Casper Mihl

Intravascular enhancement with identical iodine delivery rate using different iodine contrast media in a circulation phantom.

PurposeBoth iodine delivery rate (IDR) and iodine concentration are decisive factors for vascular enhancement in computed tomographic angiography. It is unclear, however, whether the use of high–iodine concentration contrast media is beneficial to lower iodine concentrations when IDR is kept identical. This study evaluates the effect of using different iodine concentrations on intravascular attenuation in a circulation phantom while maintaining a constant IDR. Materials and MethodsA circulation phantom with a low-pressure venous compartment and a high-pressure arterial compartment simulating physiological circulation parameters was used (heart rate, 60 beats per minute; stroke volume, 60 mL; blood pressure, 120/80 mm Hg). Maintaining a constant IDR (2.0 g/s) and a constant total iodine load (20 g), prewarmed (37°C) contrast media with differing iodine concentrations (240–400 mg/mL) were injected into the phantom using a double-headed power injector. Serial computed tomographic scans at the level of the ascending aorta (AA), the descending aorta (DA), and the left main coronary artery (LM) were obtained. Total amount of contrast volume (milliliters), iodine delivery (grams of iodine), peak flow rate (milliliter per second), and intravascular pressure (pounds per square inch) were monitored using a dedicated data acquisition program. Attenuation values in the AA, the DA, and the LM were constantly measured (Hounsfield unit [HU]). In addition, time-enhancement curves, aortic peak enhancement, and time to peak were determined. ResultsAll contrast injection protocols resulted in similar attenuation values: the AA (516 [11] to 531 [37] HU), the DA (514 [17] to 531 [32] HU), and the LM (490 [10] to 507 [17] HU). No significant differences were found between the AA, the DA, and the LM for either peak enhancement (all P > 0.05) or mean time to peak (AA, 19.4 [0.58] to 20.1 [1.05] seconds; DA, 21.1 [1.0] to 21.4 [1.15] seconds; LM, 19.8 [0.58] to 20.1 [1.05] seconds). ConclusionsThis phantom study demonstrates that constant injection parameters (IDR, overall iodine load) lead to robust enhancement patterns, regardless of the contrast material used. Higher iodine concentration itself does not lead to higher attenuation levels. These results may stimulate a shift in paradigm toward clinical usage of contrast media with lower iodine concentrations (eg, 240 mg iodine/mL) in individual tailored contrast protocols. The use of low–iodine concentration contrast media is desirable because of the lower viscosity and the resulting lower injection pressure.

Performance of angiographic, electrocardiographic and MRI methods to assess the area at risk in acute myocardial infarction

Objective Validation of methods to assess the area at risk (AAR) in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction is limited. A study was undertaken to test different AAR methods using established physiological concepts to provide a reference standard. Main outcome measured In 78 reperfused patients with first ST elevation myocardial infarction, AAR was measured by electrocardiographic (Aldrich), angiographic (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI), APPROACH) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance methods (T2-weighted hyperintensity and delayed enhanced endocardial surface area (ESA)). The following established physiological concepts were used to evaluate the AAR methods: (1) AAR size is always ≥ infarct size (IS); (2) in transmural infarcts AAR size=IS; (3) correlation between AAR size and IS increases as infarct transmurality increases; and (4) myocardial salvage ((AAR-IS)/AAR×100) is inversely related to infarct transmurality. Results Overall, 65%, 87%, 76%, 87% and 97% of patients using the Aldrich, BARI, APPROACH, T2-weighted hyperintensity and ESA methods obeyed the concept that AAR size is ≥IS. In patients with transmural infarcts (n=22), Bland–Altman analysis showed poor agreement (wide 95% limits of agreement) between AAR size and IS for the BARI, Aldrich and APPROACH methods (95% CI −22.9 to 29.6, 95% CI −28.3 to 21.3 and 95% CI −16.9 to 20.0, respectively) and better agreement for T2-weighted hyperintensity and ESA (95% CI −6.9 to 16.6 and 95% CI −4.3 to 18.0, respectively). Increasing correlation between AAR size and IS with increasing infarct transmurality was observed for the APPROACH, T2-weighted hyperintensity and ESA methods, with ESA having the highest correlation (r=0.93, p<0.001). The percentage of patients within a narrow margin (±30%) of the inverse line of identity between salvage extent and infarct transmurality was 56%, 76%, 65%, 77% and 92% for the Aldrich, BARI, APPROACH, T2-weighted hyperintensity and ESA methods, respectively, where higher percentages represent better concordance with the concept that the extent of salvage should be inversely related to infarct transmurality. Conclusions For measuring AAR, cardiovascular magnetic resonance methods are better than angiographic methods, which are better than electrocardiographic methods. Overall, ESA performed best for measuring AAR in vivo.

