C. Becchi

The increase of endothelial progenitor cells in the peripheral blood: a new parameter for detecting onset and severity of sepsis.

Sepsis is a clinical syndrome characterized by non-specific inflammatory response with evidence of profound changes in the function and structure of endothelium. Recent evidence suggests that vascular maintenance, repair and angiogenesis are in part mediated by recruitment from bone marrow (BM) of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). In this study we were interested in whether EPCs are increasingly mobilized during sepsis and if this mobilization is associated with sepsis severity. Our flow cytometry data demonstrate that in the CD34+ cell gate the number of EPCs in the blood of patients with sepsis had a four-fold increase (45 ± 4.5% p<0.001) compared to healthy controls (12 ± 3.6%) and that this increase was already evident at 6 hours from diagnosis (40.6 ± 4.2%), reaching its maximum at 72 hours. Also the percentage of cEPCs identified in the patients with sepsis (35 ± 4.6% of the CD34+ cell) was statistically different (p<0.001) compared to that found in the blood of patients with severe sepsis (75 ± 4.9%). In addition, we proved that at six hours after sepsis diagnosis, VEGF, CXCL8 and CXCL12 serum levels were significantly higher in septic patients compared to healthy volunteers 559 ± 82.14 pg/ml vs 2.9 ± 0.6 (p<0.0001), 189.8 ± 67.3 pg/ml 15 vs 11.9 ± 1.6 (p=0.014) and 780.5 ± 106.5 pg/ml; vs 190.2 ± 71.4 (p < 0.001). Our data suggest that the cEPC evaluation in peripheral blood, even at early times of diagnosis, in patients with sepsis can be envisaged as a valuable parameter to confirm diagnosis and suggest further prognosis.

Opioid-free analgesia by continuous psoas compartment block after total hip arthroplasty. A randomized study

Background and objective Adequate analgesia is needed after total hip arthroplasty to control pain at rest and during rehabilitation. Our aim was to compare, in a randomized study, the efficacy of two analgesia regimens in control of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty: opioid‐free continuous psoas compartment block vs. an opioid/non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs continuous intravenous infusion. Methods In all, 73 patients (ASA I–III), aged 61–82 yr, undergoing total hip arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled in a single‐blind randomized trial. Patients were allocated either to the study group (Group A, n = 37) or to the control group (Group B, n = 36). Patients in Group A underwent preoperative placement of a catheter in the psoas compartment and, 30 min before the end of surgery, the catheter was primed with a loading dose of 0.75% ropivacaine (0.4 mL kg−1) followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mL h−1 ropivacaine 0.2% for 48 h. Patients in Group B received, from 1 h before the end of surgery, a continuous intravenous infusion of 0.1% morphine and 0.12% ketorolac at 2 mL h−1 for 48 h. Both groups received spinal anaesthesia for surgery. Pain scores at rest and after mobilization, amount of rescue analgesia, nausea/vomiting and haemodynamic parameters were recorded. Results In Group A, median pain scores were very low during the whole study duration both at rest and during physiotherapy in comparison to Group B. Less rescue analgesia was needed and less nausea and vomiting was observed in Group A. Conclusions Opioid‐free continuous psoas compartment block seems to be an appropriate and reliable technique in providing effective postoperative analgesia at rest and during physiotherapy after total hip arthroplasty when compared to intravenous morphine/ketorolac infusion.

Ketamine, propofol and low dose remifentanil versus propofol and remifentanil for ERCP outside the operating room: Is ketamine not only a “rescue drug”?

Summary Background Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ERCP is a painful and long procedure requiring transient deep analgesia and conscious sedation. An ideal anaesthetic that guarantees a rapid and smooth induction, good quality of maintenance, lack of adverse effects and rapid recovery is still lacking. This study aimed to compare safety and efficacy of a continuous infusion of low dose remifentanil plus ketamine combined with propofol in comparison to the standard regimen dose of remifentanil plus propofol continuous infusion during ERCP. Material/Methods 322 ASAI-III patients, 18–85 years old and scheduled for planned ERCP were randomized. Exclusion criteria were a predictable difficult airway, drug allergy, and ASA IV–V patients. We evaluated Propofol 1 mg/kg/h plus Remifentanil 0.25 μg/kg/min (GR) vs. Propofol 1 mg/kg/h plus Ketamine 5 μg/kg/min and Remifentanil 0.1 μg/kg/min (GK). Main outcome measures were respiratory depression, nausea/vomiting, quality of intraoperative conditions, and discharge time. P≤0.05 was statistically significant (95% CI). Results Respiratory depression was observed in 25 patients in the GR group compared to 9 patients in the GK group (p=0.0035). ERCP was interrupted in 9 cases of GR vs. no cases in GK; patients ventilated without any complication. Mean discharge time was 20±5 min in GK and 35±6 min in GR (p=0.0078) and transfer to the ward delayed because of nausea and vomiting in 30 patients in GR vs. 5 patients in GK (p=0.0024). Quality of intraoperative conditions was rated highly satisfactory in 92% of GK vs. 67% of GR (p=0.028). Conclusions The drug combination used in GK confers clinical advantages because it avoids deep sedation, maintains adequate analgesia with conscious sedation, and achieves lower incidence of postprocedural nausea and vomiting with shorter discharge times.

