Edwin S. Rosenberg

Extraction Sockets and Implantation of Hydroxyapatites With Membrane Barriers A Histologic Study

The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the effect on extraction socket healing when an absorbable hydroxyapatite (AH) and a nonabsorbable anorganic bovine bone mineral (ABB) covered with either an acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane barrier were left exposed to the oral cavity. Following tooth extraction, a total of 16 sockets in 15 patients with deficient buccal plates of ≥5 mm were randomly divided into 4 treatment groups: 1) AH covered with ADMA, 2) AH covered with an ePTFE membrane, 3) ABB covered with ADMA, and 4) ABB covered with an ePTFE membrane. Primary coverage was not attempted or obtained in any of the 16 treated sockets. Six to 8 months postextraction at the time of implant placement, histologic cores of the treatment sites were obtained. These cores were processed, stained with Stevenel’s blue/van Gieson’s picro fuchsin, and histomorphometrically analyzed. Vital bone, connective tissue and marrow, and residual graft particles were reported as a percentage of the total core. The mean vital bone was 34.5% (AH with ADMA), 41.7% (ABB with ADMA), 27.6% (ePTFE and AH), and 17.8% (ePTFE and ABB). The average percentage of vital bone in the 8 sockets covered with ADAMA was 38% compared with an average percentage vital bone of 22% in the 8 sockets covered with ePTFE membrane barriers. Because of the small number of specimens in the 4 groups, statistical analysis was not possible. However, in this pilot study, ADMA-covered sites resulted in more vital bone present 6 to 8 months postsocket treatment than obtained in the ePTFE-covered sites regardless of bone replacement materials used. Further research is warranted to see if these results show a similar difference in bone-to-implant contact after implant placement.

Darkfield microscopic spirochete count in the differentiation of endodontic and periodontal abscesses.

A previous experimental study indicated that a darkfield microscopic spirochete count of 0 to 10% was indicative of a lesion entirely of endodontic origin and a count between 30 and 58% suggested a purely periodontal lesion. Two clinical cases are described where the differentiation of an endodontic lesion from a periodontal lesion was difficult and the traditional diagnostic indicators either could not be used or gave conflicting results. In these cases the percentage of spirochetes in the exudates of the lesions was used as an aid to diagnosis with successful treatment results.

PERIODONTAL REGENERATION AROUND NATURAL TEETH

1. Evidence is conclusive (Table 2) that periodontal regeneration in humans is possible following the use of bone grafts, guided tissue regeneration procedures, both without and in combination with bone grafts, and root demineralization procedures. 2. Clinically guided tissue regeneration procedures have demonstrated significant positive clinical change beyond that achieved with debridement alone in treating mandibular and maxillary (buccal only) Class II furcations. Similar data exist for intraosseous defects. Evidence suggests that the use of bone grafts or GTR procedures produce equal clinical benefit in treating intraosseous defects. Further research is necessary to evaluate GTR procedures compared to, or combined with, bone grafts in treating intraosseous defects. 3. Although there are some data suggesting hopeful results in Class II furcations, the clinical advantage of procedures combining present regenerative techniques remains to be demonstrated. Additional randomized controlled trials with sufficient power are needed to demonstrate the potential usefulness of these techniques. 4. Outcomes following regenerative attempts remain somewhat variable with differences in results between studies and individual subjects. Some of this variability is likely patient related in terms of compliance with plaque control and maintenance procedures, as well as personal habits; e.g., smoking. Variations in the defects selected for study may also affect predictability of outcomes along with other factors. 5. There is evidence to suggest that present regenerative techniques lead to significant amounts of regeneration at localized sites on specific teeth. However, if complete regeneration is to become a reality, additional stimuli to enhance the regenerative process are likely needed. Perhaps this will be accomplished in the future, with combined procedures that include appropriate polypeptide growth factors or tissue factors to provide additional stimulus.

Histomorphometric comparison of different concentrations of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein with allogeneic bone compared to the use of 100% mineralized cancellous bone allograft in maxillary sinus grafting

The purpose of this study was to histomorphometrically evaluate the percentage of vital bone after grafting of maxillary sinuses using two different concentrations of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein/acellular collagen sponge (rhBMP-2/ACS) combined with mineralized cancellous bone allograft (MCBA) and to compare the results to a control sinus grafted with MCBA only. Thirty-six sinuses in 18 patients had two of three of the graft combinations including: (1) control, MCBA only; (2) test one, MCBA + 5.6 mL of rhBMP-2/ACS (containing 8.4 mg of rhBMP-2); or (3) test two, MCBA + 2.8 mL of rhBMP-2/ACS (containing 4.2 mg of rhBMP-2). Histologic cores were taken 6 to 9 month following sinus augmentation. The results showed no statistically significant differences in vital bone between the two test groups compared to the control sinus group treated with MCBA alone. Future studies involving more cases and evaluating survival of implants placed in these augmented sinuses are needed to verify the results of this randomized prospective study.

The use of a xenogeneic collagen matrix at the time of implant placement to increase the volume of buccal soft tissue.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Mucograft (MG; a porcine-derived purified collagen membrane) to increase the thickness and height of the buccal soft tissue when placed at the time of implant placement in patients with thin or deficient keratinized tissue (KT). The primary endpoint of the study was the change in thickness and height of the buccal KT. Secondary endpoints included stability of the midbuccal soft tissue level; clinician rating of color, texture, and contour of treatment site; probing pocket depths (PPDs); assessment of satisfaction outcome; and patient assessment of pain/discomfort. Thirty-two patients were enrolled and 31 patients completed the study. There were no statistically significant (SS) differences between the MG and control groups for height measures. There was no SS difference for KT thickness (P = .117) between the groups at the final measurement (3 months postsurgery). However, there was an SS difference (P = .009) in favor of the MG group when comparing the difference in presurgical KT thickness to that 3 months postsurgery. Thus, MG was successful (compared to the control) in increasing the buccal KT. There were no SS differences between the groups for any of the other endpoints, including color, texture, contour, and pain assessment at any visit or successful outcome between the treatment group and the control. More cases and longer follow-up of implants placed with MG are needed to verify the results of this randomized prospective study.

Intentional replantation: a case report

Summary A case of successful intentional replantation has been described. Endodontic therapy was performed on a mandibular second molar and subsequently failed. Although we believed that extraction was the preferred treatment because of the location of the tooth, an intentional replantation was attempted as a last effort to retain the tooth. The technique, philosophy, and observations were discussed. A seven-year series of follow-up radiographic and clinical findings trace the success of this case.

16 – Esthetics and implant surgery

An accurate diagnosis and assessment is critical for any clinical situation, but particularly for those involving the esthetic zone. The patient’s esthetic expectations should be ascertained and the anticipated treatment time, the possibility of multiple procedures, and other contributing factors (such as orthodontic, occlusal, periodontal, restorative or endodontic needs) should be discussed. At this point a comprehensive examination should be performed that includes a detailed restorative and periodontal charting, occlusal evaluation, alveolar ridge evaluation, appropriate radiographs, and study casts. Successful treatment outcome is predicated on satisfying the functional needs of the case and the cosmetic expectations of the patient. A successful outcome cannot be achieved if these factors are mutually exclusive, Radiographic Assessment