Influence of Contrast Media Viscosity and Temperature on Injection Pressure in Computed Tomographic Angiography A Phantom Study

PurposeIodinated contrast media (CM) in computed tomographic angiography is characterized by its concentration and, consecutively, by its viscosity. Viscosity itself is directly influenced by temperature, which will furthermore affect injection pressure. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to systematically evaluate the viscosity of different CM at different temperatures and to assess their impact on injection pressure in a circulation phantom. Materials and MethodsInitially, viscosity of different contrast media concentrations (240, 300, 370, and 400 mgI/mL) was measured at different temperatures (20°C–40°C) with a commercially available viscosimeter. In the next step, a circulation phantom with physical conditions was used. Contrast media were prepared at different temperatures (20°C, 30°C, 37°C) and injected through a standard 18-gauge needle. All other relevant parameters were kept constant (iodine delivery rate, 1.9 g I/s; total amount of iodine, 15 g I). Peak flow rate (in milliliter per second) and injection pressure (psi) were monitored. Differences in significance were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). ResultsViscosities for iodinated CM of 240, 300, 370, and 400 mg I/mL at 20°C were 5.1, 9.1, 21.2, and 28.8 mPa.s, respectively, whereas, at 40°C, these were substantially lower (2.8, 4.4, 8.7, and 11.2 mPa.s). In the circulation phantom, mean (SD) peak pressures for CM of 240 mg I/mL at 20°C, 30°C, and 37°C were 107 (1.5), 95 (0.6), and 92 (2.1) psi; for CM of 300 mg I/mL, 119 (1.5), 104 (0.6), and 100 (3.6) psi; for CM of 370 mg I/mL, 150 (0.6), 133 (4.4), and 120 (3.5) psi; and for CM of 400 mg I/mL, 169 (1.0), 140 (2.1), and 135 (2.9) psi, respectively, with all P values less than 0.05. ConclusionsLow concentration, low viscosity, and high temperatures of CM are beneficial in terms of injection pressure. This should also be considered for individually tailored contrast protocols in daily routine scanning.

Coronary CT angiography using low concentrated contrast media injected with high flow rates: Feasible in clinical practice.

PURPOSE Aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that peak injection pressures and image quality using low concentrated contrast media (CM) (240 mg/mL) injected with high flow rates will be comparable to a standard injection protocol (CM: 300 mg/mL) in coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). MATERIAL AND METHODS One hundred consecutive patients were scanned on a 2nd generation dual-source CT scanner. Group 1 (n=50) received prewarmed Iopromide 240 mg/mL at an injection rate of 9 mL/s, followed by a saline chaser. Group 2 (n=50) received the standard injection protocol: prewarmed Iopromide 300 mg/mL; flow rate: 7.2 mL/s. For both protocols, the iodine delivery rate (IDR, 2.16 gI/s) and the total iodine load (22.5 gI) were kept identical. Injection pressure (psi) was continuously monitored by a data acquisition program. Contrast enhancement was measured in the thoracic aorta and all proximal and distal coronary segments. Subjective and objective image quality was evaluated between both groups. RESULTS No significant differences in peak injection pressures were found between both CM groups (121 ± 5.6 psi vs. 120 ± 5.3 psi, p=0.54). Flow rates of 9 mL/s were safely injected without any complications. No significant differences in contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and subjective image quality were found (all p>0.05). No significant differences in attenuation levels were found in the thoracic aorta and all segments of the coronary arteries (all p>0.05). CONCLUSION Usage of low iodine concentration CM and injection with high flow rates is feasible. High flow rates (9 mL/s) of Iopromide 240 were safely injected without complications and should not be considered a drawback in clinical practice. No significant differences in peak pressure and image quality were found. This creates a doorway towards applicability of a broad variety in flow rates and IDRs and subsequently more individually tailored injection protocols.

Computed Tomography Angiography With High Flow Rates An In Vitro and In Vivo Feasibility Study

ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to test high-flow application of contrast media (CM) using novel high-flow needles and to assess injection- and flow-related parameters in a circulation phantom and in an in vivo population. Materials and MethodsA circulation phantom simulating physiological parameters was used. Preheated CM (300 mg/mL) was injected at flow rates varying between 5 and 15 mL/s through a novel 18-gauge high-flow intravenous injection needle. In addition, feasibility of these high-flow needles was tested with administration of flow rates of 9 mL/s in 20 patients referred for pre–transcatheter aortic valve implantation assessment. Injection parameters (eg, peak pressures, peak flow rates) in both phantom and in vivo setup were continuously monitored by a data acquisition program. Attenuation at predefined levels of the aorta (eg, aortic root to common femoral arteries) was measured in all patients to determine clinical applicability. ResultsIn the phantom setup, injection rates up to 15 mL/s were feasible. An enhancement plateau was reached at 11 mL/s (464 [20] HU). In patients, no pressure- or flow-related complications (eg, extravasation) were recorded (mean [SD] peak pressure, 154 [8] psi; mean [SD] peak flow rate, 9.2 [0.1 mL/s; range, 9.1–9.6]). Diagnostic attenuation values were reached at all predefined levels of the aorta (330.8 [113.1] HU to 622.9 [81.5] HU). ConclusionsThese results indicate that injections with 9 mL/s using high-flow injection needles are safe. The pressure limit of 325 psi was not reached, and the injections resulted in diagnostic attenuation values. Using this dedicated needle, high flow rates should not be considered a drawback for CM application in routine CT angiography examinations.

Automated quantification of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) in coronary CT angiography; comparison with manual assessment and correlation with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is emerging as a risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the applicability and efficiency of automated EAT quantification. METHODS EAT volume was assessed both manually and automatically in 157 patients undergoing coronary CT angiography. Manual assessment consisted of a short-axis-based manual measurement, whereas automated assessment on both contrast and non-contrast-enhanced data sets was achieved through novel prototype software. Duration of both quantification methods was recorded, and EAT volumes were compared with paired samples t test. Correlation of volumes was determined with intraclass correlation coefficient; agreement was tested with Bland-Altman analysis. The association between EAT and CAD was estimated with logistic regression. RESULTS Automated quantification was significantly less time consuming than automated quantification (17 ± 2 seconds vs 280 ± 78 seconds; P < .0001). Although manual EAT volume differed significantly from automated EAT volume (75 ± 33 cm(³) vs 95 ± 45 cm(³); P < .001), a good correlation between both assessments was found (r = 0.76; P < .001). For all methods, EAT volume was positively associated with the presence of CAD. Stronger predictive value for the severity of CAD was achieved through automated quantification on both contrast-enhanced and non-contrast-enhanced data sets. CONCLUSION Automated EAT quantification is a quick method to estimate EAT and may serve as a predictor for CAD presence and severity.

Automated Tube Voltage Selection for Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Angiography Using Different Contrast Media Concentrations and a Constant Iodine Delivery Rate

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate radiation dose reduction using automated tube voltage selection during CT angiography (CTA) and to evaluate the impact of contrast medium (CM) injection protocols on dose reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS A circulation phantom containing the thoracic and abdominal vasculature was used. Four different concentrations of CM (iopromide 300 and 370 mg I/mL and iomeprol 350 and 400 mg I/mL) were administered while maintaining an identical iodine delivery rate (1.8 g I/s) and total iodine load (20.0 g). Three different scanning protocols for CTA of the thoracoabdominal aorta were used: protocol A, no dose modulation; protocol B, automated tube current modulation (CARE Dose4D); and protocol C, automated tube voltage selection (CARE kV). The dose-length product was recorded to calculate the effective dose. Attenuation values (in Hounsfield units), image noise levels, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in six predefined intravascular sites (three thoracic and three abdominal) were measured by two readers. All values were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and two-way ANOVA. RESULTS There was a significant reduction in the effective dose (in millisieverts) for protocols B (mean ± SD, 2.03 ± 0.1 mSv) and C (1.00 ± 0.0 mSv) compared with protocol A (4.34 ± 0.0 mSv). The dose was reduced by 53% for protocol B and by 77% for protocol C. No significant differences were found in the effective dose among the different CM injection protocols within the scanning protocols; all p values were > 0.05. The attenuation values and SNRs were comparable among all the different CM injection protocols; all p values were > 0.05. CONCLUSION A large radiation dose reduction (77%) can be achieved using automated tube voltage selection independent of the CM injection protocol.

Individualized CT Angiography Protocols for the Evaluation of the Aorta: A Feasibility Study

