Carl-Magnus Rudenstam

Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.

PURPOSE To evaluate the prognostic importance of immunocytochemically determined c-erbB-2 overexpression in the primary tumors of patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary tumors from 1,506 breast cancer patients (760 node-negative and 746 node-positive) who were treated in the International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group Trial V were studied. Node-negative patients were allocated randomly to either a single cycle of perioperative chemotherapy (PeCT) or no adjuvant treatment, and node-positive patients received either a prolonged chemotherapy (with tamoxifen for postmenopausal patients) or a single perioperative cycle. RESULTS Tumors from 16% of the node-negative patients and 19% of the node-positive patients were found to be c-erbB-2-positive. In both groups c-erbB-2 positivity correlated with negative progesterone receptors (PR), negative estrogen receptors (ER), and high tumor grade. Lobular carcinomas were all negative, and, thus support the view that such tumors represent a defined subtype of breast carcinoma. The expression of c-erbB-2 was prognostically significant for node-positive but not for node-negative patients. However, in both subgroups, the prognostic significance was greater for patients who had received more adjuvant therapy. For node-positive patients, the effect of prolonged-duration therapy on disease-free survival (DFS) was greater for patients without c-erbB-2 overexpression (hazards ratio [HR], = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.72) than for those with c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.16). Similarly, for node-negative patients, the effect of PeCT on DFS was greater for those without c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.09) than for those with c-erbB-2 overexpression (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.66 to 2.25). CONCLUSION We conclude that tumors with overexpression of the c-erbB-2 oncogene are less responsive to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF)-containing adjuvant therapy regimens than those with a normal amount of gene product.

Burdens and Benefits of Adjuvant Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil and Tamoxifen for Elderly Patients With Breast Cancer: The International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VII

PURPOSE Information on the tolerability and efficacy of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for older women is limited. We studied these issues using the data collected as part of the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial VII. PATIENTS AND METHODS Postmenopausal women with operable, node-positive breast cancer were randomized to receive either tamoxifen alone for 5 years (306 patients) or tamoxifen plus three consecutive cycles of classical cyclophosphamide (100 mg/m(2) orally days 1 to 14), methotrexate (40 mg/m(2) intravenous days 1 and 8), and fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2) intravenous days 1 and 8) every 28 days (CMF; 302 patients). The median follow-up was 8.0 years. RESULTS Among the 299 patients who received at least one dose of CMF, women 65 years of age or older (n = 76) had higher grades of toxicity compared with women less than 65 years old (n = 223) (P =.004). More women in the older age group compared with the younger women experienced grade 3 toxicity of any type (17% v 7%, respectively), grade 3 hematologic toxicity (9% v 5%, respectively), and grade 3 mucosal toxicity (4% v 1%, respectively). Older patients also received less than their expected CMF dose compared with younger postmenopausal women (P =.0008). The subjective burdens of treatment, however, were similar for younger and older patients based on quality-of-life measures (performance status, coping, physical well-being, mood, and appetite). For older patients, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 63% for CMF plus tamoxifen and 61% for tamoxifen alone (hazards ratio [HR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 1.52; P =.99). For younger patients, the corresponding 5-year DFS rates were 61% and 53% (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.91; P =.008), but the test for heterogeneity of CMF effect according to age group was not statistically significant. The reduced effectiveness of CMF among older women could not be attributed to dose reductions according to dose received. CONCLUSION CMF tolerability and effectiveness were both reduced for older patients compared with younger postmenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients who received tamoxifen for 5 years. The development and evaluation of less toxic and more effective chemotherapy regimens are required for high-risk elderly patients.

Is chemotherapy alone adequate for young women with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer?

