Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Marilyn James is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Marilyn James.


British Journal of Surgery | 2004

Randomized clinical trial of the effects of preoperative and postoperative oral nutritional supplements on clinical course and cost of care

F. Smedley; T. Bowling; Marilyn James; Elizabeth A. Stokes; C. Goodger; O. O'Connor; C. Oldale; Peter Jones; D. Silk

Postoperative oral nutritional supplementation has been shown to be of clinical benefit. This study examined the clinical effects and cost of administration of oral supplements both before and after surgery.


BMJ | 2000

Cost effectiveness analysis of screening for sight threatening diabetic eye disease

Marilyn James; David Turner; Deborah Broadbent; Jiten Vora; Simon P. Harding

Abstract Objective: To measure the cost effectiveness of systematic photographic screening for sight threatening diabetic eye disease compared with existing practice. Design: Cost effectiveness analysis Setting: Liverpool. Subjects: A target population of 5000 diabetic patients invited for screening. Main outcome measures: Cost effectiveness (cost per true positive) of systematic and opportunistic programmes; incremental cost effectiveness of replacing opportunistic with systematic screening. Results: Baseline prevalence of sight threatening eye disease was 14.1%. The cost effectiveness of the systematic programme was £209 (sensitivity 89%, specificity 86%, compliance 80%, annual cost £104 996) and of the opportunistic programme was £289 (combined sensitivity 63%, specificity 92%, compliance 78%, annual cost £99 981). The incremental cost effectiveness of completely replacing the opportunistic programme was £32. Absolute values of cost effectiveness were highly sensitive to varying prevalence, sensitivity and specificity, compliance, and programme size. Conclusion: Replacing existing programmes with systematic screening for diabetic eye disease is justified.


Journal of Psychosomatic Research | 2001

Psychiatric status, somatisation, and health care utilization of frequent attenders at the emergency department: A comparison with routine attenders

Edwina Williams; Elspeth Guthrie; Kevin Mackway-Jones; Marilyn James; Barbara Tomenson; Joe Eastham; Deborah McNally

Seventy-seven frequent attenders at an emergency department (ED) in an inner-city hospital in the UK (defined as seven or more visits in the previous 12 months) were compared with 182 patients who were attending the same department on a routine basis. Patients completed the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) and the Short Form (SF)-36. Information was obtained on 64% of the frequent attenders and 45% underwent a detailed psychiatric assessment. Of the frequent attenders, 45% had psychiatric disorder and 49% had some form of an alcohol-related disorder. Compared with routine attenders, frequent attenders reported lower health status, had more psychiatric disorder (odds ratio: OR=8.2, 95% confidence interval: CI=3.8--18.1), had more general hospital admissions (OR=19.9, 95% CI=8.3--47.8), more psychiatric admissions (OR=167.5, 95% CI=9.5--2959.0), and more GP visits (95% CI for difference=-10.2 to -5.7). There was no evidence that frequent attenders had more somatisation than routine attenders. Specific treatment and management strategies need to be developed for this group of patients, although a substantial proportion may be difficult to engage in the treatment process.


BMJ | 2002

Costs and benefits of a one stop clinic compared with a dedicated breast clinic: randomised controlled trial

Paola Dey; N.J. Bundred; Alan R Gibbs; Penelope Hopwood; A. Baildam; Caroline R M Boggis; Marilyn James; W. Fiona Knox; Vicki Leidecker; Ciaran Woodman

Abstract Objective: To determine the cost to the NHS and the impact on anxiety of a one stop clinic for assessing women with suspected breast cancer. Study design: Randomised controlled trial. Participants: Women aged 35 or over referred with a breast lump. Study setting: Teaching hospital, north west England. Interventions: Women were randomly allocated to attend a one stop clinic or a dedicated breast clinic. Outcome measures: Reduction in mean anxiety from baseline at 24 hours after the first visit and at 3 weeks and 3 months after diagnosis; mean cost per patient. Results: 670 women were randomised. Compared with women who attended the dedicated clinic, patients attending the one stop clinic were less anxious 24 hours after the visit (adjusted mean change in state anxiety −5.7 (95% confidence interval −8.4 to −3.0)) but not at 3 weeks or 3 months after diagnosis. The additional cost to the NHS of a one stop attendance was £32 per woman; this was largely explained by greater cytopathological and radiological staff costs. Conclusion: One stop clinics may not be justified in terms of a reduction in short term anxiety.


International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care | 2005

Cost and health status analysis after autologous chondrocyte implantation and mosaicplasty: a retrospective comparison.

