Camilla B. Pimentel

Sulfonylureas and risk of falls and fractures among nursing home residents with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS Although sulfonylureas increase the risk of hypoglycemia which may lead to fall-associated fractures, studies quantifying the association between sulfonylureas and falls and/or fractures are sparse and existing studies have yielded inconsistent results. Our objective is to evaluate the extent to which sulfonylurea use was associated with fractures and falls among nursing home residents with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS We performed a propensity-matched retrospective new user cohort study of 12,327 Medicare Parts A/B/D eligible long-stay NH residents. Medicare Part D data provided information on sulfonylurea and biguanide use initiated as monotherapy (nsulfonylurea=5807 and nbiguanide=6151) after NH entry. Medicare hospitalizations were used to identify hypoglycemic events (ICD-9-CM codes 250.8, 251.1, 251.2) and fall-associated fractures (ICD-9-CM codes 800, 804, 812-817, 820, 823, 824). Minimum Data Set 2.0 (2008-2010) provided information on falls and potential confounders. Cox models conducted on propensity-matched samples provided adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Falls were common (37.4 per 100 person-years). Fractures were not associated with initiation of sulfonylureas. Sulfonylurea initiation was associated with an excess risk of falls among residents with moderate activities of daily living limitations (aHR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.00-1.26), but not among those with minimal limitations or dependence in activities of daily living. CONCLUSIONS Nursing home residents with moderate limitations in activities of daily living are at increased risk of falls upon initiation of sulfonylureas. Initiating sulfonylurea use in NH residents must be done with caution.

A systematic review of cancer GWAS and candidate gene meta-analyses reveals limited overlap but similar effect sizes.

Candidate gene and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) represent two complementary approaches to uncovering genetic contributions to common diseases. We systematically reviewed the contributions of these approaches to our knowledge of genetic associations with cancer risk by analyzing the data in the Cancer Genome-wide Association and Meta Analyses database (Cancer GAMAdb). The database catalogs studies published since January 1, 2000, by study and cancer type. In all, we found that meta-analyses and pooled analyses of candidate genes reported 349 statistically significant associations and GWAS reported 269, for a total of 577 unique associations. Only 41 (7.1%) associations were reported in both candidate gene meta-analyses and GWAS, usually with similar effect sizes. When considering only noteworthy associations (defined as those with false-positive report probabilities ≤0.2) and accounting for indirect overlap, we found 202 associations, with 27 of those appearing in both meta-analyses and GWAS. Our findings suggest that meta-analyses of well-conducted candidate gene studies may continue to add to our understanding of the genetic associations in the post-GWAS era.

Review of the Gene-Environment Interaction Literature in Cancer: What Do We Know?

Risk of cancer is determined by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Although the study of gene‐environment interactions (G×E) has been an active area of research, little is reported about the known findings in the literature.

Pain management in nursing home residents with cancer.

To assess improvements in pain management of nursing home (NH) residents with cancer since the implementation of pain management quality indicators.

A Review of NCI's Extramural Grant Portfolio: Identifying Opportunities for Future Research in Genes and Environment in Cancer

Background: Genetic and environmental factors jointly influence cancer risk. The NIH has made the study of gene–environment (GxE) interactions a research priority since the year 2000. Methods: To assess the current status of GxE research in cancer, we analyzed the extramural grant portfolio of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) from Fiscal Years 2007 to 2009. Publications attributed to selected grants were also evaluated. Results: From the 1,106 research grants identified in our portfolio analysis, a random sample of 450 grants (40%) was selected for data abstraction; of these, 147 (33%) were considered relevant. The most common cancer type was breast (20%, n = 29), followed by lymphoproliferative (10%, n = 14), colorectal (9%, n = 13), melanoma/other skin (9%, n = 13), and lung/upper aerodigestive tract (8%, n = 12) cancers. The majority of grants were studies of candidate genes (68%, n = 100) compared with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) (8%, n = 12). Approximately one-third studied environmental exposures categorized as energy balance (37%, n = 54) or drugs/treatment (29%, n = 43). From the 147 relevant grants, 108 publications classified as GxE or pharmacogenomic were identified. These publications were linked to 37 of the 147 grant applications (25%). Conclusion: The findings from our portfolio analysis suggest that GxE studies are concentrated in specific areas. There is room for investments in other aspects of GxE research, including, but not limited to developing alternative approaches to exposure assessment, broadening the spectrum of cancer types investigated, and conducting GxE within GWAS. Impact: This portfolio analysis provides a cross-sectional review of NCI support for GxE research in cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(4); 501–7. ©2013 AACR.

New Initiation of Long‐Acting Opioids in Long‐Stay Nursing Home Residents

To estimate the prevalence of new initiation of long‐acting opioids since introduction of national efforts to increase prescriber and public awareness on safe use of transdermal fentanyl patches.

Adaptation of a nursing home culture change research instrument for frontline staff quality improvement use.

