Madeleine Kok

Influence of Contrast Media Viscosity and Temperature on Injection Pressure in Computed Tomographic Angiography A Phantom Study

PurposeIodinated contrast media (CM) in computed tomographic angiography is characterized by its concentration and, consecutively, by its viscosity. Viscosity itself is directly influenced by temperature, which will furthermore affect injection pressure. Therefore, the purposes of this study were to systematically evaluate the viscosity of different CM at different temperatures and to assess their impact on injection pressure in a circulation phantom. Materials and MethodsInitially, viscosity of different contrast media concentrations (240, 300, 370, and 400 mgI/mL) was measured at different temperatures (20°C–40°C) with a commercially available viscosimeter. In the next step, a circulation phantom with physical conditions was used. Contrast media were prepared at different temperatures (20°C, 30°C, 37°C) and injected through a standard 18-gauge needle. All other relevant parameters were kept constant (iodine delivery rate, 1.9 g I/s; total amount of iodine, 15 g I). Peak flow rate (in milliliter per second) and injection pressure (psi) were monitored. Differences in significance were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis test (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). ResultsViscosities for iodinated CM of 240, 300, 370, and 400 mg I/mL at 20°C were 5.1, 9.1, 21.2, and 28.8 mPa.s, respectively, whereas, at 40°C, these were substantially lower (2.8, 4.4, 8.7, and 11.2 mPa.s). In the circulation phantom, mean (SD) peak pressures for CM of 240 mg I/mL at 20°C, 30°C, and 37°C were 107 (1.5), 95 (0.6), and 92 (2.1) psi; for CM of 300 mg I/mL, 119 (1.5), 104 (0.6), and 100 (3.6) psi; for CM of 370 mg I/mL, 150 (0.6), 133 (4.4), and 120 (3.5) psi; and for CM of 400 mg I/mL, 169 (1.0), 140 (2.1), and 135 (2.9) psi, respectively, with all P values less than 0.05. ConclusionsLow concentration, low viscosity, and high temperatures of CM are beneficial in terms of injection pressure. This should also be considered for individually tailored contrast protocols in daily routine scanning.

Coronary CT angiography using low concentrated contrast media injected with high flow rates: Feasible in clinical practice.

PURPOSE Aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that peak injection pressures and image quality using low concentrated contrast media (CM) (240 mg/mL) injected with high flow rates will be comparable to a standard injection protocol (CM: 300 mg/mL) in coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). MATERIAL AND METHODS One hundred consecutive patients were scanned on a 2nd generation dual-source CT scanner. Group 1 (n=50) received prewarmed Iopromide 240 mg/mL at an injection rate of 9 mL/s, followed by a saline chaser. Group 2 (n=50) received the standard injection protocol: prewarmed Iopromide 300 mg/mL; flow rate: 7.2 mL/s. For both protocols, the iodine delivery rate (IDR, 2.16 gI/s) and the total iodine load (22.5 gI) were kept identical. Injection pressure (psi) was continuously monitored by a data acquisition program. Contrast enhancement was measured in the thoracic aorta and all proximal and distal coronary segments. Subjective and objective image quality was evaluated between both groups. RESULTS No significant differences in peak injection pressures were found between both CM groups (121 ± 5.6 psi vs. 120 ± 5.3 psi, p=0.54). Flow rates of 9 mL/s were safely injected without any complications. No significant differences in contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and subjective image quality were found (all p>0.05). No significant differences in attenuation levels were found in the thoracic aorta and all segments of the coronary arteries (all p>0.05). CONCLUSION Usage of low iodine concentration CM and injection with high flow rates is feasible. High flow rates (9 mL/s) of Iopromide 240 were safely injected without complications and should not be considered a drawback in clinical practice. No significant differences in peak pressure and image quality were found. This creates a doorway towards applicability of a broad variety in flow rates and IDRs and subsequently more individually tailored injection protocols.

Computed Tomography Angiography With High Flow Rates An In Vitro and In Vivo Feasibility Study

ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to test high-flow application of contrast media (CM) using novel high-flow needles and to assess injection- and flow-related parameters in a circulation phantom and in an in vivo population. Materials and MethodsA circulation phantom simulating physiological parameters was used. Preheated CM (300 mg/mL) was injected at flow rates varying between 5 and 15 mL/s through a novel 18-gauge high-flow intravenous injection needle. In addition, feasibility of these high-flow needles was tested with administration of flow rates of 9 mL/s in 20 patients referred for pre–transcatheter aortic valve implantation assessment. Injection parameters (eg, peak pressures, peak flow rates) in both phantom and in vivo setup were continuously monitored by a data acquisition program. Attenuation at predefined levels of the aorta (eg, aortic root to common femoral arteries) was measured in all patients to determine clinical applicability. ResultsIn the phantom setup, injection rates up to 15 mL/s were feasible. An enhancement plateau was reached at 11 mL/s (464 [20] HU). In patients, no pressure- or flow-related complications (eg, extravasation) were recorded (mean [SD] peak pressure, 154 [8] psi; mean [SD] peak flow rate, 9.2 [0.1 mL/s; range, 9.1–9.6]). Diagnostic attenuation values were reached at all predefined levels of the aorta (330.8 [113.1] HU to 622.9 [81.5] HU). ConclusionsThese results indicate that injections with 9 mL/s using high-flow injection needles are safe. The pressure limit of 325 psi was not reached, and the injections resulted in diagnostic attenuation values. Using this dedicated needle, high flow rates should not be considered a drawback for CM application in routine CT angiography examinations.

Automated Tube Voltage Selection for Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Angiography Using Different Contrast Media Concentrations and a Constant Iodine Delivery Rate

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to systematically investigate radiation dose reduction using automated tube voltage selection during CT angiography (CTA) and to evaluate the impact of contrast medium (CM) injection protocols on dose reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS A circulation phantom containing the thoracic and abdominal vasculature was used. Four different concentrations of CM (iopromide 300 and 370 mg I/mL and iomeprol 350 and 400 mg I/mL) were administered while maintaining an identical iodine delivery rate (1.8 g I/s) and total iodine load (20.0 g). Three different scanning protocols for CTA of the thoracoabdominal aorta were used: protocol A, no dose modulation; protocol B, automated tube current modulation (CARE Dose4D); and protocol C, automated tube voltage selection (CARE kV). The dose-length product was recorded to calculate the effective dose. Attenuation values (in Hounsfield units), image noise levels, and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in six predefined intravascular sites (three thoracic and three abdominal) were measured by two readers. All values were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and two-way ANOVA. RESULTS There was a significant reduction in the effective dose (in millisieverts) for protocols B (mean ± SD, 2.03 ± 0.1 mSv) and C (1.00 ± 0.0 mSv) compared with protocol A (4.34 ± 0.0 mSv). The dose was reduced by 53% for protocol B and by 77% for protocol C. No significant differences were found in the effective dose among the different CM injection protocols within the scanning protocols; all p values were > 0.05. The attenuation values and SNRs were comparable among all the different CM injection protocols; all p values were > 0.05. CONCLUSION A large radiation dose reduction (77%) can be achieved using automated tube voltage selection independent of the CM injection protocol.

Individualized CT Angiography Protocols for the Evaluation of the Aorta: A Feasibility Study

PURPOSE Ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast media are potential drawbacks to repetitive follow-up CT angiography in current practice. The aim of the present study was to optimize radiation dose and contrast agent volume by using individualized CT angiography protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty consecutive patients referred for CT angiography of the whole aorta were prospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into groups of patients with a body mass index (BMI) < 28 kg/m(2) (group 1; n = 50) and those with a BMI ≥ 28 kg/m(2) (group 2; n = 30). A control group consisted of 50 consecutive patients who were retrospectively evaluated. CT angiography parameters on a second-generation dual-source scanner were 128 × 0.6-mm collimation, pitch of 0.9, rotation time of 0.33 seconds, tube voltages of 80/100/120 kVp (group 1/group 2/control), reference tube current of 400 mA, and image reconstruction at 1-mm/0.8-mm slice thickness (kernels, B30f [control] and I30f/strength 3 [groups 1/2]). The control group received 120 mL of contrast agent (300 mgI/mL) at 4.8 mL/s; groups 1 and 2 received 44 mL and 53 mL at 3.3 mL/s and 4 mL/s, respectively. Effective dose was evaluated for each patient. Image quality was determined by qualitative image analysis at the levels of the thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic aorta as nondiagnostic, diagnostic, good, or excellent, and quantitative image analysis was performed, including attenuation values and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). RESULTS Mean effective radiation dose values for CT angiography of the aorta were 3.7 mSv ± 0.7 in group 1, 6.7 mSv ± 1.4 in group 2, and 8.7 mSv ± 1.9 in the control group (P < .001). Mean attenuation values and CNR levels were 334 HU ± 66 and 16 ± 8, respectively, in group 1, 277 HU ± 56 and 14 ± 5 in group 2, and 305 HU ± 77 and 11 ± 4 in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Iterative reconstruction algorithms resulted in 23%-57% less radiation in combination with 55%-63% less contrast agent volume compared with standard CT protocols.

Patient Comfort During Contrast Media Injection in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Using Varying Contrast Media Concentrations and Flow Rates: Results From the EICAR Trial.

PurposePain sensation and extravasation are potential drawbacks of contrast media (CM) injection during computed tomographic angiography. The purpose was to evaluate safety and patient comfort of higher flow rates in different CM protocols during coronary computed tomographic angiography. MethodsTwo hundred consecutive patients of a double-blind randomized controlled trial (NCT02462044) were analyzed. Patients were randomized to receive 94 mL of prewarmed iopromide 240 mg I/mL at 8.3 mL/s (group I), 75 mL of 300 mg I/mL at 6.7 mL/s (group II), or 61 mL of 370 mg I/mL at 5.4 mL/s (group III), respectively. Iodine delivery rate (2.0 g I/s) and total iodine load (22.5 g I) were kept identical. Outcome was defined as intravascular enhancement, patient comfort during injection, and injection safety, expressed as the occurrence of extravasation. Patients completed a questionnaire for comfort, pain, and stress during CM injection. Comfort was graded using a 5-point scale, 1 representing “very bad” and 5 “very well.” Pain was graded using a 10-point scale, 0 representing “no pain” and 10 “severe pain.” Stress was graded using a 5-point scale, 1 representing “no stress” and 5 “unsustainable stress.” ResultsMean enhancement levels within the coronary arteries were as follows: 437 ± 104 Hounsfield units (HU) (group I), 448 ± 111 HU (group II), and 447 ± 106 HU (group III), with P ≥ 0.18. Extravasation occurred in none of the patients. Median (interquartile range) for comfort, pain, and stress was, respectively, 4 (4–5), 0 (0–0), and 1 (1–2), with P ≥ 0.68. ConclusionsHigh flow rates of prewarmed CM were safely injected without discomfort, pain, or stress. Therefore, the use of high flow rates should not be considered a drawback for CM administration in clinical practice.

Contrast Enhancement of the Right Ventricle during Coronary CT Angiography--Is It Necessary?

Purpose It is unclear if prolonged contrast media injection, to improve right ventricular visualization during coronary CT angiography, leads to increased detection of right ventricle pathology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate right ventricle enhancement and subsequent detection of right ventricle disease during coronary CT angiography. Materials and Methods 472 consecutive patients referred for screening coronary CT angiography were retrospectively evaluated. Every patient underwent multidetector-row CT of the coronary arteries: 128x 0.6mm coll., 100-120kV, rot. time 0.28s, ref. mAs 350 and received an individualized (P3T) contrast bolus injection of iodinated contrast medium (300 mgI/ml). Patient data were analyzed to assess right ventricle enhancement (HU) and right ventricle pathology. Image quality was defined good when right ventricle enhancement >200HU, moderate when 140-200HU and poor when <140HU. Results Good image quality was found in 372 patients, moderate in 80 patients and poor in 20 patients. Mean enhancement of the right ventricle cavity was 268HU±102. Patients received an average bolus of 108±24 ml at an average peak flow rate of 6.1±2.2 ml/s. In only three out of 472 patients (0.63%) pathology of the right ventricle was found (dilatation) No other right ventricle pathology was detected. Conclusion Right ventricle pathology was detected in three out of 472 patients; the dilatation observed in these three cases may have been picked up even without dedicated enhancement of the right ventricle. Based on our findings, right ventricle enhancement can be omitted during screening coronary CT angiography.