Caterina Ferraro
OSI Pharmaceuticals
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Caterina Ferraro.
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry | 2017
Andrew P. Crew; Kanak Raina; Hanqing Dong; Yimin Qian; Jing Wang; Dominico Vigil; Yevgeniy V. Serebrenik; Brian D. Hamman; Alicia Morgan; Caterina Ferraro; Kam W. Siu; Taavi K. Neklesa; James D. Winkler; Kevin Coleman; Craig M. Crews
Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are bifunctional molecules that recruit an E3 ligase to a target protein to facilitate ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of that protein. While the field of targeted degraders is still relatively young, the potential for this modality to become a differentiated and therapeutic reality is strong, such that both academic and pharmaceutical institutions are now entering this interesting area of research. In this article, we describe a broadly applicable process for identifying degrader hits based on the serine/threonine kinase TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and have generalized the key structural elements associated with degradation activities. Compound 3i is a potent hit (TBK1 DC50 = 12 nM, Dmax = 96%) with excellent selectivity against a related kinase IKKε, which was further used as a chemical tool to assess TBK1 as a target in mutant K-Ras cancer cells.
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters | 2013
Arno G. Steinig; An-Hu Li; Jing Wang; Xin Chen; Hanqing Dong; Caterina Ferraro; Meizhong Jin; Mridula Kadalbajoo; Andrew Kleinberg; Kathryn M. Stolz; Paula A. Tavares-Greco; Ti Wang; Mark Albertella; Yue Peng; Linda Crew; Jennifer Kahler; Julie Kan; Ryan Schulz; Andy Cooke; Mark Bittner; Roy Turton; Maryland Franklin; Prafulla C. Gokhale; Darla Landfair; Christine Mantis; Jen Workman; Robert Wild; Jonathan A. Pachter; David M. Epstein; Mark J. Mulvihill
A series of novel 6-aminofuro[3,2-c]pyridines as kinase inhibitors is described, most notably, OSI-296 (6). We discuss our exploration of structure-activity relationships and optimization leading to OSI-296 and disclose its pharmacological activity against cMET and RON in cellular assays. OSI-296 is a potent and selective inhibitor of cMET and RON kinases that shows in vivo efficacy in tumor xenografts models upon oral dosing and is well tolerated.
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2015
James D. Winkler; Meizhong Jin; Andy P. Crew; AnnMarie K. Rossi; Ryan R. Willard; Hanqing Dong; Kam W. Siu; Jing Wang; Deborah A. Gordon; Xin Chen; Caterina Ferraro; Craig M. Crews; Kevin Coleman; Taavi K. Neklesa
Patients with prostate cancer who progress on therapy often have enhanced Androgen Receptor (AR) signaling due to several mechanisms: increased androgen production, increased AR expression, and/or specific AR mutations that render current therapies ineffective. A novel approach to block AR signaling is to specifically target AR for degradation. To do this, we have created AR PROTACs (PROtein-TArgeting Chimeras), bi-functional molecules that have an AR binding moiety on one end and an E3 ligase-recruiting element on the other end, which leads to AR ubiquitination and degradation. We have applied this technology to determine whether it could address mechanisms of resistance to current therapy in prostate cancer models. Our lead AR PROTAC, ARV-330, degrades AR in LNCaP and VCaP cells with 50% degradation concentrations (DC50s) 80% after sc injection. Treatment of mice with ARV-330, at doses ranging from 0.3 to 10 mg/kg, resulted in reduction of AR protein levels and prostate involution in normal mice and, in mice implanted with VCaP tumors, reduction in plasma PSA and blockade of tumor growth. In summary, the AR PROTAC ARV-330 removes AR from prostate cancer cells in a potent manner and produces therapeutic effects as a result. This cellular efficacy has translated into biomarker activity and efficacy in animal models, and ARV-330 is now in preclinical development. Thus, targeted degradation of AR may provide a novel mechanism for providing efficacious therapy for patients with prostate cancer for whom current therapies have failed. Citation Format: James D. Winkler, Meizhong Jin, Andy P. Crew, AnnMarie K. Rossi, Ryan R. Willard, Hanqing Dong, Kam Siu, Jing Wang, Deborah A. Gordon, Xin Chen, Caterina Ferraro, Craig M. Crews, Kevin Coleman, Taavi K. Neklesa. ARV-330: An androgen receptor PROTAC degrader for prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr PR08.