Regional anticoagulation and antiaggregation for CVVH in critically ill patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study

Background: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and clinical safety of regional anticoagulation (heparin pre‐filter plus post‐filter protamine) plus antiaggregation (pre‐filter prostacyclin) [Group 1 (G1)] vs. only systemic heparin anticoagulation without antiaggregation [Group 2 (G2)] in critically ill patients with acute renal failure undergoing continuous veno‐venous haemofiltration (CVVH).

Role of patient posture during puncture on successful unilateral spinal anaesthesia in outpatient lower abdominal surgery

Background and objective: Unilateral spinal anaesthesia is a useful anaesthesia technique in lower abdominal surgery, especially in an outpatient setting. Patient posture is pivotal in the achievement of unilateral anaesthesia. Nevertheless, no studies have elucidated the influence of patient posture during the anaesthetic injection on unilaterality. Thus, the aim was to compare the effect of patient posture, during the induction phase of spinal anaesthesia, on block characteristics. Methods: Eighty patients, ASA I–II, scheduled for unilateral hernioplasty were randomized into two groups. Anaesthesia was performed in lateral position in Group 1 (G1) with operative side down and in sitting position in Group 2 (G2) whose patients were then immediately turned on their lateral side. All patients were maintained for 20 min in lateral position with their operative side down. Hyperbaric bupivacaine 1% 10 mg were used. Results: Unilateral anaesthesia was seen in 80% (32/40) and 12.5% (5/40) of G1 and G2, respectively. The readiness for surgery was faster in G1 (P < 0.0001). The motor block in the non‐operative side was stronger in G2 (P < 0.0001). The offset of sensory block was faster in G1 (P = 0.0001). The offset of motor block was slower in G1 (P = 0.0008). The time for voiding was shorter in G1, although not significant. Conclusions: Lateral posture during the induction of spinal anaesthesia is pivotal for a higher success of unilateral block, a fast readiness to surgery, and a fast recovery. Therefore, this technique can be considered feasible and time‐saving for lower abdominal surgery.

Correlation Between Markers of TH2-Oriented Response and SOFA Score in Sepsis

A shift from Th1- to Th2-type cell immune response has been suggested to occur during sepsis, contributing to cell-mediated immunity suppression and to poor prognosis. The aim was to study the relationship between old and new Th2 markers and the clinical outcome of sepsis. 30 critically ill patients with sepsis for � 48 hours were enrolled in a pro- spective clinical study. Blood samples were collected at the enrolment, at the 5 th and 10 th day. Serum levels of total IgE and soluble chemokines related to Th1- and Th2 responses were evaluated. The percentages and absolute number of CD4+ and CD8+Tcells as well as CRTH2+Tcell subsets were detected by flow cytometry. Sepsis severity was assessed with SOFA score. The mean values of total IgE in septic patients were significantly higher than in controls(p<0.01). Moreover, IgE levels of septic patients who died were higher than those of survived patients(p<0.05). It has been found that IgE levels directly and RANTES inversely correlated with SOFA score at different time points(p<0.01). A significant correlation between the percentages of CRTH2+/CD4+(but not CRTH2+/CD8+)T cells and SOFA at different time points was observed(p<0.05). The direct correlation between total IgE, the percentages of circulating CRTh2+CD4+T cells and the clinical outcome suggests that clinical worsening of sepsis is closely linked to the shift towards a predominant less protective Th2 phenotype. Although these are preliminary results, the longitudinal analysis of these parameters during the disease could be proposed as useful prognostic tools in sepsis.