C. Etard

Lessons from recent accidents in radiation therapy in France

Many accidents in radiotherapy have been reported in France over the last years. This is due to the recent legal obligation to declare to the national safety authorities any significant incident relative to the use of ionising radiation including medical applications. The causes and consequences of the most serious events in radiotherapy are presented in this paper. Lessons can be learned from possible technical dysfunctions, from human errors or organisational weaknesses as to how such events can be prevented. The technical aspects are addressed here: in particular, dosimetric issues.

Establishment of diagnostic reference levels in cardiac CT in France: a need for patient dose optimisation

The objective of this study was to propose diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), in the context of a large variability in patient radiation dose, and the lack of European recommendations. Volume Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were collected from 460 CCTAs performed over a 3-month period at eight French hospitals. CCTAs (∼50 per centre) were performed using the routine protocols of the centres, and 64- to 320-detector CT scanners. ECG gating was prospective (n = 199) or retrospective (n = 261). The large gap in dose between these two modes required to propose specific DRLs: 26 and 44 mGy for CTDIvol, and 370 and 970 mGy cm for DLP, respectively. This study confirms the large variability in patient doses during CCTA and underlines the need for the optimisation of cardiac acquisition protocols. Availability of national DRLs should be mandatory in this setting.

Exposition à la scanographie dans l’enfance et risque de cancer à long terme. Une synthèse des études épidémiologiques récentes

Amongst medical exams requiring ionizing radiation, computed tomography (CT) scans are used more frequently, including in children. These CT examinations are associated with absorbed doses that are much higher than those associated with conventional radiology. In comparison to adults, children have a greater sensitivity to radiation and a longer life span with more years at cancer risks. Five epidemiological studies on cancer risks after CT scan exposure during childhood were published between 2012 and 2015. The results of these studies are consistent and show an increase of cancer risks in children who have been exposed to several CT scans. However, methodological limits due to indication bias, retrospective assessment of radiation exposure from CT scans and lack of statistical power are to be taken into consideration. International projects such as EPI-CT (Epidemiological study to quantify risks for pediatric computerized tomography and to optimize dose), with a focus on dosimetric reconstruction and minimization of bias will provide more precise results. In the meantime, available results reinforce the necessity of justification and optimization of doses.

Patient dose in interventional radiology: a multicentre study of the most frequent procedures in France

ObjectivesA national retrospective survey on patient doses was performed by the French Society of Medical physicists to assess reference levels (RLs) in interventional radiology as required by the European Directive 2013/59/Euratom.MethodsFifteen interventional procedures in neuroradiology, vascular radiology and osteoarticular procedures were analysed. Kerma area product (KAP), fluoroscopy time (FT), reference air kerma and number of images were recorded for 10 to 30 patients per procedure. RLs were calculated as the 3rd quartiles of the distributions.ResultsResults on 4600 procedures from 36 departments confirmed the large variability in patient dose for the same procedure. RLs were proposed for the four dosimetric estimators and the 15 procedures. RLs in terms of KAP and FT were 90 Gm.cm2 and 11 mins for cerebral angiography, 35 Gy.cm2 and 16 mins for biliary drainage, 75 Gy.cm2 and 6 mins for lower limbs arteriography and 70 Gy.cm2 and 11 mins for vertebroplasty. For these four procedures, RLs were defined according to the complexity of the procedure. For all the procedures, the results were lower than most of those already published.ConclusionsThis study reports RLs in interventional radiology based on a national survey. Continual evolution of practices and technologies requires regular updates of RLs.Key Points• Delivered dose in interventional radiology depends on procedure, practice and patient.• National RLs are proposed for 15 interventional procedures.• Reference levels (RLs) are useful to benchmark practices and optimize protocols.• RLs are proposed for kerma area product, air kerma, fluoroscopy time and number of images.• RLs should be adapted to the procedure complexity and updated regularly.

Radiation Doses to Patients in Interventional Coronary Procedures-Estimation of Updated National Reference Levels by Dose Audit.

The objective of this study was to estimate the French national updated reference levels (RLs) for coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by a dose audit from a large data set of unselected procedures and in standard-sized patients. Kerma-area product (PKA), air kerma at interventional point (Ka,r), fluoroscopy time (FT), and the number of registered frames (NFs) and runs (NRs) were collected from 51 229 CAs and 42 222 PCIs performed over a 12-month period at 61 French hospitals. RLs estimated by the 75th percentile in CAs and PCIs performed in unselected patients were 36 and 78 Gy.cm² for PKA, 498 and 1285 mGy for Ka,r, 6 and 15 min for FT, and 566 and 960 for NF, respectively. These values were consistent with the RLs calculated in standard-sized patients. The large difference in dose between sexes leads us to propose specific RLs in males and females. The results suggest a trend for a time-course reduction in RLs for interventional coronary procedures.

SynthèseExposition à la scanographie dans l’enfance et risque de cancer à long terme. Une synthèse des études épidémiologiques récentesExposure to CT scans in childhood and long-term cancer risk: A review of epidemiological studies

Amongst medical exams requiring ionizing radiation, computed tomography (CT) scans are used more frequently, including in children. These CT examinations are associated with absorbed doses that are much higher than those associated with conventional radiology. In comparison to adults, children have a greater sensitivity to radiation and a longer life span with more years at cancer risks. Five epidemiological studies on cancer risks after CT scan exposure during childhood were published between 2012 and 2015. The results of these studies are consistent and show an increase of cancer risks in children who have been exposed to several CT scans. However, methodological limits due to indication bias, retrospective assessment of radiation exposure from CT scans and lack of statistical power are to be taken into consideration. International projects such as EPI-CT (Epidemiological study to quantify risks for pediatric computerized tomography and to optimize dose), with a focus on dosimetric reconstruction and minimization of bias will provide more precise results. In the meantime, available results reinforce the necessity of justification and optimization of doses.

Using diagnostic reference levels to evaluate the improvement of patient dose optimisation and the influence of recent technologies in radiography and computed tomography

OBJECTIVES Twelve years since the implementation of Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL) process in France, the Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection French Institute (IRSN) presents its latest analyses performed on the most recent national data. METHODS Statutorily, each year, medical imaging departments must perform patient exposure evaluation from their clinical practice for at least 2 types of radiographic and computed tomography (CT) examinations freely chosen in the regulatory list. The samples of dosimetric data used for the evaluations must be sent to IRSN for national assessment using a dedicated and secured web portal. The analyses of collected data for radiography and CT allow IRSN to estimate the representativeness of current DRLs in terms of target practices and examinations, dosimetric quantities and numerical values. Technical data are transmitted, such as detector type in radiography or commissioning date of CT, and are included in some complementary analyses in order to evaluate their influence on patient exposure. RESULTS Since 2004 the involvement of professionals in the DRL process has highly increased in CT (about 80% in 2015) but remains quite weak in radiography (almost 30%). Analyses show some discordance between regulation references and clinical practice leading to clinical doses data which are 40% lower than DRLs in 2015. As a consequence, the list of examinations types and some numerical values should be updated in the regulation. Focused analyses show a significant patient exposure reduction when digital radiography is used and when CT equipment is under five years old. CONCLUSIONS Based on these findings, IRSN recommends to update DRL regulation with current and relevant examination lists, dosimetric quantities and numerical values. In addition, this study shows that technology and generation of equipment, such as detector type in radiography or image reconstruction algorithm in CT, take an important place in the dose optimisation process, enabling significant patient exposure reduction when it is associated with protocols optimisation.

Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in populations highly exposed to tobacco: A systematic methodological appraisal of published randomised controlled trials

Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening recommendations for lung cancer are contradictory. The French National Authority for Health commissioned experts to carry a systematic review on the effectiveness, acceptability and safety of lung cancer screening with LDCT in subjects highly exposed to tobacco. We used MEDLINE and Embase databases (2003-2014) and identified 83 publications representing ten randomised control trials. Control arms and methodology varied considerably, precluding a full comparison and questioning reproducibility of the findings. From five trials reporting mortality results, only the National Lung Screening Trial found a significant decrease of disease-specific and all-cause mortality with LDCT screening compared to chest X-ray screening. None of the studies provided all information needed to document the risk-benefit balance. The lack of statistical power and the methodological heterogeneity of European trials question on the possibility of obtaining valid results separately or by pooling. We conclude, in regard to the lack of strong scientific evidence, that LDCT screening should not be recommended in subjects highly exposed to tobacco.

Chest X-ray screening examinations among French uranium miners: exposure estimation and impact on radon-associated lung cancer risk.

Background Medical surveillance of uranium miners can include periodic chest X-ray examinations. This study aimed to assess the X-ray exposure due to occupational health monitoring in the French cohort of uranium miners, and to test whether consideration of this additional radiation exposure impacts the excess risk of lung cancer death associated with radon exposure. Method X-ray exposure due to occupational health monitoring was estimated retrospectively based on review of a sample of miners’ medical records and bibliographic data. Four exposure scenarios were designed, differing in their assumptions about the type of procedures performed, their frequency, and the lung dose delivered. Radon exposure and lung doses from exposure to α-particle emitters and external γ rays have previously been individually assessed. Exposure-risk and dose-risk relations were estimated by Poisson regression with a linear excess relative risk (ERR) model. Results The cohort included 5086 miners with a mean follow-up duration of 30.1 years. The mean number of chest X-ray examinations ranged from 15.1 in the lowest to 34 in the highest-exposure scenario, and produced a mean cumulative lung dose ranging from 4.6 to 34.2 mGy. The role of occupation-related imaging screening X-ray procedures in total equivalent lung dose appeared insignificant compared to α-emitter exposure. X-ray exposure was not associated with lung cancer mortality risk. The ERR associated with radon remained significantly positive when X-ray exposure was included in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions X-ray exposure did not confound the exposure-risk relation between radon and lung cancer.

Characterization of MOSFET detectors for in vivo dosimetry in interventional radiology and for dose reconstruction in case of overexposure.

AbstractAs MOSFET (Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor) detectors allow dose measurements in real time, the interest in these dosimeters is growing. The aim of this study was to investigate the dosimetric properties of commercially available TN-502RD-H MOSFET silicon detectors (Best Medical Canada, Ottawa, Canada) in order to use them for in vivo dosimetry in interventional radiology and for dose reconstruction in case of overexposure. Reproducibility of the measurements, dose rate dependence, and dose response of the MOSFET detectors have been studied with a 60Co source. Influence of the dose rate, frequency, and pulse duration on MOSFET responses has also been studied in pulsed x-ray fields. Finally, in order to validate the integrated dose given by MOSFET detectors, MOSFETs and TLDs (7LiF:Mg,Cu,P) were fixed on an Alderson-Rando phantom in the conditions of an interventional neuroradiology procedure, and their responses have been compared. The results of this study show the suitability of MOSFET detectors for in vivo dosimetry in interventional radiology and for dose reconstruction in case of accident, provided a well-corrected energy dependence, a pulse duration equal to or higher than 10 ms, and an optimized contact between the detector and the skin of the patient are achieved.