Carmina R. Fumaz

Prospective randomized two-arm controlled study to determine the efficacy of a specific intervention to improve long-term adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Background: Nearly perfect compliance seems to be indispensable to obtain the maximum benefit from highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Interventions to ensure a high level of adherence during a relatively long‐term period of therapy are necessary. Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, two‐arm controlled study including patients starting their first‐ or second‐line HAART who were randomized to receive psychoeducative intervention to implement adherence (experimental group [EG]) or a usual medical follow‐up (control group [CG]). We aimed to study the efficacy of a psychoeducative intervention to ensure long‐term adherence to HAART, its relation with the virologic efficacy of treatment, and to determine the variables related to long‐term adherence. Visits were made at weeks 0, 4, 24, and 48 for data collection. Self‐reported adherence was registered at each visit and its veracity was tested by randomized blood analyses performed without previous warning to 40% of patients. Appropriate adherence was defined as the consumption of ≥95% of medication prescribed. Statistical analyses were performed both by the as treated (AT) and the intention to treat missing = failure (ITT) methods. Results: In all, 116 patients were included. At week 48, 94% of patients in the EG versus 69% controls achieved adherence ≥95% (p = .008); 89% of patients in the EG versus 66% controls had HIV‐1 RNA levels <400 copies/ml (p = .026). Overall, 85% of patients with adherence ≥95% but only 45% of those with adherence <95% had viral load (VL) <400 copies/ml (p = .008). In multivariate analysis, variables significantly related to adherence were having received a psychoeducative intervention (odds ratio [OR], 6.58; p = .04), poor effort to take medication (OR, 5.38; p = .03), and high self‐perceived capacity to follow the regimen (OR, 13.76; p = .04). Self‐reported adherence and drug plasma levels coincided in 93% of cases. However, differences in adherence did not reach statistical significance in the ITT analysis although a clear tendency toward benefit was observed in EG. Conclusions: Specific and maintained psychoeducative interventions based on excellence on clinical practice are useful to keep high levels of adherence as well as high levels of viral suppression. There is a clear relation between high adherence levels and virologic success. Assessment of certain specific variables related to adherence may be helpful to monitor patients compliance in the clinical setting.

antiretroviral Treatment Simplification With Nevirapine in Protease Inhibitor-experienced Patients With Hiv-associated Lipodystrophy : 1-year Prospective Follow-up of a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study

Background: Simpler and less toxic antiretroviral strategies are needed to maximize treatment compliance without sacrificing potency, at least for drug‐experienced HIV‐infected patients currently on regimens containing protease inhibitors (PIs). Small nonrandomized studies have suggested a beneficial role of PI‐sparing regimens on lipodystrophy. Objectives: To assess the virologic, immunologic, and clinical benefit of switching the PI to nevirapine in patients with HIV‐associated lipodystrophy and sustained viral suppression before entry in the study. Design: Open‐labeled, prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Setting: Seven reference inpatient centers for HIV/AIDS in Spain. Patients: One hundred six HIV‐infected adults with clinically evident lipodystrophy who sustained HIV‐RNA suppression for at least 6 months with PI‐containing antiretroviral combinations. Intervention: Replacement of the PI with nevirapine during 48 weeks (Group A) versus continuing the prior PI (Group B). Measurements: Several virologic and immunologic analyses, standard and specific biochemical tests, and anthropometric and dual X‐ray absorptiometry measurements. Results: At week 48, an HIV‐1 RNA level <400 copies/ml was maintained in 79% and 77% of patients in Groups A and B, respectively, whereas 74% and 72% of patients had viral load levels <50 copies/ml. Absolute CD4+ counts significantly increased in both groups compared with baseline values, and a significant decrease in CD38+CD8+ cells was observed in Group A (p < .01) but not in group B. Overall, no significant changes in anthropometric or body shape measurements were found after 48 weeks. Fasting total cholesterol and triglyceride levels decreased in Group A (but not in Group B) compared with baseline values (p < .05), although no significant differences were seen between groups at the end of the study. Subjects in Group A reported a better quality of life (QOL) index than controls (p < .001), with the main reason reported being the greater simplicity of the new drug regimen. Conclusions: Protease inhibitor‐sparing regimens, including nevirapine, seem to be an effective alternative for PI‐experienced patients. Nevirapine‐based triple therapies allow maintained control of HIV‐1 RNA levels and improve the immunologic response at 48 weeks of follow‐up in patients with prior sustained virologic suppression. The switch to nevirapine significantly improved the lipidic profile in Group A, although there were no differences between groups at the end of the study. Additionally, no significant changes were seen in terms of lipodystrophy‐related body shape changes 1 year after the PI substitution. Finally, nevirapine‐containing regimens have a simpler dosing schedule, and this facilitates high adherence and improves QOL.

Virological, Immunological, and Clinical Impact of Switching from Protease Inhibitors to Nevirapine or to Efavirenz in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection and Long-Lasting Viral Suppression

Seventy-seven subjects infected with human immunodeficiency virus were randomized to switch from protease inhibitor (PI) therapy to nevirapine therapy (group A; n=26) or to efavirenz therapy (group B; n=25) or to continue PI therapy (group C; n=26). At month 12, viral suppression had been maintained in 96% of patients in group A, 92% of patients in group B, and 92% of patients in group C. A significant increase in the CD4(+) level was observed in all 3 groups. In group A, lipid profiles improved, whereas levels of gamma-glutamiltransferase and alanine aminotransferase significantly increased; 1 subject interrupted treatment because of hepatotoxicity. In group B, an increase in gamma-glutamiltransferase levels was also observed, and 3 patients interrupted treatment because of central nervous system symptoms. Two patients in group C withdrew therapy. Quality of life significantly improved for groups A and B. In patients receiving effective PI-based therapy, the replacement of the PI with either nevirapine or efavirenz is safe and virologically effective.

Long-term neuropsychiatric disorders on efavirenz-based approaches : Quality of life, psychologic issues, and adherence

Background:Efavirenz has been associated with neuropsychiatric disorders, although little is known about its long-term toxicity. Objective:To assess neuropsychiatric disorders and their relation to efavirenz plasma levels as well as quality of life, psychologic status, and adherence in HIV-infected patients on long-term efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy. Methods:Cross-sectional study comparing 60 patients on an efavirenz-based approach (EFV group) and 60 patients on a protease inhibitor-containing regimen (PI group) for at least 1 year. Adverse events, efavirenz plasma levels, quality of life, psychologic status, and adherence were assessed. Results:The mean time on treatment was 91.1 ± 39.5 weeks in the EFV group and 119.9 ± 67.4 weeks in the PI group. Mild dizziness, sadness, mood changes, irritability, lightheadedness, nervousness, impaired concentration, abnormal dreams, and somnolence were reported more frequently in the EFV group than in the PI group (P < 0.05). Forty-nine of 60 patients presented with therapeutic efavirenz plasma levels (range: 1.0-4.0 mg/L). Efavirenz plasma levels were similar in subjects with and without neuropsychiatric disorders. No significant differences were found between the EFV group and the PI group regarding quality of life and psychologic status. Sixty percent of patients in the EFV group and 55% in the PI group reported adherence ≥95%. Conclusions:Mild and clinically tolerable neuropsychiatric disorders may persist in patients after a mean of 2 years using an efavirenz-based approach. Quality of life and psychologic status remained good in both study groups. Interventions to enhance long-term adherence should be applied in clinical practice.

Quality of life, emotional status, and adherence of HIV-1-infected patients treated with efavirenz versus protease inhibitor-containing regimens.

&NA; We assessed the impact of an efavirenz‐containing regimen versus a protease inhibitor‐containing regimen on quality of life, emotional status, and adherence of HIV‐1‐infected patients. In addition, we sought to define the adverse events associated with these treatments, with a special focus on central nervous system disorders in the efavirenz treatment group. This prospective, randomized, two‐arm, controlled study included 100 patients for whom initial treatment with a protease inhibitorcontaining regimen failed. Patients were randomized to start treatment with two nucleoside retrotranscriptase inhibitors plus efavirenz (group 1; 51 patients) or two nucleoside retrotranscriptase inhibitors plus one or more new protease inhibitors (group 2; 49 patients). Quality of life was assessed by a five‐point item adapted from the HIV questionnaire of the Medical Outcomes Study, emotional status was evaluated by the Profile of Mood State questionnaire, and patients self‐reported adherence. Data were analyzed by both an as‐treated method and an intention‐to‐treat‐last observation carried forward method. Patients in group 1 reported the following findings at week 4: dizziness (66%), abnormal dreaming (48%), light‐headedness (37%), and difficulty sleeping (35%). At week 24, dizziness (13%; p < .001), abnormal dreaming (18%; p = .002), light‐headedness (13%; p = .01), difficulty sleeping (7%; p = .001), and nervousness (13%; p = .01) decreased in these patients. Irritability, abnormal dreaming, and nervousness persisted at week 48 in 13%, 10%, and 8% of group 1 patients, respectively. Patients in group 2 reported the following findings at week 4: lightheadedness (8%), dizziness (5%), difficulty sleeping (4%), nervousness (4%), and headaches (3%). Patients in group 2 reported the following findings at week 48: difficulty sleeping (4%), nervousness (3%), headaches (3%), and light‐headedness (2%). In group 1, quality of life (p < .001) and emotional status (week 48; p = .004) improved, both of which were better than those in group 2 (p = .001). Both groups maintained high levels of medication adherence, and no significant differences in the number of patients who had viral loads of <200 copies/mL at week 48 were found (78% of group 1 patients vs. 85% of group 2 patients; p = not significant). At week 48, the mean CD4 cell count ± SD was 497 ± 224/mm3 in group 1 and 539 ± 298/mm3 in group 2 (p = not significant). Despite similar immunologic and virologic outcomes, a second‐line efavirenz‐containing regimen improved quality of life of HIV‐1‐infected patients compared with a second‐line protease inhibitor‐containing regimen. However, close follow‐up of patients receiving treatment with efavirenz‐based regimens is recommended, especially for those with previous emotional disturbances due to central nervous system disorders in the short term and those with persistence of a low percentage of these disorders in the long term.

Antiretroviral therapy interruption guided by CD4 cell counts and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels in chronically HIV-1-infected patients.

Objective:We evaluated the safety of CD4 cell count and plasma HIV-1 RNA (pVL)-guided treatment interruptions (GTI) and determined predictors of duration of treatment interruption. Methods:Chronically HIV-1-infected adults with sustained CD4 cell counts > 500 cells/μl and pVL < 50 copies/ml were randomly assigned to either continue with standard antiretroviral therapy (control group, n = 101) or to interrupt therapy aimed at maintaining CD4 cell counts > 350 cells/μl and pVL < 100 000 copies/ml (GTI group, n = 100). Both groups were followed for 2 years. Results:There were no AIDS-defining illnesses or deaths in either group. Compared to controls, subjects interrupting therapy reduced treatment exposure by 67%, but suffered significantly more adverse events related to the intake of medication or to therapy interruption [relative hazard, 2.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.64–4.49; P < 0.001), mainly due to an excess in mononucleosis-like symptoms. While GTI subjects demonstrated improvements in the psychosocial spheres of quality of life and pain reporting, GTI had no effect on the physical aspects of quality of life. Although both groups had a similar hazard for developing CD4 cell count < 200 cells/μl; at least 10% of subjects on GTI had CD4 cell counts < 350 cells/μl at every time point. Drug resistance mutations were detected in 36% of subjects but were selected de novo only in subjects interrupting non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy. Lower CD4 cell count nadir, higher set-point pVL and prior exposure to suboptimal regimens were all independent predictors of the need to reinitiate treatment. Conclusions:Overall, GTI were not as safe as continuing therapy. Despite achieving some improvements in quality of life, GTI did not reduce the overall rate of management-related adverse events.

Nadir CD4 cell count predicts neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected patients.

Though antiretroviral therapy attenuates neurocognitive disruption, impairment is still observed. We studied the nadir CD4 cell count as a predictor of neurocognitive changes. This cross-sectional study assessed 64 HIV-infected patients in two groups: G1 (n = 26, nadir CD4 < or =200 cells/ml) and G2 (n = 38, nadir CD4 >200 cells/ml). Percentages of patients showing neurocognitive impairment were compared according to different nadir CD4 cutoffs (200, 250, 300, and 350 cells/ml). From G2, we also took the subgroup of patients receiving treatment (G3) and compared this group with G1, in which all patients were being treated. Demographic and clinical variables were evaluated, as were differences in neurocognitive function. Neurocognitive impairment tended to be more prevalent in G1 [19 patients (73.1%)] than in G2 [20 (52.6%), p = 0.123]. When nadir CD4 cutoffs were compared, there was a trend toward more impaired subjects as the CD4 nadir decreased. Significantly different functioning was found in attention/working memory (digit span backward, p = 0.032) and executive functions (trail making test, part B, p = 0.020), with better performance in G2. Comparison between G1 and G3 confirmed those findings. We found differences in neurocognitive functioning in relation to nadir CD4 count in HIV-infected patients. Attention should be given to this value in the management of neurocognitive protection in HIV infection.

