Carmelo Di Primo

Monomeric Nucleoprotein of Influenza a Virus.

Isolated influenza A virus nucleoprotein exists in an equilibrium between monomers and trimers. Samples containing only monomers or only trimers can be stabilized by respectively low and high salt. The trimers bind RNA with high affinity but remain trimmers, whereas the monomers polymerise onto RNA forming nucleoprotein-RNA complexes. When wild type (wt) nucleoprotein is crystallized, it forms trimers, whether one starts with monomers or trimers. We therefore crystallized the obligate monomeric R416A mutant nucleoprotein and observed how the domain exchange loop that leads over to a neighbouring protomer in the trimer structure interacts with equivalent sites on the mutant monomer surface, avoiding polymerisation. The C-terminus of the monomer is bound to the side of the RNA binding surface, lowering its positive charge. Biophysical characterization of the mutant and wild type monomeric proteins gives the same results, suggesting that the exchange domain is folded in the same way for the wild type protein. In a search for how monomeric wt nucleoprotein may be stabilized in the infected cell we determined the phosphorylation sites on nucleoprotein isolated from virus particles. We found that serine 165 was phosphorylated and conserved in all influenza A and B viruses. The S165D mutant that mimics phosphorylation is monomeric and displays a lowered affinity for RNA compared with wt monomeric NP. This suggests that phosphorylation may regulate the polymerisation state and RNA binding of nucleoprotein in the infected cell. The monomer structure could be used for finding new anti influenza drugs because compounds that stabilize the monomer may slow down viral infection.

Structure-Based Discovery of the Novel Antiviral Properties of Naproxen against the Nucleoprotein of Influenza A Virus

ABSTRACT The nucleoprotein (NP) binds the viral RNA genome and associates with the polymerase in a ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) required for transcription and replication of influenza A virus. NP has no cellular counterpart, and the NP sequence is highly conserved, which led to considering NP a hot target in the search for antivirals. We report here that monomeric nucleoprotein can be inhibited by a small molecule binding in its RNA binding groove, resulting in a novel antiviral against influenza A virus. We identified naproxen, an anti-inflammatory drug that targeted the nucleoprotein to inhibit NP-RNA association required for NP function, by virtual screening. Further docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations identified in the RNA groove two NP-naproxen complexes of similar levels of interaction energy. The predicted naproxen binding sites were tested using the Y148A, R152A, R355A, and R361A proteins carrying single-point mutations. Surface plasmon resonance, fluorescence, and other in vitro experiments supported the notion that naproxen binds at a site identified by MD simulations and showed that naproxen competed with RNA binding to wild-type (WT) NP and protected active monomers of the nucleoprotein against proteolytic cleavage. Naproxen protected Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells against viral challenges with the H1N1 and H3N2 viral strains and was much more effective than other cyclooxygenase inhibitors in decreasing viral titers of MDCK cells. In a mouse model of intranasal infection, naproxen treatment decreased the viral titers in mice lungs. In conclusion, naproxen is a promising lead compound for novel antivirals against influenza A virus that targets the nucleoprotein in its RNA binding groove.

Loop–loop interaction of HIV-1 TAR RNA with N3′ → P5′ deoxyphosphoramidate aptamers inhibits in vitro Tat-mediated transcription

A hairpin RNA aptamer has been identified by in vitro selection against the transactivation-responsive element (TAR) of HIV-1. A nuclease-resistant N3′ → P5′ phosphoramidate isosequential analog of this aptamer also folds as a hairpin and forms with TAR a loop–loop “kissing” complex with a binding constant in the low nanomolar range as demonstrated by electrophoretic mobility-shift assays and surface plasmon resonance experiments. The key structural determinants, which contribute to the stability of the RNA aptamer–TAR complex, loop complementarity and the GA residues closing the aptamer loop, remain crucial for the N3′ → P5′ aptamer–TAR complex. Moreover, the N3′ → P5′ phosphoramidate aptamer specifically interferes with the binding of a peptide derived from the transactivator protein (Tat) peptide to TAR and selectively inhibits the Tat-mediated transcription in an in vitro assay, which marks this nuclease-resistant aptamer as a relevant candidate for experiments in cells.

