Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Catherine Kaylor-Hughes is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Catherine Kaylor-Hughes.


Neurocase | 2008

Looking for truth and finding lies: The prospects for a nascent neuroimaging of deception

Sean A. Spence; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes

Lying is ubiquitous and has acquired many names. In ‘natural experiments’, both pathological lying and truthfulness implicate prefrontal cortices. Recently, the advent of functional neuroimaging has allowed investigators to study deception in the non-pathological state. Prefrontal cortices are again implicated, although the regions identified vary across experiments. Forensic application of such technology (to the detection of deceit) requires the solution of tractable technical problems. Whether we ‘should’ detect deception remains an ethical problem: one for societies to resolve. However, such a procedure would only appear to be ethical when subjects volunteer to participate, as might occur during the investigation of alleged miscarriages of justice. We demonstrate how this might be approached.


Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health | 2011

The functional anatomical distinction between truth telling and deception is preserved among people with schizophrenia

Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Sudheer T. Lankappa; Robert Fung; Alexandra Hope‐Urwin; Iain D. Wilkinson; Sean A. Spence

BACKGROUND A recently emergent functional neuroimaging literature has described the functional anatomical correlates of deception among healthy volunteers, most often implicating the ventrolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices. To date, there have been no such imaging studies of people with severe mental illness. AIMS To discover whether the brains of people with schizophrenia would manifest a similar functional anatomical distinction between the states of truthfulness and deceit. It is hypothesised that, as with healthy people, persons with schizophrenia will show activation in the ventrolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices when lying. METHOD Fifty-two people satisfying Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder-IV criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T while responding truthfully or with lies to questions concerning their recent actions. Half the sample was concurrently experiencing delusions. RESULTS As hypothesised, patients exhibited greater activity in ventrolateral prefrontal cortices while lying. Truthful responses were not associated with any areas of relatively increased activation. The presence or absence of delusions did not substantially affect these findings, although subtle laterality effects were discernible upon post hoc analyses. CONCLUSIONS As in healthy cohorts, the brains of people with schizophrenia exhibit a functional anatomical distinction between the states of truthfulness and deceit. Furthermore, this distinction pertains even in the presence of delusions.


BMC Psychiatry | 2010

Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder

Richard Morriss; Sarah Marttunnen; Anne Garland; Neil Nixon; Ruth McDonald; Tim Sweeney; Heather Flambert; Richard Fox; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Marilyn James; Min Yang

BackgroundAround 40 per cent of patients with unipolar depressive disorder who are treated in secondary care mental health services do not respond to first or second line treatments for depression. Such patients have 20 times the suicide rate of the general population and treatment response becomes harder to achieve and sustain the longer they remain depressed. Despite this there are no randomised controlled trials of community based service delivery interventions delivering both algorithm based pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for patients with chronic depressive disorder in secondary care mental health services who remain moderately or severely depressed after six months treatment. Without such trials evidence based guidelines on services for such patients cannot be derived.Methods/designSingle blind individually randomised controlled trial of a specialist depression disorder team (psychiatrist and psychotherapist jointly assessing and providing algorithm based drug and psychological treatment) versus usual secondary care treatment. We will recruit 174 patients with unipolar depressive disorder in secondary mental health services with a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score ≥ 16 and global assessment of function (GAF) ≤ 60 after ≥ 6 months treatment. The primary outcome measures will be the HDRS and GAF supplemented by economic analysis incuding the EQ5 D and analysis of barriers to care, implementation and the process of care. Audits to benchmark both treatment arms against national standards of care will aid the interpretation of the results of the study.DiscussionThis trial will be the first to assess the effectiveness and implementation of a community based specialist depression disorder team. The study has been specially designed as part of the CLAHRC Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Lincolnshire joint collaboration between university, health and social care organisations to provide information of direct relevance to decisions on commissioning, service provision and implementation.Trial registrationClinical trials.gov identifier NCT01047124


BMJ Open | 2014

Protocol investigating the clinical utility of an objective measure of activity and attention (QbTest) on diagnostic and treatment decision-making in children and young people with ADHD—‘Assessing QbTest Utility in ADHD’ (AQUA): a randomised controlled trial

Charlotte L. Hall; Gemma M. Walker; Althea Z. Valentine; Boliang Guo; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Marilyn James; David Daley; Kapil Sayal; Chris Hollis