Cancer Research | 2015
Meizhong Jin; James D. Winkler; Kevin Coleman; Andrew P. Crew; AnnMarie K. Rossi; Ryan R. Willard; Hanqing Dong; Kam W. Siu; Jing Wang; Deborah A. Gordon; Xin Chen; Caterina Ferraro; Craig M. Crews; Taavi K. Neklesa
Progression of prostate cancer in patients treated with anti-androgen therapy usually involves several mechanisms of enhanced Androgen Receptor (AR) signaling, including increased intratumoral androgen synthesis, increased AR expression and AR mutations. We have developed a protein degradation technology called PROTACs (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera), which uses bi-functional molecules that simultaneously bind a target of choice and an E3 ligase. PROTACs, via induced proximity, cause ubiquitination and degradation of the targeted, pathological protein. As opposed to traditional target inhibition, which is a competitive process, degradation is a progressive process. As such, it is less susceptible to increases in endogenous ligand, target expression, or mutations in the target. Thus this technology seems ideal for addressing the mechanisms of AR resistance in patients with prostate cancer. AR PROTACs were shown to degrade AR in LNCaP and VCaP cells, with low nM to pM potency, and had a >85% reduction in AR concentration (Dmax). Degradation was rapid, with 50% of AR lost within 15 minutes and maximal degradation observed by 4 hours. The degradation process in cells was specific, as the PROTAC activity can be competed with excess E3 ligand and PROTACs with an inactive epimer for E3 ligase binding did not degrade AR. AR PROTACs induced rapid apoptosis and cell death in VCaP cells. In LNCap and VCaP cell systems, AR PROTACs were anti-proliferative under conditions in which enzalutamide was inactive, such as increasing concentrations of the AR agonist R1881 and cells containing the ARF876L mutation. AR PROTACs typically exhibited good pharmacokinetic properties, with t1/2 values of several hours and bioavailability of >50% after ip or sc injection. In mice, AR PROTACs demonstrate in vivo activity, including reduction of AR protein levels, prostate involution and tumor growth inhibition. In summary, PROTACs designed to degrade AR are potent, specific, active in vitro and in vivo, and have cellular efficacy superior to enzalutamide. Targeted degradation of AR may provide a novel mechanism for providing efficacious therapy for patients with prostate cancer for whom current therapies have failed. Citation Format: Meizhong Jin, James D. Winkler, Kevin Coleman, Andrew P. Crew, AnnMarie K. Rossi, Ryan R. Willard, Hanqing Dong, Kam Siu, Jing Wang, Deborah A. Gordon, Xin Chen, Caterina Ferraro, Craig M. Crews, Taavi K. Neklesa. Targeted degradation of the androgen receptor in prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-097. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-LB-097
Archive | 2011
Andrew P. Crew; Hanqing Dong; Caterina Ferraro; Dan Sherman; Kam W. Siu
Archive | 2010
Rama Devi Appari; Xin Chen; Ramesh Chilukuri; Andrew P. Crew; Hanqing Dong; Caterina Ferraro; Kenneth Foreman; Ramesh C. Gupta; An Hu Li; Dan Sherman; Kathryn M. Stolz; Brian Volk; Robert Zahler
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Taavi K. Neklesa; Lawrence Snyder; Ryan R. Willard; Nicholas Vitale; Kanak Raina; Jennifer Pizzano; Deborah A. Gordon; Mark Bookbinder; Jennifer Macaluso; Hanqing Dong; Zheng Liu; Caterina Ferraro; Gan Wang; Jing Wang; Craig M. Crews; John Houston; Andrew P. Crew; Ian Taylor
Archive | 2016
Meizhong Jin; Andrew Philip Crew; Hanqing Dong; Jing Wang; Kam W. Siu; Caterina Ferraro; Xin Chen; Yimin Qian
Cancer Research | 2018
Taavi K. Neklesa; Lawrence Snyder; Ryan R. Willard; Nicholas Vitale; Kanak Raina; Jennifer Pizzano; Deborah M. Gordon; Mark Bookbinder; Jennifer Macaluso; Hanqing Dong; Zheng Liu; Caterina Ferraro; Gan Wang; Jing Wang; Craig M. Crews; John Houston; Andrew P. Crew; Ian Taylor
Archive | 2016
Andrew Philip Crew; Jing Wang; Hanqing Dong; Yimin Qian; Kam W. Siu; Caterina Ferraro; Craig M. Crews