Sarah Derrett; Elizabeth A. Stokes; Marilyn James; W. Bartlett; G. Bentley

OBJECTIVES Chondral defects of the knee cartilage are prevalent. Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and mosaicplasty are increasingly used to treat symptomatic knee defects. This study assessed the costs and health status outcomes after ACI and mosaicplasty. METHODS Patients were eligible to participate in this cross-sectional study if they received ACI or mosaicplasty at the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital between 1997 and 2001 or were on a waiting list for ACI. Secondary-care resource use was collected to 2 years postoperatively using a resource collection proforma. Participants responded to postal questions about sociodemographic characteristics and knee-related (Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System) and general health status (EQ-5D). RESULTS Fifty-three ACI, twenty mosaicplasty, and twenty-two patients waiting for ACI participated. The average cost per patient was higher for ACI (10,600 pounds sterling: 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 10,036 pounds sterling-11,214 pounds sterling) than mosaicplasty (7,948 pounds sterling: 95 percent CI, 6,957 pounds sterling-9,243 pounds sterling). Postoperatively, ACI and mosaicplasty patients (combined) experienced better health status than those waiting for ACI. ACI patients tended to have better health status outcomes than mosaicplasty patients (not statistically significant). Estimated average EQ-5D social tariff improvements for quality-adjusted life year (QALY) calculations were 0.23 (ACI) and 0.06 (mosaicplasty). Average costs per QALY were 23,043 pounds sterling (ACI) and 66,233 pounds sterling (mosaicplasty). The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) for providing ACI over mosaicplasty was 16,349 pounds sterling. CONCLUSIONS Average costs were higher for ACI than mosaicplasty. However, both the estimated cost per QALY and ICER for providing ACI over mosaicplasty fell beneath an implicit English funding threshold of 30,000 pounds sterling per QALY. Prospective studies should include measures of utility to confirm the estimated cost utility ratios of ACI and mosaicplasty.


BMC Family Practice | 2012

Persistent frequent attenders in primary care: costs, reasons for attendance, organisation of care and potential for cognitive behavioural therapeutic intervention

Richard Morriss; Joe Kai; Christopher Atha; Anthony J Avery; Sara Bayes; Matthew Franklin; Tracey George; Marilyn James; Samuel Malins; Ruth McDonald; Shireen Patel; Michelle Stubley; Min Yang

BackgroundThe top 3% of frequent attendance in primary care is associated with 15% of all appointments in primary care, a fivefold increase in hospital expenditure, and more mental disorder and functional somatic symptoms compared to normal attendance. Although often temporary if these rates of attendance last more than two years, they may become persistent (persistent frequent or regular attendance). However, there is no long-term study of the economic impact or clinical characteristics of regular attendance in primary care. Cognitive behaviour formulation and treatment (CBT) for regular attendance as a motivated behaviour may offer an understanding of the development, maintenance and treatment of regular attendance in the context of their health problems, cognitive processes and social context.Methods/designA case control design will compare the clinical characteristics, patterns of health care use and economic costs over the last 10 years of 100 regular attenders (≥30 appointments with general practitioner [GP] over 2 years) with 100 normal attenders (6–22 appointments with GP over 2 years), from purposefully selected primary care practices with differing organisation of care and patient demographics. Qualitative interviews with regular attending patients and practice staff will explore patient barriers, drivers and experiences of consultation, and organisation of care by practices with its challenges. Cognitive behaviour formulation analysed thematically will explore the development, maintenance and therapeutic opportunities for management in regular attenders. The feasibility, acceptability and utility of CBT for regular attendance will be examined.DiscussionThe health care costs, clinical needs, patient motivation for consultation and organisation of care for persistent frequent or regular attendance in primary care will be explored to develop training and policies for service providers. CBT for regular attendance will be piloted with a view to developing this approach as part of a multifaceted intervention.


Health Policy | 1999

Towards an integrated needs and outcome framework

Marilyn James

The British National Health Service alongside many other western countries is faced with competing pressures for limited health care resources which reflect, along with an increased accountability of both purchasers and providers of health care, the need for a clear function of explicit prioritisation from those who purchase health care. To enable limited health resources to be thus allocated, purchasers of health care must, therefore, be able to quantify not only the needs of their populations, but to predict and measure the outcomes from a health care intervention. This paper is concerned with the value framework underlying the twin dimension of needs and outcome assessment and seeks to address this framework from the sociological, philosophical and economic perspective and to determine the implications for the underlying distributive ethic.


