Camila Maria Pereira Rates
Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Camila Maria Pereira Rates.
Revista Bioética | 2013
Camila Maria Pereira Rates; Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia
El presente estudio descriptivo, exploratorio, con abordaje cuantitativo, enfoco identificar el conocimiento de los investigadores en el campo de la salud acerca de las normas eticas para la investigacion involucrando seres humanos. Se encontro que 24 (48%) de los investigadores desconocen los documentos internacionales en los cuales la Resolucion 196/96 del Consejo Nacional de Salud se fundamenta, 15 (30%) desconocen la composicion de la Comision Etica de la Investigacion y 14 (28%) no tienen el conocimiento adecuado acerca de las funciones del Comite de Etica de Investigacion Nacional. Los investigadores revelaron un conocimiento satisfactorio acerca de las cuestiones abordadas en el instrumento de recoleccion de datos. El mantenimiento de la resolucion desde hace muchos anos ha contribuido para que los investigadores la conocieran de modo satisfactorio. Sin embargo, todavia tienen que participar en capacitaciones enfocadas en la actualizacion de las normas de etica en investigacion, sobre todo, actualmente, cuando se vivencia un momento de revision de los presupuestos brasilenos de la etica en la investigacion con seres humanos.
Revista Bioética | 2017
Daniela Aparecida Azevedo Leite; Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia; Patrícia Pinto Braga; Camila Maria Pereira Rates; Cissa Azevedo; Elma Lourdes Campos Pavone Zoboli
There are several bioethical models capable of contributing to decision making in health. The casuistic model works with the analysis of real cases for decision making regarding bioethical problems. It is conducted with 16 academic scholars from the health field with the objective of identifying academic experiences in the teaching-learning process of bioethics. It uses the case method, based on the casuistic model. It is a descriptive, qualitative study using thematic analysis, where two categories emerged: “the difficulty of practical application of paradigms and analogies in the casuistic model’’ and ‘’how the casuistic model facilitates the formation of ethical positioning and the decision making process’’. From the reported experiences, it is concluded that the casuistic model significantly contributes to decision making in bioethical issues and assists in the teaching- -learning process of bioethics during undergraduate study in the health field.
Revista Bioética | 2014
Camila Maria Pereira Rates; Marcella Rodrigues e Costa; Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia
Characterization of risks in search of an ethics committee in research protocols: bioethical analysis A descriptive study in order to learn how researchers described risks and protective/preventive measures of their researches submitted to analyzes by an ethics committee in research. 175 research protocols submitted to a research ethics committee were included. As a result, only 38 (24.7%) described the risks in the forms and 36 (23.5%) in the informed consent. However, 110 (62.9%) described preventive measures in the forms and 143 (93.5%) in the informed consent. It was concluded that, although researchers have identified preventive measures, they have not described the risks to which the measures were targeted. It is possible that they find
Revista Bioética | 2014
Camila Maria Pereira Rates; Marcella Rodrigues e Costa; Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia
Characterization of risks in search of an ethics committee in research protocols: bioethical analysis A descriptive study in order to learn how researchers described risks and protective/preventive measures of their researches submitted to analyzes by an ethics committee in research. 175 research protocols submitted to a research ethics committee were included. As a result, only 38 (24.7%) described the risks in the forms and 36 (23.5%) in the informed consent. However, 110 (62.9%) described preventive measures in the forms and 143 (93.5%) in the informed consent. It was concluded that, although researchers have identified preventive measures, they have not described the risks to which the measures were targeted. It is possible that they find
Revista Bioética | 2014
Camila Maria Pereira Rates; Marcella Rodrigues e Costa; Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia
Characterization of risks in search of an ethics committee in research protocols: bioethical analysis A descriptive study in order to learn how researchers described risks and protective/preventive measures of their researches submitted to analyzes by an ethics committee in research. 175 research protocols submitted to a research ethics committee were included. As a result, only 38 (24.7%) described the risks in the forms and 36 (23.5%) in the informed consent. However, 110 (62.9%) described preventive measures in the forms and 143 (93.5%) in the informed consent. It was concluded that, although researchers have identified preventive measures, they have not described the risks to which the measures were targeted. It is possible that they find
Revista Bioética | 2013
Camila Maria Pereira Rates; Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia
El presente estudio descriptivo, exploratorio, con abordaje cuantitativo, enfoco identificar el conocimiento de los investigadores en el campo de la salud acerca de las normas eticas para la investigacion involucrando seres humanos. Se encontro que 24 (48%) de los investigadores desconocen los documentos internacionales en los cuales la Resolucion 196/96 del Consejo Nacional de Salud se fundamenta, 15 (30%) desconocen la composicion de la Comision Etica de la Investigacion y 14 (28%) no tienen el conocimiento adecuado acerca de las funciones del Comite de Etica de Investigacion Nacional. Los investigadores revelaron un conocimiento satisfactorio acerca de las cuestiones abordadas en el instrumento de recoleccion de datos. El mantenimiento de la resolucion desde hace muchos anos ha contribuido para que los investigadores la conocieran de modo satisfactorio. Sin embargo, todavia tienen que participar en capacitaciones enfocadas en la actualizacion de las normas de etica en investigacion, sobre todo, actualmente, cuando se vivencia un momento de revision de los presupuestos brasilenos de la etica en la investigacion con seres humanos.
Revista Bioética | 2013
Camila Maria Pereira Rates; Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia
El presente estudio descriptivo, exploratorio, con abordaje cuantitativo, enfoco identificar el conocimiento de los investigadores en el campo de la salud acerca de las normas eticas para la investigacion involucrando seres humanos. Se encontro que 24 (48%) de los investigadores desconocen los documentos internacionales en los cuales la Resolucion 196/96 del Consejo Nacional de Salud se fundamenta, 15 (30%) desconocen la composicion de la Comision Etica de la Investigacion y 14 (28%) no tienen el conocimiento adecuado acerca de las funciones del Comite de Etica de Investigacion Nacional. Los investigadores revelaron un conocimiento satisfactorio acerca de las cuestiones abordadas en el instrumento de recoleccion de datos. El mantenimiento de la resolucion desde hace muchos anos ha contribuido para que los investigadores la conocieran de modo satisfactorio. Sin embargo, todavia tienen que participar en capacitaciones enfocadas en la actualizacion de las normas de etica en investigacion, sobre todo, actualmente, cuando se vivencia un momento de revision de los presupuestos brasilenos de la etica en la investigacion con seres humanos.
Rev. bioét. (Impr.) | 2010
Camila Maria Pereira Rates; Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia
Revista de Enfermagem do Centro-Oeste Mineiro | 2015
Camila Maria Pereira Rates; Cissa Azevedo; Angela Mendes Taveira; Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia; Alisson Araújo
Hospice and Palliative Medicine International Journal | 2018
Camila Maria Pereira Rates; Juliana Dias Reis Pessalacia
Collaboration
Dive into the Camila Maria Pereira Rates's collaboration.
Daniela Aparecida Azevedo Leite
Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei
View shared research outputsIsabely Karoline da Silva Ribeiro
Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei
View shared research outputsLuciana Regina Ferreira da Mata
Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei
View shared research outputs