Burton E. Becker

Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: A retrospective study

This retrospective report presents findings on 22 patients with 24 implants replacing single molars with implant-supported restorations. Patients with known bruxism habits were not considered for single-molar implant replacement. The patients underwent follow-up for an average of 24 months. The cumulative success rate was 95%, which reflects the loss of one 5 x 6 mm wide implant. Eleven implants were placed in edentulous ridges, and 13 were placed in extraction sockets. Most of the implants were placed in type B and C bone quantity and type 2 and 3 bone quality. All implants were restored on abutments with nonrotating gold cylinders. The occlusion for all restorations was developed to minimize centric contacts and lateral interferences. The frequency of gold retaining-screw loosening was obtained for 21 patients. The gold retaining screws loosened in eight implants between one and three times (38%). No incidence of crown or implant fracture occurred. Within the limits of this study, replacement of single-tooth molars by implant-supported restorations was predictable; however, a high incidence of gold screw loosening was seen.

Treatment of mandibular 3-wall intrabony defects by flap debridement and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes. Long-term evaluation of 32 treated patients.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the healing potential of deep, primarily 3wall intrabony defects which were treated by flap debridement and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membranes and followed for extended time periods. All of the treated defects were in the mandibular arch. Thirty-two patients were treated and reexamined at an average of 3 years 5 months. Twenty-four of these patients had re-entry procedures at the second examination. Sixteen of these patients were examined a third time at an average of 4 years 3 months. The patients were evaluated for changes in probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), recession, changes in crestal resorption, and defect bone fill. The paired t-test for related samples was used to test for differences between examinations. Between Exams 1 and 2 there was a statistically significant reduction of pocket depth (3.8 mm), gain in clinical attachment level (4.2 mm), and an increase in recession (-1.2 mm). For the 24 patients who had re-entry procedures there was an average defect fill of 4.3 mm (P < 0.0001) and 0.33 mm of crestal resorption (P < 0.0001). The 16 patients who were examined 3 times sustained decreases in PD, gains in CAL, and recession recorded at the second examination. These changes were statistically significant at Exam 3. The results of this study demonstrate that deep, 3-wall intrabony defects treated by debridement and ePTFE barrier membranes will have significant decreases in PD, gains in CAL, recession, decreases in crestal resorption, and gains in bone fill. These gains can be maintained over extended time intervals and are considered to be predictable. J Periodontol 1993; 64:1138-1144.

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Papillae Deficiencies in the Esthetic Zone: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND The presence of papillary deficiencies adjacent to dental implants or teeth presents an esthetic concern for the dental team and patients. PURPOSE The aim of this pilot project is to evaluate a new method for reducing or eliminating small papillary deficiencies. The use of a commercially available gel was evaluated as a possible method for enhancing deficient papillae. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eleven patients, seven females and four males, with an average age of 55.8 years (ranging from 25 to 75 years) with 14 treated sites are included in this pilot study. Patients had a minimum of one papillary deficiency in the esthetic zone. Prior to treatment photographs were either taken at a 1:1 ratio or converted to a 1:1 ratio using a commercially available program. A standardization photographic device was not used. After administration of a local anesthetic, a 23-gauge needle was used to inject less than 0.2 mL of a commercially available and Food and Drug Administration-approved gel of hyaluronic acid 2-3 mm apical to the coronal tip of the involved papillae. Patients were seen every three weeks and treatment was repeated up to three times. Patients were followed from 6 to 25 months after initial gel application. A computer program measured changes in pixels between initial and final treatments. A formula was derived to determine percentage change in the negative space between initial and final examinations. RESULTS Each site was individually evaluated. Three implant sites and one site adjacent to a tooth had 100% improvement between treatment examinations. Seven sites improved from 94 to 97%, three sites improved from 76 to 88%, and one site adjacent to an implant had 57% improvement. CONCLUSION Results from this pilot study are encouraging and present evidence that small papillary deficiencies between implants and teeth can be enhanced by injection of a hyaluronic gel. Improvements were maintained for a range of 6 to 25 months.

