C. Di Gregorio

Pathology of Colorectal Cancer

Abstract The earliest phases of colorectal tumourigenesis initiate in the normal mucosa, with a generalised disorder of cell replication, and with the appearance of clusters of enlarged crypts (aberrant crypts) showing proliferative, biochemical and biomolecular abnormalities. The large majority of colorectal malignancies develop from adenomatous polyps. These can be defined as well demarcated masses of epithelial dysplasia, with uncontrolled crypt cell division. An adenoma can be considered malignant when neoplastic cells pass through the muscularis mucosae and infiltrate the submucosa. Definitions like “carcinoma in situ” or “intramucosal carcinoma” should be abandoned, since they lead to confusion. Although several lines of evidence indicate that carcinomas usually originate from pre-existing adenomas, this does not imply that all polyps undergo malignant changes, and does not exclude “de novo” carcinogenesis. Besides adenomas, other types of polypoid lesions include hyperplastic polyps (showing elongated crypts often with cystic dilatation), serrated adenomas (with a serrated glandular pattern), flat adenomas (flat lesions which are difficult to detect in routine lower endoscopy, but may possess malignant potential), hamartomatous polyps (which show a complex branching pattern of smooth muscle supporting normal lamina propria and glands), and inflammatory polyps. Colorectal carcinomas are one of the most frequent neoplasms in Western society; the macroscopic appearance of these lesions may be that of a polypoid vegetating mass or of a flat infiltrating lesion. Most of these tumours are adenocarcinomas (96%), that, in some cases, show a mucinous component. More rare malignancies of the large bowel include signet-ring cell carcinoma, squamous carcinoma, undifferentiated neoplasms and medullary type adenocarcinoma (solid carcinoma with minimal glandular differentiation or slight cellular pleomorphism). Colorectal carcinoma can be graded into well, moderately and poorly differentiated lesions; there is little evidence, however, that grading may be of help in evaluating prognosis of affected patients. In conclusion, colorectal tumours cover a wide range of premalignant and malignant lesions, many of which can easily be removed at endoscopy It follows that colorectal neoplasms might be prevented by interfering with the various steps of carcinogenesis, which begins with uncontrolled epithelial cell replication, continues with the formation of adenomas of various dimensions, and eventually evolves into malignancy.

Histology of aberrant crypt foci in the human colon

Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) have been identified in the methylene‐blue stained mucosa of the human colon. Some lines of evidence suggest that ACF may be precursors of colon cancer. The objective of the present study was to establish morphological criteria able to define and classify ACF in histological sections. Twenty‐four colectomy specimens were collected after operation for colorectal cancer and fixed in 10% formalin. Strips of grossly normal mucosa were stained in a 0.2% solution of methylene blue in saline for 5–10 min. The strips were measured, put on a glass slide and observed under a light microscope at ×25. One hundred and fourteen ACF identified by topology were sectioned parallel to the muscularis mucosae. Eighty‐four ACF were evident at histological examination and could be classified into three main groups: group A (61 ACF, 72.6%) including foci whose epithelial cells had regular nuclei, with only mild or focal crowding but no stratification, no mucin depletion and no dysplasia; group B (16 ACF, 19.1%), in which features of hyperplasia were evident; and group C (seven ACF, 8.3%) including foci with enlarged, crowded and stratified nuclei, mucin depletion, frequent mitoses, and evident dysplasia, diffuse or focal (mild in five cases, moderate in two) representing microadenomas. Finally, hyperplastic foci were significantly larger than foci of group A and C. Group B ACF were also more frequent in the rectum than in the colon. In conclusion, selected histological features allow the definition of groups of ACF, which may represent sequential steps in the development of human colorectal tumours.

Attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis and Muir-Torre syndrome linked to compound biallelic constitutional MYH gene mutations.