Enhanced interpersonal relationships and meaningful resident engagement in daily life are central to nursing home cultural transformation, yet these critical components of person-centered care may be difficult for frontline staff to measure using traditional research instruments. To address the need for easy-to-use instruments to help nursing home staff members evaluate and improve person-centered care, the psychometric method of cognitive-based interviewing was used to adapt a structured observation instrument originally developed for researchers and nursing home surveyors. Twenty-eight staff members from 2 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) nursing homes participated in 1 of 3 rounds of cognitive-based interviews, using the instrument in real-life situations. Modifications to the original instrument were guided by a cognitive processing model of instrument refinement. Following 2 rounds of cognitive interviews, pretesting of the revised instrument, and another round of cognitive interviews, the resulting set of 3 short instruments mirrored the concepts of the original longer instrument but were significantly easier for frontline staff to understand and use. Final results indicated frontline staff found the revised instruments feasible to use and clinically relevant in measuring and improving the lived experience of a changing culture. This article provides a framework for developing or adapting other measurement tools for frontline culture change efforts in nursing homes, in addition to reporting on a practical set of instruments to measure aspects of person-centered care.

Medicare part D and long-term care: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.

BackgroundIn the largest overhaul to Medicare since its creation in 1965, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 established Part D in 2006 to improve access to essential medication among disabled and older Americans. Despite previous evidence of a positive impact on the general Medicare population, Part D’s overall effects on long-term care (LTC) are unknown.ObjectiveThe purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature regarding Part D’s impact on the LTC context, specifically costs to LTC residents, providers and payers; prescription drug coverage and utilization; and clinical and administrative outcomes.Data sourcesFour electronic databases [PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Health Business Fulltext Elite and Science Citation Index Expanded], selected US government and non-profit websites, and bibliographies were searched for quantitative and qualitative studies characterizing Part D in the LTC context. Searches were limited to studies that may have been published between 1 January 2006 (date of Part D implementation) and 8 January 2013.Study selectionSystematic searches identified 1,624 publications for a three-stage (title, abstract and full-text) review. Included publications were in English language; based in the US; assessed Part D-related outcomes; and included or were directly relevant to LTC residents or settings. News articles, reviews, opinion pieces, letters or commentaries; case reports or case series; simulation or modeling studies; and summaries that did not report original data were excluded.Study appraisal and synthesis methodsA standardized form was used to abstract study type, study design, LTC setting, sources of data, method of data collection, time periods assessed, unit of observation, outcomes and results. Methodological quality was assessed using modified criteria specific to quantitative and qualitative studies.ResultsEleven quantitative and eight qualitative studies met inclusion criteria. In the seven years since its implementation, Part D decreased out-of-pocket costs among enrolled nursing home residents and potentially increased costs borne by LTC facilities. Coverage of prescription drugs frequently used by older adults was adequate, except for certain drugs and alternative formulations of importance to LTC residents. The use of medications that raise safety concerns was decreased, but overall drug utilization may have been unaffected. Although there was uncertain impact on clinical outcomes, quantitative studies demonstrated evidence of unintended health consequences. Qualitative studies consistently revealed increased administrative burden among providers.LimitationsEmpirical evidence of Part D’s LTC impact was sparse. Due to limitations in available types of data, quantitative studies were generically lacking in methodological rigor. Qualitative studies suffered from lack of clarity of reporting. As future studies use clinical Medicare data, study quality is expected to improve.ConclusionAlthough LTC-specific policies continue to evolve, it appears that the prescription drug benefit may require further modifications to more effectively provide for LTC residents’ unique medication needs and improve their health outcomes. Adjustments may be needed for Part D to be more compatible with LTC prescription drug delivery processes.

Use of Atypical Antipsychotics in Nursing Homes and Pharmaceutical Marketing

To describe the current extent and type of pharmaceutical marketing in nursing homes (NHs) in one state and to provide preliminary evidence for the potential influence of pharmaceutical marketing on the use of atypical antipsychotics in NHs.

Impact of Intervention to Improve Nursing Home Resident–Staff Interactions and Engagement

Background and Objectives For nursing home residents, positive interactions with staff and engagement in daily life contribute meaningfully to quality of life. We sought to improve these aspects of person-centered care in an opportunistic snowball sample of six Veterans Health Administration nursing homes (e.g., Community Living Centers-CLCs) using an intervention that targeted staff behavior change, focusing on improving interactions between residents and staff and thereby ultimately aiming to improve resident engagement. Research Design and Methods We grounded this mixed-methods study in the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model of behavior change. We implemented the intervention by (a) using a set of evidence-based practices for implementing quality improvement and (b) combining primarily CLC-based staff facilitation with some researcher-led facilitation. Validated resident and staff surveys and structured observations collected pre and post intervention, as well as semi-structured staff interviews conducted post intervention, helped assess intervention success. Results Sixty-two CLC residents and 308 staff members responded to the surveys. Researchers conducted 1,490 discrete observations. Intervention implementation was associated with increased staff communication with residents during the provision of direct care and decreased negative staff interactions with residents. In the 66 interviews, staff consistently credited the intervention with helping them (a) develop awareness of the importance of identifying opportunities for engagement and (b) act to improve the quality of interactions between residents and staff. Discussion and Implications The intervention proved feasible and influenced staff to make simple enhancements to their behaviors that improved resident-staff interactions and staff-assessed resident engagement.