PERIODONTAL REGENERATION AROUND NATURAL TEETH

1. Evidence is conclusive (Table 2) that periodontal regeneration in humans is possible following the use of bone grafts, guided tissue regeneration procedures, both without and in combination with bone grafts, and root demineralization procedures. 2. Clinically guided tissue regeneration procedures have demonstrated significant positive clinical change beyond that achieved with debridement alone in treating mandibular and maxillary (buccal only) Class II furcations. Similar data exist for intraosseous defects. Evidence suggests that the use of bone grafts or GTR procedures produce equal clinical benefit in treating intraosseous defects. Further research is necessary to evaluate GTR procedures compared to, or combined with, bone grafts in treating intraosseous defects. 3. Although there are some data suggesting hopeful results in Class II furcations, the clinical advantage of procedures combining present regenerative techniques remains to be demonstrated. Additional randomized controlled trials with sufficient power are needed to demonstrate the potential usefulness of these techniques. 4. Outcomes following regenerative attempts remain somewhat variable with differences in results between studies and individual subjects. Some of this variability is likely patient related in terms of compliance with plaque control and maintenance procedures, as well as personal habits; e.g., smoking. Variations in the defects selected for study may also affect predictability of outcomes along with other factors. 5. There is evidence to suggest that present regenerative techniques lead to significant amounts of regeneration at localized sites on specific teeth. However, if complete regeneration is to become a reality, additional stimuli to enhance the regenerative process are likely needed. Perhaps this will be accomplished in the future, with combined procedures that include appropriate polypeptide growth factors or tissue factors to provide additional stimulus.

Prospective Clinical Trial Evaluating a New Implant System for Implant Survival, Implant Stability and Radiographic Bone Changes

BACKGROUND There are a few prospective studies reporting on new implant systems. When a new implant is brought to market, prospective trials should be carried out to determine the predictability of that system. PURPOSE This prospective study evaluates implant survival, Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA), and crestal bone level changes for a new implant system (Neoss System, Bimodal surface, Neoss Ltd, Harrogate, UK). MATERIALS AND METHODS Seventy-six patients, 38 females (age ranging from 23 to 57 years) and 38 males (ranging in age from 17 to 85 years) received 100 Neoss implants. Patients were consecutively enrolled in the study if they were missing one or more teeth in either arch, or a single tooth was scheduled for removal and immediate implant replacement. Evaluated implants were 4, 4.5, or 5 mm wide and were 7, 9, 11, 13, or 15 mm long. A one-stage approach was followed. At first stage and prior to healing abutment placement RFA measurements were taken. Measurements were retaken at second stage. Fifty-one implants were placed for restoration of single missing teeth and 49 were for short span implant bridges. RESULTS The cumulative survival rate at 1- to 2-year interval was 93%. Average initial RFA measurement for all implants was 72.06, while the average final score was 72.58. These changes were not statistically significant. Changes in RFA scores for maxillary implants were insignificant. Forty-two paired mandibular RFA measurements were evaluated. Initial and final mean mandibular RAF measurements were 73.65 (SD 9.203) and 77.186 (SD 6.177), respectively. These changes were statistically significant (p = .02). Sixty-four paired radiographs were available for evaluation. Between examinations, there was an average -0.6 mm of bone loss, which was statistically significant (p = .03). On average, 4.0-mm-wide implants lost 0.1 mm of bone when compared with 5-mm-wide implants. These differences were insignificant (p = .86). Bone loss was adjusted for implant length, and tooth position and there were small, but clinically insignificant changes. Five-millimeter-wide implants lose 0.2 mm more than 4.0-mm-wide implants (p = .7). Maxillary incisors lose the least amount of bone 0.152 (p = .33). CONCLUSIONS The implants tested in this study had initially high RAF readings, indicating good primary stability. RFA readings for implants placed in the mandible improved from baseline and the changes were statistically significant. Marginal bone levels revealed clinically insignificant bone loss from implant installation to second stage. Loss of seven implants with initially high RFA readings is surprising.

Dental Implants in an Aged Population: Evaluation of Periodontal Health, Bone Loss, Implant Survival, and Quality of Life.