Sustained antiretroviral treatment adherence in survivors of the pre-HAART era: attitudes and beliefs

Abstract The objective of this study was to assess adherence of HIV-1-infected patients who started treatment in the pre-HAART era and to determine variables associated with better adherence, including relevant attitudes and beliefs. This is a cross-sectional study enrolling patients who had received antiretroviral therapy for ≥10 years. Adherence was evaluated through self-reporting and plasma drug concentrations. Treatment variables, attitudes and beliefs were collected during structured interviews. The results show that for 87 patients the median (interquartile range) time on therapy was 13 (10–19) years; 80 were on therapy at the time of analysis. Adherence was ≥95% in 54 patients (67.5%), 90–94% in 22 (27.5%) and <90% in 4 (5%). Drug concentrations were below the lower limit of detection in five patients. Younger age (p=0.014), female gender (p=0.005), current substance abuse (p=0.004) and hepatitis C virus co-infection (p<0.001) were related to lower adherence. Adherence did not differ in relation to different drug families or once- or twice-daily regimens. Patients with adherence <95% were more likely to have interrupted treatment without doctors recommendation (p=0.009). Adherent patients exhibited a higher perception of risk of developing the illness and of benefits of therapy, higher self-efficacy and intention to adhere and were more influenced by events that motivate medication intake. To conclude, adherence was >90% in most patients on antiretroviral therapy for ≥10 years. Adherence was more related to beliefs about health and illness than to the characteristics of medication or level of knowledge about treatment. Care adherence interventions should include assessment of health beliefs.

Influence of the type of pegylated interferon on the onset of depressive and neuropsychiatric symptoms in HIV-HCV coinfected patients

Abstract This is a prospective observational comparative 48-week study to assess the impact of the different types of Peg-IFN on depressive and neuropsychiatric symptoms during treatment in HIV-HCV coinfected patients. Thirty-one patients treated with Peg-IFN α-2b 1.5µg/kg/w plus ribavirine (RBV) (Peg-IFN α-2b Group) and 32 patients receiving Peg-IFN α-2a 180µg/w plus RBV (Peg-IFN α-2a Group) were included. Depressive and neuropsychiatric symptoms, quality of life and adherence were assessed. Fifteen subjects (23%) discontinued therapy (p = 0.3, between groups). Overall, 37 patients presented mild to moderate depressive symptoms, 9 moderate to severe and 3 severe, without differences between groups. Patients in Peg-IFN α-2b reported higher fatigue and dizziness at weeks 12 (p < 0.05) and 24 (p < 0.05), and irritability and memory loss at week 24 (p < 0.05) with respect to Peg-IFN α-2a Group. At week 12, role functioning, general health perception, vitality, emotional role, mental health and the summary areas of physical health and mental health were lower in Peg-IFN α-2b Group (p < 0.05). The same was observed in physical functioning (p = 0.05) and role functioning, general health perception, emotional role and mental health (p < 0.001) at week 24. Three months after finishing treatment, no patient had depressive or neuropsychiatric symptoms, and quality of life improved. Antiretroviral adherence was low but adherence to anti-HCV therapy remained high in both groups. According to our data, Peg-IFN α-2a and Peg-IFN α-2b exert a similar impact on the overall rate of depressive symptoms, although patients treated with Peg-IFN α-2a experience less fatigue and fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms and a lower impairment in their physical and mental quality of life.

A brief and feasible paper-based method to screen for neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected patients: the NEU screen.

Objective:Practical screening methods are necessary to detect neurocognitive impairment (NCI) in HIV-infected patients. We aimed to find a brief and feasible paper-based tool to facilitate the diagnosis of an HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. Methods:A total of 106 HIV-infected outpatients with variable clinical characteristics were recruited in a multicenter investigation. NCI was diagnosed using a standardized neuropsychological tests battery (7 areas, 21 measures, ∼2 hours). Multiple score combinations were compared to find a paper-based method that took ⩽10 minutes to apply. The presence of NCI was considered the gold standard for comparisons, and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Results:Subjects were mostly middle-aged (median, 44 years) men (87%) on antiretroviral treatment. NCI was detected in 51 individuals (48%) and was associated with lower nadir CD4 count (P < 0.001), receiving antiretroviral therapy (P = 0.004), fewer years of education (P = 0.009), and presence of comorbidities (P < 0.001). The score combination that showed the highest sensitivity (74.5%) and specificity (81.8%) detecting NCI included 3 measures of attention/working memory, executive functioning, and verbal fluency (part A of Trail Making Test, part B of Trail Making Test, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test scores). A broader paper-based selection of measures covering 7 areas indicated a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.3% (7 measures, ∼35 minutes). Conclusions:The combination of the 3 measures presented in this study seems to be a rapid and feasible screening mean for NCI in HIV-infected patients. This approach, combined with screening for potential comorbidities and daily functioning interference, could help in the initial stages of a HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder diagnosis and in settings with limited access to neuropsychological resources.