Peculiar dermatologic manifestations are present in several heritable gastrointestinal disorders. Muir–Torre syndrome (MTS) is a genodermatosis whose peculiar feature is the presence of sebaceous gland tumors associated with visceral malignancies. We describe one patient in whom multiple sebaceous gland tumors were associated with early onset colon and thyroid cancers and attenuated polyposis coli. Her family history was positive for colonic adenomas. She had a daughter presenting with yellow papules in the forehead region developed in the late infancy. Skin and visceral neoplasms were tested for microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical status of mismatch repair (MMR), APC and MYH proteins. The proband colon and skin tumors were microsatellite stable and showed normal expression of MMR proteins. Cytoplasmic expression of MYH protein was revealed in colonic cancer cells. Compound heterozygosity due to biallelic mutations in MYH, R168H and 379delC, was identified in the proband. The 11‐year‐old daughter was carrier of the monoallelic constitutional mutation 379delC in the MYH gene; in the sister, the R168H MYH gene mutation was detected. This report presents an interesting case of association between MYH‐associated polyposis and sebaceous gland tumors. These findings suggest that patients with MTS phenotype that include colonic polyposis should be screened for MYH gene mutations.

Genetic testing among high-risk individuals in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is frequently associated with constitutional mutations in a class of genes involved in DNA mismatch repair. We identified 32 kindreds, with germline mutations in one of three genes hMSH2, hMLH1 or hMSH6. In this study, we purposed to evaluate how many high-risk individuals in each family underwent genetic testing: moreover, we assessed how many mutation-positive unaffected individuals accepted colonoscopic surveillance and the main findings of the recommended follow-up. Families were identified through a population-based registry, or referred from other centres. Members of the families were invited for an education session with two members of the staff. When a kindred was consistent with HNPCC, neoplastic tissues were examined for microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemical expression of MSH2, MLH1 and MSH6 proteins. Moreover, constitutional mutations were searched by SSCP or direct sequencing of the whole genomic region. Of the 164 subjects assessed by genetic testing, 89 were gene carriers (66 affected – that is, with HNPCC-related cancer diagnosis – and 23 unaffected) and 75 tested negative. Among the 23 unaffected gene carriers, 18 (78.3%) underwent colonoscopy and four declined. On a total of 292 first degree at risk of cancer, 194 (66.4%) did not undergo genetic testing. The main reasons for this were: (a) difficulty to reach family members at risk, (b) lack of collaboration, (c) lack of interest in preventive medicine or ‘fatalistic’ attitude towards cancer occurrence. The number of colorectal lesions detected at endoscopy in gene carriers was significantly (P<0.01) higher than in controls (noncarriers). We conclude that a large fraction of high-risk individuals in mutation-positive HNPCC families does not undergo genetic testing, despite the benefits of molecular screening and endoscopic surveillance. This clearly indicates that there are still barriers to genetic testing in HNPCC, and that we are unable to provide adequate protection against cancer development in these families.

Aberrant crypt foci in patients with colorectal cancer

Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) are clusters of abnormally large colonic crypts identified on the mucosal surface of the human colon. They are thought to be preneoplastic lesions. The aim of the present study was to compare density (number of ACF per square cm of mucosal surface), crypt multiplicity (number of crypts per ACF) and histology of ACF in colonic resections of colorectal cancer patients resident in two Italian provinces with a twofold difference in colorectal cancer incidence rates. Thirty-two and 26 colonic resections were collected after operation in Ragusa (Southern Italy) and Modena (Northern Italy), respectively, and fixed in 10% formalin. Mucosal layers were observed under a light microscope at 25x after staining with methylene blue. Density of ACF was significantly higher in Modena (median 0.101 ACF cm(-2)) than in Ragusa (0.049, P = 0.001), whereas there was no difference in crypt multiplicity. ACF were classified into three groups according to histological features: ACF with mild alterations (hypertrophic ACF, 73%), ACF with hyperplasia (hyperplastic ACF, 17%) and ACF with dysplasia (microadenomas, 10%). The proportions of ACF in the three groups were similar in the two provinces. Density of ACF was higher and crypt multiplicity lower proceeding from proximal to distal large bowel. Microadenomas were observed only in the colon, whereas hyperplastic ACF were more frequent in the rectum. In conclusion, density of ACF correlates with colorectal cancer rates in two Italian provinces, and shows a positive gradient from proximal to distal large bowel. Histology of ACF suggests that they may be precursors of both hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps. These data provide further evidence of the role of ACF in human colorectal carcinogenesis.

