Carla A. Sueta

A heart failure self-management program for patients of all literacy levels: A randomized, controlled trial [ISRCTN11535170]

BackgroundSelf-management programs for patients with heart failure can reduce hospitalizations and mortality. However, no programs have analyzed their usefulness for patients with low literacy. We compared the efficacy of a heart failure self-management program designed for patients with low literacy versus usual care.MethodsWe performed a 12-month randomized controlled trial. From November 2001 to April 2003, we enrolled participants aged 30–80, who had heart failure and took furosemide. Intervention patients received education on self-care emphasizing daily weight measurement, diuretic dose self-adjustment, and symptom recognition and response. Picture-based educational materials, a digital scale, and scheduled telephone follow-up were provided to reinforce adherence. Control patients received a generic heart failure brochure and usual care. Primary outcomes were combined hospitalization or death, and heart failure-related quality of life.Results123 patients (64 control, 59 intervention) participated; 41% had inadequate literacy. Patients in the intervention group had a lower rate of hospitalization or death (crude incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.69; CI 0.4, 1.2; adjusted IRR = 0.53; CI 0.32, 0.89). This difference was larger for patients with low literacy (IRR = 0.39; CI 0.16, 0.91) than for higher literacy (IRR = 0.56; CI 0.3, 1.04), but the interaction was not statistically significant. At 12 months, more patients in the intervention group reported monitoring weights daily (79% vs. 29%, p < 0.0001). After adjusting for baseline demographic and treatment differences, we found no difference in heart failure-related quality of life at 12 months (difference = -2; CI -5, +9).ConclusionA primary care-based heart failure self-management program designed for patients with low literacy reduces the risk of hospitalizations or death.

Relation Between Gender, Etiology and Survival in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure

OBJECTIVES This study investigated the relation between gender, etiology and survival in patients with symptomatic heart failure. BACKGROUND Previous work provides conflicting results concerning the relation between gender, clinical characteristics and survival in patients with heart failure. METHODS We examined the relation of these factors in 557 patients (380 men, 177 women) who had symptomatic heart failure, predominantly nonischemic in origin (68%) and typically associated with severe left ventricular dysfunction. RESULTS Follow-up data were available in 99% of patients (mean follow-up period 2.4 years, range 1 day to 10 years) after study entry, and 201 patients reached the primary study end point of all-cause mortality. By life-table analysis, women were significantly less likely to reach this primary end point than men (p < 0.001). A significant association was found between female gender and better survival (p < 0.001), which depended on the primary etiology of heart failure (p = 0.008 for the gender-etiology interaction) but not on baseline ventricular function. Women survived longer than men when heart failure was due to nonischemic causes (men vs. women: relative risk [RR] 2.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59 to 3.51, p < 0.001). In contrast, outcome appeared similar when heart failure was due to ischemic heart disease (men vs. women: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.61, p = 0.651). CONCLUSIONS Women with heart failure due to nonischemic causes had significantly better survival than men with or without coronary disease as their primary cause of heart failure.

Transitional care interventions to prevent readmissions for persons with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization and health care costs in the United States (1). Up to 25% of patients hospitalized with HF are readmitted within 30 days (25). Readmissions after an index hospitalization for HF are related to various conditions. An analysis of Medicare claims data from 2007 to 2009 found that 35% of readmissions within 30 days were for HF; the remainder were for diverse indications (for example, renal disorders, pneumonia, and arrhythmias) (2). To reduce rehospitalization of Medicare patients, in October 2012, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services began decreasing reimbursements to hospitals with excessive risk-standardized readmission (6). This policy incentivizes hospitals to develop programs to reduce readmission rates for persons with HF. Despite advances in the quality of acute and chronic HF disease management, knowledge gaps remain about effective interventions to support the transition of care for persons with HF. Interventions designed to prevent readmissions among populations transitioning from one care setting to another are often called transitional care interventions (7, 8). They aim to avoid poor outcomes caused by uncoordinated care, such as preventable readmissions (9). Although no clear set of components defines transitional care interventions, they focus on patient or caregiver education, medication reconciliation, and coordination among health professionals involved in the transition. We conducted a systematic review of transitional care interventions for persons with HF for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (10). We included a broad range of intervention types (Table 1) applicable to adults transitioning from hospital to home that aimed to prevent readmissions. Although 30-day readmissions are the focus of quality measures, we also included readmissions measured over 3 to 6 months because these are common, costly, and potentially preventable (5). The full technical report addressed 5 questions (Appendix Table 1). For this article, we focused on readmission and mortality outcomes. Table 1. Transitional Care Interventions Appendix Table 1. Scope and Key Questions* Methods We developed and followed a standard protocol. A technical report that details methods and includes complete search strategies and additional evidence tables is available at www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm. Data Sources and Searches We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL for English-language and human-only studies published from 1 July 2007 to late October 2013, and we used a previous technology assessment on a similar topic to identify randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) published before 1 July 2007 (11). An experienced Evidence-based Practice Center librarian conducted the searches, and a second librarian reviewed them. We manually searched reference lists of pertinent reviews, included trials, and background articles on this topic to look for relevant citations our searches might have missed. We searched for relevant unpublished studies using ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Study Selection We developed inclusion and exclusion criteria with respect to populations, interventions, comparators, outcomes, timing, settings, and study designs (Appendix Table 2). We included studies of adults recruited during or within 1 week of an index hospitalization for HF that compared a transitional care intervention with another eligible intervention or with usual care (that is, routine or standard care, as defined by the primary studies). We required that interventions include 1 or more of the following components: education of patient or caregiver delivered before or after discharge, planned or scheduled outpatient clinic visits (primary care or multidisciplinary heart failure [MDS-HF] clinic), home visits, telemonitoring, structured telephone support (STS), transition coach or case management, or interventions to increase provider continuity. We required studies to report a readmission rate, mortality rate, or the composite outcome (all-cause readmission or mortality). In the full report, we also assessed emergency department visits, acute care visits, hospital days of subsequent readmissions, quality of life, functional status, and caregiver or self-care burden (10). Appendix Table 2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Studies of Transitional Care Interventions for Patients Hospitalized for HF Data Extraction and Risk-of-Bias Assessment One team member extracted relevant data from each article, and a second team member reviewed all data extractions for completeness and accuracy. We used predefined criteria based on the AHRQ Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews (12) to rate studies as having low, medium, high, or unclear risk of bias. Two reviewers independently assessed risk of bias for each study, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Data Synthesis and Analysis We categorized intervention types primarily on the basis of the method and environment of delivery, as defined in Table 1. One investigator categorized the intervention, and a second team member reviewed the categorization. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Given heterogeneity of the clinic-based interventions, we subcategorized these by clinic setting: MDS-HF, nurse-led HF, or primary care. We used DerSimonianLaird random-effects models (13) for meta-analyses of outcomes reported by multiple studies that were sufficiently similar to justify combining results. We ran meta-analyses of trials that reported the number of deaths or number of persons readmitted in each group (and not total readmissions per group). When only the total number of readmissions per group was available, we contacted authors for additional data. When we could not obtain the number of persons readmitted, we did not include the results in meta-analyses; instead, we included the results in qualitative syntheses and considered them when grading the strength of evidence (SOE). For readmission and mortality rates, we calculated risk ratios (RRs). We stratified analyses for each intervention category by outcome timing and separated rates reported at 30 days from those after 30 days (that is, rates reported over 3 to 6 months were combined). We did not include studies rated as high or unclear risk of bias in our main analyses but included them in sensitivity analyses, which are available in the technical report (10); we describe them here only when they differed from primary analyses. We assessed statistical heterogeneity using the chi-square and I 2 statistics (14, 15). We calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) for readmission and mortality outcomes when we had statistically significant findings based on our primary analyses of trials rated as low or medium risk of bias, and we found at least low SOE for benefit. The NNT was derived from the RR and median usual care event rate using methods described in the Cochrane Handbook (16). We conducted meta-analyses using Stata, version 11.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas). We did meta-analysis stratified by intensity in each intervention category when variation existed. The results of these subgroup analyses are available in the main report (10); we describe them here only when we found a difference in efficacy based on level of intensity. Given the heterogeneity of included interventions, we could not develop a single measure of intensity that could be applied to all intervention categories. For most interventions, we defined intensity as the duration, frequency, or periodicity of patient contact and categorized each intervention as low-, medium-, or high-intensity. We reserved the low-intensity category for interventions that included 1 episode of patient contact or few resources. We graded SOE as high, moderate, low, or insufficient based on guidance established for the Evidence-based Practice Center program (17). The approach incorporates 4 key domains: risk of bias, consistency, directness, and precision. When only 1 study reported an outcome of interest, we usually graded the SOE as insufficient (primarily due to unknown consistency and imprecision); however, when similar interventions had consistent results at other time points, we graded the SOE as low. Two reviewers assessed each domain for each outcome, and differences were resolved by consensus. Role of the Funding Source The AHRQ funded this review, and AHRQ staff participated in the development of the scope of the work and reviewed draft manuscripts. Approval from AHRQ was required before the manuscript could be submitted for publication, but the authors are solely responsible for the content and the decision to submit it for publication. Results Searches of all sources identified 2419 potentially relevant citations. We included 47 RCTs (Appendix Figure 1). Trial characteristics are shown in Appendix Table 3. Most trials compared a transitional care intervention with usual care; 2 directly compared more than 1 intervention (both rated high risk of bias) (18, 19). In general, trials included adults with a mean age of 70 years who were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of HF. Most reported HF disease severity based on the New York Heart Association classification and included persons with moderate to severe HF. Twenty-nine trials reported mean ejection fraction. Of these, 27 enrolled persons with a mean ejection fraction less than 0.50 and 7 trials specified a reduced ejection fraction as an inclusion criterion. Across most trials, the majority of patients were prescribed an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker. The percentages of patients who were prescribed -blockers at discharge varied widely across trials. Trials were conducted in a range of settings: academic medical centers, Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals,

Gender Differences in Survival in Advanced Heart Failure Insights From the FIRST Study

BACKGROUND Previous natural history studies in broad populations of heart failure patients have associated female gender with improved survival, particularly in patients with a nonischemic etiology of ventricular dysfunction. This study investigates whether a similar survival advantage for women would be evident among patients with advanced heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS The study analysis is based on the Flolan International Randomized Survival Trial (FIRST) study which enrolled 471 patients (359 men and 112 women) who had evidence of end-stage heart failure with marked symptoms (60% NYHA class IV) and severe left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction 18+/-4.9%). A Cox proportional-hazards model, adjusted for age, gender, 6-minute walk, dobutamine use at randomization, mean pulmonary artery blood pressure, and treatment assignment, showed a significant association between female gender and better survival (relative risk of death for men versus women was 2.18, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.41; P<0.001). Although formal interaction testing was negative (P=0.275), among patients with a nonischemic etiology of heart failure, the relative risk of death for men versus women was 3.08 (95% CI 1.56 to 6.09, P=0.001), whereas among those with ischemic heart disease, the relative risk of death for men versus women was 1.64 (95% CI 0.87 to 3.09, P=0.127). CONCLUSIONS Women with advanced heart failure appear to have better survival than men. Subgroup analysis suggests this finding is strongest among patients with a nonischemic etiology of heart failure.

Multisite Randomized Trial of a Single-Session Versus Multisession Literacy-Sensitive Self-Care Intervention for Patients With Heart Failure

Background— Self-care training can reduce hospitalization for heart failure (HF), and more intensive intervention may benefit more vulnerable patients, including those with low literacy. Methods and Results— A 1-year, multisite, randomized, controlled comparative effectiveness trial with 605 patients with HF was conducted. Those randomized to a single session received a 40-minute in-person, literacy-sensitive training; the multisession group received the same initial training and then ongoing telephone-based support. The primary outcome was combined incidence of all-cause hospitalization or death; secondary outcomes included HF-related hospitalization and HF-related quality of life, with prespecified stratification by literacy. Overall, the incidence of all-cause hospitalization and death did not differ between intervention groups (incidence rate ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.83–1.22). The effect of multisession training compared with single-session training differed by literacy group: Among those with low literacy, the multisession training yielded a lower incidence of all-cause hospitalization and death (incidence rate ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.45–1.25), and among those with higher literacy, the multisession intervention yielded a higher incidence (incidence rate ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.99–1.50; interaction P=0.048). For HF-related hospitalization, among those with low literacy, multisession training yielded a lower incidence (incidence rate ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–1.12), and among those with higher literacy, it yielded a higher incidence (incidence rate ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.92–1.88; interaction P=0.005). HF-related quality of life improved more for patients receiving multisession than for those receiving single-session interventions at 1 and 6 months, but the difference at 12 months was smaller. Effects on HF-related quality of life did not differ by literacy. Conclusions— Overall, an intensive multisession intervention did not change clinical outcomes compared with a single-session intervention. People with low literacy appear to benefit more from multisession interventions than people with higher literacy. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00378950.

Safety and Efficacy of Epoprostenol in Patients with Severe Congestive Heart Failure

Patients with advanced heart failure often remain severely symptomatic and have a high mortality rate despite currently available therapy. We studied the safety and efficacy of a new approach to the patient with refractory heart failure: continuous intravenous treatment via a portable infusion pump with epoprostenol (prostacyclin), a potent pulmonary and systemic vasodilator. A group of 33 patients with severe heart failure (64% New York Heart Association class IV and 36% class III) and profound ventricular dysfunction (median left ventricular ejection fraction, 0.15)--despite prior treatment with diuretics (100%), digitalis (91%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (85%), and dobutamine (30%)--underwent a baseline 6-minute walk test prior to dose titration with epoprostenol during invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Subjects responding during the dose titration were randomized, on an open basis, to receive either continuous epoprostenol infusion via an indwelling central venous catheter plus conventional therapy or conventional therapy alone for 12 weeks. The initial dose-ranging study with epoprostenol produced a significant decline in systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance and a substantial increase in cardiac index despite a fall in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Symptoms related to vasodilation were noted within the first week after randomization to epoprostenol in 9 of 16 patients but resolved with adjustment of the infusion and concomitant medications in all but one subject. Dose adjustments during the chronic epoprostenol infusion were infrequent after the first week and complications related to the drug delivery system were rare. The change in distance walked from baseline to the last available 6-minute walk test was significantly greater in patients who received epoprostenol compared with patients assigned to standard therapy (72 +/- 40 vs -39 +/- 32 m, mean +/- SEM; p = 0.033). Our study suggests that long-term intravenous infusion of epoprostenol is feasible in patients with severe heart failure and our hemodynamic and functional results suggest clinical benefit as well. However, until recent results indicating an adverse effect of epoprostenol on survival are fully evaluated, the role of this drug in the treatment of advanced heart failure will remain uncertain.

Effect of acute magnesium administration on the frequency of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with heart failure

BackgroundThere is a high incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and sudden death in patients with heart failure. Unfortunately, currently available antiarrhythmic agents have only limited efficacy and may result in proarrhythmia and hemodynamic deterioration in these patients. Methods and Results We studied the acute effect of intravenous Methods and ResultsWe studied the acute effect of intravenous magnesium chloride on the frequency and severity of ventricular arrhythmia in 30 patients with symptomatic heart failure using a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 23.0±8.0% (mean±SD). No patient had a history of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia or was receiving antiarrhythmic agents, calcium channel antagonists, or P-blockers. Patients were randomized to receive placebo (5% dextrose [D5W] in water alone) or magnesium chloride in D5W given as a bolus of 0.3 mEq/kg over 10 minutes followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.08 mEq/kg per hour for 24 hours. The magnesium concentrations 30 minutes and 24 hours after the bolus were 3.6±0.1 and 4.2±0.1 mg/dL, respectively. There was no significant change in serum potassium concentration during magnesium administration. Blinded analysis revealed that administration of intravenous magnesium chloride, compared with placebo, significantly decreased total ventricular ectopy per hour (mean±SEM, 70±26 versus 149±64. P < .001), couplets per day (23±11 versus 94±59, P = .007), and episodes of ventricular tachycardia per day (0.8±0.2 versus 2.6±1.0, P = .051). ConclusionsIntravenous magnesium chloride administration reduces the frequency of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with symptomatic heart failure.

Lipid Management Among Coronary Artery Disease Patients With Diabetes Mellitus or Advanced Age

Aggressive lipid management is likely beneficial for coronary artery disease patients with diabetes mellitus or of advanced age. Nevertheless, a study of a large national sample of patients seen in ambulatory medical practices suggests pharmacologic undertreatment in these high-risk groups.

Association of body mass, gender and race with heart failure primarily due to hypertension

OBJECTIVES This study was performed to determine the association between clinical characteristics, particularly body mass and race, and the likelihood of hypertension as the primary etiology for heart failure (HTNCM). BACKGROUND Although held to be important in the development of heart failure, the clinical characteristics predictive of HTNCM have not been well delineated. METHODS The study analysis was conducted using 680 patients from the University of North Carolina Heart Failure Database. This data set is racially diverse (44% African-American) and contains data concerning baseline clinical characteristics and cardiac function in patients with and without HTNCM. Logistic regression techniques determined independent predictors of HTNCM among the entire study population as well as the subgroup of study patients with hypertension. RESULTS Hypertension was present in 51% of the study patients but was the primary etiology of heart failure in only 25%. Body mass, race, gender and baseline systolic blood pressure were identified as significant independent predictors of the likelihood of HTNCM (all p < 0.001). These characteristics were predictors in the total study population and also in the subgroup of study patients with hypertension. CONCLUSIONS Hypertension remains a common etiologic factor for the development of heart failure but was the primary cause of heart failure in a minority of study patients. However, the presence of increased body mass, female gender, African-American ethnic origin or elevated baseline systolic blood pressure significantly increased the likelihood of HTNCM.

Acute hemodynamic effects of the prostacyclin analog 15AU81 in severe congestive heart failure

This multicenter, open-label study provides the first assessment of the safety and acute hemodynamic effects of a short-term infusion of 15AU81, a chemically stable analog of prostacyclin, in patients with New York Heart Association class III or IV heart failure. Twelve patients underwent sequential dose escalation by increasing the rate of the infusion at 15-minute intervals until the drug was no longer tolerated. Patients then received a 90-minute infusion at their maximum tolerated dose. The infusion was then discontinued and the subjects were observed during a 90-minute washout segment. Serial hemodynamic measurements were made throughout the dose-ranging, maintenance, and washout segments. A significant decrease in systemic vascular resistance (1,935 +/- 774 vs 1,243 +/- 351 dynes.s.cm-5; p < 0.001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (395 +/- 335 vs 223 +/- 198 dynes.s.cm-5; p = 0.008) occurred from the infusion of vehicle to the maximum tolerated dose. During dose titration, there was a a significant increase in cardiac index (1.9 +/- 0.7 vs 2.6 +/- 0.6 liters/min/m2; p < 0.001) and a tendency for a mild reduction in pulmonary artery wedge pressure (18 +/- 7 vs 17 +/- 6; p = 0.055) for the 8 patients with values on vehicle and maximum tolerated dose. These hemodynamic changes persisted during the maintenance infusion and disappeared rapidly during the washout segment. The most common adverse event to limit dose-ranging was headache, which occurred at a mean maximum tolerated dose of 36 +/- 15 ng/kg/min. Administration of 15AU81 was associated with significant acute hemodynamic improvement in patients with severe heart failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)