Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Carl E. Rosow is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Carl E. Rosow.


Anesthesiology | 1997

bispectral Analysis Measures Sedation and Memory Effects of Propofol, Midazolam, Isoflurane, and Alfentanil in Healthy Volunteers

Peter S. A. Glass; Marc Bloom; Lee A. Kearse; Carl E. Rosow; Peter S. Sebel; Paul Manberg

Background:The bispectral index (BIS), a value derived from the electroencephalograph (EEG), has been proposed as a measure of anesthetic effect. To establish its utility for this purpose, it is important to determine the relation among BIS, measured drug concentration, and increasing levels of seda


Anesthesiology | 1997

Bispectral index monitoring allows faster emergence and improved recovery from propofol, alfentanil and nitrous oxide anesthesia

Tong J. Gan; Peter S. A. Glass; Alastair Windsor; Fredrick Payne; Carl E. Rosow; Peter S. Sebel; Paul Manberg

Background: The bispectral index (BIS), a parameter derived from the electroencephalograph (EEG), has been shown to correlate with increasing sedation and loss of consciousness. This study determined whether addition of BIS monitoring to standard anesthetic practice results in improvements in the conduct of anesthesia or in patient outcomes. Methods: Three hundred two patients receiving a propofol‐alfentanil‐nitrous oxide anesthetic were studied at four institutions. Thirty‐four patients were initially enrolled to determine preexisting anesthetic practice and patient outcomes at each institution. Subsequent patients were randomized to either standard clinical practice (SP group), or standard practice plus BIS monitoring (BIS group). In all patients, the anesthesiologist attempted to provide a stable anesthetic with the fastest possible recovery. BIS was recorded for all patients, but viewed only in the BIS group. In the BIS group, propofol infusions were adjusted to achieve a target BIS between 45–60, increasing to 60–75 during the final 15 min of the case. In the SP group, propofol dose adjustments were made based only on standard clinical signs. Drug use, intraoperative responses, and patient recovery parameters were recorded. Results: Demographics were similar between groups. Compared with the SP group, patients in the BIS group required lower normalized propofol infusion rates (134 vs. 116 micro gram [center dot] kg sup ‐1 [center dot] min sup ‐1; P < 0.001), were extubated sooner (11.22 vs. 7.25 min; P < 0.003), had a higher percentage of patients oriented on arrival to PACU (43% vs. 23%; P < 0.02), had better postanesthesia care unit (PACU) nursing assessments (P < 0.001), and became eligible for discharge sooner (37.77 vs. 31.70 min; P < 0.04). There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative responses between the groups. Conclusions: Titrating propofol with BIS monitoring during balanced anesthesia decreased propofol use and significantly improved recovery. Intraoperative course was not changed. These findings indicate that the use of BIS may be valuable in guiding the administration of propofol intraoperatively.


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 2000

Pediatric Evaluation of the Bispectral Index (bis) Monitor and Correlation of Bis with End-tidal Sevoflurane Concentration in Infants and Children

William T. Denman; Emily L. Swanson; David E. Rosow; Kristen Ezbicki; Patricia D. Connors; Carl E. Rosow

The bispectral index (BIS) has been developed in adults and correlates well with clinical hypnotic effects of anesthetics. We investigated whether BIS reflects clinical markers of hypnosis and demonstrates agent dose-responsiveness in infants and children. In an observational arm of this study, BIS values in children undergoing general anesthesia were observed and compared with similar data collected previously in a study of adults. In a second arm of the study, a range of steady-state end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane was administered and corresponding BIS documented. Data were examined for differences between infants (0–2 yr) and children (2–12 yr). No difference was seen in BIS values in children before induction, during maintenance, and on emergence compared with adult values. There was no difference in BIS between infants and children at similar clinical levels of anesthesia. In children and infants, BIS was inversely proportional to the end-tidal concentration of sevoflurane. The sevoflurane concentration for a BIS = 50 (95% confidence interval) was significantly different: 1.55% (1.40–1.70) for infants versus 1.25% (1.12–1.37) for children. Although validation with specific behavioral end points was not possible, BIS correlated with clinical indicators of anesthesia in children as it did in adults: as depth of anesthesia increased, BIS diminished. BIS correlated with sevoflurane concentration in infants and children. The concentration-response difference between infants and children was consistent with data showing that minimum alveolar concentration is higher in children less than 1 yr of age. Implications: The use of bispectral index (BIS) during general anesthesia improves the titration of anesthetics in adults. The data from this study suggest that the same equipment and method of electroencephalogram analysis may be applied to infants and children.


