D. Timmerman
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D. Timmerman.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2008
D. Timmerman; Antonia Carla Testa; Tom Bourne; L. Ameye; D. Jurkovic; C. Van Holsbeke; D. Paladini; B. Van Calster; Ignace Vergote; S. Van Huffel; Lil Valentin
To derive simple and clinically useful ultrasound‐based rules for discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2003
D. Timmerman; J. Wauters; S. Van Calenbergh; D. Van Schoubroeck; G. Maleux; T. Van den Bosch; Bernard Spitz
The aim of this study was to assess the spontaneous outcome of uterine vascular malformations detected with ultrasonography and color Doppler, and to investigate the predictive value of color Doppler imaging as to which patients require invasive treatment.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2006
Lil Valentin; L. Ameye; D. Jurkovic; U. Metzger; Fabrice Lecuru; S. Van Huffel; D. Timmerman
To determine which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings, and to determine if the use of logistic regression models for calculation of individual risk of malignancy would improve the diagnostic accuracy in difficult tumors.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2010
D. Timmerman; B. Van Calster; Antonia Carla Testa; S. Guerriero; D. Fischerova; Andrea Lissoni; C. Van Holsbeke; R. Fruscio; A. Czekierdowski; D. Jurkovic; L. Savelli; Ignace Vergote; Tom Bourne; S. Van Huffel; Lil Valentin
The aims of the study were to temporally and externally validate the diagnostic performance of two logistic regression models containing clinical and ultrasound variables in order to estimate the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses, and to compare the results with the subjective interpretation of ultrasound findings carried out by an experienced ultrasound examiner (‘subjective assessment’).
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2010
C. Van Holsbeke; B. Van Calster; S. Guerriero; L. Savelli; D. Paladini; Andrea Lissoni; A. Czekierdowski; D. Fischerova; J. Zhang; G Mestdagh; Antonia Carla Testa; Tom Bourne; Lil Valentin; D. Timmerman
To describe the ultrasound characteristics of endometriomas in pre‐ and postmenopausal patients and to develop rules that characterize endometriomas.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2005
G. Condous; E. Kirk; Chuan Lu; S. Van Huffel; Olivier Gevaert; B. De Moor; F. De Smet; D. Timmerman; Tom Bourne
Various serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) discriminatory zones are currently used for evaluating the likelihood of an ectopic pregnancy in women classified as having a pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) following a transvaginal ultrasound examination. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of discriminatory zones for serum hCG levels of > 1000 IU/L, 1500 IU/L and 2000 IU/L for the detection of ectopic pregnancy in such women.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2003
D. Timmerman; Jasper Verguts; Maja Konstantinovic; Philippe Moerman; D. Van Schoubroeck; Jan Deprest; S. Van Huffel
Unenhanced transvaginal sonography is not accurate in the detection of endometrial polyps. Currently, second‐stage tests such as saline contrast sonohysterography and office hysteroscopy are used to diagnose endometrial lesions, but both have limitations and side effects. We proposed visualization of the pedicle artery on color Doppler imaging as a sign of polyps.
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2010
F. Leone; D. Timmerman; Tom Bourne; Lil Valentin; E. Epstein; Steven R. Goldstein; H. Marret; Anna K. Parsons; Berit Gull; O. Istre; W. Sepulveda; E. Ferrazzi; T. Van den Bosch
The IETA (International Endometrial Tumor Analysis group) statement is a consensus statement on terms, definitions and measurements that may be used to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and uterine cavity on gray‐scale sonography, color flow imaging and sonohysterography. The relationship between the ultrasound features described and the presence or absence of pathology is not known. However, the IETA terms and definitions may form the basis for prospective studies to predict the risk of different endometrial pathologies based on their ultrasound appearance. Copyright
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2016
S. Guerriero; G. Condous; T. Van den Bosch; Lil Valentin; F. Leone; D. Van Schoubroeck; C. Exacoustos; A. Installe; Wellington P. Martins; Mauricio Simões Abrão; G. Hudelist; M. Bazot; Juan Luis Alcázar; M.O. Gonçalves; M. Pascual; Silvia Ajossa; L. Savelli; R. Dunham; S. Reid; Uche Menakaya; Tom Bourne; Simone Ferrero; M. León; T. Bignardi; T. Holland; D. Jurkovic; Beryl R. Benacerraf; Yutaka Osuga; Edgardo Somigliana; D. Timmerman
The IDEA (International Deep Endometriosis Analysis group) statement is a consensus opinion on terms, definitions and measurements that may be used to describe the sonographic features of the different phenotypes of endometriosis. Currently, it is difficult to compare results between published studies because authors use different terms when describing the same structures and anatomical locations. We hope that the terms and definitions suggested herein will be adopted in centers around the world. This would result in consistent use of nomenclature when describing the ultrasound location and extent of endometriosis. We believe that the standardization of terminology will allow meaningful comparisons between future studies in women with an ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and should facilitate multicenter research. Copyright
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics | 2004
G. Condous; C. Lu; S. Van Huffel; D. Timmerman; T. Bourne
Objective: To evaluate accuracy, user variability and impact of experience on the use of serum hCG and progesterone in women who have a pregnancy of unknown location (PULs). Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study. Presenting 1932 consecutive women to an Early Pregnancy Unit had a transvaginal scan. The location of the pregnancy could not be found in 189 women (Pregnancy of unknown location, PUL), and so blood was taken to measure serum hCG and progesterone at presentation and subsequently after 48 h, according to the protocol. All women were monitored at regular intervals until the final outcome was known, which was a failing PUL, a viable or failing intra‐uterine pregnancy, an ectopic pregnancy or a persisting PUL. The final study group comprised 185 PUL, as four cases of persisting PUL were treated and excluded from the analysis. Five investigators assessed the hormonal data independently. The investigators experience as defined by the number of years working in obstetrics and gynecology ranged from 2 to 15 years. Each investigator knew the women were clinically stable and that the scan result was consistent with a PUL, i.e. there were no signs of intra‐ or extra‐uterine pregnancy, and there was no hemoperitoneum on TVS. When assessing the PULs, each investigator was given the hormonal results at time 0 and 48 h for serum hCG and progesterone and asked to classify the PULs as failing PULs, immediately viable intra‐uterine PULs and ectopic PULs. No other clinical information about the women was made available. Results: Complete data 185 women (89%): 102 failing PULs, 63 immediately viable intra‐uterine PULs and 20 ectopic PULs (total 185). The most experienced investigator obtained the best accuracy 163/185 (88.1%); not significantly different from those obtained by less experienced investigators (range 85.9–87.6%). Mean correct classification of failing PUL and immediately viable intra‐uterine PULs was 93% (range 89–95%); corresponding value for ectopic PULs was 42% (range 25–60%). Agreement between observers for classification of failing PULs and immediately viable intra‐uterine PULs was almost perfect (Cohens kappa 0.86–0.90), whereas the value for ectopic PULs group was fair to moderate (Cohens kappa 0.39–0.67). All 5 investigators misdiagnosed same 35% of ectopic PULs. Conclusions: Serum hCG and progesterone levels at defined times can be used to predict the immediate viability of a PUL, but cannot be used reliably to predict its location. Clinical experience does not significantly improve the ability to assess PUL outcome.