Introduction The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) state that young people need to have access to the best evidence-based care to improve outcome. The current ‘gold standard’ ADHD diagnostic assessment combines clinical observation with subjective parent, teacher and self-reports. In routine practice, reports from multiple informants may be unavailable or contradictory, leading to diagnostic uncertainty and delay. The addition of objective tests of attention and activity may help reduce diagnostic uncertainty and delays in initiating treatment leading to improved outcomes. This trial investigates whether providing clinicians with an objective report of levels of attention, impulsivity and activity can lead to an earlier, and more accurate, clinical diagnosis and improved patient outcome. Methods and analysis This multisite randomised controlled trial will recruit young people (aged 6–17 years old) who have been referred for an ADHD diagnostic assessment at Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) and Community Paediatric clinics across England. Routine clinical assessment will be augmented by the QbTest, incorporating a continuous performance test (CPT) and infrared motion tracking of activity. The participant will be randomised into one of two study arms: QbOpen (clinician has immediate access to a QbTest report): QbBlind (report is withheld until the study end). Primary outcomes are time to diagnosis and diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes include clinicians diagnostic confidence and routine clinical outcome measures. Cost-effective analysis will be conducted, alongside a qualitative assessment of the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating QbTest in routine practice. Ethics and dissemination The findings from the study will inform commissioners, clinicians and managers about the feasibility, acceptability, clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of incorporating QbTest into routine diagnostic assessment of young people with ADHD. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. The study has received ethical approval. Trial registration number NCT02209116.


Neuropsychoanalysis | 2009

Toward a Cognitive Neurobiological Account of Free Association

Sean A. Spence; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Lisa Cooley; Russell D. Green; Iain D. Wilkinson; Randolph W. Parks; Mike D. Hunter

Free association has been central to psychoanalytic theory and practice for over a century, yet its physiology has largely been ignored. When viewed from a cognitive neurobiological perspective, the process resembles a minimally constrained executive task, one that might engage the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. To test this hypothesis, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to detect neural activity while subjects performed overt, vocal free association in the scanner. Twelve healthy subjects performed three active tasks—vocal free association, orthographic (letter) fluency, and semantic (category) fluency—alternating with a baseline condition, word repetition. Stimulus administration and overt response performance occurred during periods of scanner silence. Each subject was scanned three times, the order of conditions counterbalanced across scans. Statistical parametric mapping was used to perform a mixed-effects analysis of those images acquired. We found that, in common with both verbal fluency tasks, free association was accompanied by activation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Indeed, it elicited significantly greater activation in adjacent areas. The main effect of “task,” common to all three active conditions, revealed an extensive network of activation within executive brain regions (including bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices). While free association has been considered a probe of the “unconscious,” these data suggest that, early on in the process, under experiment conditions, this behavior engages components of the prefrontal executive (specifically, on the left). This finding points to a possible congruence between psychological accounts of “ego” function and neuropsychological accounts of a cognitive executive instantiated in prefrontal systems.


Journal of Affective Disorders | 2017

Factor structure and longitudinal measurement invariance of PHQ-9 for specialist mental health care patients with persistent major depressive disorder: Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling

Boliang Guo; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Anne Garland; Neil Nixon; Tim Sweeney; Sandra Simpson; Tim Dalgleish; Rajini Ramana; Min Yang; Richard Morriss

BACKGROUND The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a widely used instrument for measuring levels of depression in patients in clinical practice and academic research; its factor structure has been investigated in various samples, with limited evidence of measurement equivalence/invariance (ME/I) but not in patients with more severe depression of long duration. This study aims to explore the factor structure of the PHQ-9 and the ME/I between treatment groups over time for these patients. METHODS 187 secondary care patients with persistent major depressive disorder (PMDD) were recruited to a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with allocation to either a specialist depression team arm or a general mental health arm; their PHQ-9 score was measured at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Exploratory Structural Equational Modelling (ESEM) was performed to examine the factor structure for this specific patient group. ME/I between treatment arm at and across follow-up time were further explored by means of multiple-group ESEM approach using the best-fitted factor structure. RESULTS A two-factor structure was evidenced (somatic and affective factor). This two-factor structure had strong factorial invariance between the treatment groups at and across follow up times. LIMITATIONS Participants were largely white British in a RCT with 40% attrition potentially limiting the studys generalisability. Not all two-factor modelling criteria were met at every time-point. CONCLUSION PHQ-9 has a two-factor structure for PMDD patients, with strong measurement invariance between treatment groups at and across follow-up time, demonstrating its validity for RCTs and prospective longitudinal studies in chronic moderate to severe depression.


