Mark Dershwitz

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil in volunteer subjects with severe liver disease.

Background Remifentanil, a new micro-opioid agonist with an extremely short duration of action, is metabolized by circulating and tissue esterases; therefore, its clearance should be relatively unaffected by changes in hepatic or renal function. This study was designed to determine whether severe hepatic disease affects the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Methods Ten volunteers with chronic, stable, severe hepatic disease and awaiting liver transplantation and ten matched controls were enrolled. Each subject was given a 4-h infusion of remifentanil. The first five pairs received 0.0125 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 *symbol* min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.025 micro gram *symbol* kg sup -1 *symbol* min sup -1 for 3 h; the second five pairs received double these infusion rates. During and after the infusion, arterial blood was obtained for pharmacokinetic analyses, and the ventilatory response to a hypercarbic challenge was assessed. Simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed. The pharmacokinetics were described using a one-compartment intravenous infusion model, and ventilatory depression was modelled using the inhibitory Emax model. The pharmacokinetics of the metabolite GR90291 were determined using noncompartmental methods. Results There were no differences in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters for remifentanil or GR90291 between the two groups. The subjects with liver disease were more sensitive to the ventilatory depressant effects of remifentanil. The EC50 values (the remifentanil concentrations determined from simultaneous pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analyses to depress carbon dioxide-stimulated minute ventilation by 50%) in the control and hepatic disease groups were 2.52 ng/ml (95% confidence interval 2.07-2.97 ng/ml) and 1.56 ng/ml (95% confidence interval 1.37-1.76 ng/ml), respectively. Conclusions The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil and GR90291 are unchanged in persons with severe, chronic liver disease. Such patients may be more sensitive to the ventilatory depressant effects of remifentanil, a finding of uncertain clinical significance, considering the extremely short duration of action of the drug.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inhaled versus Intravenous Morphine in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND A new pulmonary drug delivery system produces aerosols from disposable packets of medication. This study compared the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of morphine delivered by an AERx prototype with intravenous morphine. METHODS Fifteen healthy volunteers were enrolled. Two subjects were administered four inhalations of 2.2 mg morphine each at 1-min intervals or 4.4 mg over 3 min by intravenous infusion. Thirteen subjects were given twice the above doses, i.e., eight inhalations or 8.8 mg intravenously over 7 min. Arterial blood sampling was performed every minute during administration and at 2, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 240 min after administration. The effect of morphine was assessed by measuring pupil diameter and ventilatory response to a hypercapnic challenge. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses were performed simultaneously using mixed-effect models. RESULTS The pharmacokinetic data after intravenous administration were described by a three-exponent decay model preceded by a lag time. The pharmacokinetic model for administration by inhalation consisted of the three-exponent intravenous pharmacokinetic model preceded by a two-exponent absorption model. The authors found that, with administration by inhalation, the total bioavailability was 59%, of which 43% was absorbed almost instantaneously and 57% was absorbed with a half-life of 18 min. The median times to the half-maximal miotic effects of morphine were 10 and 5.5 min after inhalation and intravenous administration, respectively (P < 0.01). The pharmacodynamic parameter ke0 was approximately 0.003 min-1. CONCLUSIONS The onset and duration of the effects of morphine are similar after intravenous administration or inhalation via this new pulmonary drug delivery system. Morphine bioavailability after such administration is 59% of the dose loaded into the dosage form.

Pharmacokinetics Anesthesiologists, and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil in Persons with Renal Failure Compared with Healthy Volunteers

Background Remifentanil is an opioid analgesic for use in anesthesia. An ester linkage renders it susceptible to rapid metabolism by blood and tissue esterases. Thus it was hypothesized that remifentanil elimination would be independent of renal function. Because its principal metabolite (GR90291) is eliminated renally, it would depend on renal function. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and its metabolite in persons with and without renal failure. Methods Two groups of volunteers received two-stage infusions of remifentanil: low dose with 0.0125 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.025 micro gram kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h; and high dose with 0.025 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.05 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h. Blood samples were collected for analysis of remifentanil and GR90291 concentrations. The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil were fit using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Remifentanils effect was determined intermittently using minute ventilation during a hypercapnic (7.5% CO2) challenge. Results Fifteen patients with renal failure and eight control participants were enrolled. The clearance and volume of distribution of remifentanil were not different between those with renal failure and the controls. Patients with renal failure showed a marked reduction in the elimination of GR90291; the half-life of the metabolite increased from 1.5 h in the controls to more than 26 h in patients with renal failure. The steady-state concentration of GR90291 is likely to be more than 25 times higher in persons with renal failure. There were no obvious differences in opioid effects on minute ventilation in the controls and in patients with renal failure. Conclusions The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil were not altered in patients with renal disease, but the elimination of its principal metabolite, GR90291, was markedly reduced. Based on simulations, the concentration of GR90291 at the end of a 12-h remifentanil infusion of 2 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 is not likely to produce significant opioid effects.

Initial clinical experience with remifentanil, a new opioid metabolized by esterases.