PURPOSE Ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast media are potential drawbacks to repetitive follow-up CT angiography in current practice. The aim of the present study was to optimize radiation dose and contrast agent volume by using individualized CT angiography protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty consecutive patients referred for CT angiography of the whole aorta were prospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into groups of patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 28 kg/m(2) (group 1; n = 50) and those with a BMI ≥ 28 kg/m(2) (group 2; n = 30). A control group consisted of 50 consecutive patients who were retrospectively evaluated. CT angiography parameters on a second-generation dual-source scanner were 128 × 0.6-mm collimation, pitch of 0.9, rotation time of 0.33 seconds, tube voltages of 80/100/120 kVp (group 1/group 2/control), reference tube current of 400 mA, and image reconstruction at 1-mm/0.8-mm slice thickness (kernels, B30f [control] and I30f/strength 3 [groups 1/2]). The control group received 120 mL of contrast agent (300 mgI/mL) at 4.8 mL/s; groups 1 and 2 received 44 mL and 53 mL at 3.3 mL/s and 4 mL/s, respectively. Effective dose was evaluated for each patient. Image quality was determined by qualitative image analysis at the levels of the thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic aorta as nondiagnostic, diagnostic, good, or excellent, and quantitative image analysis was performed, including attenuation values and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). RESULTS Mean effective radiation dose values for CT angiography of the aorta were 3.7 mSv ± 0.7 in group 1, 6.7 mSv ± 1.4 in group 2, and 8.7 mSv ± 1.9 in the control group (P < .001). Mean attenuation values and CNR levels were 334 HU ± 66 and 16 ± 8, respectively, in group 1, 277 HU ± 56 and 14 ± 5 in group 2, and 305 HU ± 77 and 11 ± 4 in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Iterative reconstruction algorithms resulted in 23%-57% less radiation in combination with 55%-63% less contrast agent volume compared with standard CT protocols.

Patient Comfort During Contrast Media Injection in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Using Varying Contrast Media Concentrations and Flow Rates: Results From the EICAR Trial.

PurposePain sensation and extravasation are potential drawbacks of contrast media (CM) injection during computed tomographic angiography. The purpose was to evaluate safety and patient comfort of higher flow rates in different CM protocols during coronary computed tomographic angiography. MethodsTwo hundred consecutive patients of a double-blind randomized controlled trial (NCT02462044) were analyzed. Patients were randomized to receive 94 mL of prewarmed iopromide 240 mg I/mL at 8.3 mL/s (group I), 75 mL of 300 mg I/mL at 6.7 mL/s (group II), or 61 mL of 370 mg I/mL at 5.4 mL/s (group III), respectively. Iodine delivery rate (2.0 g I/s) and total iodine load (22.5 g I) were kept identical. Outcome was defined as intravascular enhancement, patient comfort during injection, and injection safety, expressed as the occurrence of extravasation. Patients completed a questionnaire for comfort, pain, and stress during CM injection. Comfort was graded using a 5-point scale, 1 representing “very bad” and 5 “very well.” Pain was graded using a 10-point scale, 0 representing “no pain” and 10 “severe pain.” Stress was graded using a 5-point scale, 1 representing “no stress” and 5 “unsustainable stress.” ResultsMean enhancement levels within the coronary arteries were as follows: 437 ± 104 Hounsfield units (HU) (group I), 448 ± 111 HU (group II), and 447 ± 106 HU (group III), with P ≥ 0.18. Extravasation occurred in none of the patients. Median (interquartile range) for comfort, pain, and stress was, respectively, 4 (4–5), 0 (0–0), and 1 (1–2), with P ≥ 0.68. ConclusionsHigh flow rates of prewarmed CM were safely injected without discomfort, pain, or stress. Therefore, the use of high flow rates should not be considered a drawback for CM administration in clinical practice.

The relationships between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging variables of acute myocardial infarction and both left ventricular dysfunction and immediate postreperfusion ST segment recovery

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to explore the relationships between cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)-determined variables of acute myocardial infarction and both left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and immediate postreperfusion ST segment recovery. METHODS In 79 patients with first acute myocardial infarction, 8 different ST segment recovery (STR) variables were measured 30 and 60 minutes after percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging was performed 5 ± 2 and 104 ± 11 days after admission. Using k-means cluster analysis, 3 CMR risk groups for LV dysfunction (low LV ejection fraction at baseline and follow-up) were identified based on combinations of infarct size (IS), infarct transmurality, and microvascular obstruction. Stepwise discriminant analysis was used to determine which STR variable best discriminated between CMR risk groups. RESULTS Baseline LV ejection fraction improved in all groups but remained lowest in the high-risk group (41% ± 7% and 44% ± 6%), as compared with the intermediate (51% ± 5% and 56% ± 5%) and low-risk groups (56% ± 7% and 58% ± 5%). Infarct size was significantly different among the groups (34% ± 5%, 19% ± 4%, and 6% ± 4%; P < .001) and mainly determined the effect on LV dysfunction. Of all STR variables, worst lead residual ST deviation 30 minutes after reperfusion accurately discriminated between the high- and combined low-/intermediate risk groups. CONCLUSION Worst lead residual ST deviation 30 minutes after reperfusion allows accurate identification of patients at high risk for LV dysfunction, which was mainly related to IS rather than transmurality or microvascular obstruction.