Carrie H. Colla

Spending Differences Associated With the Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration

CONTEXT The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently launched accountable care organization (ACO) programs designed to improve quality and slow cost growth. The ACOs resemble an earlier pilot, the Medicare Physician Group Practice Demonstration (PGPD), in which participating physician groups received bonus payments if they achieved lower cost growth than local controls and met quality targets. Although evidence indicates the PGPD improved quality, uncertainty remains about its effect on costs. OBJECTIVE To estimate cost savings associated with the PGPD overall and for beneficiaries dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. DESIGN Quasi-experimental analyses comparing preintervention (2001-2004) and postintervention (2005-2009) trends in spending of PGPD participants to local control groups. We compared estimates using several alternative approaches to adjust for case mix. SETTING Ten physician groups from across the United States. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS The intervention group was composed of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries (n = 990,177) receiving care primarily from the physicians in the participating medical groups. Controls were Medicare beneficiaries (n = 7,514,453) from the same regions who received care largely from non-PGPD physicians. Overall, 15% of beneficiaries were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Annual spending per Medicare fee-for-service beneficiary. RESULTS Annual savings per beneficiary were modest overall (adjusted mean

Medicare Spending and Outcomes After Postacute Care for Stroke and Hip Fracture

114, 95% CI,

Choosing Wisely: Prevalence and Correlates of Low-Value Health Care Services in the United States

12-

Accountable Care Organizations in the United States: Market and Demographic Factors Associated with Formation

216). Annual savings were significant in dually eligible beneficiaries (adjusted mean

Association Between Medicare Accountable Care Organization Implementation and Spending Among Clinically Vulnerable Beneficiaries

532, 95% CI,

An Early Assessment of Accountable Care Organizations’ Efforts to Engage Patients and Their Families

277-

Hospitals Participating In ACOs Tend To Be Large And Urban, Allowing Access To Capital And Data

786), but were not significant among nondually eligible beneficiaries (adjusted mean

Interventions Aimed at Reducing Use of Low-Value Health Services: A Systematic Review:

59, 95% CI,

Preventive Care Quality of Medicare Accountable Care Organizations: Associations of Organizational Characteristics With Performance.

166 in savings to

Implementation of a Pilot Accountable Care Organization Payment Model and the Use of Discretionary and Nondiscretionary Cardiovascular Care

47 in additional spending). The adjusted mean spending reductions were concentrated in acute care (overall,