A clinical–biological risk stratification model for resected gastric cancer: prognostic impact of Her2, Fhit, and APC expression status

BACKGROUND To obtain a prognostic stratification model for resected gastric cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinicopathological and molecular data (expression of Cdx2, Apc, β-catenin, E-cadherin, Fhit, p53, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her2); HER2 and TOPO2A gene copy number; PIK3CA mutations; microsatellite instability) were correlated to cancer-specific/overall survival (CSS/OS) using a Cox model. Individual patient probability (IPP) was estimated by logistic equation. A continuous score to identify risk-classes was derived according to the model ratios. RESULTS Two-hundred eight patients were studied (median follow-up 20 months). At multivariate analysis, sex, stage, margins, location, nodes, Apc, and Fhit were independent predictors for CSS; the same factors (and age and Her2, except Fhit) predicted OS. Multivariate model predicted IPP with high prognostic accuracy (0.90 for CSS; 0.91 for OS). A two-class model significantly separated low- and high-risk patients for CSS (23.4% and 85.6%, P < 0.0001) and OS (21.4% and 82.0%, P < 0.0001). A three-class model differentiated low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients for CSS (6.3%, 35.3%, and 88.0%, P < 0.0001) and OS (6.1%, 34.6%, and 86.5%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS A risk classification system comprising the immunohistochemical expression of three proteins (Apc, Fhit, and Her2) and five clinicopathological parameters (stage, resected nodes, margins, location, and sex) accurately separates the resected gastric cancer patients into three classes of risk.

Different phenotypes in Muir–Torre syndrome: clinical and biomolecular characterization in two Italian families

The Muir–Torre syndrome (MTS) is an autosomal dominant genodermatosis characterized by the presence of sebaceous gland tumours, with or without keratoacanthomas, associated with visceral malignancies. We describe and characterize two families in which the ample phenotypic variability of MTS was evident. After clinical evaluation, the skin and visceral tumours of one member of a family with ‘classic’ MTS and one member of a family with a ‘peculiar’ MTS phenotype without sebaceous lesions, but with only multiple keratoacanthomas, were analysed for microsatellite instability (MSI) and by immunohistochemistry. Tumours of both individuals showed MSI, with a concomitant lack of MSH2 immunostaining in all evaluated skin and visceral lesions; moreover, in the proband of family 2 a constitutional mutation (C→T substitution leading to a stop codon) in the MSH2 gene was identified. We conclude that the diagnosis of MTS, which is mainly clinical, should take into account an ample phenotypic variability, which includes both cases with typical cancer aggregation in families and cases characterized by the association of visceral malignancies with multiple keratoacanthomas (without sebaceous lesions), without an apparent family history of cancer.

A founder MLH1 mutation in families from the districts of Modena and Reggio-Emilia in northern Italy with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer associated with protein elongation and instability

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), or Lynch syndrome, is an autosomal dominant condition predisposing to tumours of the large bowel and other sites. In HNPCC, cancer predisposition is usually inherited as a highly penetrant trait, with a tendency to the development of multiple tumours. Clinical diagnosis of HNPCC is based on the so-called modified “Amsterdam criteria”,1 which include: ( a ) the presence of at least three family members—one of whom must be a first degree relative to two other members—affected with carcinoma of the colon, rectum, endometrium, small bowel, or urothelium; ( b ) a direct transmission of the disease from parent to child; ( c ) the occurrence of at least one tumour before the patient reaches 50 years of age; and ( d ) the exclusion of a diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis. The genetic defects underlying most HNPCC cases are represented by constitutional point mutations of one of several genes encoding for proteins of the DNA mismatch repair complex. The vast majority of mutations are located in the major mismatch repair genes MSH2 and MLH1 (International Collaborative Group on HNPCC Mutation Database). The constitutional defects most commonly identified are nonsense, splice-site, or frameshift alterations, which all predict the synthesis of shorter, non-functional proteins. Tumours arising in carriers of mismatch repair gene mutations are characterised by a high frequency of insertion or deletion type somatic mutations within microsatellite repeats.2 These are the expression of mismatch repair deficiency, which arises when a second somatic mutation affecting the wild-type allele fully inactivates the gene locus already altered in the germline.3 Inactivation of a specific mismatch repair locus in a HNPCC tumour is often revealed by immunohistochemical methods, which show absence of nuclear staining following incubation with antibodies against the mismatch repair protein encoded by the mutant gene.4 In addition to genetic heterogeneity, HNPCC …