BACKGROUND The prognosis of breast cancer in very young women is generally considered to be unfavourable. Therefore, the outcome of adjuvant therapy was analysed in a population of young (<35 years) premenopausal patients treated in four randomised controlled trials. METHODS Between 1978 and 1993 the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) treated 3700 premenopausal and perimenopausal patients with various timing and duration of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF with or without low-dose prednisone and oophorectomy). 314 of these women were less than 35 years old at randomisation. FINDINGS Relapse and death occurred earlier and more often in younger (<35 years) than in older (> or = 35) patients with a 10 year disease-free survival of 35% (SE 3) versus 47% (1) (hazard ratio 1.41 [95% CI 1.22-1.62], p<0.001) and overall survival of 49% (3) versus 62% (1) (1.50 [1.28-1.77], p<0.001). Younger patients with oestrogen-receptor positive tumours had a significantly worse disease-free survival than younger patients with oestrogen-receptor negative tumours. By contrast, among older patients the disease-free survival was similar irrespective of oestrogen-receptor status. INTERPRETATION Young premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant CMF chemotherapy had higher risk of relapse and death than older premenopausal patients, especially if their tumours expressed oestrogen receptors. The endocrine effects of chemotherapy alone are insufficient for the younger age group and these patients should strongly consider additional endocrine therapies (tamoxifen or ovarian ablation) if their tumours express oestrogen receptors.

A randomized trial comparing axillary clearance versus no axillary clearance in older patients (≥ 60 years) with breast cancer: First results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 10–93

505 Background: Axillary clearance is associated with undesirable side-effects. We therefore investigated if avoiding axillary surgery in older women would result in improved quality of life (QL) and similar disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS Between 1993 and 2002, women ≥ 60 years old with clinically N0 operable breast cancer were randomized to primary surgery plus axillary clearance (Sx+Ax) followed by tamoxifen (Tam) versus Sx without Ax followed by Tam. The primary endpoint was QL reported by the patient (using linear analogue self-assessment [LASA] scales) and by physician assessment at sequential time points. RESULTS 473 patients (234 to Sx+Ax, 239 to Sx) were randomized to meet the target accrual of 472 patients. The median age was 74 years in both arms. Other characteristics were also balanced: 80% ER-positive; 45% mastectomies; 33% breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy (RT); 22% breast-conserving surgery without RT. The table below gives the results of 2 of the LASAs and 2 of the physician-reported side-effects. In all of these assessments the largest differences were observed from baseline to post-operative, with patients randomized to Sx+Ax having worse QL and more side effects, but the differences tended to approach baseline values in 6 to 12 months. At a median follow-up of 6 years, results for Sx+Ax vs. Sx were similar for DFS (total events: 84 vs. 77; 5-year DFS: 71% vs. 70%; relative risk (RR) [Sx+Ax/Sx]: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.82-1.53; p=0.46) and OS (total deaths: 65 vs. 62; 5-year OS: 78% vs. 80%; RR [Sx+Ax/Sx]: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.77-1.55; p=0.61). CONCLUSIONS Avoiding axillary clearance for women ≥ 60 years old who have clinically N0 disease and receive Tam results in similar efficacy with improved QL. [Figure: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Early Start of Adjuvant Chemotherapy May Improve Treatment Outcome for Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients With Tumors not Expressing Estrogen Receptors

PURPOSE The proper time to commence adjuvant chemotherapy after primary surgery for breast cancer is unknown. An analysis of the International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Trial V at a median follow-up of 11 years suggested that early initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy might improve outcome for premenopausal, node-positive patients whose tumors did not express any estrogen receptor (ER). PATIENTS AND METHODS We investigated the relationship between early initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy, ER status, and prognosis in 1,788 premenopausal, node-positive patients treated on IBCSG trials I, II, and VI. The disease-free survival for 599 patients (84 with ER-absent tumors) who commenced adjuvant chemotherapy within 20 days (early initiation) was compared with the disease-free survival for 1,189 patients (142 with ER-absent tumors) who started chemotherapy 21 to 86 days after surgery (conventional initiation). The median follow-up was 7.7 years. RESULTS Among patients with ER-absent tumors, the 10-year disease-free survival was 60% for the early initiation group compared with 34% for the conventional initiation group (226 patients; hazard ratio [HR], 0. 49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33 to 0.72; P =.0003). This difference remained statistically significant in a Cox multiple regression analysis controlling for study group, number of positive nodes, tumor size, age, vessel invasion, and institution (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.92; P =.019). Conversely, early initiation of chemotherapy did not significantly improve disease-free survival for patients with tumors expressing ER (1,562 patients; multiple regression HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.10; P =.40). CONCLUSION In premenopausal patients with ER-absent tumors, early initiation of systemic chemotherapy after primary surgery might improve outcome. Further confirmatory studies are required before any widespread modification of current clinical practice. In premenopausal patients with tumors expressing some ER, gains from early initiation are unlikely to be clinically significant.

Prognostic significance of tumor grade in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis

The prognostic significance of histologic tumor grade has been evaluated in 1537 women entered into the Ludwig Trials I‐IV of adjuvant therapy for node‐positive breast cancer. Tumor grade was determined on histologic review of primary tumor sections by two central review pathologists using a modification of the Bloom and Richardson grading system. The 5‐year overall survival rates (±SE) were: Grade 1, 86% ± 2; Grade 2, 70% ± 2; and Grade 3, 57% ± 2 (P <0.0001). This survival difference was seen in both premenopausal (P <0.0001) and postmenopausal (P <0.0001) women. Significant differences in disease‐free survival (DPS) by tumor grade were also observed (P <0.0001). The tumor grade determined by the 75 contributing local clinic pathologists was also highly significant for predicting DPS and overall survival. Tumor grade remained a statistically significant prognostic factor for DPS (P <0.0001) and overall survival (P <0.0001) in multivariate analyses controlling for nodal status, tumor size, estrogen receptor status, menopausal status, age, peritumoral vessel invasion, and treatment assigned. In postmenopausal patients for whom adjuvant treatment was compared with no adjuvant therapy, the prognostic significance of tumor grade was modified by the effect of treatment. The presence of vessel invasion by primary tumor cells was a stronger predictor of early recurrence than was increasing tumor grade in postmenopausal patients who received no adjuvant therapy. The higher failure rates for patients with high‐grade tumors was due to a larger number of failures in regional and visceral sites. Tumor grade can be determined by any pathologist and allows for selection of a subpopulation of breast cancer patients at high risk for early mortality.

Prognostic importance of thymidylate synthase expression in early breast cancer.

PURPOSE To assess the prognostic importance of thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in breast tumors of patients with early-stage breast cancer, and to determine whether the benefit of chemotherapy (CT) is associated with TS expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS The level of TS expression was evaluated in 210 node-negative and 278 node-positive patients enrolled onto Trial V of the International Breast Cancer Study Group ([IBCSG] formerly the Ludwig Breast Cancer Study Group) with a median follow-up time of 8.5 years. TS expression was assessed using the immunohistochemical method with the monoclonal antibody TS 106 on paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. RESULTS High TS expression was associated with a significantly worse prognosis in node-positive but not in node-negative breast cancer patients. Twenty-seven percent of node-positive patients with high TS expression were disease-free at 10 years, compared with 44% of node-positive patients with low TS expression (P = .03). Forty-one percent of patients with node-positive high-TS-expressing tumors were alive after 10 years, compared with 49% of those with low TS expression (P = .06). The association between TS and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was independent of other prognostic factors such as tumor size, tumor grade, nodal status, vessel invasion, estrogen receptor (ER)/ progestin receptor (PR) status, c-erb B-2, or Ki-67 expression. In node-positive patients, six cycles of standard adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil ([5-FU] CMF) CT improved DFS and OS compared with one cycle of perioperative CMF therapy. The magnitude of this benefit was greatest in patients whose tumors had high TS expression (P < .01 for DFS; P < .01 for OS). Node-negative patients demonstrated no difference in outcome to CT based on TS expression; however, the power to detect differences was limited by the small number of events in this group. CONCLUSION In early-stage breast cancer, high TS expression is associated with a significantly worse prognosis in node-positive patients. Node-positive patients with high TS levels demonstrate the most significant improvement in DFS and OS when treated with six cycles of conventional adjuvant CMF therapy.

Identifying Breast Cancer Patients at High Risk for Bone Metastases

PURPOSE To identify patient populations at high risk for bone metastases at any time after diagnosis of operable breast cancer, because these patients are potential beneficiaries of treatment with bisphosphonates. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated data from 6,792 patients who were randomized in International Breast Cancer Study Group clinical trials between 1978 and 1993. Median follow-up was 10. 7 years. A total of 1,275 patients (18.7%) presented with node-negative disease, whereas 3,354 patients (49.4%) had one to three and 2,163 patients (31.9%) had four or more involved axillary lymph nodes. We also assessed the incidence of subsequent bone metastases in the cohort of 1,220 patients who had a first event in local or regional sites or soft tissue alone. Median follow-up for this cohort was 7.7 years from first recurrence. RESULTS For the entire population with operable disease, the cumulative incidence of bone metastases at any time was 8.2% at 2 years from randomization and 27.3% at 10 years. The highest cumulative incidences of bone metastases at any time were among patients who had four or more involved axillary nodes at the time of diagnosis (14.9% at 2 years and 40.8% at 10 years) and among patients who had as their first event a local or regional recurrence or a recurrence in soft tissue, without any other overt metastases (21.1% at 2 years from first recurrence and 36.7% at 10 years). CONCLUSION Treatments to prevent bone metastases may have a major impact on the course of breast cancer and may be most efficiently studied in populations with several involved axillary nodes at the time of presentation and in populations with local or regional recurrence or recurrence in soft tissue.

Prognostic significance of peritumoral vessel invasion in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis

To assess the prognostic significance of peritumoral vessel invasion, data were examined for 1,510 women entered into the Ludwig Breast Cancer Group Trials I to IV evaluating adjuvant therapy for operable breast cancer with axillary nodal metastasis. Vessel invasion by tumor cells was identified by routine light microscopy in 59 per cent (889 of 1,510) of the patients and was equally distributed between premenopausal/perimenopausal (60 per cent, 468 of 778) and postmenopausal (58 per cent, 421 of 732) women. In logrank analyses stratified by nodal status (one to three or four or more positive nodes), the four-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was significantly lower in patients with vessel invasion than in women without vessel invasion (50 per cent versus 65 per cent, P less than 0.0001). This DFS difference was seen for both premenopausal/perimenopausal (P = 0.0004) and postmenopausal (P = 0.0002) patients. The four-year overall survival rate was also lower in patients with vessel invasion (71 per cent versus 82 per cent, P = 0.0006), both for premenopausal/perimenopausal (P = 0.002) and postmenopausal (P = 0.04) women. The presence of vessel invasion was significantly associated with increasing numbers of positive axillary lymph nodes, rising tumor grade, nonstellate tumor border growth pattern, and higher steroid hormone receptor content of the primary tumor. The assessment of peritumoral vessel invasion continued to have prognostic significance for DFS (P less than 0.0001) and overall survival (P = 0.003) when evaluated in multivariate models controlling for treatment assigned, nodal status, tumor size, estrogen receptor status, menopausal status, and age. Depending on the subpopulation, patients with vessel invasion had a 41 per cent to 54 per cent greater risk of treatment failure than those without vessel invasion and a 29 per cent to 64 per cent greater risk of death. The percentage of treatment failures at distant sites was higher for women with than for those without vessel invasion (27 per cent versus 18 per cent, P = 0.003). In patients with axillary lymph node metastases, peritumoral vessel invasion may be a sign of increased systemic disease burden.

Clinical relevance of single item quality of life indicators in cancer clinical trials

We investigated the hypothesis that global single-item quality-of-life indicators are less precise for specific treatment effects (discriminant validity) than multi-item scales but similarly efficient for overall treatment comparisons and changes over time (responsiveness) because they reflect the summation of the individual meaning and importance of various factors. Linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) indicators for physical well-being, mood and coping were compared with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD), the Mood Adjective Check List (MACL) and the emotional behaviour and social interaction scales of the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) in 84 patients with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant therapy. Discriminant validity was investigated by multitrait-multimethod correlation, responsiveness by standardized response mean (SRM). Discriminant validity of the indicators was present at baseline but less under treatment. Responsiveness was demonstrated by the expected pattern among treatments (P = 0.008). In patients without chemotherapy, the SRMs indicated moderate (0.5–0.8) to large (>0.8) improvements in physical well-being (0.70), coping (0.92), HAD anxiety (0.89) and depression (1.19), and MACL mental well-being (0.68). In patients with chemotherapy for the first 3 months, small but clinically significant improvements (>).2) included mood (0.38), coping (0.41), HAD axiety (0.31) and MACL mental well-being (0.35). Patients with 6 months chemotherapy showed no changes. The indicators also reflected mood disorders (HAD) and marked psychosocial dysfunction (SIP) at baseline and under treatment according to pre-defined cut-off levels. Global indicators were confirmed to be efficient for evaluating treatments overall and changes over time. The lower reliability of single as opposed to multi-item scales affects primarily their discriminant validity. This is less decisive in large sample sizes.