Liquid-crystal NMR structure of HIV TAR RNA bound to its SELEX RNA aptamer reveals the origins of the high stability of the complex

Transactivation-response element (TAR) is a stable stem–loop structure of HIV RNA, which plays a crucial role during the life cycle of the virus. The apical loop of TAR acts as a binding site for essential cellular cofactors required for the replication of HIV. High-affinity aptamers directed against the apical loop of TAR have been identified by the SELEX approach. The RNA aptamers with the highest affinity for TAR fold as hairpins and form kissing complexes with the targeted RNA through loop–loop interactions. The aptamers with the strongest binding properties all possess a GA base pair combination at the loop-closing position. Using liquid-crystal NMR methodology, we have obtained a structural model in solution of a TAR–aptamer kissing complex with an unprecedented accuracy. This high-resolution structure reveals that the GA base pair is unilaterally shifted toward the 5′ strand and is stabilized by a network of intersugar hydrogen bonds. This specific conformation of the GA base pair allows for the formation of two supplementary stable base-pair interactions. By systematic permutations of the loop-closing base pair, we establish that the identified atomic interactions, which form the basis for the high stability of the complex, are maintained in several other kissing complexes. This study rationalizes the stabilizing role of the loop-closing GA base pairs in kissing complexes and may help the development or improvement of drugs against RNA loops of viruses or pathogens as well as the conception of biochemical tools targeting RNA hairpins involved in important biological functions.

Exploring TAR–RNA aptamer loop–loop interaction by X-ray crystallography, UV spectroscopy and surface plasmon resonance

In HIV-1, trans-activation of transcription of the viral genome is regulated by an imperfect hairpin, the trans-activating responsive (TAR) RNA element, located at the 5′ untranslated end of all viral transcripts. TAR acts as a binding site for viral and cellular proteins. In an attempt to identify RNA ligands that would interfere with the virus life-cycle by interacting with TAR, an in vitro selection was previously carried out. RNA hairpins that formed kissing-loop dimers with TAR were selected [Ducongé F. and Toulmé JJ (1999) RNA, 5:1605–1614]. We describe here the crystal structure of TAR bound to a high-affinity RNA aptamer. The two hairpins form a kissing complex and interact through six Watson–Crick base pairs. The complex adopts an overall conformation with an inter-helix angle of 28.1°, thus contrasting with previously reported solution and modelling studies. Structural analysis reveals that inter-backbone hydrogen bonds between ribose 2′ hydroxyl and phosphate oxygens at the stem-loop junctions can be formed. Thermal denaturation and surface plasmon resonance experiments with chemically modified 2′-O-methyl incorporated into both hairpins at key positions, clearly demonstrate the involvement of this intermolecular network of hydrogen bonds in complex stability.

Systematic screening of LNA/2′-O-methyl chimeric derivatives of a TAR RNA aptamer

We synthesized and evaluated by surface plasmon resonance 64 LNA/2′‐O‐methyl sequences corresponding to all possible combinations of such residues in a kissing aptamer loop complementary to the 6‐nt loop of the TAR element of HIV‐1. Three combinations of LNA/2′‐O‐methyl nucleoside analogues where one or two LNA units are located on the 3′ side of the aptamer loop display an affinity for TAR below 1 nM, i.e. one order of magnitude higher than the parent RNA aptamer. One of these combinations inhibits the TAR‐dependent luciferase expression in a cell assay.

Regulating eukaryotic gene expression with aptamers.

Aptamers are RNA or DNA oligonucleotides identified within a randomly synthesized library, through an in vitro selection procedure. The selected candidates display a pre‐determined property of interest with respect to a given target. Successful selection has been carried out against targets ranging from small (amino acids, antibiotics) to macro‐molecules (proteins, nucleic acids). They generally show an affinity in the nanomolar range and a high specificity of target recognition. Interestingly, aptamers selected against purified targets in the test tube retain their properties within cells. RNA aptamers can be generated in situ from an appropriate DNA construct or delivered as nuclease‐resistant oligonucleotide analogues. For example, aptamers recognizing RNA structure through loop–loop interactions modulate the trans‐activation of in vitro transcription mediated by the TAR RNA element of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Consequently, they constitute both exquisite tools for functional genomics analysis and promising prototypes of therapeutic agents. Natural aptameric motifs have been identified within mRNA sequences, which upon binding to a metabolite control the expression of the encoded gene, which is generally involved in the biosynthesis of this particular metabolite.

