Cameron Sellars

Risk Factors for Chest Infection in Acute Stroke A Prospective Cohort Study

Background and Purpose— Pneumonia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after stroke. We aimed to determine key characteristics that would allow prediction of those patients who are at highest risk for poststroke pneumonia. Methods— We studied a series of consecutive patients with acute stroke who were admitted to hospital. Detailed evaluation included the modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; the Abbreviated Mental Test; and measures of swallow, respiratory, and oral health status. Pneumonia was diagnosed by set criteria. Patients were followed up at 3 months after stroke. Results— We studied 412 patients, 391 (94.9%) with ischemic stroke and 21 (5.1%) with hemorrhagic stroke; 78 (18.9%) met the study criteria for pneumonia. Subjects who developed pneumonia were older (mean±SD age, 75.9±11.4 vs 64.9±13.9 years), had higher modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lower Abbreviated Mental Test scores, and a higher oral cavity score, and a greater proportion tested positive for bacterial cultures from oral swabs. In binary logistic-regression analysis, independent predictors (P<0.05) of pneumonia were age >65 years, dysarthria or no speech due to aphasia, a modified Rankin Scale score ≥4, an Abbreviated Mental Test score <8, and failure on the water swallow test. The presence of 2 or more of these risk factors carried 90.9% sensitivity and 75.6% specificity for the development of pneumonia. Conclusions— Pneumonia after stroke is associated with older age, dysarthria/no speech due to aphasia, severity of poststroke disability, cognitive impairment, and an abnormal water swallow test result. Simple assessment of these variables could be used to identify patients at high risk of developing pneumonia after stroke.

Is voice therapy an effective treatment for dysphonia? A randomised controlled trial

Abstract Objectives: To assess the overall efficacy of voice therapy for dysphonia. Design: Single blind randomised controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient clinic in a teaching hospital. Participants: 204 outpatients aged 17-87 with a primary symptom of persistent hoarseness for at least two months. Interventions: After baseline assessments, patients were randomised to six weeks of either voice therapy or no treatment. Assessments were repeated at six weeks on the 145 (71%) patients who continued to this stage and at 12-14 weeks on the 133 (65%) patients who completed the study. The assessments at the three time points for the 70 patients who completed treatment and the 63 patients in the group given no treatment were compared. Main outcome measures: Ratings of laryngeal features, Buffalo voice profile, amplitude and pitch perturbation, voice profile questionnaire, hospital anxiety and depression scale, clinical interview schedule, SF-36. Results: Voice therapy improved voice quality as assessed by rating by patients (P=0.001) and rating by observer (P<0.001). The treatment effects for these two outcomes were 4.1 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 6.6) points and 0.82 (0.50 to 1.13) points. Amplitude perturbation showed improvement at six weeks (P=0.005) but not on completion of the study. Patients with dysphonia had appreciable psychological distress and lower quality of life than controls, but voice therapy had no significant impact on either of these variables. Conclusion: Voice therapy is effective in improving voice quality as assessed by self rated and observer rated methods. What is already known on this topic Many patients with dysphonia are treated by voice therapy The effectiveness of voice therapy in a diverse group of patients is unknown What this study adds Voice therapy is an effective treatment for dysphonia in terms of report by patients and perceptual ratings by an expert Psychological distress and reduction in general health status are common in patients with dysphonia but are not significantly affected by a course of voice therapy

Barriers to achieving evidence-based stroke rehabilitation

Objective: To determine the perceived barriers to evidence-based practice by health professionals working within the field of stroke rehabilitation. Design: Focus groups were carried out to identify the perceived barriers; these were followed by a postal questionnaire that asked stroke rehabilitation professionals to rate their agreement with the perceived barriers. Subjects: One hundred and five stroke rehabilitation professionals participated in the focus groups and were sent the postal questionnaire. Eighty-six responses were returned, from 27 physiotherapists, 26 occupational therapists, 22 nurses, 6 speech and language therapists, and 5 other professionals. Main outcome measures: Proportion of subjects rating their level of agreement with statements as 1 ‘agree’, 2, 3, 4 or 5 ‘disagree’. Scores of 1 or 2 were classified as ‘agreement’, and scores of 4 or 5 were classified as ‘disagreement’: the percentages of subjects agreeing or disagreeing with each statement were calculated. Results: Twenty barriers were identified, classified under the headings ‘ability’, ‘opportunity’ and ‘implementation’. Seventy-nine (92%) of all respondents agreed that keeping up to date with research findings was important to them, but only 7 (8%) were happy with the time that they had to do this. Fifty-eight (67%) perceived a need for further training. Only 4 (5%) agreed that it was easy to transfer research findings into their daily practice. A number of significant differences were found between the perceived barriers of different disciplines.

