Carol Wrzosek
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Carol Wrzosek.
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications | 2002
Ming-Biao Yin; Gunnar Hapke; Jiaxi Wu; Rami G. Azrak; Cheryl Frank; Carol Wrzosek; Youcef M. Rustum
A novel karenitecin, BNP1350, is a topoisomerase I-targeting anticancer agent with significant antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo. A BNP1350-resistant human head and neck carcinoma A253 cell line, denoted A253/BNPR, was developed. The A253/BNPR cell line was approximately 9-fold resistant to BNP1350 and 4-fold cross-resistant to another topoisomerase I inhibitor SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. After drug treatment with equimolar concentrations of BNP1350 (0.7 microM) for 2h, activation of the DNA double-strand break repair protein complexes was similar in the two cell lines, suggesting that DNA dsb repair is not attributable to resistance to BNP1350 in the A253/BNPR cells. Cell cycle analysis indicates that the A253 cell line accumulated primarily in S phase, but G(2) phase accumulation was observed in the A253/BNPR cell line at 48 h after drug removal. Elevated chk1 phosphorylation at Ser(345) following DNA damage induced by BNP1350 was accompanied by G(2) accumulation in the A253/BNPR cell line, while exposure to equimolar concentrations of BNP1350 (0.7 microM) induced S-phase arrest and no increased phosphorylation of chk1 at Ser(345) in the A253 cell line. Under the same conditions, increased chk1 activity was observed in the A253/BNPR cell line, but not in the A253 cell line. Moreover, stimulated binding of 14-3-3 proteins to chk1 was observed in BNP1350-treated A253/BNPR cells. To confirm relationship between chk1 expression/phosphorylation and drug resistance to topo I poisons, we examined the effects of chk1 or chk2 antisense oligonucleotides on the cellular growth inhibition. Chk1 antisense oligonucleotide can sensitize the A253/BNPR cells to killing by topo I inhibitor BNP1350, but no significant sensitization of BNP1350-induced growth inhibition was observed in the drug-sensitive cell line. Chk2 antisense oligonucleotide has only a small sensitization effect on BNP1350-induced growth inhibition in both cell lines. The data indicate that the chk1 signaling pathways that mediate cell cycle checkpoint are associated with cellular resistance to BNP1350 in the A253/BNPR cell line.
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | 2000
Hans Minderman; Carol Wrzosek; Shousong Cao; Teruhiro Utsugi; Takashi Kobunai; Yuji Yamada; Youcef M. Rustum
Abstract TAS-103 is a recently developed dual inhibitor of topoisomerase-I (topo-I) and topoisomerase-II (topo-II). TAS-103 has documented cytotoxicity in vitro and antitumor activity against a variety of mouse, rat, and human xenografts in vivo. Purpose: To determine TAS-103 activity against (multi)drug resistant cells in vitro and to delineate its mechanism of action. Methods: TAS-103 was evaluated for activity against three human multidrug-resistant cell lines representing resistance mediated by P-glycoprotein (Pgp)-, multidrug resistance protein (MRP), and lung resistance protein (LRP) as well as one camptothecin-resistant cell line associated with a mutated topo-I enzyme. Drug sensitivity following short (2 h), intermediate (6–8 h) and long term (24 h) exposures were compared. The mechanism of action was studied by evaluating inhibition of topoisomerase-I and -II specific DNA relaxation assays, drug-induced DNA/protein cross-link formation, and competitive DNA intercalation with ethidium bromide. Results: Increasing the exposure time only modestly potentiated TAS-103 cytotoxicity (3–5 fold) demonstrating a lack of strong exposure duration dependency. TAS-103 cytotoxicity was not affected by the presence of any of the drug resistance mechanisms studied. TAS-103 inhibits topo-I and -II activity in DNA relaxation assays, but in our assay system TAS-103 was found to have only a weak ability to induce DNA-protein crosslinks. DNA migration patterns in agarose gel electrophoresis indicate that TAS-103 can interact directly with DNA. Also its ability to displace ethidium bromide which has intercalated into the DNA provides an indication on the nature of drug-DNA interaction. Conclusions: TAS-103 cytotoxicity is not affected by the presence of Pgp, MRP, LRP or mutations in the CAM binding region of the topo-I enzyme and its growth-inhibitory effect appears to be weakly dependent on exposure duration. The presented evidence suggest that the inhibitory effects of TAS-103 on topo-I and -II may in part be related to its DNA binding rather than primarily through stabilization of topo-I or -II intermediates with DNA through specific binding to the enzymes.
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta | 1998
Ming-Biao Yin; Bin Guo; Wieland Voigt; Udo Vanhoefer; John F. Gibbs; Basil S. Skenderis; Cheryl Frank; Carol Wrzosek; Youcef M. Rustum
The newly synthesized calcium channel blocker, Ro44-5912, significantly potentiates doxorubicin (Dox)-induced cytotoxicity at non-cytotoxic concentrations in Dox-resistant human ovarian cell line, A2780/DX5, overexpressing P170-glycoprotein (Pgp). Induction of DNA single- and double-strand breaks (ssbs and dsbs) was measured using alkaline elution and constant-field gel electrophoresis (CFGE) assays. The results indicate that potentiation of the cytotoxicity of Dox by Ro44-5912 was accompanied by significant increases in both, Dox-induced DNA ssbs and dsbs in the resistant cells. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis showed that Dox induced DNA fragments in the 50-800 kilobase (kb) and 0.8-5.7 megabase (Mb) ranges. The majority of the newly synthesized DNA fragments were in the 50-800 kb range. Ro44-5912 treatment resulted in significant potentiation of DNA fragmentation in the 50-800 kb range with a minor increase in 0.8-5.7 Mb DNA fragments, suggesting that the modulator functions by potentiating nascent DNA fragmentation in the resistant cells. Exposure to Dox with Ro44-5912 was associated with a prolonged blockage of cells in the S-phase. In contrast, exposure to Dox alone resulted in temporary blockage of cells in G2/M phase (approximately 24 h) followed by restoration of cell proliferation and normal DNA histograms at 48 h after 2 h drug exposure. Incorporation of BrdUrd by flow cytometric analysis was inhibited by Dox in the presence of Ro44-5912, showing that there is a block of DNA replication. An increased damage in newly synthesized DNA could concur with a blocked DNA replication. Moreover, slowing progression through the S-phase in cells exposed to Dox in combination with Ro44-5912 is accompanied by increased sensitivity of Dox poisons, indicating a correlation of specific S-phase perturbation with the reversal of Dox resistance by Ro44-5912 in cells expressing Pgp. The results suggest that drug-induced augmentation of nascent DNA fragmentation and specific cell-cycle perturbation are potentially important molecular determinants for reversal of multidrug resistance in addition to restoration of intracellular drug retention.
The Prostate | 2018
Michael V. Fiandalo; John Wilton; Krystin M. Mantione; Carol Wrzosek; Kristopher Attwood; Yue Wu; James L. Mohler
Almost all men who present with advanced prostate cancer (CaP) and some men who fail therapy for clinically localized CaP are treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). CaP cell lines are used to identify and characterize new agents for ADT or investigate mechanisms of ADT resistance. CaP cell lines are maintained in culture medium that contains fetal bovine serum, which contains testosterone (T). Androgen deprivation experiments are performed using media supplemented with androgen‐free serum, such as charcoal stripped fetal bovine serum (CS‐FBS). However, CS‐FBS composition varies from batch‐to‐batch and variations may impact experimental reproducibility. Serum free media (SFM) may provide a better defined alternative to media supplemented with CS‐FBS (CSM).
Cytometry | 1996
Hans Minderman; Udo Vanhoefer; Karoly Toth; Ming-Biao Yin; M. Denice Minderman; Carol Wrzosek; Marilyn L. Slovak; Youcef M. Rustum
Cancer Research | 1996
Sei-Ichi Matsui; Mark A. Arredondo; Carol Wrzosek; Youcef M. Rustum
Current Drug Metabolism | 2003
Donald B. White; Harry K. Slocum; Yseult Brun; Carol Wrzosek; William R. Greco
Experimental Cell Research | 1999
Ming-Biao Yin; Bin Guo; Angeles Panadero; Cheryl Frank; Carol Wrzosek; Harry K. Slocum; Youcef M. Rustum
Cancer Research | 1994
Carl W. Porter; Barbara Ganis; Youcef M. Rustum; Carol Wrzosek; Debora L. Kramer; Raymond J. Bergeron
Molecular Pharmacology | 2000
Ming-Biao Yin; Bin Guo; Udo Vanhoefer; Rami G. Azrak; Hans Minderman; Cheryl Frank; Carol Wrzosek; Harry K. Slocum; Youcef M. Rustum