Anesthesiology | 1982

Histamine Release during Morphine and Fentanyl Anesthesia

Carl E. Rosow; Jonathan Moss; Daniel M. Philbin; John J. Savarese

High doses of morphine produce peripheral vasodilation and frequently significant hypotension. These effects are thought to be due, in part, to the release of histamine. One putative advantage of high-dose fentanyl anesthesia is its relatively small effect on peripheral vascular resistance. In a randomized study, the authors examined the possibility that the hemodynamic differences between morphine and fentanyl might be attributable to histamine release. Fifteen patients were studied prior to coronary artery bypass surgery. Subjects received an infusion of morphine (1 mg·kg−1, iv at 100 Amg-·kg−1·min−1 [n – 8]) or fentanyl (50 μg·kg−1 at 5 μg·kg−1·min−1 [n = 7]). Patients in the morphine group had an average 750 per cent peak increase in plasma histamine accompanied by a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (-27 mmHg) and systemic vascular resistance (-520 dyne·s·cm−1). The greatest decrease in systemic vascular resistance occurred in those patients with the highest levels of plasma histamine (r = −0.81). Patients in the fentanyl group had no change in plasma histamine and no decrease in arterial pressure or systemic vascular resistance. Cardiac output and heart rate were comparable between the two groups. Differences in the release of histamine account for most, if not all, of the different effects of morphine and fentanyl on the peripheral vasculature.


Anesthesiology Clinics of North America | 2001

Bispectral index monitoring

Carl E. Rosow; Paul Manberg

The Bispectral Index (BIS) is a newly processed electroencephalogram parameter that was specifically developed to measure the hypnotic effects of anesthesia. Results from volunteer studies demonstrate that BIS correlates well with clinical assessments of sedation induced by sedative-hypnotic drugs. Clinical utility studies have shown also that BIS monitoring allows for better titration of anesthesia, resulting in lower hypnotic drug use and improved recovery. The data suggest that improved anesthetic titration with BIS provides sufficient clinical and economic benefits to justify its routine use. This article summarizes the clinical development and validation of BIS and describes how BIS monitoring can be used to improve anesthetic outcomes.


Anesthesiology | 1996

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil in volunteer subjects with severe liver disease.

Mark Dershwitz; J. Frank Hoke; Carl E. Rosow; Piotr Michalowski; Patricia M. Connors; Keith T. Muir; Jules L. Dienstag

Background Remifentanil, a new micro-opioid agonist with an extremely short duration of action, is metabolized by circulating and tissue esterases; therefore, its clearance should be relatively unaffected by changes in hepatic or renal function. This study was designed to determine whether severe hepatic disease affects the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Methods Ten volunteers with chronic, stable, severe hepatic disease and awaiting liver transplantation and ten matched controls were enrolled. Each subject was given a 4-h infusion of remifentanil. The first five pairs received 0.0125 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 *symbol* min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.025 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 *symbol* min sup -1 for 3 h; the second five pairs received double these infusion rates. During and after the infusion, arterial blood was obtained for pharmacokinetic analyses, and the ventilatory response to a hypercarbic challenge was assessed. Simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed. The pharmacokinetics were described using a one-compartment intravenous infusion model, and ventilatory depression was modelled using the inhibitory Emax model. The pharmacokinetics of the metabolite GR90291 were determined using noncompartmental methods. Results There were no differences in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters for remifentanil or GR90291 between the two groups. The subjects with liver disease were more sensitive to the ventilatory depressant effects of remifentanil. The EC50 values (the remifentanil concentrations determined from simultaneous pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses to depress carbon dioxide-stimulated minute ventilation by 50%) in the control and hepatic disease groups were 2.52 ng/ml (95% confidence interval 2.07-2.97 ng/ml) and 1.56 ng/ml (95% confidence interval 1.37-1.76 ng/ml), respectively. Conclusions The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil and GR90291 are unchanged in persons with severe, chronic liver disease. Such patients may be more sensitive to the ventilatory depressant effects of remifentanil, a finding of uncertain clinical significance, considering the extremely short duration of action of the drug.