Diabetic Medicine | 2002

Current status of screening for diabetic retinopathy in the UK

Naveed Younis; Deborah Broadbent; Marilyn James; Simon P. Harding; Jiten Vora

This article reviews the current status of retinopathy screening schemes in the UK. There is evidence that high‐quality diabetic retinopathy screening schemes are in existence but provision is patchy. Many health authorities have ad hoc screening programmes reaching only about 60% of patients, with unacceptable or undocumented efficacy and minimal quality control. Several models of screening are currently in use with the current preferred option being camera‐based screening. Digital imaging systems offer the best prospects for image acquisition, although at present evidence of adequate effectiveness only exists for 35 mm film‐based systems. The final report of the National Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme commissioned by the UK National Screening Committee for inclusion into the national service framework for diabetes, is thus eagerly awaited and should set standards for screening programmes, in order to improve the care of all those with diabetes. Quality assurance will be the main driver in the immediate future of improvements in screening programmes. Research data will provide the evidence to refine techniques and set targets in the longer term, with the emphasis on cost‐effectiveness and quality of life.


Family Practice | 2015

Clinical characteristics of persistent frequent attenders in primary care: case–control study

Shireen Patel; Joe Kai; Christopher Atha; Anthony J Avery; Boliang Guo; Marilyn James; Samuel Malins; Christopher James Sampson; Michelle Stubley; Richard Morriss

BACKGROUND Most frequent attendance in primary care is temporary, but persistent frequent attendance is expensive and may be suitable for psychological intervention. To plan appropriate intervention and service delivery, there is a need for research involving standardized psychiatric interviews with assessment of physical health and health status. OBJECTIVE To compare the mental and physical health characteristics and health status of persistent frequent attenders (FAs) in primary care, currently and over the preceding 2 years, with normal attenders (NAs) matched by age, gender and general practice. METHODS Case-control study of 71 FAs (30 or more GP or practice nurse consultations in 2 years) and 71 NAs, drawn from five primary care practices, employing standardized psychiatric interview, quality of life, health anxiety and primary care electronic record review over the preceding 2 years. RESULTS Compared to NAs, FAs were more likely to report a lower quality of life (P < 0.001), be unmarried (P = 0.03) and have no educational qualifications (P = 0.009) but did not differ in employment status. FAs experienced greater health anxiety (P < 0.001), morbid obesity (P = 0.02), pain (P < 0.001) and long-term pathological and ill-defined physical conditions (P < 0.001). FAs had more depression including dysthymia, anxiety and somatoform disorders (all P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Persistent frequent attendance in primary care was associated with poor quality of life and high clinical complexity characterized by diverse and often persistent physical and mental multimorbidity. A brokerage model with GPs working in close liaison with skilled psychological therapists is required to manage such persistent complexity.


BMC Psychiatry | 2010

Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder

Richard Morriss; Sarah Marttunnen; Anne Garland; Neil Nixon; Ruth McDonald; Tim Sweeney; Heather Flambert; Richard Fox; Catherine Kaylor-Hughes; Marilyn James; Min Yang

BackgroundAround 40 per cent of patients with unipolar depressive disorder who are treated in secondary care mental health services do not respond to first or second line treatments for depression. Such patients have 20 times the suicide rate of the general population and treatment response becomes harder to achieve and sustain the longer they remain depressed. Despite this there are no randomised controlled trials of community based service delivery interventions delivering both algorithm based pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for patients with chronic depressive disorder in secondary care mental health services who remain moderately or severely depressed after six months treatment. Without such trials evidence based guidelines on services for such patients cannot be derived.Methods/designSingle blind individually randomised controlled trial of a specialist depression disorder team (psychiatrist and psychotherapist jointly assessing and providing algorithm based drug and psychological treatment) versus usual secondary care treatment. We will recruit 174 patients with unipolar depressive disorder in secondary mental health services with a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score ≥ 16 and global assessment of function (GAF) ≤ 60 after ≥ 6 months treatment. The primary outcome measures will be the HDRS and GAF supplemented by economic analysis incuding the EQ5 D and analysis of barriers to care, implementation and the process of care. Audits to benchmark both treatment arms against national standards of care will aid the interpretation of the results of the study.DiscussionThis trial will be the first to assess the effectiveness and implementation of a community based specialist depression disorder team. The study has been specially designed as part of the CLAHRC Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Lincolnshire joint collaboration between university, health and social care organisations to provide information of direct relevance to decisions on commissioning, service provision and implementation.Trial registrationClinical trials.gov identifier NCT01047124

Collaboration


Dive into the Marilyn James's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Boliang Guo

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chris Hollis

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kapil Sayal

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Daley

University of Nottingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge