Carlo Presutti

Stress induces region specific alterations in microRNAs expression in mice.

Several studies have demonstrated that exposure to both acute and chronic aversive stimuli can affect neural activity in different brain areas. In particular it has been shown that stressful events can induce not only short-term changes in neural transmission and gene regulation, but also long-term changes that can lead to structural modification. In this study we investigated, in CD1 mice, the effects of single or repeated exposures to restraint stress (2h for 1 or 5 consecutive days) in the frontal cortex on a crucial class of gene expression regulators, the microRNAs (miRs).First we performed a microarray profiling on RNA extracted from the frontal cortex of mice exposed to acute or repeated restraint stress. The results indicated a prominent increase in the expression levels of different miRs after acute stress while only minor changes were observed after repeated restraint. The Northern blot analysis on selected miRs confirmed an increase after acute restraint for let-7a, miR-9 and miR 26-a/b. Finally, Northern blot analysis of the selected miRs on RNA extracted from the hippocampus of stressed mice demonstrated that such changes were region specific, as no differences were observed in the hippocampus. These data suggest that control of mRNA translation through miRs is an additional mechanism by which stressful events regulates protein expression in the frontal cortex.

Purified Box C/D snoRNPs Are Able To Reproduce Site-Specific 2′-O-Methylation of Target RNA In Vitro

ABSTRACT Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are associated in ribonucleoprotein particles localized to the nucleolus (snoRNPs). Most of the members of the box C/D family function in directing site-specific 2′-O-methylation of substrate RNAs. Although the selection of the target nucleotide requires the antisense element and the conserved box D or D′ of the snoRNA, the methyltransferase activity is supposed to reside in one of the protein components. Through protein tagging of a snoRNP-specific factor, we purified to homogeneity box C/D snoRNPs from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mass spectrometric analysis demonstrated the presence of Nop1p, Nop58p, Nop56p, and Snu13p as integral components of the particle. We show that purified snoRNPs are able to reproduce the site-specific methylation pattern on target RNA and that the predicted S-adenosyl-l-methionine-binding region of Nop1p is responsible for the catalytic activity.

Processing of the Intron-Encoded U18 Small Nucleolar RNA in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Relies on Both Exo- and Endonucleolytic Activities

ABSTRACT Many small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) are encoded within introns of protein-encoding genes and are released by processing of their host pre-mRNA. We have investigated the mechanism of processing of the yeast U18 snoRNA, which is found in the intron of the gene coding for translational elongation factor EF-1β. We have focused our analysis on the relationship between splicing of the EF-1β pre-mRNA and production of the mature snoRNA. Mutations inhibiting splicing of the EF-1β pre-mRNA have been shown to produce normal U18 snoRNA levels together with the accumulation of intermediates deriving from the pre-mRNA, thus indicating that the precursor is an efficient processing substrate. Inhibition of 5′→3′ exonucleases obtained by insertion of G cassettes or by the use of a rat1-1 xrn1Δ mutant strain does not impair U18 release. In the Exo− strain, 3′ cutoff products, diagnostic of an endonuclease-mediated processing pathway, were detected. Our data indicate that biosynthesis of the yeast U18 snoRNA relies on two different pathways, depending on both exonucleolytic and endonucleolytic activities: a major processing pathway based on conversion of the debranched intron and a minor one acting by endonucleolytic cleavage of the pre-mRNA.

Differential regulation of miR-21 and miR-146a by Epstein–Barr virus-encoded EBNA2

The discovery of microRNA (miR) represents a novel paradigm in RNA-based regulation of gene expression and their dysregulation has become a hallmark of many a tumor. In virally associated cancers, the host–pathogen interaction could involve alteration in miR expression. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-encoded EBNA2 is indispensable for the capacity of the virus to transform B cells in vitro. Here, we studied how it affects cellular miRs. Extensive miR profiling of the virus-infected and EBNA2-transfected B lymphoma cells revealed that oncomiR miR-21 is positively regulated by this viral protein. Conversely, Burkitt’s lymphoma (BL) cell lines infected with EBNA2 lacking P3HR1 strain did not show any increase in miR-21. EBNA2 increased phosphorylation of AKT and this was directly correlated with increased miR-21. In contrast, miR-146a was downregulated by EBNA2 in B lymphoma cells. Low miR-146a expression correlates with an elevated level of IRAK1 and type I interferon in EBNA2 transfectants. Taken together, the present data suggest that EBNA2 might contribute to EBV-induced B-cell transformation by altering miR expression and in particular by increasing oncomiR-like miR-21 and by affecting the antiviral responses of the innate immune system through downregulation of its key regulator miR-146a.

Epstein–Barr virus encoded LMP1 downregulates TCL1 oncogene through miR-29b

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) encoded latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) is noted for its transforming potential. Yet, it also acts as a cytostatic and growth-relenting factor in Burkitts lymphoma (BL) cells. The underlying molecular mechanisms of the growth inhibitory property of LMP1 have remained largely unknown. In this study, we show that LMP1 negatively regulates a major oncogene, TCL1, in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and BL cells. MicroRNA (miR) profiling of LMP1 transfectants showed that among others, miR-29b, is upregulated. LMP1 diminished TCL1 by inducing miR-29b through C-terminus activation region 1 (CTAR1) and CTAR2. miR-29b locked nucleic acid (LNA) antisense oligonucleotide transfection into LMP1-expressing cells reduced miR-29b expression and consequently reconstituted TCL1, suggesting that LMP1 negatively regulates TCL1 through miR-29b upregulation. The miR-29b increase by LMP1 was due to an increase in the cluster pri-miR-29b1-a transcription, derived from human chromosome 7. Using pharmacological inhibitors, we found that p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-activating function of LMP1 is important for this effect. The ability of LMP1 to negatively regulate TCL1 through miR-29b might underlie its B-cell lymphoma growth antagonistic property. As LMP1 is also important for B-cell transformation, we suggest that the functional dichotomy of this viral protein may depend on a combination of levels of its expression, lineage and differentiation of the target cells and regulation of miRs, which then directs the outcome of the cellular response.

Non coding RNA and brain

Small non coding RNAs are a group of very different RNA molecules, present in virtually all cells, with a wide spectrum of regulatory functions which include RNA modification and regulation of protein synthesis. They have been isolated and characterized in all organisms and tissues, from Archaeobacteria to mammals. In mammalian brain there are a number of these small molecules, which are involved in neuronal differentiation as well as, possibly, in learning and memory. In this manuscript, we analyze the present knowledge about the function of the most important groups of small non-coding RNA present in brain: small nucleolar RNAs, small cytoplasmic RNAs, and microRNAs. The last ones, in particular, appear to be critical for dictating neuronal cell identity during development and to play an important role in neurite growth, synaptic development and neuronal plasticity.

Modulation of microRNA editing, expression and processing by ADAR2 deaminase in glioblastoma

BackgroundADAR enzymes convert adenosines to inosines within double-stranded RNAs, including microRNA (miRNA) precursors, with important consequences on miRNA retargeting and expression. ADAR2 activity is impaired in glioblastoma and its rescue has anti-tumoral effects. However, how ADAR2 activity may impact the miRNome and the progression of glioblastoma is not known.ResultsBy integrating deep-sequencing and array approaches with bioinformatics analyses and molecular studies, we show that ADAR2 is essential to edit a small number of mature miRNAs and to significantly modulate the expression of about 90 miRNAs in glioblastoma cells. Specifically, the rescue of ADAR2 activity in cancer cells recovers the edited miRNA population lost in glioblastoma cell lines and tissues, and rebalances expression of onco-miRNAs and tumor suppressor miRNAs to the levels observed in normal human brain. We report that the major effect of ADAR2 is to reduce the expression of a large number of miRNAs, most of which act as onco-miRNAs. ADAR2 can edit miR-222/221 and miR-21 precursors and decrease the expression of the corresponding mature onco-miRNAs in vivo and in vitro, with important effects on cell proliferation and migration.ConclusionsOur findings disclose an additional layer of complexity in miRNome regulation and provide information to better understand the impact of ADAR2 editing enzyme in glioblastoma. We propose that ADAR2 is a key factor for maintaining edited-miRNA population and balancing the expression of several essential miRNAs involved in cancer.

The ribosomal protein L2 in S. cerevisiae controls the level of accumulation of its own mRNA

The expression of the yeast L2 r‐protein gene is controlled at the level of mRNA accumulation. The product of the gene appears to participate in this regulation by an autogenous feedback mechanism. This control does not operate at the level of transcription but instead affects L2 mRNA accumulation. This autogenous regulation of mRNA accumulation provides an interesting analogy to the autogenous translational regulation of r‐proteins in Escherichia coli.

Acute Stress Alters Amygdala microRNA miR-135a and miR-124 Expression: Inferences for Corticosteroid Dependent Stress Response

The amygdala is a brain structure considered a key node for the regulation of neuroendocrine stress response. Stress-induced response in amygdala is accomplished through neurotransmitter activation and an alteration of gene expression. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important regulators of gene expression in the nervous system and are very well suited effectors of stress response for their ability to reversibly silence specific mRNAs. In order to study how acute stress affects miRNAs expression in amygdala we analyzed the miRNA profile after two hours of mouse restraint, by microarray analysis and reverse transcription real time PCR. We found that miR-135a and miR-124 were negatively regulated. Among in silico predicted targets we identified the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) as a target of both miR-135a and miR-124. Luciferase experiments and endogenous protein expression analysis upon miRNA upregulation and inhibition allowed us to demonstrate that mir-135a and mir-124 are able to negatively affect the expression of the MR. The increased levels of the amygdala MR protein after two hours of restraint, that we analyzed by western blot, negatively correlate with miR-135a and miR-124 expression. These findings point to a role of miR-135a and miR-124 in acute stress as regulators of the MR, an important effector of early stress response.

Cyclin D1 is a major target of miR-206 in cell differentiation and transformation

miR-206, a member of the so-called myomiR family, is largely acknowledged as a specific, positive regulator of skeletal muscle differentiation. A growing body of evidence also suggests a tumor suppressor function for miR-206, as it is frequently downregulated in various types of cancers. In this study, we show that miR-206 directly targets cyclin D1 and contributes to the regulation of CCND1 gene expression in both myogenic and non-muscle, transformed cells. We demonstrate that miR-206, either exogenous or endogenous, reduces cyclin D1 levels and proliferation rate in C2C12 cells without promoting differentiation, and that miR-206 knockdown in terminally differentiated C2C12 cells leads to cyclin D1 accumulation in myotubes, indicating that miR-206 might be involved in the maintenance of the post-mitotic state. Targeting of cyclin D1 might also account, at least in part, for the tumor-suppressor activity suggested for miR-206 in previous studies. Accordingly, the analysis of neoplastic and matched normal lung tissues reveals that miR-206 downregulation in lung tumors correlates, in most cases, with higher cyclin D1 levels. Moreover, gain-of-function experiments with cancer-derived cell lines and with in vitro transformed cells indicate that miR-206-mediated cyclin D1 repression is directly coupled to growth inhibition. Altogether, our data highlight a novel activity for miR-206 in skeletal muscle differentiation and identify cyclin D1 as a major target that further strengthens the tumor suppressor function proposed for miR-206.