British Journal of Psychiatry Open | 2016

Protocol investigating the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of cognitive–behavioural therapy delivered remotely for unscheduled care users with health anxiety: randomised controlled trial

Shireen Patel; Samuel Malins; Boliang Guo; Marilyn James; Joe Kai; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Emma Rowley; David Smart; Michelle Stubley; Helen Tyrer; Richard Morriss

Background Health anxiety and medically unexplained symptoms cost the National Health Service (NHS) an estimated £3 billion per year in unnecessary costs with little evidence of patient benefit. Effective treatment is rarely taken up due to issues such as stigma or previous negative experiences with mental health services. An approach to overcome this might be to offer remotely delivered psychological therapy, which can be just as effective as face-to-face therapy and may be more accessible and suitable. Aims To investigate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of remotely delivered cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) to people with high health anxiety repeatedly accessing unscheduled care (trial registration: NCT02298036). Method A multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be undertaken in primary and secondary care providers of unscheduled care across the East Midlands. One hundred and forty-four eligible participants will be equally randomised to receive either remote CBT (6–12 sessions) or treatment as usual (TAU). Two doctoral research studies will investigate the barriers and facilitators to delivering the intervention and the factors contributing to the optimisation of therapeutic outcome. Results This trial will be the first to test the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of remotely delivered CBT for the treatment of high health anxiety. Conclusions The findings will enable an understanding as to how this intervention might fit into a wider care pathway to enhance patient experience of care. Declaration of interest None. Copyright and usage


JMIR Research Protocols | 2017

Direct to Public Peer Support and e-Therapy Program Versus Information to Aid Self-Management of Depression and Anxiety: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Mat Rawsthorne; Neil S. Coulson; Sandra Simpson; Lucy Simons; Boliang Guo; Marilyn James; Paul Moran; Chris Hollis; Anthony J Avery; Laila J Tata; Laura Williams; Richard Morriss

Background Regardless of geography or income, effective help for depression and anxiety only reaches a small proportion of those who might benefit from it. The scale of the problem suggests a role for effective, safe, anonymized public health–driven Web-based services such as Big White Wall (BWW), which offer immediate peer support at low cost. Objective Using Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) methodology, the aim of this study was to determine the population reach, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and barriers and drivers to implementation of BWW compared with Web-based information compiled by UK’s National Health Service (NHS, NHS Choices Moodzone) in people with probable mild to moderate depression and anxiety disorder. Methods A pragmatic, parallel-group, single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) is being conducted using a fully automated trial website in which eligible participants are randomized to receive either 6 months access to BWW or signposted to the NHS Moodzone site. The recruitment of 2200 people to the study will be facilitated by a public health engagement campaign involving general marketing and social media, primary care clinical champions, health care staff, large employers, and third sector groups. People will refer themselves to the study and will be eligible if they are older than 16 years, have probable mild to moderate depression or anxiety disorders, and have access to the Internet. Results The primary outcome will be the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale at 6 weeks. We will also explore the reach, maintenance, cost-effectiveness, and barriers and drivers to implementation and possible mechanisms of actions using a range of qualitative and quantitative methods. Conclusions This will be the first fully digital trial of a direct to public online peer support program for common mental disorders. The potential advantages of adding this to current NHS mental health services and the challenges of designing a public health campaign and RCT of two digital interventions using a fully automated digital enrollment and data collection process are considered for people with depression and anxiety. Trial Registration International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 12673428; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN12673428/12673428 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6uw6ZJk5a)


NeuroImage | 2008

Speaking of secrets and lies: The contribution of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to vocal deception

Sean A. Spence; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Tom F. D. Farrow; Iain D. Wilkinson


NeuroImage | 2011

Higher or lower? The functional anatomy of perceived allocentric social hierarchies

Tom F. D. Farrow; Sarah C. Jones; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Iain D. Wilkinson; Peter W. R. Woodruff; Michael D. Hunter; Sean A. Spence

Collaboration


Dive into the Catherine Kaylor-Hughes's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Boliang Guo

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marilyn James

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne Garland

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris Hollis

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Neil Nixon

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sandra Simpson

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge