60, and tumor volume of 25 ml in the FSRT group. Late complications developed in 14 patients in the SRS group and 2 patients in the FSRT group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Given that FSRT patients had comparable survival to SRS patients, despite having poorer pretreatment prognostic factors and a lower risk of late complications, FSRT may be a better option for patients with larger tumors or tumors in eloquent structures. Since this is a nonrandomized study, further investigation is needed to confirm this and to determine an optimal dose/fractionation scheme.

Dosimetric considerations for patients with HIP prostheses undergoing pelvic irradiation. Report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 63.

This document is the report of a task group of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the AAPM and has been prepared primarily to advise hospital physicists involved in external beam treatment of patients with pelvic malignancies who have high atomic number (Z) hip prostheses. The purpose of the report is to make the radiation oncology community aware of the problems arising from the presence of these devices in the radiation beam, to quantify the dose perturbations they cause, and, finally, to provide recommendations for treatment planning and delivery. Some of the data and recommendations are also applicable to patients having implanted high-Z prosthetic devices such as pins, humeral head replacements. The scientific understanding and methodology of clinical dosimetry for these situations is still incomplete. This report is intended to reflect the current state of scientific understanding and technical methodology in clinical dosimetry for radiation oncology patients with high-Z hip prostheses.

Measurement of dose in the buildup region using fixed-separation plane-parallel ionization chambers

Accurate measurement of dose at the surface of a phantom and in the buildup region is a difficult task but one that is important for the proper treatment of patients. The instruments of choice for these measurements are extrapolation chambers but few institutions have these instruments at their disposal. As a result, fixed-separation plane-parallel ionization chambers are most commonly used for this purpose. Recent papers have re-emphasized the inaccuracies in the measurement of dose in the buildup region of normally incident photon beams when using fixed-separation plane-parallel ionization chambers. Data for Co-60, 6-, 10-, 18-, and 24-MV photon beams are presented that show the magnitude of this over response in the buildup region for several commercially available plane-parallel ionization chambers versus results obtained using both an extrapolation chamber and LiF thermoluminescent detectors. Differences in the percent depth dose at the surface of a phantom of greater than 19% were found for one of the chambers. All chambers over responded in the buildup region to some degree based upon their internal dimensions. The appropriateness of published corrections for these chambers is evaluated and guidelines for the accurate measurement of dose in the buildup region are presented.

Feasibility study of helical tomotherapy for total body or total marrow irradiation.

Total body radiation (TBI) has been used for many years as a preconditioning agent before bone marrow transplantation. Many side effects still plague its use. We investigated the planning and delivery of total body irradiation (TBI) and selective total marrow irradiation (TMI) and a reduced radiation dose to sensitive structures using image-guided helical tomotherapy. To assess the feasibility of using helical tomotherapy, (A) we studied variations in pitch, field width, and modulation factor on total body and total marrow helical tomotherapy treatments. We varied these parameters to provide a uniform dose along with a treatment times similar to conventional TBI (15-30min). (B) We also investigated limited (head, chest, and pelvis) megavoltage CT (MVCT) scanning for the dimensional pretreatment setup verification rather than total body MVCT scanning to shorten the overall treatment time per treatment fraction

Recommendations for clinical electron beam dosimetry: Supplement to the recommendations of Task Group 25

The goal of Task Group 25 (TG-25) of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of.Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) was to provide a methodology and set of procedures for a medical physicist performing clinical electron beam dosimetry in the nominal energy range of 5-25 MeV. Specifically, the task group recommended procedures for acquiring basic information required for acceptance testing and treatment planning of new accelerators with therapeutic electron beams. Since the publication of the TG-25 report, significant advances have taken place in the field of electron beam dosimetry, the most significant being that primary standards laboratories around the world have shifted from calibration standards based on exposure or air kerma to standards based on absorbed dose to water. The AAPM has published a new calibration protocol, TG-51, for the calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams. The formalism and dosimetry procedures recommended in this protocol are based on the absorbed dose to water calibration coefficient of an ionization chamber at 60Co energy, N60Co(D,w), together with the theoretical beam quality conversion coefficient k(Q) for the determination of absorbed dose to water in high-energy photon and electron beams. Task Group 70 was charged to reassess and update the recommendations in TG-25 to bring them into alignment with report TG-51 and to recommend new methodologies and procedures that would allow the practicing medical physicist to initiate and continue a high quality program in clinical electron beam dosimetry. This TG-70 report is a supplement to the TG-25 report and enhances the TG-25 report by including new topics and topics that were not covered in depth in the TG-25 report. These topics include procedures for obtaining data to commission a treatment planning computer, determining dose in irregularly shaped electron fields, and commissioning of sophisticated special procedures using high-energy electron beams. The use of radiochromic film for electrons is addressed, and radiographic film that is no longer available has been replaced by film that is available. Realistic stopping-power data are incorporated when appropriate along with enhanced tables of electron fluence data. A larger list of clinical applications of electron beams is included in the full TG-70 report available at http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports. Descriptions of the techniques in the clinical sections are not exhaustive but do describe key elements of the procedures and how to initiate these programs in the clinic. There have been no major changes since the TG-25 report relating to flatness and symmetry, surface dose, use of thermoluminescent dosimeters or diodes, virtual source position designation, air gap corrections, oblique incidence, or corrections for inhomogeneities. Thus these topics are not addressed in the TG-70 report.

Dosimetry of asymmetric x ray collimators

We have studied the dosimetry of an independent jaw system (provided with the Varian Clinac 2,500) using ionometric measurements performed both in air and in a water phantom. Our study shows that the effect of the independent jaw on the dose distribution is similar to that of secondary blocking except for changes produced in the collimator scatter. A system of dose calculation was developed which takes into account the changes in the collimator scatter as well as in the isodose distribution. A method is described to correctly generate isodose curves for fields shaped by an independent jaw using a modified AECL TP11 treatment planning system. The primary modification in the program consists of correcting the zero-area tissue-maximum ratios for the off-axis variation in beam quality.

Patient selection criteria for the treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery

In this study we evaluate prognostic factors that predict local-regional control and survival following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with brain metastasis and establish guidelines for patient selection. Our evaluation is based on 73 patients with brain metastasis treated with SRS at the University of Minnesota between March 1991 and November 1995. The ability of stereotactic radiosurgery to improve local control in patients with brain metastases is confirmed in our study in which only 6 of 62 patients failed locally after SRS, with an actuarial local progression-free survival of 80% at 2 years. Variables that predicted worse prognosis were larger tumor size (p=0.05) for local progression-free survival and multiplicity of metastasis (p=0.03) and infratentiorial location of metastases (p=0.006) for regional progression-free survival. Absence of extracranial disease, KPS ≥ 70, and single intracranial metastasis were significant predictors of longer survival. Patients who fulfill all three criteria will survive longer after SRS (MS=17.7 months) and will most likely benefit from the increase local control in the brain achieved by SRS. Survival in patients who do not meet any of these criteria is very poor (MS=1.5 months), and these patients are less likely to benefit from this treatment. Careful selection of patients for SRS is warranted.

The polarity effect for commercially available plane-parallel ionization chambers

The polarity effect was investigated for three different commercially available plane-parallel ionization chambers: the Memorial Pipe chamber, the Victoreen/Nuclear Associates model 30-329 chamber manufactured by PTW, Frieburg, and the Capintec PS-033 thin-window ionization chamber. The primary study was the polarity effect versus depth below the phantom surface for 6-, 10-, 18-, and 24-MV x-ray beams, and 9- and 22-MeV electron beams. The polarity effect in the region of nonelectronic equilibrium that exists at the interface of two dissimilar materials, polystyrene and aluminum, was investigated as well as the effects of field size. For the group of plane-parallel ionization chambers that we studied, we found a polarity effect of only 1%-2% for electron beams at the depth of dmax. At depths greater than dmax, the polarity effect for electrons increased and was as high as 4.5% for some chambers. When used in the buildup region of high-energy photon beams, these same chambers exhibited up to a 30% difference in collected charge between one polarity and the other. This effect and its relationship to physical chamber characteristics is discussed.

In vivo diode dosimetry for routine quality assurance in IMRT.

Due to the complexity of IMRT dosimetry, dose delivery evaluation is generally done using a treatment plan in which the optimized fluence distribution has been transferred to a test phantom for accessibility and simplicity of measurement. The actual patient doses may be reconstructed in vivo through the use of electronic portal imaging devices or films, but the assessment of absolute dose from these measurements is time-consuming and complicated. In our clinic we have instituted the use of routine diode dosimetry for IMRT patients following the same procedure used for standard radiation therapy patients in which each new treatment field is checked at the start of treatment. For standard cases the dose at dmax is calculated as part of the monitor unit calculation. For the IMRT cases, the dose contribution to the dmax depth for each field is taken from the treatment plan. We found that about 90% of the diode measurements agreed to within +/- 10% of the planned doses (45/51 fields) and 63% (32/51 fields) achieved +/- 5% agreement. By using this direct in vivo method to verify the clinical doses delivered, we have been able to make a uniform startup procedure for all patients while simplifying our IMRT QA process.