Cathy A. Cowan
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Cathy A. Cowan.
Health Affairs | 2008
Sean Keehan; Andrea Sisko; Christopher Truffer; Sheila Smith; Cathy A. Cowan; John A. Poisal; M. Kent Clemens
The outlook for national health spending calls for continued steady growth. Spending growth is projected to be 6.7 percent in 2007, similar to its rate in 2006. Average annual growth over the projection period is expected to be 6.7 percent. Slower growth in private spending toward the end of the period is expected to be offset by stronger growth in public spending. The health share of gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to increase to 16.3 percent in 2007 and then rise throughout the projection period, reaching 19.5 percent of GDP by 2017.
Health Affairs | 2008
Aaron Catlin; Cathy A. Cowan; Micah Hartman; Stephen Heffler
In 2006, U.S. health care spending increased 6.7 percent to
Medicare & Medicaid Research Review | 2012
Didem Bernard; Cathy A. Cowan; Thomas M. Selden; Liming Cai; Aaron Catlin; Stephen Heffler
2.1 trillion, or
Health Affairs | 2006
Cynthia Smith; Cathy A. Cowan; Stephen Heffler; Aaron Catlin
7,026 per person. The health care portion of gross domestic product (GDP) was 16.0 percent, slightly higher than in 2005. Prescription drug spending growth accelerated in 2006 to 8.5 percent, partly as a result of Medicare Part Ds impact. Most of the other major health care services and public payers experienced slower growth in 2006 than in prior years. The implementation of Medicare Part D caused a major shift in the distribution of payers for prescription drugs, as Medicare played a larger role in drug purchases than it had before.
Health Affairs | 2004
Katharine R. Levit; Cynthia Smith; Cathy A. Cowan; Art Sensenig; Aaron Catlin
OBJECTIVE Provide a comparison of health care expenditure estimates for 2007 from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and the National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA). Reconciling these estimates serves two important purposes. First, it is an important quality assurance exercise for improving and ensuring the integrity of each sources estimates. Second, the reconciliation provides a consistent baseline of health expenditure data for policy simulations. Our results assist researchers to adjust MEPS to be consistent with the NHEA so that the projected costs as well as budgetary and tax implications of any policy change are consistent with national health spending estimates. DATA SOURCES The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey produced by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the National Health Center for Health Statistics and the National Health Expenditures produced by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Office of the Actuary. RESULTS In this study, we focus on the personal health care (PHC) sector, which includes the goods and services rendered to treat or prevent a specific disease or condition in an individual. The official 2007 NHEA estimate for PHC spending is
Health Affairs | 2007
John A. Poisal; Christopher Truffer; Sheila Smith; Andrea Sisko; Cathy A. Cowan; Sean Keehan; Bridget Dickensheets
1,915 billion and the MEPS estimate is
Health Affairs | 2007
Aaron Catlin; Cathy A. Cowan; Stephen Heffler; Benjamin Washington
1,126 billion. Adjusting the NHEA estimates for differences in underlying populations, covered services, and other measurement concepts reduces the NHEA estimate for 2007 to
Health Affairs | 2001
Stephen Heffler; Katharine R. Levit; Sheila Smith; Cynthia Smith; Cathy A. Cowan; Mark S. Freeland
1,366 billion. As a result, MEPS is
Health Affairs | 2003
Katharine R. Levit; Cynthia Smith; Cathy A. Cowan; Art Sensenig; Aaron Catlin
240 billion, or 17.6 percent, less than the adjusted NHEA total.
Health Affairs | 2005
Cynthia Smith; Cathy A. Cowan; Art Sensenig; Aaron Catlin