Anesthesiology | 2000

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled versus Intravenous Morphine in Healthy Volunteers

Mark Dershwitz; John Walsh; Richard Morishige; Patricia M. Connors; Reid Rubsamen; Steven L. Shafer; Carl E. Rosow

BACKGROUND A new pulmonary drug delivery system produces aerosols from disposable packets of medication. This study compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine delivered by an AERx prototype with intravenous morphine. METHODS Fifteen healthy volunteers were enrolled. Two subjects were administered four inhalations of 2.2 mg morphine each at 1-min intervals or 4.4 mg over 3 min by intravenous infusion. Thirteen subjects were given twice the above doses, i.e., eight inhalations or 8.8 mg intravenously over 7 min. Arterial blood sampling was performed every minute during administration and at 2, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 240 min after administration. The effect of morphine was assessed by measuring pupil diameter and ventilatory response to a hypercapnic challenge. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed simultaneously using mixed-effect models. RESULTS The pharmacokinetic data after intravenous administration were described by a three-exponent decay model preceded by a lag time. The pharmacokinetic model for administration by inhalation consisted of the three-exponent intravenous pharmacokinetic model preceded by a two-exponent absorption model. The authors found that, with administration by inhalation, the total bioavailability was 59%, of which 43% was absorbed almost instantaneously and 57% was absorbed with a half-life of 18 min. The median times to the half-maximal miotic effects of morphine were 10 and 5.5 min after inhalation and intravenous administration, respectively (P < 0.01). The pharmacodynamic parameter ke0 was approximately 0.003 min-1. CONCLUSIONS The onset and duration of the effects of morphine are similar after intravenous administration or inhalation via this new pulmonary drug delivery system. Morphine bioavailability after such administration is 59% of the dose loaded into the dosage form.


Anesthesiology | 1990

Fentanyl and Sufentanil Anesthesia Revisited: How Much is Enough?

Daniel M. Philbin; Carl E. Rosow; Robert C. Schneider; G. Koski; Michael N. D'Ambra

This study was undertaken to determine if fentanyl and sufentanil could produce dose-related suppression of hemodynamic and hormonal responses to surgical stimulation. Eighty patients scheduled for elective CABG were studied in two consecutive protocols: protocol I was a randomized double-blind study of 40 patients who received a single dose of fentanyl (50 or 100 micrograms/kg) or sufentanil (10, 20, or 30 micrograms/kg). Hemodynamic measurements and hormonal concentrations (renin, aldosterone, cortisol, and catecholamines) were determined before and after induction and after intubation and sternotomy. Protocol II was an open randomized study of 40 patients who received sufentanil in one of four doses: 30 micrograms/kg as a single dose, 10 micrograms/kg plus infusion 0.05 microgram.kg-1.min-1, 20 micrograms/kg plus infusion 0.1 microgram.kg-1.min-1, or 40 micrograms/kg plus infusion 0.2 microgram.kg-1.min-1. Hemodynamic measurements and plasma sufentanil and catecholamine concentrations were determined before and after induction and after intubation, sternotomy, and aortic cannulation. Both protocols defined a hemodynamic response as a 15% or more increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP) from control and a hormonal response 50% or more increase over control. During protocol I, 18 patients had a hemodynamic response (average increase in SBP 22.6 +/- 2%) and 35 patients had a total of 59 hormonal responses. During protocol II, 24 patients had a hemodynamic response (average increase in SBP - 31 +/- 3%) and there were 15 catecholamine responses. There were no differences between dose groups in either protocol. It was concluded that in these dose ranges, suppression of hemodynamic or hormonal stress responses is not related to opioid dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Anesthesiology | 1997

Pharmacokinetics Anesthesiologists, and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil in Persons with Renal Failure Compared with Healthy Volunteers

Frank J. Hoke; David Shlugman; Mark Dershwitz; Piotr Michalowski; Sherry Malthouse-Dufore; Patricia M. Connors; Dave Martel; Carl E. Rosow; Keith T. Muir; Nina Rubin; Peter S. A. Glass

Background Remifentanil is an opioid analgesic for use in anesthesia. An ester linkage renders it susceptible to rapid metabolism by blood and tissue esterases. Thus it was hypothesized that remifentanil elimination would be independent of renal function. Because its principal metabolite (GR90291) is eliminated renally, it would depend on renal function. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and its metabolite in persons with and without renal failure. Methods Two groups of volunteers received two-stage infusions of remifentanil: low dose with 0.0125 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.025 micro gram kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h; and high dose with 0.025 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.05 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h. Blood samples were collected for analysis of remifentanil and GR90291 concentrations. The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil were fit using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Remifentanils effect was determined intermittently using minute ventilation during a hypercapnic (7.5% CO2) challenge. Results Fifteen patients with renal failure and eight control participants were enrolled. The clearance and volume of distribution of remifentanil were not different between those with renal failure and the controls. Patients with renal failure showed a marked reduction in the elimination of GR90291; the half-life of the metabolite increased from 1.5 h in the controls to more than 26 h in patients with renal failure. The steady-state concentration of GR90291 is likely to be more than 25 times higher in persons with renal failure. There were no obvious differences in opioid effects on minute ventilation in the controls and in patients with renal failure. Conclusions The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil were not altered in patients with renal disease, but the elimination of its principal metabolite, GR90291, was markedly reduced. Based on simulations, the concentration of GR90291 at the end of a 12-h remifentanil infusion of 2 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 is not likely to produce significant opioid effects.


Anesthesia & Analgesia | 1995

Initial clinical experience with remifentanil, a new opioid metabolized by esterases.

Mark Dershwitz; Gail I. Randel; Carl E. Rosow; Robert J. Fragen; Patricia M. Connors; Eleanor S. Librojo; Dea L. Shaw; Amy Peng

Remifentanil is a new, esterase-metabolized opioid for anesthesia. Nonspecific esterases terminate the drug effect, with a context-sensitive half-time which plateaus at 3-4 min. This dose-ranging pilot study was designed to estimate the dose requirement of remifentanil for abolition of the responses to skin incision and intraoperative stimuli, and to determine the speed of recovery. Fifty-one unpremedicated patients took part at two centers. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, 67% nitrous oxide, and vecuronium. Remifentanil was then given (1 μg/kg, plus an infusion of 0.0125-1.0 μg. kg -1 . min -1 ). Responses were defined as : >15% increase in systolic blood pressure or >20% increase in heart rate, tearing, sweating, movement, or coughing. Responses to incision or surgery were treated with 0.5 μg/kg remifentanil boluses and a 50% increase in infusion rate, which could be done twice. Subsequent responses were treated with propofol or isoflurane. Remifentanil and nitrous oxide administration were terminated after the incision was closed. ED50 for response to skin incision varied between the two study sites (0.020 and 0.087 μg. kg -1 . min -1 ). ED50 for response to all surgical stimuli was 0.52 μg. kg -1 . min -1 . At 0.3 μg. kg -1 . min -1 or more, only 3 of 21 patients required isoflurane. Recovery was not longer in patients receiving larger doses to spontaneous ventilation (2.5-4.6 min), tracheal extubation (4.2-7.0 min), and response to verbal command (3.0-4.6 min). Postoperative pain was reported in most patients (92%) at a median time of 21 min. We conclude that remifentanil was effective and well tolerated as a component of nitrous oxide-opioid-relaxant anesthesia. Over the 80-fold range of infusion rates given, patients awoke, breathed, and were tracheally extubated within a few minutes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Carl E. Rosow's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge