Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Catherine Bonvoisin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Catherine Bonvoisin.


Transplantation | 2008

Polyomavirus in renal transplantation: a hot problem.

Catherine Bonvoisin; Laurent Weekers; Patricia Xhignesse; Stéphanie Grosch; Miroslav Milicevic; Jean-Marie Krzesinski

Polyomavirus BK has emerged as an important complication after kidney transplantation. Although, BK nephropathy develops in only 1% to 5% of renal transplant recipients, its prognosis when present is very poor. The most accepted risk factor is the level of immunosuppressive treatment, but the serostatus of donor and recipient and the absence of human leukocyte antigen C7 in donor and/or recipient influence the BK virus (BKV) reactivation. The gold standard in diagnosing BKV nephropathy (BKVN) continues to be biopsy with use of immunohistochemistry for large T antigens. Urinary decoy cells and blood BKV DNA polymerase chain reaction are used in the screening, but their positive predictive values are poor. However, their use as predictors of the evolution of BKVN is more valuable. The reduction of immunosuppressive therapy currently represents the first-line treatment for BKVN. Cidofovir and leflunomide can be used when BKVN continues to progress. In the event of graft loss, retransplantation is possible with a low risk of recurrence when the infection is no longer active.


Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2014

Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in conditions of renal ischaemia/reperfusion

Pauline Erpicum; Olivier Detry; Laurent Weekers; Catherine Bonvoisin; Chantal Lechanteur; Alexandra Briquet; Yves Beguin; Jean-Marie Krzesinski; François Jouret

Acute kidney injury (AKI) represents a worldwide public health issue of increasing incidence, with a significant morbi-mortality. AKI treatment mostly relies on supportive manoeuvres in the absence of specific target-oriented therapy. The pathophysiology of AKI commonly involves ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) events, which cause both immune and metabolic consequences in renal tissue. Similarly, at the time of kidney transplantation (KT), I/R is an unavoidable event which contributes to early graft dysfunction and enhanced graft immunogenicity. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) represent a heterogeneous population of adult, fibroblast-like multi-potent cells characterized by their ability to differentiate into tissues of mesodermal lineages. Because MSC have demonstrated immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory and tissue repair properties, MSC administration at the time of I/R and/or at later times has been hypothesized to attenuate AKI severity and to accelerate the regeneration process. Furthermore, MSC in KT could help prevent both I/R injury and acute rejection, thereby increasing graft function and survival. In this review, summarizing the encouraging observations in animal models and in pilot clinical trials, we outline the benefit of MSC therapy in AKI and KT, and envisage their putative role in renal ischaemic conditioning.


Transplantation Proceedings | 2010

Results of Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death

Hieu Ledinh; Catherine Bonvoisin; Laurent Weekers; A. De Roover; Pierre Honore; Jean-Paul Squifflet; M. Meurisse; Olivier Detry

Confronting the organ donor shortage, many transplant centers around the world increasingly use donors after cardiac death (DCD). Over the past 20 years, follow-up studies in kidney recipients comparing DCD and donors after brain death (DBD) have shown comparable long-term graft function and survival. As a consequence, DCD programs should be continued and expanded, for these donors constitute a potential solution to the imbalance between the numbers of end-stage kidney disease patients on waiting lists versus available kidney grafts. DCD kidneys do not necessarily signify suboptimal grafts; they may merit to be allocated the same as DBD grafts.


Transplant International | 2012

Results of kidney transplantation from controlled donors after cardio‐circulatory death: a single center experience

Hieu Ledinh; Laurent Weekers; Catherine Bonvoisin; Jean-Marie Krzesinski; Josée Monard; Arnaud De Roover; Jean-Paul Squifflet; Michel Meurisse; Olivier Detry

The aim of this study was to determine results of kidney transplantation (KT) from controlled donation after cardio‐circulatory death (DCD). Primary end‐points were graft and patient survival, and post‐transplant complications. The influence of delayed graft function (DGF) on graft survival and DGF risk factors were analyzed as secondary end‐points. This is a retrospective mono‐center review of a consecutive series of 59 DCD‐KT performed between 2005 and 2010. Overall graft survival was 96.6%, 94.6%, and 90.7% at 3 months, 1 and 3 years, respectively. Main cause of graft loss was patient’s death with a functioning graft. No primary nonfunction grafts. Renal graft function was suboptimal at hospital discharge, but nearly normalized at 3 months. DGF was observed in 45.6% of all DCD‐KT. DGF significantly increased postoperative length of hospitalization, but had no deleterious impact on graft function or survival. Donor body mass index ≥30 was the only donor factor that was found to significantly increase the risk of DGF (P < 0.05). Despite a higher rate of DGF, controlled DCD‐KT offers a valuable contribution to the pool of deceased donor kidney grafts, with comparable mid‐term results to those procured after brain death.


Transplantation proceedings | 2012

Delayed graft function does not harm the future of donation-after-cardiac death in kidney transplantation.

H. Le Dinh; Laurent Weekers; Catherine Bonvoisin; Jean-Marie Krzesinski; Josée Monard; A. De Roover; Jean-Paul Squifflet; M. Meurisse; Olivier Detry

INTRODUCTION Delayed graft function (DGF) occurs more frequently in kidney transplants from donation after cardiac death (DCD) than from donation after brain death (DBD). We investigated the effect of DGF on posttransplantation outcomes among grafts from controlled DCD kidneys. PATIENTS AND METHODS This single-center retrospective study recruited 80 controlled DCD kidneys transplanted from January 2005 to December 2011. Mean patient follow-up was 28.5 months. RESULTS There were no primary nonfunction grafts; the DGF rate was 35.5%. Overall graft survival rates between groups with versus without DGF were 92.4% and 95.2% at 1 year, 92.4% and 87.1% at 3 years, and 84.7% and 87.1% at 5 years, respectively (P = not significant (NS)). Patients with versus without DGF showed the same survival rates at the corresponding time 92.4% vs 97.2%, 92.4% vs 93.9%, and 84.7% vs 93.9% (P = NS). Estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in the DGF compared with the non-DGF group at hospital discharge (29 vs 42 mL/min; P = .00) and at 6 months posttransplantation (46 vs 52 mL/min; P = .04), but the difference disappeared thereafter: 47 vs 52 mL/min at 1 year, 50 vs 48 mL/min at 3 years, and 54 vs 53 mL/min at 5 years (P = NS). DGF did not increase the risk of an acute rejection episode (29.6% vs 30.6%; P = NS) or rate of surgical complications (33.3% vs 26.5%; P = NS). However, DGF prolonged significantly the length of hospitalization in the DGF versus the non- DGF group (18.9 vs 13 days; P = .00). Donor body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m(2), recipient BMI ≥30 kg/m(2), and pretransplantation dialysis duration increased the risk of DGF upon multivariate logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS Apart from the longer hospital stay, DGF had no deleterious impact on the future of kidney allografts from controlled DCD, which showed comparable graft and patient survivals, renal function, rejection rates, and surgical complications as a group without DGF. Therefore, DGF should no longer be considered to be a medical barrier to the use of kidney grafts from controlled DCD.


Transplantation Proceedings | 2010

Contribution of Donors After Cardiac Death to the Deceased Donor Pool: 2002 to 2009 University of Liege Experience

Hieu Ledinh; Nicolas Meurisse; Marie-Hélène Delbouille; Josée Monard; Marie-France Hans; Catherine Bonvoisin; Laurent Weekers; Jean Joris; A. Kaba; Séverine Lauwick; Pierre Damas; François Damas; Bernard Lambermont; Laurent Kohnen; Arnaud Deroover; Pierre Honore; Jean-Paul Squifflet; M. Meurisse; Olivier Detry

OBJECTIVE In this study, we have evaluated the organ procurement and transplantation activity from donors after cardiac death (DCD) at our institution over an 8-year period. Our aim was to determine whether this program influenced transplantation programs, or donation after brain death (DBD) activity. METHODS We prospectively collected our procurement and transplantation statistics in a database for retrospective review. RESULTS We observed an increasing trend in potential and actual DCD number. The mean conversion rate turning potential into effective donors was 58.1%. DCD accounted for 16.6% of the deceased donor (DD) pool over 8 years. The mean age for effective DCD donors was 53.9 years (range, 3-79). Among the effective donors, 63.3% (n = 31) came from the transplant center and 36.7% (n = 18) were referred from collaborative hospitals. All donors were Maastricht III category. The number of kidney and liver transplants using DCD sources tended to increase. DCD kidney transplants represented 10.8% of the DD kidney pool and DCD liver transplants made up 13.9% of the DD liver pool over 8 years. The DBD program activity increased in the same time period. In 2009, 17 DCD and 33 DBD procurements were performed in a region with a little >1 million inhabitants. CONCLUSION The establishment of a DCD program in our institution enlarged the donor pool and did not compromise the development of the DBD program. In our experience, DCD are a valuable source for abdominal organ transplantation.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2016

Fluorodeoxyglucose F(18) Positron Emission Tomography Coupled With Computed Tomography in Suspected Acute Renal Allograft Rejection.

Pierre Lovinfosse; Laurent Weekers; Catherine Bonvoisin; Christophe Bovy; Stéphanie Grosch; Jean-Marie Krzesinski; Roland Hustinx; François Jouret

Management of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with suspected acute rejection (AR) ultimately relies on kidney biopsy; however, noninvasive tests predicting nonrejection would help avoid unnecessary biopsy. AR involves recruitment of leukocytes avid for fluorodeoxyglucose F18 (18F‐FDG), thus 18F‐FDG positron emission tomography (PET) coupled with computed tomography (CT) may noninvasively distinguish nonrejection from AR. From January 2013 to February 2015, we prospectively performed 32 18F‐FDG PET/CT scans in 31 adult KTRs with suspected AR who underwent transplant biopsy. Biopsies were categorized into four groups: normal (n = 8), borderline (n = 10), AR (n = 8), or other (n = 6, including 3 with polyoma BK nephropathy). Estimated GFR was comparable in all groups. PET/CT was performed 201 ± 18 minutes after administration of 3.2 ± 0.2 MBq/kg of 18F‐FDG, before any immunosuppression change. Mean standard uptake values (SUVs) of both upper and lower renal poles were measured. Mean SUVs reached 1.5 ± 0.2, 1.6 ± 0.3, 2.9 ± 0.8, and 2.2 ± 1.2 for the normal, borderline, AR, and other groups, respectively. One‐way analysis of variance demonstrated a significant difference of mean SUVs among groups. A positive correlation between mean SUV and acute composite Banff score was found, with r2 = 0.49. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.93, with 100% sensitivity and 50% specificity using a mean SUV threshold of 1.6. In conclusion, 18F‐FDG PET/CT may help noninvasively prevent avoidable transplant biopsies in KTRs with suspected AR.


Transplantation Proceedings | 2014

A More Than 20% Increase in Deceased-Donor Organ Procurement and Transplantation Activity After the Use of Donation After Circulatory Death

H. Le Dinh; Josée Monard; Marie-Hélène Delbouille; Marie-France Hans; Laurent Weekers; Catherine Bonvoisin; Jean Joris; Séverine Lauwick; A. Kaba; Didier Ledoux; A. De Roover; Pierre Honore; Jean-Paul Squifflet; M. Meurisse; Olivier Detry

BACKGROUND Organ procurement and transplant activity from controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) was evaluated over an 11-year period to determine whether this program influenced the transplant and donation after brain death (DBD) activities. MATERIAL AND METHODS Deceased donor (DD) procurement and transplant data were prospectively collected in a local database for retrospective review. RESULTS There was an increasing trend in the potential and actual DCD numbers over time. DCD accounted for 21.9% of the DD pool over 11 years, representing 23.7% and 24.2% of the DD kidney and liver pool, respectively. The DBD retrieval and transplant activity increased during the same time period. Mean conversion rate turning potential into effective DCD donors was 47.3%. Mean DCD donor age was 54.6 years (range, 3-83). Donors ≥60 years old made up 44.1% of the DCD pool. Among referred donors, reasons for nondonation were medical contraindications (33.7%) and family refusals (19%). Mean organ yield per DCD donor was 2.3 organs. Mean total procurement warm ischemia time was 19.5 minutes (range, 6-39). In 2012, 17 DCD and 37 DBD procurements were performed in the Liege region, which has slightly >1 million inhabitants. CONCLUSIONS This DCD program implementation enlarged the DD pool and did not compromise the development of DBD programs. The potential DCD pool might be underused and seems to be a valuable organ donor source.


BMC Nephrology | 2012

Urinary and dietary sodium and potassium associated with blood pressure control in treated hypertensive kidney transplant recipients: an observational study

Annie Saint-Remy; Mélanie Somja; Karen Gellner; Laurent Weekers; Catherine Bonvoisin; Jean-Marie Krzesinski

BackgroundIn kidney transplant (Kt) recipients , hypertension is a major risk for cardiovascular complications but also for graft failure. Blood pressure (BP) control is therefore mandatory. Office BP (OBP) remains frequently used for clinical decisions, however home BP (HBP) have brought a significant improvement in the BP control. Sodium is a modifiable risk factor, many studies accounted for a decrease of BP with a sodium restricted diet. Increased potassium intake has been also recommended in hypertension management. Using an agreement between office and home BP, the present study investigated the relations between the BP control in Kt recipients and their urinary excretion and dietary consumption of sodium and potassium.MethodsThe BP control defined by OBP <140/90 mmHg and HBP <135/85 mmHg was tested in 70 Kt recipients (mean age 56 ± 11.5 years; mean graft survival 7 ± 6.6 years) treated with antihypertensive medications. OBP and HBP were measured with a validated oscillometric device (Omron M6®). The 24-hour urinary sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) excretions as well as dietary intakes were compared between controlled and uncontrolled (in office and at home) recipients. Non parametric Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney Test was used for between groups comparisons and Fishers exact test for frequencies comparisons. Pearson correlation coefficients and paired t-test were used when sample size was >30.ResultsUsing an agreement between OBP and HBP, we identified controlled (21%) and uncontrolled recipients (49%). Major confounding effects susceptible to interfere with the BP regulation did not differ between groups, the amounts of sodium excretion were similar (154 ± 93 vs 162 ± 88 mmol/24 h) but uncontrolled patients excreted less potassium (68 ± 14 vs 54 ± 20 mmol/24 h; P = 0.029) and had significantly lower potassium intakes (3279 ± 753 vs 2208 ± 720 mg/24 h; P = 0.009), associated with a higher urinary Na+/K + ratio. Systolic HBP was inversely and significantly correlated to urinary potassium (r = −0.48; P = 0.002), a positive but non significant relation was observed with urinary sodium (r = 0,30;P = 0.074).ConclusionsHalf of the treated hypertensive Kt recipients remained uncontrolled in office and at home. Restoring a well-balanced sodium/potassium ratio intakes could be a non pharmacological opportunity to improve blood pressure control.


Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation | 2016

The closure of arteriovenous fistula in kidney transplant recipients is associated with an acceleration of kidney function decline

Laurent Weekers; Pauline Vanderweckene; Hans Pottel; Diego Castanares-Zapatero; Catherine Bonvoisin; Etienne Hamoir; Sylvie Maweja; Jean-Marie Krzesinski; Pierre Delanaye; François Jouret

Background The creation of arteriovenous fistula (AVF) may retard chronic kidney disease progression in the general population. Conversely, the impact of AVF closure on renal function in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains unknown. Methods From 2007 to 2013, we retrospectively categorized 285 KTRs into three groups: no AVF (Group 0, n = 90), closed AVF (Group 1, n = 114) and left-open AVF (Group 2, n = 81). AVF closure occurred at 653 ± 441 days after kidney transplantation (KTx), with a thrombosis:ligation ratio of 19:95. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was determined using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. Linear mixed models calculated the slope and intercept of eGFR decline versus time, starting at 3 months post-KTx, with a median follow-up of 1807 days (95% confidence interval 1665–2028). Results The eGFR slope was less in Group 1 (−0.081 mL/min/month) compared with Group 0 (−0.183 mL/min/month; P = 0.03) or Group 2 (−0.164 mL/min/month; P = 0.09). Still, the eGFR slope significantly deteriorated after (−0.159 mL/min/month) versus before (0.038 mL/min/month) AVF closure (P = 0.03). Study periods before versus after AVF closure were balanced to a mean of 13.5 and 12.5 months, respectively, with at least 10 observations per patient (n = 99). Conclusions In conclusion, a significant acceleration of eGFR decline is observed over the 12 months following the closure of a functioning AVF in KTRs.

Collaboration


Dive into the Catherine Bonvoisin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge