Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where C. Van Holsbeke is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by C. Van Holsbeke.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2008

Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer

D. Timmerman; Antonia Carla Testa; Tom Bourne; L. Ameye; D. Jurkovic; C. Van Holsbeke; D. Paladini; B. Van Calster; Ignace Vergote; S. Van Huffel; Lil Valentin

To derive simple and clinically useful ultrasound‐based rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2010

Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound‐based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group

D. Timmerman; B. Van Calster; Antonia Carla Testa; S. Guerriero; D. Fischerova; Andrea Lissoni; C. Van Holsbeke; R. Fruscio; A. Czekierdowski; D. Jurkovic; L. Savelli; Ignace Vergote; Tom Bourne; S. Van Huffel; Lil Valentin

The aims of the study were to temporally and externally validate the diagnostic performance of two logistic regression models containing clinical and ultrasound variables in order to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses, and to compare the results with the subjective interpretation of ultrasound findings carried out by an experienced ultrasound examiner (‘subjective assessment’).


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2010

Endometriomas: their ultrasound characteristics

C. Van Holsbeke; B. Van Calster; S. Guerriero; L. Savelli; D. Paladini; Andrea Lissoni; A. Czekierdowski; D. Fischerova; J. Zhang; G Mestdagh; Antonia Carla Testa; Tom Bourne; Lil Valentin; D. Timmerman

To describe the ultrasound characteristics of endometriomas in pre‐ and postmenopausal patients and to develop rules that characterize endometriomas.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007

Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses

A Sokalska; Dirk Timmerman; Antonia Carla Testa; C. Van Holsbeke; Andrea Lissoni; F. Leone; D. Jurkovic; Lil Valentin

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of subjective evaluation of gray‐scale and Doppler ultrasound findings (here called pattern recognition) when used by experienced ultrasound examiners with regard to making a specific diagnosis of adnexal masses.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2009

Adding a single CA 125 measurement to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner does not improve preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses

Lil Valentin; D. Jurkovic; B. Van Calster; Antonia Carla Testa; C. Van Holsbeke; Tom Bourne; Ignace Vergote; S. Van Huffel; Dirk Timmerman

To determine whether CA 125 measurement is superior to ultrasound imaging performed by an experienced examiner for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions, and to determine whether adding CA 125 to ultrasound examination improves diagnostic performance.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2013

Improving strategies for diagnosing ovarian cancer: a summary of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) studies

Jeroen Kaijser; Tom Bourne; Lil Valentin; A. Sayasneh; C. Van Holsbeke; Ignace Vergote; Antonia Carla Testa; D. Franchi; B. Van Calster; D. Timmerman

In order to ensure that ovarian cancer patients access appropriate treatment to improve the outcome of this disease, accurate characterization before any surgery on ovarian pathology is essential. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) collaboration has standardized the approach to the ultrasound description of adnexal pathology. A prospectively collected large database enabled previously developed prediction models like the risk of malignancy index (RMI) to be tested and novel prediction models to be developed and externally validated in order to determine the optimal approach to characterize adnexal pathology preoperatively. The main IOTA prediction models (logistic regression model 1 (LR1) and logistic regression model 2 (LR2)) have both shown excellent diagnostic performance (area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.96 and 0.95, respectively) and outperform previous diagnostic algorithms. Their test performance almost matches subjective assessment by experienced examiners, which is accepted to be the best way to classify adnexal masses before surgery. A two‐step strategy using the IOTA simple rules supplemented with subjective assessment of ultrasound findings when the rules do not apply, also reached excellent diagnostic performance (sensitivity 90%, specificity 93%) and misclassified fewer malignancies than did the RMI. An evidence‐based approach to the preoperative characterization of ovarian and other adnexal masses should include the use of LR1, LR2 or IOTA simple rules and subjective assessment by an experienced examiner. Copyright


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007

Imaging in gynecological disease (1): ultrasound features of metastases in the ovaries differ depending on the origin of the primary tumor

Antonia Carla Testa; Gabriella Ferrandina; Dirk Timmerman; L. Savelli; M. Ludovisi; C. Van Holsbeke; M. Malaggese; Giovanni Scambia; Lil Valentin

To describe the gray‐scale and color Doppler ultrasound findings of metastatic tumors in the ovary according to the origin of the primary tumor.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2011

Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray‐scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help

Lil Valentin; L. Ameye; L. Savelli; R. Fruscio; Fpg Leone; A. Czekierdowski; Aa Lissoni; D. Fischerova; S. Guerriero; C. Van Holsbeke; S. Van Huffel; D. Timmerman

To develop a logistic regression model that can discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses perceived to be difficult to classify by subjective evaluation of gray‐scale and Doppler ultrasound findings (subjective assessment) and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of subjective assessment, serum CA 125 and the risk of malignancy index (RMI).


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2008

Imaging of gynecological disease (3): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of granulosa cell tumors of the ovary

C. Van Holsbeke; E Domali; T. Holland; Ruth Achten; Antonia Carla Testa; Lil Valentin; D. Jurkovic; Philippe Moerman; Dirk Timmerman

To describe the clinical and ultrasound characteristics of granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of the ovary, and to define the ultrasound appearance of GCTs based on pattern recognition.


Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007

Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors using Bayesian kernel-based methods

B. Van Calster; D. Timmerman; C. Lu; Johan A. K. Suykens; Lil Valentin; C. Van Holsbeke; Frédéric Amant; Ignace Vergote; S. Van Huffel

To develop flexible classifiers that predict malignancy in adnexal masses using a large database from nine centers.

Collaboration


Dive into the C. Van Holsbeke's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. Timmerman

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Testa

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Antonia Carla Testa

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. Van Calster

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Van Huffel

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Czekierdowski

Medical University of Lublin

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge