Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where C. Lineweaver is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by C. Lineweaver.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1993

Dipole anisotropy in the COBE DMR first year sky maps

A. Kogut; C. Lineweaver; George F. Smoot; C. L. Bennett; A. J. Banday; N. W. Boggess; Edward S. Cheng; G. De Amici; Dale J. Fixsen; G. Hinshaw; P. D. Jackson; Michael A. Janssen; P. Keegstra; K. Loewenstein; P. M. Lubin; John C. Mather; L. Tenorio; Ron Weiss; D. T. Wilkinson; E. L. Wright

We present a determination of the cosmic microwave background dipole amplitude and direction from the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometers (DMR) first year of data. Data from the six DMR channels are consistent with a Doppler-shifted Planck function of dipole amplitude ΔT=3.365±0.027 mK toward direction (l II , b II )=(264°.4±0°.3, 48°.4±0°.5). The implied velocity of the Local Group with respect to the CMB rest frame is v LG =627±22 km s −1 toward (l II , b II )=(276°±3°, 30°±3°). DMR has also mapped the dipole anisotropy resulting from the Earths orbital motion about the Solar system barycenter, yielding a measurement of the monopole CMB temperature T 0 at 31.5, 53, and 90 GHz, T 0 =2.75±0.05 KWe present a determination of the cosmic microwave background dipole amplitude and direction from the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometers (DMR) first year of data. Data from the six DMR channels are consistent with a Doppler-shifted Planck function of dipole amplitude Delta T = 3.365 +/-0.027 mK toward direction (l,b) = (264.4 +/- 0.3 deg, 48.4 +/- 0.5 deg). The implied velocity of the Local Group with respect to the CMB rest frame is 627 +/- 22 km/s toward (l,b) = (276 +/- 3 deg, 30 +/- 3 deg). DMR has also mapped the dipole anisotropy resulting from the Earths orbital motion about the Solar system barycenter, yielding a measurement of the monopole CMB temperature at 31.5, 53, and 90 GHz, to be 2.75 +/- 0.05 K.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1992

Interpretation of the cosmic microwave background radiation anisotropy detected by the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer

E. L. Wright; S. S. Meyer; C. L. Bennett; N. W. Boggess; Edward S. Cheng; Michael G. Hauser; A. Kogut; C. Lineweaver; John C. Mather; George F. Smoot

The large-scale cosmic background anisotropy detected by the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer (DMR) instrument is compared to the sensitive previous measurements on various angular scales, and to the predictions of a wide variety of models of structure formation driven by gravitational instability. The observed anisotropy is consistent with all previously measured upper limits and with a number of dynamical models of structure formation. For example, the data agree with an unbiased cold dark matter (CDM) model with H0 = 50 km/s Mpc and Delta-M/M = 1 in a 16 Mpc radius sphere. Other models, such as CDM plus massive neutrinos (hot dark matter (HDM)), or CDM with a nonzero cosmological constant are also consistent with the COBE detection and can provide the extra power seen on 5-10,000 km/s scales. 39 refs.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1994

Cosmic temperature fluctuations from two years of COBE differential microwave radiometers observations

C. L. Bennett; E. Kaita; John C. Mather; E. S. Cheng; K. M. Górski; D. T. Wilkinson; E. L. Wright; P. D. Jackson; George F. Smoot; Ron Weiss; P. M. Lubin; G. Hinshaw; K. Loewenstein; A. Kogut; C. Lineweaver; P. Keegstra; S. S. Meyer; A. J. Banday

The first two years of COBE DMR observations of the CMB anisotropy are analyzed and compared with our previously published first year results. The results are consistent, but the addition of the second year of data increases the precision and accuracy of the detected CMB temperature fluctuations. The two-year 53 GHz data are characterized by RMS temperature fluctuations of DT=44+/-7 uK at 7 degrees and DT=30.5+/-2.7 uK at 10 degrees angular resolution. The 53X90 GHz cross-correlation amplitude at zero lag is C(0)^{1/2}=36+/-5 uK (68%CL) for the unsmoothed 7 degree DMR data. A likelihood analysis of the cross correlation function, including the quadrupole anisotropy, gives a most likely quadrupole-normalized amplitude Q_{rms-PS}=12.4^{+5.2}_{-3.3} uK (68% CL) and a spectral index n=1.59^{+0.49}_{-0.55} for a power law model of initial density fluctuations, P(k)~k^n. With n fixed to 1.0 the most likely amplitude is 17.4 +/-1.5 uK (68% CL). Excluding the quadrupole anisotropy we find Q_{rms-PS}= 16.0^{+7.5}_{-5.2} uK (68% CL), n=1.21^{+0.60}_{-0.55}, and, with n fixed to 1.0 the most likely amplitude is 18.2+/-1.6 uK (68% CL). Monte Carlo simulations indicate that these derived estimates of n may be biased by ~+0.3 (with the observed low value of the quadrupole included in the analysis) and {}~+0.1 (with the quadrupole excluded). Thus the most likely bias-corrected estimate of n is between 1.1 and 1.3. Our best estimate of the dipole from the two-year DMR data is 3.363+/-0.024 mK towards Galactic coordinates (l,b)= (264.4+/-0.2 degrees, +48.1+/-0.4 degrees), and our best estimate of the RMS quadrupole amplitude in our sky is 6+/-3 uK.The first two years of COBE DMR observations of the CMB anisotropy are analyzed and compared with our previously published first year results. The results are consistent, but the addition of the second year of data increases the precision and accuracy of the detected CMB temperature fluctuations. The two-year 53 GHz data are characterized by RMS temperature fluctuations of DT=44+/-7 uK at 7 degrees and DT=30.5+/-2.7 uK at 10 degrees angular resolution. The 53X90 GHz cross-correlation amplitude at zero lag is C(0)^{1/2}=36+/-5 uK (68%CL) for the unsmoothed 7 degree DMR data. A likelihood analysis of the cross correlation function, including the quadrupole anisotropy, gives a most likely quadrupole-normalized amplitude Q_{rms-PS}=12.4^{+5.2}_{-3.3} uK (68% CL) and a spectral index n=1.59^{+0.49}_{-0.55} for a power law model of initial density fluctuations, P(k)~k^n. With n fixed to 1.0 the most likely amplitude is 17.4 +/-1.5 uK (68% CL). Excluding the quadrupole anisotropy we find Q_{rms-PS}= 16.0^{+7.5}_{-5.2} uK (68% CL), n=1.21^{+0.60}_{-0.55}, and, with n fixed to 1.0 the most likely amplitude is 18.2+/-1.6 uK (68% CL). Monte Carlo simulations indicate that these derived estimates of n may be biased by ~+0.3 (with the observed low value of the quadrupole included in the analysis) and {}~+0.1 (with the quadrupole excluded). Thus the most likely bias-corrected estimate of n is between 1.1 and 1.3. Our best estimate of the dipole from the two-year DMR data is 3.363+/-0.024 mK towards Galactic coordinates (l,b)= (264.4+/-0.2 degrees, +48.1+/-0.4 degrees), and our best estimate of the RMS quadrupole amplitude in our sky is 6+/-3 uK.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1996

The dipole observed in the COBE DMR 4 year data

C. Lineweaver; L. Tenorio; George F. Smoot; P. Keegstra

The largest anisotropy in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the {approx_equal}3 mK dipole assumed to be due to our velocity with respect to the CMB. Using the 4 year data set from all six channels of the {ital COBE} Differential Microwave Radiometers (DMR), we obtain a best-fit dipole amplitude 3.358{plus_minus}0.001{plus_minus}0.023 mK in the direction ({ital l},{ital b})=(264.31{degrees}{plus_minus}0.04{degree}{plus_minus}0.16{degree} +48.05{degrees}{plus_minus}0.02{degree}{plus_minus}0.09{degree}), where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second include calibration and combined systematic uncertainties. This measurement is consistent with previous DMR and FIRAS results. {copyright} {ital 1996 The American Astronomical Society.}


The Astrophysical Journal | 1996

The dipole observed in the {ital COBE} DMR 4 year data

C. Lineweaver; L. Tenorio; George F. Smoot; P. Keegstra; A. J. Banday; P. M. Lubin

The largest anisotropy in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the {approx_equal}3 mK dipole assumed to be due to our velocity with respect to the CMB. Using the 4 year data set from all six channels of the {ital COBE} Differential Microwave Radiometers (DMR), we obtain a best-fit dipole amplitude 3.358{plus_minus}0.001{plus_minus}0.023 mK in the direction ({ital l},{ital b})=(264.31{degrees}{plus_minus}0.04{degree}{plus_minus}0.16{degree} +48.05{degrees}{plus_minus}0.02{degree}{plus_minus}0.09{degree}), where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second include calibration and combined systematic uncertainties. This measurement is consistent with previous DMR and FIRAS results. {copyright} {ital 1996 The American Astronomical Society.}


The Astrophysical Journal | 1995

Three-Point Correlations in the COBE DMR 2 Year Anisotropy Maps

G. Hinshaw; A. J. Banday; C. L. Bennett; Krzysztof M. Gorski; A. Kogut; C. Lineweaver; George F. Smoot; E. L. Wright

The two-point temperature correlation function is evaluated from the 4 yr COBE DMR microwave anisotropy maps. We examine the two-point function, which is the Legendre transform of the angular power spectrum, and show that the data are statistically consistent from channel to channel and frequency to frequency. The most likely quadrupole normalization is computed for a scale-invariant power-law spectrum of CMB anisotropy, using a variety of data combinations. For a given data set, the normalization inferred from the two-point data is consistent with that inferred by other methods. The smallest and largest normalizations deduced from any data combination are 16.4 and 19.6 μK, respectively, with a value ~18 μK generally preferred.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1992

COBE differential Microwave Radiometers : preliminary systematic error analysis

A. Kogut; George F. Smoot; C. L. Bennett; E. L. Wright; J. Aymon; G. De Amici; G. Hinshaw; P. D. Jackson; E. Kaita; P. Keegstra; C. Lineweaver; K. Loewenstein; L. Rokke; L. Tenorio; N. W. Boggess; Edward S. Cheng; Samuel Gulkis; Michael G. Hauser; Michael A. Janssen; T. Kelsall; John C. Mather; S. S. Meyer; S. H. Moseley; Thomas L. Murdock; Richard A. Shafer; R. F. Silverberg; Rainer Weiss; D. T. Wilkinson

The Differential Microwave Radiometers (DMR) instrument aboard the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) maps the full microwave sky in order to measure the large-angular-scale anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation. Solar system foreground sources, instrumental effects, as well as data recovery and processing, can combine to create statistically significant artifacts in the analyzed data. We discuss the techniques available for the identification and subtraction of these effects from the DMR data and present preliminary limits on their magnitude in the DMR 1 yr maps (Smoot et al. 1992)


The Astrophysical Journal | 1994

Comments on the statistical analysis of excess variance in the COBE differential microwave radiometer maps

E. L. Wright; George F. Smoot; A. Kogut; G. Hinshaw; L. Tenorio; C. Lineweaver; C. L. Bennett; P. M. Lubin

Cosmic anisotrophy produces an excess variance sq sigma(sub sky) in the Delta maps produced by the Differential Microwave Radiometer (DMR) on cosmic background explorer (COBE) that is over and above the instrument noise. After smoothing to an effective resolution of 10 deg, this excess sigma(sub sky)(10 deg), provides an estimate for the amplitude of the primordial density perturbation power spectrum with a cosmic uncertainty of only 12%. We employ detailed Monte Carlo techniques to express the amplitude derived from this statistic in terms of the universal root mean square (rms) quadrupole amplitude, (Q sq/RMS)(exp 0.5). The effects of monopole and dipole subtraction and the non-Gaussian shape of the DMR beam cause the derived (Q sq/RMS)(exp 0.5) to be 5%-10% larger than would be derived using simplified analytic approximations. We also investigate the properties of two other map statistics: the actual quadrupole and the Boughn-Cottingham statistic. Both the sigma(sub sky)(10 deg) statistic and the Boughn-Cottingham statistic are consistent with the (Q sq/RMS)(exp 0.5) = 17 +/- 5 micro K reported by Smoot et al. (1992) and Wright et al. (1992).


The Astrophysical Journal | 1992

COBE differential microwave radiometers - Calibration techniques

C. L. Bennett; George F. Smoot; Michael A. Janssen; Samuel Gulkis; A. Kogut; G. Hinshaw; C. Backus; Michael G. Hauser; John C. Mather; L. Rokke; L. Tenorio; Ron Weiss; D. T. Wilkinson; E. L. Wright; G. De Amici; N. W. Boggess; Edward S. Cheng; P. D. Jackson; P. Keegstra; T. Kelsall; R. Kummerer; C. Lineweaver; S. H. Moseley; Thomas L. Murdock; J. Santana; Richard A. Shafer; R. F. Silverberg

The COBE spacecraft was launched November 18, 1989 UT carrying three scientific instruments into earth orbit for studies of cosmology. One of these instruments, the Differential Microwave Radiometer (DMR), is designed to measure the large-angular-scale temperature anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation at three frequencies (31.5, 53, and 90 GHz). This paper presents three methods used to calibrate the DMR. First, the signal difference between beam-filling hot and cold targets observed on the ground provides a primary calibration that is transferred to space by noise sources internal to the instrument. Second, the moon is used in flight as an external calibration source. Third, the signal arising from the Doppler effect due to the earths motion around the barycenter of the solar system is used as an external calibration source. Preliminary analysis of the external source calibration techniques confirms the accuracy of the currently more precise ground-based calibration. Assuming the noise source behavior did not change from the ground-based calibration to flight, a 0.1-0.4 percent relative and 0.7-2.5 percent absolute calibration uncertainty is derived, depending on radiometer channel.


The Astrophysical Journal | 1994

Limits on three-point correlations in the COBE DMR first-year anisotropy maps

G. Hinshaw; A. Kogut; K. M. Górski; A. J. Banday; C. L. Bennett; C. Lineweaver; P. M. Lubin; George F. Smoot; E. L. Wright

We compute the three-point temperature correlation function of the {\it COBE} Differential Microwave Radiometer (DMR) first-year sky maps to search for non-Gaussian temperature fluctuations. The level of fluctuations seen in the computed correlation function are too large to be attributable solely to instrument noise. However the fluctuations are consistent with the level expected to result from a superposition of instrument noise and sky signal arising from a Gaussian power law model of initial fluctuations, with a quadrupole normalized amplitude of 17

Collaboration


Dive into the C. Lineweaver's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Kogut

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

C. L. Bennett

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. Hinshaw

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

E. L. Wright

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L. Tenorio

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John C. Mather

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge