Jo E. Rodgers

A randomized trial of intermittent lorazepam versus propofol with daily interruption in mechanically ventilated patients.

Objective:To compare duration of mechanical ventilation for patients randomized to receive lorazepam by intermittent bolus administration vs. continuous infusions of propofol using protocols that include scheduled daily interruption of sedation. Design:A randomized open-label trial enrolling patients from October 2001 to March 2004. Setting:Medical intensive care units of two tertiary care medical centers. Patients:Adult patients expected to require mechanical ventilation for >48 hrs and who required ≥10 mg of lorazepam or a continuous infusion of a sedative to achieve adequate sedation. Interventions:Patients were randomized to receive lorazepam by intermittent bolus administration or propofol by continuous infusion to maintain a Ramsay score of 2–3. Sedation was interrupted on a daily basis for both groups. Measurements and Main Results:The primary outcome was median ventilator days. Secondary outcomes included 28-day ventilator-free survival, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and hospital mortality. Median ventilator days were significantly lower in the daily interruption propofol group compared with the intermittent bolus lorazepam group (5.8 vs. 8.4, p = .04). The difference was largest for hospital survivors (4.4 vs. 9.0, p = .006). There was a trend toward greater ventilator-free survival for patients in the daily interruption propofol group (median 18.5 days for propofol vs. 10.2 for lorazepam, p = .06). Hospital mortality was not different. Conclusions:For medical patients requiring >48 hrs of mechanical ventilation, sedation with propofol results in significantly fewer ventilator days compared with intermittent lorazepam when sedatives are interrupted daily.

Advanced (stage D) heart failure: A statement from the heart failure society of america guidelines committee

We propose that stage D advanced heart failure be defined as the presence of progressive and/or persistent severe signs and symptoms of heart failure despite optimized medical, surgical, and device therapy. Importantly, the progressive decline should be primarily driven by the heart failure syndrome. Formally defining advanced heart failure and specifying when medical and device therapies have failed is challenging, but signs and symptoms, hemodynamics, exercise testing, biomarkers, and risk prediction models are useful in this process. Identification of patients in stage D is a clinically important task because treatments are inherently limited, morbidity is typically progressive, and survival is often short. Age, frailty, and psychosocial issues affect both outcomes and selection of therapy for stage D patients. Heart transplant and mechanical circulatory support devices are potential treatment options in select patients. In addition to considering indications, contraindications, clinical status, and comorbidities, treatment selection for stage D patients involves incorporating the patients wishes for survival versus quality of life, and palliative and hospice care should be integrated into care plans. More research is needed to determine optimal strategies for patient selection and medical decision making, with the ultimate goal of improving clinical and patient centered outcomes in patients with stage D heart failure.

Continuous Versus Intermittent Infusion of Furosemide in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

BACKGROUND Despite advances in the treatment of chronic ambulatory heart failure, hospitalization rates for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remain high. Although loop diuretics are used in nearly all patients with ADHF to relieve congestive symptoms, optimal dosing strategies remain poorly defined. METHODS AND RESULTS This was a prospective, randomized, parallel-group study comparing the effectiveness of continuous intravenous (cIV) with intermittent intravenous (iIV) infusion of furosemide in 56 patients with ADHF. The dose and duration of furosemide as well as concomitant medications to treat ADHF were determined by physician preference. The primary end point of the study was net urine output (nUOP)/24 hours. Safety measures including electrolyte loss and hemodynamic instability were also assessed. Twenty-six patients received cIV and 30 patients received iIV dosing. The mean nUOP/24 hours was 2098+/-1132 mL in patients receiving cIV versus 1575+/-1100 mL in the iIV group (P=.086). The cIV group had significantly greater total urine output (tUOP) with 3726+/-1121 mL/24 hours versus 2955+/-1267 mL/24 hours in the iIV group (P=.019) and tUOP/mg furosemide with 38.0+/-31.0 mL/mg versus 22.2+/-12.5 mL/mg (P=.021). Mean weight loss was not significantly different between the groups. The cIV group experienced a shorter length of hospital stay (6.9+/-3.7 versus 10.9+/-8.3 days, P=.006). There were no differences in safety measures between the groups. CONCLUSIONS The cIV of furosemide was well tolerated and significantly more effective than iIV for tUOP. In addition, continuous infusion appears to provide more efficient diuresis.

Evaluation and management of thrombocytopenia and suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in hospitalized patients: The Complications After Thrombocytopenia Caused by Heparin (CATCH) registry

BACKGROUND Thrombocytopenia and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are potentially devastating paradoxical side effects of heparin therapy. We explored the evaluation, management, and clinical consequences of thrombocytopenia occurring during heparin therapy in diverse clinical settings. METHODS CATCH was a prospective observational study that enrolled 3,536 patients in 48 US hospitals. Data were collected on 3 strata: patients receiving any form of heparin for > or =96 hours (n = 2,420); cardiac care unit (CCU) patients treated with heparin who developed thrombocytopenia (n = 1,090); patients who had an HIT assay performed (n = 449). RESULTS Thrombocytopenia occurred in 36.4% of patients in the prolonged heparin stratum and was associated with an increased risk of death or thromboembolic complication (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9). Among a subset of patients whose clinical presentation suggested they were at high risk for HIT, suspicion for HIT was uncommon (prolonged heparin stratum 19.8%, CCU stratum 37.6%) and often did not arise until > or =1 day after patients developed thrombocytopenia. Often patients were not evaluated for HIT until after they had had a thromboembolic complication (prolonged heparin stratum 43.8%, CCU stratum 61%). Even after HIT was suspected, patients often continued to receive heparin. Direct thrombin inhibitor use was infrequent (prolonged heparin stratum 29.4%, CCU stratum 35.6%). Among the few patients who underwent evaluation, HIT was confirmed in 46.7% of the prolonged heparin stratum and 31.4% of the CCU stratum. CONCLUSIONS Thrombocytopenia is common among patients receiving heparin, and it is associated with substantial risk for catastrophic complications. Despite the high risk for HIT in this population, recognition, evaluation, and appropriate treatment are infrequent and delayed.

Economic evaluation of propofol and lorazepam for critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Objective:The economic implications of sedative choice in the management of patients receiving mechanical ventilation are unclear because of differences in costs and clinical outcomes associated with specific sedatives. Therefore, we aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of the most commonly used sedatives prescribed for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Design, Setting, and Patients:Adopting the perspective of a hospital, we developed a probabilistic decision model to determine whether continuous propofol or intermittent lorazepam was associated with greater value when combined with daily awakenings. We also evaluated the comparative value of continuous midazolam in secondary analyses. We assumed that patients were managed in a medical intensive care unit and expected to require ventilation for ≥48 hrs. Model inputs were derived from primary analysis of randomized controlled trial data, medical literature, Medicare reimbursement rates, pharmacy databases, and institutional data. Main Results:We measured cost-effectiveness as costs per mechanical ventilator–free day within the first 28 days after intubation. Our base-case probabilistic analysis demonstrated that propofol dominated lorazepam in 91% of simulations and, on average, was both

Prolonged weakness after cisatracurium infusion: a case report.

6,378 less costly per patient and associated with more than three additional mechanical ventilator–free days. The model did not reveal clinically meaningful differences between propofol and midazolam on costs or measures of effectiveness. Conclusion:Propofol has superior value compared with lorazepam when used for sedation among the critically ill who require mechanical ventilation when used in the setting of daily sedative interruption.

Aspirin Resistance in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease with and without a History of Myocardial Infarction

OBJECTIVE To present the first documented case report of myopathy persisting for >48 hrs in a patient treated with cisatracurium and concomitant high-dose corticosteroids. DESIGN Anecdotal observations in one patient. SETTING Medical-respiratory intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary care, university teaching hospital. PATIENT A 45-yr-old female admitted status for post-bilateral total knee replacement complicated by aspiration pneumonitis and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). INTERVENTIONS The patient required pressure control ventilation and sedation with midazolam and fentanyl infusions. On ICU day 2, the patient was placed on inverse ratio ventilation and paralyzed with cisatracurium. On ICU day 6, methylprednisolone 125 mg i.v. every 6 hrs was initiated for fibroproliferative ARDS. On ICU day 11, methylprednisolone was reduced to 60 mg i.v. every 6 hrs and tapered over several weeks. Cisatracurium infusion rates ranged from 6.3 to 10.5 microg/kg/min, with an average of 8.0 microg/kg/min. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Train-of-Four was assessed before initiation of therapy and every 4 hrs, thereafter. Train-of-Four values were maintained from 1 to 4 throughout therapy and a value of 4 was recorded when therapy was discontinued. On day 13, neuromuscular blocking agent therapy was discontinued, but severe proximal and distal muscle weakness was observed bilaterally. Creatinine kinase concentrations on 3 and 13 days after discontinuation of the paralytic agent were 181 and 96 units/L, respectively. On day 24, the patient moved her fingertips. On ICU day 30, the patient was weaned from the mechanical ventilator. The patient was transferred to the ward on day 33. Extensive rehabilitation with physical and occupational therapy was required for several months. CONCLUSION Clinicians should remember that irrespective of chemical structural, neuromuscular blocking agents might produce prolonged paralysis in predisposed patients.

Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum

Background: Aspirin therapy is a cornerstone in the prevention of atherothrombotic events, but recurrent vascular events are estimated to occur in 8-18% of patients taking aspirin for secondary prevention after 2 years. Estimates of biologic aspirin resistance vary from 5% to 60%, depending on the assay used. However, the relationship between biologic measurements of aspirin resistance and adverse clinical events remains unclear. Objective: To determine whether patients with documented myocardial infarction (Ml) while on aspirin therapy (cases) were more likely to be aspirin resistant than were patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who had no history of Ml (controls) and to assess clinical predictors of aspirin resistance in patients with stable CAD. Methods: This case-control study examined aspirin responses using the VerifyNow Aspirin Assay system in 50 cases and 50 controls who had taken a dose of aspirin within 48 hours of presentation to the clinic visit. Odds ratios were estimated to determine the association between aspirin resistance and MI, Independent predictors of aspirin resistance were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: An increase in the prevalence of aspirin resistance among cases (16% vs 12% in controls) was not observed (OR 1.40; 95% CI 0.45 to 4.37; p = 0.566). In the overall CAD population, female sex was independently associated with aspirin resistance (OR 4.01; 95% CI 1.15 to 13.92; p = 0.029). Conclusions: Additional large studies are required to understand whether biologically defined aspirin resistance is associated with increased risk for cardiovascular events, with special attention paid to sex differences.

Evaluation of potential losartan‐phenytoin drug interactions in healthy volunteers*

The flipped classroom approach has garnered significant attention in health professions education, which has resulted in calls for curriculum‐wide implementations of the model. However, research to support the development of evidence‐based guidelines for large‐scale flipped classroom implementations is lacking.

Identification, diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis: a registry of prolonged heparin use and thrombocytopenia among hospitalized patients with and without cardiovascular disease. The Complication After Thrombocytopenia Caused by Heparin (CATCH) Registry steering committee.

Phenytoin, a cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9 substrate, has a narrow therapeutic index and nonlinear pharmacokinetics. Therefore there is the potential for significant concentration‐related adverse effects when phenytoin is coadministered with other CYP2C9 substrates. Losartan, an antihypertensive agent, is also a substrate for CYP2C9.