Nucleic acids targeted to drugs: SELEX against a quadruplex ligand

A number of small molecules demonstrate selective recognition of G-quadruplexes and are able to stabilize their formation. In this work, we performed the synthesis of two biotin-tagged G4 ligands and analyzed their interactions with DNA by two complementary techniques, FRET and FID. The compound that exhibited the best characteristics (a biotin pyridocarboxamide derivative with high stabilization of an intramolecular quadruplex and excellent duplex-quadruplex specificity) was used as bait for in vitro selection (SELEX). Among 80 DNA aptamer sequences selected, only a small minority (5/80) exhibited G4-prone motifs. Binding of consensus candidates was confirmed by SPR. These results indicate that G4 ligands that appear highly specific when comparing affinities or stabilization for one quadruplex against one duplex, do not only bind quadruplex sequences but may also recognize other nucleic motifs as well. This observation may be relevant when whole genome or transcriptome analysis of binding sites is seeked for, as unexpected binding sites may also be present.

Molecular Dynamics Studies of the Nucleoprotein of Influenza A Virus: Role of the Protein Flexibility in RNA Binding

The influenza viruses contain a segmented, negative stranded RNA genome. Each RNA segment is covered by multiple copies of the nucleoprotein (NP). X-ray structures have shown that NP contains well-structured domains juxtaposed with regions of missing electron densities corresponding to loops. In this study, we tested if these flexible loops gated or promoted RNA binding and RNA-induced oligomerization of NP. We first performed molecular dynamics simulations of wt NP monomer and trimer in comparison with the R361A protein mutated in the RNA binding groove, using the H1N1 NP as the initial structure. Calculation of the root-mean-square fluctuations highlighted the presence of two flexible loops in NP trimer: loop 1 (73–90), loop 2 (200–214). In NP, loops 1 and 2 formed a 10–15 Å-wide pinch giving access to the RNA binding groove. Loop 1 was stabilized by interactions with K113 of the adjacent β-sheet 1 (91–112) that interacted with the RNA grove (linker 360–373) via multiple hydrophobic contacts. In R361A, a salt bridge formed between E80 of loop 1 and R208 of loop 2 driven by hydrophobic contacts between L79 and W207, due to a decreased flexibility of loop 2 and loop 1 unfolding. Thus, RNA could not access its binding groove in R361A; accordingly, R361A had a much lower affinity for RNA than NP. Disruption of the E80-R208 interaction in the triple mutant R361A-E80A-E81A increased its RNA binding affinity and restored its oligomerization back to wt levels in contrast with impaired levels of R361A. Our data suggest that the flexibility of loops 1 and 2 is required for RNA sampling and binding which likely involve conformational change(s) of the nucleoprotein.

Real time analysis of the RNAI-RNAII-Rop complex by surface plasmon resonance: from a decaying surface to a standard kinetic analysis.

RNA loop–loop complexes are motifs that regulate biological functions in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. In E. coli, RNAI, an antisense RNA encoded by the ColE1 plasmid, regulates the plasmid replication by recognizing through loop–loop interactions RNAII, the RNA primer that binds to the plasmidic DNA to initiate the replication. Rop, a plasmid‐encoded homodimeric protein interacts with this transient RNAI–RNAII kissing complex. A surface plasmon resonance (SPR)‐based biosensor was used to investigate this protein‐nucleic acid ternary complex, at 5°C, in experimental conditions such as the protein binds either to the loop–loop complex while it dissociates or to a saturated stable RNAI–RNAII surface. The results show that RNAI hairpin dissociates from the RNAII surface 110 times slower in the presence of Rop than in its absence. Rop binds to RNAI–RNAII with an on‐rate of 3.6 × 106 M−1 s−1 and an off‐rate of 0.11 s−1, resulting in a binding equilibrium constant equal to 31 nM. A Scatchard‐plot analysis of the interaction monitored by SPR confirms a 1:1 complex of Rop and RNAI–RNAII as observed for non‐natural Rop–loop–loop complexes. Copyright