A Preliminary Comparison of Videofluoroscopy of Swallow and Pulse Oximetry in the Identification of Aspiration in Dysphagic Patients

Abstract. Pulse oximetry has recently received attention in the dysphagia literature because of its possible contribution to the management of neurogenic dysphagia. The present study was devised to examine whether pulse oximetry could be exploited to determine episodes of aspiration in patients with known dysphagia of neurologic origin. To this end, pulse oximetry was undertaken in six patients undergoing videofluoroscopic study of swallow. Normal controls also underwent pulse oximetry during feeding. The results indicate that there is no clear-cut relationship between changes in arterial oxygenation and aspiration. However, some support is found for the association between altered arterial oxygenation and oral feeding in dysphagic individuals. Further research in both normals and compromised individuals is needed.

Characterization of effective primary voice therapy for dysphonia.

Despite advances in the development of voice outcome measures, there is no methodology to define and quantify the elements of the complex process of speech therapy. The components of therapy given by one therapist to the intervention limb of a controlled trial were characterized according to a list of five minutes. The intervention was of proven benefit compared with a control period of observation. Indirect approaches comprised two thirds of therapy time. The types and duration of intervention were assessed but no treatment category seemed more associated with a favourable outcome. The design shows that it is possible to perform a prospective, structured analysis of the components of voice therapy. The method appears viable for the future comparison of the widely varying techniques current in voice therapy practice.

Swallowing abnormalities after acute stroke: A case control study.

Abstract. Dysphagia is a common and potentially fatal complication of acute stroke. However, the underlying pathophysiology, especially the relative importance of motor and sensory dysfunction, remains controversial. We conducted a case control study of 23 acute stroke patients (mean age = 72 yr) at a median of 6 days poststroke and 15 healthy controls (mean age = 76 yr). We used novel methods to assess swallowing in detail, including a timed videoendoscopic swallow study and oral sensory threshold testing using electrical stimulation. Vocal cord mobility and voluntary pharyngeal motor activity were impaired in the stroke group compared with the controls (p= 0.01 and 0.03). There was a delay during swallowing in the time to onset of epliglottic tilt in the stroke group, particularly for semisolids (p= 0.02) and solids (p= 0.01), consistent with a delay in initiation of the swallow. Sensory thresholds were not increased in the stroke group compared with controls. We conclude that pharyngeal motor dysfunction and a delay in swallow initiation are common after acute stroke. Vocal cord mobility is reduced, and this may result in reduced airway protection. We found no evidence to support the hypothesis that oropharyngeal sensory dysfunction is common after acute stroke.

Reliability of perceptions of voice quality: evidence from a problem asthma clinic population

INTRODUCTION Methods of perceptual voice evaluation have yet to achieve satisfactory consistency; complete acceptance of a recognised clinical protocol is still some way off. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three speech and language therapists rated the voices of 43 patients attending the problem asthma clinic of a teaching hospital, according to the grade-roughness-breathiness-asthenicity-strain (GRBAS) scale and other perceptual categories. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS Use of the GRBAS scale achieved only a 64.7 per cent inter-rater reliability and a 69.6 per cent intra-rater reliability for the grade component. One rater achieved a higher degree of consistency. Improved concordance on the GRBAS scale was observed for subjects with laryngeal abnormalities. Raters failed to reach any useful level of agreement in the other categories employed, except for perceived gender. DISCUSSION These results should sound a note of caution regarding routine adoption of the GRBAS scale for characterising voice quality for clinical purposes. The importance of training and the use of perceptual anchors for reliable perceptual rating need to be further investigated.