C. Van Holsbeke
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by C. Van Holsbeke.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2008
D. Timmerman; Antonia Carla Testa; Tom Bourne; L. Ameye; D. Jurkovic; C. Van Holsbeke; D. Paladini; B. Van Calster; Ignace Vergote; S. Van Huffel; Lil Valentin
To derive simple and clinically useful ultrasound‐based rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2010
D. Timmerman; B. Van Calster; Antonia Carla Testa; S. Guerriero; D. Fischerova; Andrea Lissoni; C. Van Holsbeke; R. Fruscio; A. Czekierdowski; D. Jurkovic; L. Savelli; Ignace Vergote; Tom Bourne; S. Van Huffel; Lil Valentin
The aims of the study were to temporally and externally validate the diagnostic performance of two logistic regression models containing clinical and ultrasound variables in order to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses, and to compare the results with the subjective interpretation of ultrasound findings carried out by an experienced ultrasound examiner (‘subjective assessment’).
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2010
C. Van Holsbeke; B. Van Calster; S. Guerriero; L. Savelli; D. Paladini; Andrea Lissoni; A. Czekierdowski; D. Fischerova; J. Zhang; G Mestdagh; Antonia Carla Testa; Tom Bourne; Lil Valentin; D. Timmerman
To describe the ultrasound characteristics of endometriomas in pre‐ and postmenopausal patients and to develop rules that characterize endometriomas.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007
A Sokalska; Dirk Timmerman; Antonia Carla Testa; C. Van Holsbeke; Andrea Lissoni; F. Leone; D. Jurkovic; Lil Valentin
To determine the sensitivity and specificity of subjective evaluation of gray‐scale and Doppler ultrasound findings (here called pattern recognition) when used by experienced ultrasound examiners with regard to making a specific diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2009
Lil Valentin; D. Jurkovic; B. Van Calster; Antonia Carla Testa; C. Van Holsbeke; Tom Bourne; Ignace Vergote; S. Van Huffel; Dirk Timmerman
To determine whether CA 125 measurement is superior to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions, and to determine whether adding CA 125 to ultrasound examination improves diagnostic performance.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2013
Jeroen Kaijser; Tom Bourne; Lil Valentin; A. Sayasneh; C. Van Holsbeke; Ignace Vergote; Antonia Carla Testa; D. Franchi; B. Van Calster; D. Timmerman
In order to ensure that ovarian cancer patients access appropriate treatment to improve the outcome of this disease, accurate characterization before any surgery on ovarian pathology is essential. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) collaboration has standardized the approach to the ultrasound description of adnexal pathology. A prospectively collected large database enabled previously developed prediction models like the risk of malignancy index (RMI) to be tested and novel prediction models to be developed and externally validated in order to determine the optimal approach to characterize adnexal pathology preoperatively. The main IOTA prediction models (logistic regression model 1 (LR1) and logistic regression model 2 (LR2)) have both shown excellent diagnostic performance (area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.96 and 0.95, respectively) and outperform previous diagnostic algorithms. Their test performance almost matches subjective assessment by experienced examiners, which is accepted to be the best way to classify adnexal masses before surgery. A two‐step strategy using the IOTA simple rules supplemented with subjective assessment of ultrasound findings when the rules do not apply, also reached excellent diagnostic performance (sensitivity 90%, specificity 93%) and misclassified fewer malignancies than did the RMI. An evidence‐based approach to the preoperative characterization of ovarian and other adnexal masses should include the use of LR1, LR2 or IOTA simple rules and subjective assessment by an experienced examiner. Copyright
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007
Antonia Carla Testa; Gabriella Ferrandina; Dirk Timmerman; L. Savelli; M. Ludovisi; C. Van Holsbeke; M. Malaggese; Giovanni Scambia; Lil Valentin
To describe the gray‐scale and color Doppler ultrasound findings of metastatic tumors in the ovary according to the origin of the primary tumor.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2011
Lil Valentin; L. Ameye; L. Savelli; R. Fruscio; Fpg Leone; A. Czekierdowski; Aa Lissoni; D. Fischerova; S. Guerriero; C. Van Holsbeke; S. Van Huffel; D. Timmerman
To develop a logistic regression model that can discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses perceived to be difficult to classify by subjective evaluation of gray‐scale and Doppler ultrasound findings (subjective assessment) and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of subjective assessment, serum CA 125 and the risk of malignancy index (RMI).
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2008
C. Van Holsbeke; E Domali; T. Holland; Ruth Achten; Antonia Carla Testa; Lil Valentin; D. Jurkovic; Philippe Moerman; Dirk Timmerman
To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of the ovary, and to define the ultrasound appearance of GCTs based on pattern recognition.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007
B. Van Calster; D. Timmerman; C. Lu; Johan A. K. Suykens; Lil Valentin; C. Van Holsbeke; Frédéric Amant; Ignace Vergote; S. Van Huffel
To develop flexible classifiers that predict malignancy in adnexal masses using a large database from nine centers.