Remifentanil is a new, esterase-metabolized opioid for anesthesia. Nonspecific esterases terminate the drug effect, with a context-sensitive half-time which plateaus at 3-4 min. This dose-ranging pilot study was designed to estimate the dose requirement of remifentanil for abolition of the responses to skin incision and intraoperative stimuli, and to determine the speed of recovery. Fifty-one unpremedicated patients took part at two centers. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, 67% nitrous oxide, and vecuronium. Remifentanil was then given (1 μg/kg, plus an infusion of 0.0125-1.0 μg. kg -1 . min -1 ). Responses were defined as : >15% increase in systolic blood pressure or >20% increase in heart rate, tearing, sweating, movement, or coughing. Responses to incision or surgery were treated with 0.5 μg/kg remifentanil boluses and a 50% increase in infusion rate, which could be done twice. Subsequent responses were treated with propofol or isoflurane. Remifentanil and nitrous oxide administration were terminated after the incision was closed. ED50 for response to skin incision varied between the two study sites (0.020 and 0.087 μg. kg -1 . min -1 ). ED50 for response to all surgical stimuli was 0.52 μg. kg -1 . min -1 . At 0.3 μg. kg -1 . min -1 or more, only 3 of 21 patients required isoflurane. Recovery was not longer in patients receiving larger doses to spontaneous ventilation (2.5-4.6 min), tracheal extubation (4.2-7.0 min), and response to verbal command (3.0-4.6 min). Postoperative pain was reported in most patients (92%) at a median time of 21 min. We conclude that remifentanil was effective and well tolerated as a component of nitrous oxide-opioid-relaxant anesthesia. Over the 80-fold range of infusion rates given, patients awoke, breathed, and were tracheally extubated within a few minutes.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil in Persons with Renal Failure Compared with Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND Remifentanil is an opioid analgesic for use in anesthesia. An ester linkage renders it susceptible to rapid metabolism by blood and tissue esterases. Thus it was hypothesized that remifentanil elimination would be independent of renal function. Because its principal metabolite (GR90291) is eliminated renally, it would depend on renal function. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and its metabolite in persons with and without renal failure. METHODS Two groups of volunteers received two-stage infusions of remifentanil: low dose with 0.0125 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 1 h followed by 0.025 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 3 h; and high dose with 0.025 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 1 h followed by 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 3 h. Blood samples were collected for analysis of remifentanil and GR90291 concentrations. The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil were fit using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Remifentanils effect was determined intermittently using minute ventilation during a hypercapnic (7.5% CO2) challenge. RESULTS Fifteen patients with renal failure and eight control participants were enrolled. The clearance and volume of distribution of remifentanil were not different between those with renal failure and the controls. Patients with renal failure showed a marked reduction in the elimination of GR90291; the half-life of the metabolite increased from 1.5 h in the controls to more than 26 h in patients with renal failure. The steady-state concentration of GR90291 is likely to be more than 25 times higher in persons with renal failure. There were no obvious differences in opioid effects on minute ventilation in the controls and in patients with renal failure. CONCLUSIONS The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil were not altered in patients with renal disease, but the elimination of its principal metabolite, GR90291, was markedly reduced. Based on simulations, the concentration of GR90291 at the end of a 12-h remifentanil infusion of 2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) is not likely to produce significant opioid effects.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting after total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil or alfentanil: how important is the opioid?

STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare the frequency and duration of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and either remifentanil or alfentanil in outpatients undergoing arthroscopic surgery of the extremities. DESIGN Randomized, third-party blinded study. SETTING University medical center. PATIENTS 100 ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for arthroscopic surgery of the knee or shoulder. INTERVENTIONS The anesthesia regimen consisted of a bolus followed by continuous infusion of propofol (2 mg/kg followed by 120 microg/kg/min) and the opioid (remifentanil 0.5 microg/kg followed by 0.1 microg/kg/min or alfentanil 10 microg/kg followed by 0.25 microg/kg/min). Patients breathed 100% oxygen spontaneously through a Laryngeal Mask Airway (or an endotracheal tube when medically indicated). Opioids were titrated to maintain blood pressure and heart rate within 20% of baseline and a respiratory rate of 10 to 16 breaths/min. Propofol was titrated downward as low as possible without permitting patient movement. MEASUREMENTS Nausea was determined by an 11-point categorical scale and was recorded before surgery and multiple time points thereafter. The times of emetic episodes were recorded. Treatment of PONV was at the discretion of the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) nurses who were blinded to the identity of the opioid used. MAIN RESULTS Nausea scores were 0 at all time points in over 70% of the patients in each group. None of the 100 patients vomited while in the hospital, and only one patient required antiemetic therapy. CONCLUSION When propofol-based TIVA is used for arthroscopic surgery, short-acting opioids do not significantly affect the risk of PONV.