Aetiology of colorectal cancer and relevance of monogenic inheritance

Background and aims: Although diet and lifestyle are associated with the development of colorectal malignancies, the only clearly identified aetiological factors in colorectal cancer are inheritance (hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and familial polyposis), inflammatory bowel diseases, papillomavirus, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Our aim was to determine what proportion of colorectal neoplasms could be attributed to these specific factors. Patients and methods: Data from a colorectal cancer registry were analysed over a 15 year period, during which nearly 2500 cases were recorded. In patients with suspected HNPCC, microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical expression of proteins encoded by the main DNA mismatch repair genes were assessed. In families with unstable neoplasms, constitutional mutations of the mismatch repair genes hMSH2, hMLH1, and hMSH6 were evaluated by single strand conformation polymorphism analysis and sequencing. Results: Inflammatory bowel diseases, familial polyposis, and AIDS were rare causes of colorectal cancer (three, three, and one case, respectively). Anal squamous carcinoma developed in 27 patients (1.0%) and could be attributed to papillomavirus infection. In 58 patients (from 34 families) a clinical diagnosis of HNPCC was established (2.4%). In total, cases with a known aetiology were 92 (3.7% of all patients). Microsatellite instability was detected in 15 cancers from HNPCC families, and germline mutations in six families (12 patients, 0.5% of the total). Families with unstable tumours, with or without mutations, were clinically similar, suggesting the involvement of the mismatch repair system even when mutations were not detected. Conclusions: The study suggests that the aetiology of colorectal malignancies remains elusive in the large majority of cases. Among specific causes, HNPCC represents the most frequent. However, with a population based approach, constitutional mutations of the main genes involved in HNPCC can be detected in only 20% of cases.

A mononucleotide markers panel to identify hMLH1/hMSH2 germline mutations

Hereditary NonPolyposis Colorectal Cancer (Lynch syndrome) is an autosomal dominant disease caused by germline mutations in a class of genes deputed to maintain genomic integrity during cell replication, mutations result in a generalized genomic instability, particularly evident at microsatellite loci (Microsatellite Instability, MSI). MSI is present in 85–90% of colorectal cancers that occur in Lynch Syndrome. To standardize the molecular diagnosis of MSI, a panel of 5 microsatellite markers was proposed (known as the “Bethesda panel”). Aim of our study is to evaluate if MSI testing with two mononucleotide markers, such as BAT25 and BAT26, was sufficient to identify patients with hMLH1/hMSH2 germline mutations. We tested 105 tumours for MSI using both the Bethesda markers and the two mononucleotide markers BAT25 and BAT26. Moreover, immunohistochemical evaluation of MLH1 and MSH2 proteins was executed on the tumours with at least one unstable microsatellite, whereas germline hMLH1/hMSH2 mutations were searched for all cases showing two or more unstable microsatellites. The Bethesda panel detected more MSI(+) tumors than the mononucleotide panel (49.5% and 28.6%, respectively). However, the mononucleotide panel was more efficient to detect MSI(+) tumours with lack of expression of Mismatch Repair proteins (93% vs 54%). Germline mutations were detected in almost all patients whose tumours showed MSI and no expression of MLH1/MSH2 proteins. No germline mutations were found in patients with MSI(+) tumour defined only through dinucleotide markers. In conclusion, the proposed mononucleotide markers panel seems to have a higher predictive value to identify hMLH1 and hMSH2 mutation-positive patients with Lynch syndrome. Moreover, this panel showed increased specificity, thus improving the cost/effectiveness ratio of the biomolecular analyses.