PURPOSE To evaluate aged partially and fully edentulous patients who received dental implants and were maintained over time. Further, to determine how the partially and edentulous ageing populations (65 and above) with dental implants maintain bone levels, proper oral hygiene, and perceive benefits of dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since 1995, patients receiving dental implants have been prospectively entered into an Access-based computerized program (Triton Tacking System). Patient demographics (age, sex), bone quality, quantity, implant location, and type of surgery have been continuously entered into the database. The database was queried for patients receiving implants (first stage) between 66 and 93 years of age. Thirty-one patients were within this age group. Twenty-five patients returned to the clinic for periodontal and dental implant evaluation. The Periodontal Index was used to evaluate selected teeth in terms of probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque accumulation, and mobility. Using NIH Image J, radiographs taken at second stage and last examination were measured for changes in interproximal bone levels. Once identified, each patient anomalously filled out an abbreviated quality of health life form. Due to small sample size, descriptive statistics were used to compare clinical findings. RESULTS Fifteen males ranging from 78 to 84 (mean age 84 years) years and 16 females from 66 to 93 (mean age 83 years) (age range 66-93) were contacted by phone or mail and asked to return to our office for a re-examination. For this group, the first dental implants were placed in 1996 (n = initial two implants) and continuously recorded through 2013 (n = last seven implants). Thirty-one patients received a total of 84 implants. Two patients were edentulous, and the remaining were partially edentulous. Four implants were lost. Between implant placement and 6- to 7-year interval, 13 patients with 40 implants had a cumulative survival rate of 94.6%. Of the original group (n = 33), three were deceased, two were in nursing homes, and three could not be located. CONCLUSIONS Aged patients receiving dental implants had excellent implant survival rates, low periodontal disease index scores with minimal changes in interproximal bone levels. Results from this study indicate that patients with advanced age, in reasonably good health, have excellent implant survival rates, excellent quality of life scores, and can be maintained in good oral health.

Survival rates and bone level changes around porous oxide-coated implants (TiUnite™).

PURPOSE This prospective study evaluated implant survival rates and crestal bone changes for porous oxide-coated (TiUnite, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), parallel-walled implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients receiving TiUnite (porous oxide-surfaced implants [POS]) implants were entered into a database (Triton Tracking System) starting February 1999. Survival rates were calculated from the date of implant placement and related to surgical method of placement (two-stage buried, flapless, immediate placement, immediate placement flapless, one stage), bone quality, and implant characteristics. Failed and nonfailed implants were compared with respect to changes in mean proximal bone levels and the presence of radiolucent areas around the implant apex (shadows). RESULTS Four hundred nine patients received 817 porous oxide-coated implants, of which 38 failed. Using the last office visit as the censoring date, the cumulative survival date was 93%. The failure rate was independent of bone quality or quantity; implant diameter or length; and surgical method. For the 102 surviving implants, there was no significant change in the average crestal bone loss (+0.13 mm with a standard error, 0.17). For the 17 failing implants, the average crestal bone loss was -4.14 mm (standard error, 0.55). This difference between bone levels of failing and nonfailing implants was highly significant (p < .0001). There was no difference in the prevalence of radiographic shadows around failing and nonfailing implants at time of placement (p < .16). CONCLUSION Results from this prospective clinical study indicate that 7% of TiUnite surfaced implants failed for unknown reasons. Failing implants were characterized by significant bone loss but not by the presence of shadows.

A Novel Method for Creating an Optimal Emergence Profile Adjacent to Dental Implants

UNLABELLED In order to establish an optimal esthetic implant result, creation of an optimal emergence profile is necessary. The purpose of this clinical report is to describe a new method for creating an emergence profile starting at the time of immediate implant placement. Clinical steps for creating the emergence profile are described from the time of implant placement to restoration. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Prefabricated abutments that can be modified and used as healing abutments or for provisional restorations offer clinicians the opportunity to create emergence profiles during the healing phase after immediate implant treatment. This procedure eliminates the need for creation of an arbitrary emergence profile in the dental laboratory and eliminates the need for a surgical procedure prior to impression making.

Resonance frequency analysis: Comparing two clinical instruments

BACKGROUND Numerous studies indicate implants placed immediately after extraction or with minimally invasive procedures have excellent long-term success and survival rates. There is general agreement that implants must be stable after implant placement. This study evaluated implant stability changes from the time of implant placement to second stage (prior to restoration). Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was determined for two commercially available units (Osstell, Osstell USA, Columbia, MD and Penguin, Penguin Integration Diagnostics, Sweden). The unit of measurement was the implant stability quotient (ISQ). MATERIALS AND METHODS Prior to treatment patients were given medical and dental evaluations. Periapical and panogram radiographs were taken Computerized tomography images were taken for sites where adequate bone volume or quality were uncertain. Thirty patients were enrolled in this study (13 females, 17 males, mean age 73.4 years, (maximum age 90, minimum 47 year total of 38 implants were placed. One implant was lost. Computerized implant planning (Nobel Clinician) Nobel Biocar United States (Nobel Biocare, Yorba Linda, CA) was performed for all patients. Implants were placed utilizing a surgical guide. Using Resonance Frequency anal this study compared two RFA systems for determining implant stability (ISQ; Osstell and Penguin). Measurement pegs were screwed into the implants, and RFA measurements were taken at mesial, distal, lingual, and buccal implant surfaces. Stability measurements were taken at implant placement and at second stage. Clinical data and RFA measurements were recorded on data sheets. The average interval between first and second stages was 144.1 days (range 21.3) RESULTS: Average interval between implant placement and second stage was 141.1 days. One implant was lost prior to second stage. The results are based on 30 patients with 38 implants. At second stage, the RFA measures were slightly higher than first stage with a mean increase of 1.15, SE = 0.3, P-.067. The Penguin RFA values were marginally higher than Osstell (mean increase 1.10, SE = 0.64, P < .08). CONCLUSIONS RFA values between implant placement and second stage differed slightly between implant placement and second stage (P < 0.10). These differences were not clinically or statistically significant. At second stage, Penguin RFA values were slightly higher when compared with the Osstell device (P < 0.67). Bone quality appears to be an important factor when determining RFA readings. Type I bone had significantly higher readings when compared with other less dense bone types (P < .029) Resonance frequency evaluation data were similar for both instruments, indicating their reliability in determining implant stability. Neither instrument predicted implant failure. While subjective, Penguin was less cumbersome to utilize and the window revealing the readings was very easier to read. Further, the pegs are magnetized making insertion easy.

Dental Implants in an Aged Population: Evaluation of Periodontal Health, Bone Loss, Implant Survival, and Quality of Life: Dental Implants in Aged Population

PURPOSE To evaluate aged partially and fully edentulous patients who received dental implants and were maintained over time. Further, to determine how the partially and edentulous ageing populations (65 and above) with dental implants maintain bone levels, proper oral hygiene, and perceive benefits of dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS Since 1995, patients receiving dental implants have been prospectively entered into an Access-based computerized program (Triton Tacking System). Patient demographics (age, sex), bone quality, quantity, implant location, and type of surgery have been continuously entered into the database. The database was queried for patients receiving implants (first stage) between 66 and 93 years of age. Thirty-one patients were within this age group. Twenty-five patients returned to the clinic for periodontal and dental implant evaluation. The Periodontal Index was used to evaluate selected teeth in terms of probing depth, bleeding on probing, plaque accumulation, and mobility. Using NIH Image J, radiographs taken at second stage and last examination were measured for changes in interproximal bone levels. Once identified, each patient anomalously filled out an abbreviated quality of health life form. Due to small sample size, descriptive statistics were used to compare clinical findings. RESULTS Fifteen males ranging from 78 to 84 (mean age 84 years) years and 16 females from 66 to 93 (mean age 83 years) (age range 66-93) were contacted by phone or mail and asked to return to our office for a re-examination. For this group, the first dental implants were placed in 1996 (n = initial two implants) and continuously recorded through 2013 (n = last seven implants). Thirty-one patients received a total of 84 implants. Two patients were edentulous, and the remaining were partially edentulous. Four implants were lost. Between implant placement and 6- to 7-year interval, 13 patients with 40 implants had a cumulative survival rate of 94.6%. Of the original group (n = 33), three were deceased, two were in nursing homes, and three could not be located. CONCLUSIONS Aged patients receiving dental implants had excellent implant survival rates, low periodontal disease index scores with minimal changes in interproximal bone levels. Results from this study indicate that patients with advanced age, in reasonably good health, have excellent implant survival rates, excellent quality of life scores, and can be maintained in good oral health.