Comparison of the sedative effects of butorphanol and midazolam

Although kappa opioid agonists and certain agonist-antagonists are known to be sedating, this effect has not been well characterized in a drug-naive population. We compared the sedative properties of intravenous butorphanol with those of midazolam or the combination in 126 healthy preoperative patients. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive one of nine treatments in a double-blind fashion: 7.1, 22.5, or 71.4 micrograms/kg butorphanol; 4.3, 13.6, or 42.9 micrograms/kg midazolam; or 3.6 + 2.2, 11.3 + 6.8, or 35.7 + 21.5 micrograms/kg butorphanol and midazolam in combination. Eight visual analogue scales (VAS) were completed by the subject and an observer. The subject then performed two psychomotor tests (the Trieger dot test and the Halstead trail-making test) and was shown two playing cards in order to assess memory. The test drug was administered, and 5 min later the evaluations were repeated and two more cards were shown. On the following day the subjects were asked to recall the names of the playing cards. Butorphanol, midazolam, and their combination produced dose-related changes in VAS scores that were significant and qualitatively similar: subjects became sleepy, less nervous, weak, and less clear-thinking. There was no significant euphoria or dysphoria. The sedative and depressant effects on respiratory rate of the high-dose combination were significantly greater than those predicted by simple additivity: 14 of 14 subjects receiving the high dose of the butorphanol/midazolam combination had lid droop and marked sedation, and 2 of 14 subjects had respiratory rates of less than 4 breaths per min. All three drug treatments caused significant, dose-dependent impairment of psychomotor function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Differences in safety climate among hospital anesthesia departments and the effect of a realistic simulation-based training program

BACKGROUND:Safety climate is often measured via surveys to identify appropriate patient safety interventions. The introduction of an insurance premium incentive for simulation-based anesthesia crisis resource management (CRM) training motivated our naturalistic experiment to compare the safety climates of several departments and to assess the impact of the training. METHODS:We administered a 59-item survey to anesthesia providers in six academic anesthesia programs (Phase 1). Faculty in four of the programs subsequently participated in a CRM program using simulation. The survey was readministered 3 yr later (Phase 2). Factor analysis was used to create scales regarding common safety themes. Positive safety climate (% of respondents with positive safety attitudes) was computed for the scales to indicate the safety climate levels. RESULTS:The usable response rate was 44% (309/708) and 38% (293/772) in Phases 1 and 2 respectively. There was wide variation in response rates among hospitals and providers. Eight scales were identified. There were significantly different climate scores among hospitals but no difference between the trained and untrained cohorts. The positive safety climate scores varied from 6% to 94% on specific survey questions. Faculty and residents had significantly different perceptions of the degree to which residents are debriefed about their difficult clinical situations. CONCLUSIONS:Safety climate indicators can vary substantially among anesthesia practice groups. Scale scores and responses to specific questions can suggest practices for improvement. Overall safety climate is probably not a good criterion for assessing the impact of simulation-based CRM training. Training alone was insufficient to alter engrained behaviors in the absence of further reinforcing actions.

A randomized, double-blind, dose-response study of ondansetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting

STUDY OBJECTIVE To determine the dose-response relationship of ondansetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in women undergoing elective surgery. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS 175 women aged 18 to 80 years scheduled for elective surgery. INTERVENTIONS One of six doses of ondansetron (0.5 mg, 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, 8 mg, 16 mg) or placebo was given prior to the induction of general anesthesia with propofol. Maintenance was with nitrous oxide, isoflurane, opioid, and muscle relaxant. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The study period began when the patient emerged from anesthesia. Nausea scores were recorded on a 0 to 10 scale at multiple time points during the 24-hour study period. Patient satisfaction via a visual analog scale (VAS) was determined at 1 and 24 hours after awakening. Rescue medication was given for severe nausea, three emetic episodes within 15 minutes, or if requested by the patient. The primary efficacy variable was the need for rescue antiemetic therapy. The dose-response curve (by logistic regression) of the percentage of patients not rescued versus dose indicated an ED50 of 0.54 mg (95% confidence interval 0.03-1.05 mg). Fewer patients required rescue in the 4 mg dose group compared with lower doses. However, the difference reached significance only in comparison with the 0.5 mg dose group. Survival analysis of the need for rescue, and nausea score versus time curves, also both suggested the superiority of the 4 mg dose compared with lower doses. In addition, there was a highly significant correlation between the lack of need for rescue and satisfaction with anesthesia at 24 hours after emergence. CONCLUSION The recommended dose of ondansetron for PONV prophylaxis in women remains 4 mg.

Ondansetron is effective in decreasing postoperative nausea and vomiting

The efficacy of ondansetron, a selective 5‐HT3 receptor antagonist, in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in surgical patients was studied. Fifty women were randomized in a double‐blind manner to receive either two 8 mg doses of intravenous ondansetron or two doses of placebo vehicle: the first given just before general anesthesia induction and the second 8 hours later. During the first 24 postoperative hours, the number of emetic episodes was recorded and the subjects rated their nausea on a scale from 0 to 10. Ondansetron‐treated subjects had fewer emetic episodes (p < 0.001) and lower subjective nausea scores (p < 0.001). The number of complete responders (no emetic episodes and no rescue therapy) was 1 of 24 (4%) and 15 of 26 (58%) in the placebo and ondansetron groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Ondansetron is clearly more effective than placebo in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The adverse event profile for ondansetron was similar to that of placebo.